Edd Straw: I'd argue that in Singapore Schuey's pace wasn't quite as good as Nico's in the phase before Nico's tyres went off (early).
LOL LOL LOL. they have the same car and they had the same tyres, it's his problem if he doesn't know how to race AND look after the tyres. That's part of F1. What kind of excuse is that?
If you consult the pre-Singapore Autosport issue you will see a detailed article in which I point out Schuey's strong performance.
Oh really? Where's Turkey? All people just saw a 12th place, but if you look at the lap times, Michael had better pace and even with one set of tyres less!
Where's Malaysia GP? 25 seconds behind Michael or more?
They say the data disregards non-comparable stints, how's then 3rd stint in Belgian GP comparable? Seriously are they stupid that much? Or they hate Michael even more as they are stupid? Wasn't Michael fighting from the back of the field? 3rd stint was stint after a safety-car from lap 17 to la 29. Michael had lots of traffic. This aren't magazines really, this are bullshit-kid comics.
Michael has been faster in race pace for most of the season. Rosberg was faster just in China and Valencia.
And how he is now arguably faster than Nico on race pace. Hardly trying to come up with excuses for Nico
Sure for Nico there can be excuses, but for Michael it's always "he's to old he should retire."
Oh how much I hate people like that, who can't analyze races in details and then they call theirselves as journalists. Yeah sure, GTFO.
Edited by zelpre, 29 September 2011 - 21:00.