I would have loved to see it.
Edited by MaxFan1, 29 July 2009 - 11:33.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 11:32
Edited by MaxFan1, 29 July 2009 - 11:33.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 11:34
Posted 29 July 2009 - 11:51
Edited by Victor_RO, 29 July 2009 - 11:51.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 11:51
Posted 29 July 2009 - 11:55
Max was wrong, is there a team at Brackley?
The answer is yes, it was not as bad as Max made out it would be if a manufacturer left, it is nothing different in reality to a privateer leaving.
Actually maybe that is wrong, Aguri Suzuki left and no one replaced that private team.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 11:57
The key reason in both those cases being that cost of running in F1 is too high.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 11:59
Why don't they distribute the income equitably?
Posted 29 July 2009 - 11:59
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:01
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:03
This is a loaded question, both sides wanted budget cuts but Maxxx wanted to introduce a cap.
There's a difference.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:05
To me they are identical.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:06
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:06
The key reason in both those cases being that cost of running in F1 is too high.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:07
It's a pity that Max has decided to stand down now that F1 needs his guiding hand more than ever.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:07
They simply cannot be, a cap is a restriction put in place by a law by which you cannot exceed a maximum budget. If the teams cut their budgets they don't have to be forced to do so in specific ways or be pushed into a two tier championships.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:08
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:09
Maybe it's not too lateIt's a pity that Max has decided to stand down now that F1 needs his guiding hand more than ever.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:10
Advertisement
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:12
Everyone is more than replaceable in their job.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:15
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:17
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:18
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:19
How can you make a poll like this? Mosley has talked about cutting costs but he has changed the rules all the time and introduced ridiculous and expensive KERS that have done the exact opposite.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:20
In Max's case, it's a self-fulfilling prophecy since he brought the oh-so terrible and evil manufacturers into the sport. I don't get why people feel the need to trust either FOTA or the FIA. Both organisations are full of pricks. I don't see the logic in supporting either.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:20
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:20
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:23
And yet everyone gets all worked up about a bunch of multi-millionaires making advertising billboards run round in circles for little or no benefit to anyone but themselves.
Funny old world really.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:23
KERS was expensive because there was no budget cap in place. If there was a budget cap, teams would only be able to afford to spend a certain amount on KERS. Some teams would do a better job than others under the same budget. Then we would see who's the most innovative.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:25
KERS was expensive because there was no budget cap in place. If there was a budget cap, teams would only be able to afford to spend a certain amount on KERS. Some teams would do a better job than others under the same budget. Then we would see who's the most innovative.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:30
At least one of them, it kind of explains also why Briatore and Howett were persuing the breakaway and had such active roles in FOTA. Both men knew that their board could pull the rug from under them at any minute.Of course he was absolutely right; that budget cap was necessary. And he will be even more right if Toyota and Renault quite; as I suspect will happen.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:33
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:34
The most cynical description of F1 I've ever heard. Good job.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:35
It's a pity that Max has decided to stand down now that F1 needs his guiding hand more than ever.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:37
F1 is in the mess it is because of his guiding hand.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:42
F1 is in the mess it is because of his guiding hand.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:46
Not to worry. His 'guiding hand', as you put it, will soon be working a little Napoleon doll from the back.
There's no letter 'B' in Zey need ze punishment so he'll be fine.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:46
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:47
Advertisement
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:49
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:53
Posted 29 July 2009 - 12:53
As I put it? It was your line, not mine.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 13:02
No need to get so worked up. It's only motor {snigger} racing after all. A harmless past time for multi-millionaires to go about spending other people's money (for the most part) on occasional weekends in various parts of the world. You know, all that round and round stuff - curing cancer, bringing about world peace and solving world hunger like they do. We should worship them like the Gods they are.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 13:02
Posted 29 July 2009 - 13:04
Whatever
Posted 29 July 2009 - 13:08
Posted 29 July 2009 - 13:42
But the point is that whilst Max was saying that Formula One needs to cut costs, he introduced something which resulted in the teams spending a combined total of half a billion dollars.
At the same time that Max was saying that Formula One needs to be greener, the "fuel burn" qualifying was introduced.
Just after the recession in the 90s, Max was saying that the small teams were an embarassment to the sport and introduced a $48 million bond to stop small teams entering. Result = F1 drops to 20 cars from 26 the previous year and two prospective new teams decide against entering.
It's not that Max is some sort of saviour. Max's arguments are based around political capital and his personal wishes at the time.
Posted 29 July 2009 - 13:49
Posted 29 July 2009 - 13:50
dude.. how many times have you heard this.. ?
Different times demand different actions. If you keep operating with the same old goals and do not adjust to the economy for decades you are a poor manager.. Because Max took an action or said something 10 years ago that goes against what he proposed recently does not prove a single thing..
Posted 29 July 2009 - 13:51
If Max was right, BMW would have stayed.
Costs are down now and in 2011, cost will have reduced further down to early ninetees spending figures.
Clearly, it's not just about cost reduction.
Edited by BMW_F1, 29 July 2009 - 13:58.