Calling for facts and then ignoring them when presented
Like I said when Irvine and Schumacher finished the same race together Irvine was generally only a few positions behind Schumacher in 1996, this is a FACT!
When have I called Michael a wanker??
I admit that this year michaels wheel to wheel racing as been much improved apart from a few silly errors but that's to be expected, but many of times lastyear and this year Michael as had a good start and I've been waiting for the old schumi magic to take over and see him fly through the field and nothing happens, he just drops further and further behind
You've got to admit that on the whole michaels qualifying pace as been dismal this last couple of years compared to Nico, I'm not having the excuse that Michael sets up the car for the race and nico more for qualifying. If that was the case where Is this blistering race pace compared to Nicos?
So much for being in front, accidentally correcting yourself in the side of a Sauber in the middle of a wet corner, breaking a front wing, falling back, making a good tyre choice and then catching back up through traffic and even ending the race with less arrears than directly after the stop. And that's just Silverstone. So "we" have "not got" to admit anything. Slowly building more confidence up in him and I'm really curious if he's able to keep that more positive line drag on through the rest of the season and 2012