Jump to content


Photo

Michael Schumacher (merged)


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
20770 replies to this topic

#11001 ivand911

ivand911
  • Member

  • 8,152 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 06 July 2011 - 18:16

I get the impression (always do) that Michael will sort out its 0,2s deficit to Nico if he has a winning car, which may mean that Michael is looking for a motivation for the win, not the car itself. Deficit to Nico might down to psychological.

I guess you are right. Shit car will hardly motivate him.


Advertisement

#11002 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 28,129 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 06 July 2011 - 18:25

I guess you are right. Shit car will hardly motivate him.


Crap car or not, beating your teammate should be motivation enough. If it's not and your just going through the motions you shouldn't be in the car at all.

#11003 ivand911

ivand911
  • Member

  • 8,152 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 06 July 2011 - 18:31

Crap car or not, beating your teammate should be motivation enough. If it's not and your just going through the motions you shouldn't be in the car at all.

Yes, if you are talking about Buemi or Jaime or Koba or Sutil or Nico or, you get the picture? Some seven time WDC are off the limits.


#11004 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 28,129 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 06 July 2011 - 18:35

Yes, if you are talking about Buemi or Jaime or Koba or Sutil or Nico or, you get the picture? Some seven time WDC are off the limits.


Personally I think thats nonsense. He cannot and nor should his fans use his past results as an excuse for not giving it all now. IMHO he is giving all he can, it's just that it's not enough.

#11005 Kubiccia

Kubiccia
  • Member

  • 1,370 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 06 July 2011 - 18:40

What to expect from 4th best car? Not much. Only if you are lucky. This is what happen with the guys who have 4th best car.

I am saying comparatively to Nico, who's not a special driver.

We have seen from both Merc drivers that, in qualifying at least, they're getting the most out of their cars. The car cannot be any faster and in reality there is very little to seperate the two.

you don't know that, nobody does.


In fact, one can know. In last qualifying, it was clear that there was more to come from the car. Nico made seemed to have extracted all he could from the car but Schumi's Q3 time was merely a tenth faster than his FP2 time. The track rubbering and car qualifying mode would alone give much more than a tenth. Not to mention the fact that we don't even know if he was on 3 laps fuel in the FP2 lap.

It's not a guess, Mercedes had potential for quite a lot more than Nico's time, Schumi's FP2 driving would put him much ahead of Nico in a qualifying condition.

#11006 Sakae

Sakae
  • Member

  • 19,256 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 06 July 2011 - 19:18

Crap car or not, beating your teammate should be motivation enough. If it's not and your just going through the motions you shouldn't be in the car at all.

I am not a mind-reader, but I would not be too suprised to learn, that Michael is racing against his own expectations, and could not give a second thought where Rosberg is. Nico is not his benchmark, and if you think he is, than you do not know probably much about Schumacher.


Another topic / other posters - I also think that to make a claim (as some seems to be suggesting) that he is not extracting all out of the car is rather a statement with big words, and potentially of very little substance. Margin between drivers is small, tire grip variability can overlap that, and only what we see is Michael not totally being comfortable with tires or with the car. For some reason Nico is happier with it and good for him, but things are too volatile to write Schumacher completely off.

I do agree with Ross, that Michael did not forget how to drive, he did not loose on race craft or the speed; the vehicle is simply like a shoe that doesn't fits him well. I think that Webber is experiencing similar thing in RBR. If the car gets stable, instead sliding in turns, and it shall go where you aim, that will be a day when we see him also back in full charge.

Edited by Sakae, 06 July 2011 - 19:22.


#11007 baddog

baddog
  • Member

  • 24,021 posts
  • Joined: June 99

Posted 06 July 2011 - 21:26

In an interesting comment in Canada (Which I cannot now find :( ), Michael gave some insight into a change in his thinking and approach to practice sessions and earlier qualifying sessions, and a change in those. Basically it read as he is going to be more aggressive rather than approaching them as a purely technical prep, in order to avoid being in a position where he seems to others, and maybe feels, behind the ball when the real stuff starts. i.e. he was losing a psychological edge by not worrying about ego and position before it should technically matter.

That ties in with what happened in both Canada and Valencia in the pre-race.. for once he seemed ahead not behind on 'whole weekend' pace.

This may however be bullshit, we shall see in coming weeks heh

#11008 as65p

as65p
  • Member

  • 18,466 posts
  • Joined: June 04

Posted 06 July 2011 - 21:50

I am not a mind-reader, but I would not be too suprised to learn, that Michael is racing against his own expectations, and could not give a second thought where Rosberg is. Nico is not his benchmark, and if you think he is, than you do not know probably much about Schumacher.


That's strange, I think the direct opposite. Anyone who believes MS doesn't care about being beaten by his teammate can't know that much about the man.

#11009 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 28,129 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 06 July 2011 - 22:00

I am not a mind-reader, but I would not be too suprised to learn, that Michael is racing against his own expectations, and could not give a second thought where Rosberg is. Nico is not his benchmark, and if you think he is, than you do not know probably much about Schumacher.


Another topic / other posters - I also think that to make a claim (as some seems to be suggesting) that he is not extracting all out of the car is rather a statement with big words, and potentially of very little substance. Margin between drivers is small, tire grip variability can overlap that, and only what we see is Michael not totally being comfortable with tires or with the car. For some reason Nico is happier with it and good for him, but things are too volatile to write Schumacher completely off.

I do agree with Ross, that Michael did not forget how to drive, he did not loose on race craft or the speed; the vehicle is simply like a shoe that doesn't fits him well. I think that Webber is experiencing similar thing in RBR. If the car gets stable, instead sliding in turns, and it shall go where you aim, that will be a day when we see him also back in full charge.


I disagree. Your teammate is very much your benchmark. If your slow in comparison then questions will be asked because it means your not getting the best from the car.

#11010 Sakae

Sakae
  • Member

  • 19,256 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 07 July 2011 - 02:10

I am not convinced that MS needs NR for him to know whether his car and his own technique is best as it can under any conditions. On the contrary, I think he is using his own experience and instinct to identify causes for his less than perfect lap times, or race performance, because he knows after many years in competitive racing which elements are slowing him down on the track. Once he realizes that his own senses let him down, and he cannot read the situation, then he will probably quit, because age caught up with him, but I think he is not at that point yet.

If my theory is wrong, than as soon as he will clock faster lap times than Nico, than he would lean back, relaxed, yet we all know it's not true. He will never relax, even if he leads RBR by several seconds on the first lap, because that's the true Schumacher for you.

Nico Rosberg is not good enough benchmark for him, inconsequential bystander to his effort, because NR's performance is not why he came back out of retirement, and as long there are another eight people ahead of him, only P1 is his benchmark, and free air in the front of him when lights go off; that's what drives him, and not where on the track is his garage co-habitant.

(Anyway, IMHO).

Edited by Sakae, 07 July 2011 - 02:14.


#11011 Muz Bee

Muz Bee
  • Member

  • 2,531 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 07 July 2011 - 05:20

So much rubbish gets written in Michael's defence here, it's like getting objectivity from the Spanish fans on Alonso or Jorge Lorenzo.

Clearly Michael found something to his liking in the car, the conditions at Canada and he drove well, very well in fact. No longer being a fan of his doesn't mean I can't acknowledge what is clearly true but his fans drone on about how being beaten by Nico is somehow irrelevant and that the car and the tactics and the.... dadedadeda. Really embarassing, same old s#^*&!

Michael's fortunes may be on a genuine upswing or it could be normal transmission at Silverstone, we'll have to wait and see. Time stands still for no man, it's nothing like "he suddenly forgot how to be quick" that we are arguing (in his defence what's more!).

#11012 BRK

BRK
  • Member

  • 3,653 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 07 July 2011 - 06:41

So much rubbish gets written in Michael's defence here, it's like getting objectivity from the Spanish fans on Alonso or Jorge Lorenzo.


Or from your average Schumacher bashing hater, people that go to ridiculous lengths to play down his achievements and post rubbish.

#11013 ivand911

ivand911
  • Member

  • 8,152 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 07 July 2011 - 10:00

Schumacher Ranch Switzerland 02/07/11
http://motorsport.ne...her-ranch-1.php
http://www.wri2.net/stories.aspx
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image


Edited by ivand911, 07 July 2011 - 13:29.


#11014 Chezrome

Chezrome
  • Member

  • 1,218 posts
  • Joined: March 09

Posted 07 July 2011 - 10:36

Frankly I think MS was already losing some speed back in 2005 or 2006; another 5 years has seen him lose a bit more. I'd be amazed if he's not at least ½ second slower than 10 years ago, and probably nearer a second off his 1993-2002 peak decade.

That spell in Canada was wonderful, just like old times, but as you say I think it won't happen too often.


A second slower than 10 years ago? That means that the 'normal' old Schumacher would beat Rosberg with more than a second every qualifying?

I don't believe it. You?







#11015 swiniodzik

swiniodzik
  • Member

  • 607 posts
  • Joined: November 08

Posted 07 July 2011 - 10:53

It's funny how the roles have reversed with the Schumacher fans and detractors since the first stint of his career. Back in the Benetton and Ferrari days the fans were very vocal about how important the driver is in the overall scheme of things, with the detractors trying to point out how important the car and other external circumstances are. Now in the Mercedes era the car and circumstances have suddenly become very important for the fans while the human factor has icreased greatly for the detractors.

I think the truth about Michael, as it often does, probably lies somewhere in the middle. He probably never was a driver as great as his first stint stats suggest and many of his fans would like us to believe he was, but neither was his success inflated by things other than the man's own talent and abilities to such a degree we're being said it was by some of the detractors.

#11016 Sakae

Sakae
  • Member

  • 19,256 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 07 July 2011 - 11:03

We do not have a situation yet on the track that car will win on its own, or inversely, driver will win on his own in normal conditions on the track. I do question the notion some had expressed in here that in equal cars a driver that is ahead of his teammate is the one who committed less amount of mistakes. Equipment is never he same, regardless of name and color, and on the track where 0.001 sec can make difference, machinery inequality between cars can play a decisive role. Schumacher's frame of mind,competitiveness, and focus on the target has been legendary over the years, and I do not think that has changed three years after he returned. Mature fans can (or should?) understand that. Focus is to win, not just to beat the junior teammate.

Edited by Sakae, 07 July 2011 - 11:05.


#11017 SparkPlug

SparkPlug
  • Member

  • 491 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 07 July 2011 - 11:13

That's strange, I think the direct opposite. Anyone who believes MS doesn't care about being beaten by his teammate can't know that much about the man.

+1.

Making that statement (that Schumacher is not bothered with where Nico is in comparison) is simply trying to downplay the fact that Rosberg has simply been better than Schumacher in the past 2 seasons. Anyone with even a sole championship, forget 7 will have a very close watch on his teammate, because its a matter of pride more than anything else. Its simply wrong to state that Schumacher doesnt care about beating Rosberg. He quite simply has to (care).



#11018 Tardis40

Tardis40
  • Member

  • 759 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 07 July 2011 - 11:15

Schumacher Ranch Switzerland 02/07/11
http://www.wri2.net/stories.aspx
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image


Hey, that horse is the wrong color !!!

#11019 george1981

george1981
  • Member

  • 898 posts
  • Joined: May 10

Posted 07 July 2011 - 11:42

I always thought that Schumacher was sometimes .1s-.2s slower than the fastest driver in the field over 1 lap in a car straight out of the box. Someone like Hakkinen or Montoya could always edge him. But what Schumacher may have lacked in absolute speed he made up for with car development and set up together with consistancy in the races.

Advertisement

#11020 differential

differential
  • Member

  • 454 posts
  • Joined: May 11

Posted 07 July 2011 - 13:35

I always thought that Schumacher was sometimes .1s-.2s slower than the fastest driver in the field over 1 lap in a car straight out of the box. Someone like Hakkinen or Montoya could always edge him. But what Schumacher may have lacked in absolute speed he made up for with car development and set up together with consistancy in the races.

I don't agree with the Hakkinen comparison: there are countless amount of times where schumacher in an inferior car was faster than the superior mclaren of Hakk.

#11021 Sakae

Sakae
  • Member

  • 19,256 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 07 July 2011 - 15:47

+1.

Making that statement (that Schumacher is not bothered with where Nico is in comparison) is simply trying to downplay the fact that Rosberg has simply been better than Schumacher in the past 2 seasons. Anyone with even a sole championship, forget 7 will have a very close watch on his teammate, because its a matter of pride more than anything else. Its simply wrong to state that Schumacher doesnt care about beating Rosberg. He quite simply has to (care).

One opinion against other, but your view is not even close to the image I have of a man that I watch from the distance since 1991.

#11022 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 28,129 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 07 July 2011 - 17:55

I am not convinced that MS needs NR for him to know whether his car and his own technique is best as it can under any conditions. On the contrary, I think he is using his own experience and instinct to identify causes for his less than perfect lap times, or race performance, because he knows after many years in competitive racing which elements are slowing him down on the track. Once he realizes that his own senses let him down, and he cannot read the situation, then he will probably quit, because age caught up with him, but I think he is not at that point yet.

If my theory is wrong, than as soon as he will clock faster lap times than Nico, than he would lean back, relaxed, yet we all know it's not true. He will never relax, even if he leads RBR by several seconds on the first lap, because that's the true Schumacher for you.

Nico Rosberg is not good enough benchmark for him, inconsequential bystander to his effort, because NR's performance is not why he came back out of retirement, and as long there are another eight people ahead of him, only P1 is his benchmark, and free air in the front of him when lights go off; that's what drives him, and not where on the track is his garage co-habitant.

(Anyway, IMHO).


P1 is the target, but not the benchmark because they are not using the same machinery. You can only sensible benchmark someone who is using the same kit as you are.

#11023 Juan Kerr

Juan Kerr
  • Member

  • 2,884 posts
  • Joined: October 05

Posted 07 July 2011 - 18:12

I seems to me that Schumacher is getting a little stronger every race. Which isn't strange after a long sabatical he's had. He has worked himself up to an equal level as Rosberg, which he wasn't last year. I feel there is still more to come from Schumacher, but the car has got to improve a lot.

Its just car setup and equipment, its got nothing to do with the drivers pace.

#11024 Sakae

Sakae
  • Member

  • 19,256 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 07 July 2011 - 18:18

Performance benchmark is whatever you select as best practice. I do not wish to play semantics, but within F1 racing (industry), currently best is duo Vettel/RBR, and therefore suitable choice how Schumacher evaluates his position. (I guess). He could select NR, but I doubt that, honestly.

#11025 DutchCruijff

DutchCruijff
  • Member

  • 933 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 07 July 2011 - 18:42

"I always had the option to stop at any time I wanted. But I aim for an achievement and a fixed time. I have always said it's a three-year programme and that's what it is."

I hope that doesn't mean he won't take up the 2013 offer.

#11026 glorius&victorius

glorius&victorius
  • Member

  • 4,327 posts
  • Joined: June 02

Posted 07 July 2011 - 19:02

Time for a change of helmet scheme!

there is too much "Ferrari" on his current helmet... he needs to go back to his original scheme when he came into F1.
That will bring his mojo back!

Edited by glorius&victorius, 07 July 2011 - 19:03.


#11027 differential

differential
  • Member

  • 454 posts
  • Joined: May 11

Posted 07 July 2011 - 19:29

"I always had the option to stop at any time I wanted. But I aim for an achievement and a fixed time. I have always said it's a three-year programme and that's what it is."

I hope that doesn't mean he won't take up the 2013 offer.


"But I aim for an achievement.." pretty sure that means he'll be back next year.

#11028 Tardis40

Tardis40
  • Member

  • 759 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 07 July 2011 - 19:43

Schumacher Ranch Switzerland 02/07/11
http://motorsport.ne...her-ranch-1.php
http://www.wri2.net/stories.aspx
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image



Where's your six-shooter, Mike.


#11029 Boing 2

Boing 2
  • Member

  • 2,705 posts
  • Joined: June 08

Posted 07 July 2011 - 20:03

Performance benchmark is whatever you select as best practice. I do not wish to play semantics, but within F1 racing (industry), currently best is duo Vettel/RBR, and therefore suitable choice how Schumacher evaluates his position. (I guess). He could select NR, but I doubt that, honestly.


your first target is to get 100% from the car, the second target is to get the car up to race winning speed. If you are going consistently slower than your team mate you are failing at the first target.

#11030 Number62

Number62
  • Member

  • 497 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 07 July 2011 - 20:39

Performance benchmark is whatever you select as best practice. I do not wish to play semantics, but within F1 racing (industry), currently best is duo Vettel/RBR, and therefore suitable choice how Schumacher evaluates his position. (I guess). He could select NR, but I doubt that, honestly.


In that case he's currently the tenth best racing driver in formula one.

#11031 Sakae

Sakae
  • Member

  • 19,256 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 07 July 2011 - 22:06

By definition, in the industry you select for benchmarking leaders in your given field, not people who have the same resources like numbers of employees, budget, staplers, etc. I think Michael knows what he is doing.

Edited by Sakae, 07 July 2011 - 22:07.


#11032 Kubiccia

Kubiccia
  • Member

  • 1,370 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 07 July 2011 - 23:20

I always thought that Schumacher was sometimes .1s-.2s slower than the fastest driver in the field over 1 lap in a car straight out of the box. Someone like Hakkinen or Montoya could always edge him. But what Schumacher may have lacked in absolute speed he made up for with car development and set up together with consistancy in the races.

I don't agree with the Hakkinen comparison: there are countless amount of times where schumacher in an inferior car was faster than the superior mclaren of Hakk.


MOntoya was oftenly slower than Ralf and Kimi(the one slower than Massa). George's post is ridicolous. Schumi could beat Senna many times in qualifying despite having inferior car.
The raw pace of the guy was amazing, maybe you follow F1 for a shorter time and the Michelin qualy tires made you think Schumi was not that fast in qualifying.

#11033 Sakae

Sakae
  • Member

  • 19,256 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 08 July 2011 - 10:54

Silverstone, FP1 - Michael on his return never been in P2. He must be scratching his head. (Guys probably saving tires again).

#11034 Frans

Frans
  • Member

  • 7,701 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 08 July 2011 - 11:00

call it .... G-L-O-R-Y r-u-n ..... because that's what it was. no fuel, new tires ... pfffft. I hope he is happy with his P2. Jos Verstappen became P1 in an Minardi once, so come ON schu, can you do?

Edited by Frans, 08 July 2011 - 11:01.


#11035 MikeTekRacing

MikeTekRacing
  • Member

  • 5,820 posts
  • Joined: October 04

Posted 08 July 2011 - 11:14

no fuel? wow :)

btw, how's Jos? :))

#11036 arknor

arknor
  • Member

  • 2,298 posts
  • Joined: March 10

Posted 08 July 2011 - 11:16

call it .... G-L-O-R-Y r-u-n ..... because that's what it was. no fuel, new tires ... pfffft. I hope he is happy with his P2. Jos Verstappen became P1 in an Minardi once, so come ON schu, can you do?

i heard jos the boss once won a formula one race and then he woke up on his bed :wave:

btw the jos thread is here http://forums.autosp...showtopic=26370 quietly waiting for you

Edited by arknor, 08 July 2011 - 11:27.


#11037 FlashMaster

FlashMaster
  • Member

  • 1,901 posts
  • Joined: May 06

Posted 08 July 2011 - 11:41

call it .... G-L-O-R-Y r-u-n ..... because that's what it was. no fuel, new tires ... pfffft. I hope he is happy with his P2. Jos Verstappen became P1 in an Minardi once, so come ON schu, can you do?


Is Jos the toss still standing in the gravel pit or did he do a Vercrasheren today? Poor guy

#11038 BRK

BRK
  • Member

  • 3,653 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 08 July 2011 - 11:51

call it .... G-L-O-R-Y r-u-n ..... because that's what it was. no fuel, new tires ... pfffft. I hope he is happy with his P2. Jos Verstappen became P1 in an Minardi once, so come ON schu, can you do?


Wrong again. Though you seem to be more concerned with Friday running that most of the rest of us in here.

BTW, life has an odd way of letting you know when you're badly wrong: http://forums.autosp...howtopic=150621

 ;)



#11039 FlashMaster

FlashMaster
  • Member

  • 1,901 posts
  • Joined: May 06

Posted 08 July 2011 - 12:21

Wrong again. Though you seem to be more concerned with Friday running that most of the rest of us in here.

BTW, life has an odd way of letting you know when you're badly wrong: http://forums.autosp...howtopic=150621

;)


Karma :cool:

Advertisement

#11040 Augurk

Augurk
  • Member

  • 1,932 posts
  • Joined: December 09

Posted 08 July 2011 - 14:17

Too bad Michael didn't try the inters. He was good on the wets though!

#11041 EdwardCullen

EdwardCullen
  • Member

  • 763 posts
  • Joined: November 10

Posted 08 July 2011 - 14:32

He was on par with the superior Redbulls on wets :up:
good form

#11042 spacekid

spacekid
  • Member

  • 2,678 posts
  • Joined: April 11

Posted 08 July 2011 - 14:46

Michael looks decent enough in wet conditions this year, pre season testing included, and I think is faster than Rosberg in the wet.

Which gives me a question - why is Schumi faster in the wet, but Rosberg faster in the dry? It must be a characteristic of the 2011 cars that favours one driving style in the wet and another in the dry. Can Michael learn from this how to improve his dry weather pace?

#11043 George Costanza

George Costanza
  • Member

  • 2,856 posts
  • Joined: July 08

Posted 08 July 2011 - 14:56

Michael looks decent enough in wet conditions this year, pre season testing included, and I think is faster than Rosberg in the wet.

Which gives me a question - why is Schumi faster in the wet, but Rosberg faster in the dry? It must be a characteristic of the 2011 cars that favours one driving style in the wet and another in the dry. Can Michael learn from this how to improve his dry weather pace?


It's rather easy because Michael Schumacher is likely the greatest rain driver of all time, except for possibly Ayrton Senna, and he can adapt to the wet conditions well.

#11044 EdwardCullen

EdwardCullen
  • Member

  • 763 posts
  • Joined: November 10

Posted 08 July 2011 - 14:59

Michael looks decent enough in wet conditions this year, pre season testing included, and I think is faster than Rosberg in the wet.

Which gives me a question - why is Schumi faster in the wet, but Rosberg faster in the dry? It must be a characteristic of the 2011 cars that favours one driving style in the wet and another in the dry. Can Michael learn from this how to improve his dry weather pace?

Schumy has always been good in wet weather, and conditions where there is always uncertainty
Thats not coz the car favors a driving style in wet.

In wet the ability to feel the road and play with throttle and driver input matters alot

In short in modern era
In Wet condition driver 70% car 30%

In dry condition Driver 30% car 70%

#11045 spacekid

spacekid
  • Member

  • 2,678 posts
  • Joined: April 11

Posted 08 July 2011 - 15:06

Hmmm. Thanks guys but I think there's more to it. Whether wet or dry the driver has an input, if driver input is more in the wet and Michael shows a clear advantage over Nico there, then why not in the dry? If Michaels not as fast as he used to be then that should be exagerated in the wet, but thats not what we're seeing.

Maybe Nico just isn't much cop in the wet. Because he has tended to have the edge on pace in dry weather conditions.

#11046 MikeTekRacing

MikeTekRacing
  • Member

  • 5,820 posts
  • Joined: October 04

Posted 08 July 2011 - 15:12

Michael has recently looked as fast in dry also...
remember the qualy gaps are getting close to 0 and the trend is clear

#11047 EdwardCullen

EdwardCullen
  • Member

  • 763 posts
  • Joined: November 10

Posted 08 July 2011 - 18:18

Hmmm. Thanks guys but I think there's more to it. Whether wet or dry the driver has an input, if driver input is more in the wet and Michael shows a clear advantage over Nico there, then why not in the dry? If Michaels not as fast as he used to be then that should be exagerated in the wet, but thats not what we're seeing.

Maybe Nico just isn't much cop in the wet. Because he has tended to have the edge on pace in dry weather conditions.

maybe you should search on internet about the difference of driving in wet and dry and the impact of too much electronics in modern f1

#11048 spacekid

spacekid
  • Member

  • 2,678 posts
  • Joined: April 11

Posted 08 July 2011 - 18:38

maybe you should search on internet about the difference of driving in wet and dry and the impact of too much electronics in modern f1


I hope it wasn't meant to be, but your reply comes across as a little rude Edward. I've been watching F1 for many decades and Schumi watching his whole career. I know how wet and dry driving works. I know about modern F1, and older F1 too. Its interesting that F1 arguably technically peaked in 1992 in terms of too many electronics, but never mind.

Ok here's what I was getting at, and its about traction. Martin Brundle was recently talking about driving the 2011 cars and he noted that they have the least traction coming out of the corners of F1 cars that he has driven. Schumis driving style always used to be about being able to carry maximum speed through the whole corner, holding the line with the throttle and then driving away. In his interview Ross Brawn said that Nico and Michael have similar apex speeds, but that Nico is making up the hundreths of a second elsewhere in the corner and it all adds up to a couple of tenths a second. So that got me thinking. Perhaps Michaels driving style isn't working quite so well with these cars because the engines power band isn't where he needs it to be to make his driving style work? And rainy conditions place the car back into an operational zone that allows him to extract a greater % of performance.

It was a half formed idea I admit, just something I have been mulling over. I hoped some of you guys might have had similar thoughts about why Michael is a shade off Nico in the dry but able to do better in the wet. If its all just modern cars and driving aids that doesn't really explain Nicos pace advantage. Maybe I should just go 'check on the internet'. But y'know, this being a Schumi thread on an F1 site it seemed like the place to start.

#11049 Disgrace

Disgrace
  • RC Forum Host

  • 12,108 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 08 July 2011 - 19:45

Don't know about you guys, but aside from the Saubers, Schumacher seemed to be in the least amount of control of anyone out there. Great to watch, nonetheless.

Edited by Disgrace, 08 July 2011 - 19:45.


#11050 iakhtar

iakhtar
  • Member

  • 191 posts
  • Joined: April 10

Posted 08 July 2011 - 19:54

Whenever I see him driving like that I just figure he's exploring the limits, esp in the wet, usually pays off for him too.