Posted 23 November 2011 - 17:58
As if by magic, right after my post containing this sentence - We can consider that NR would be 0.3 quicker - it's only 0.8-1.0 if you take the last race as your barometer, but we're not in the business of doing that unless you miraculously appear whenever MS is "outclassed"-
Up steps Slate to confirm he is in fact, using that sole race as a barometer.
I think the case is closed Slate, you're not being objective at all, but you're succeeding in being extremely objectionable. It's as if you want the MODS to delete threads, posts & ban posters.
You vanish every single time MS gets close, let alone comes out on top, yet appear once he's been "dominated", demanding his retirement and casting aspersions over not only his return, but any of his achievements.
It's tiresome, inaccurate and quite insulting that you continue to peddle such one-sided nonsense. At least present a fair & balanced option, by all means say "here's the avg gap over the 2 seasons, and this is why I think if & when MERC get a better car, NR will destroy MS even more than I believe he is already".
Encourage debate, not hate. Stop the flamebaiting and engage fairly, unless you know your argument is limp. In which case, it explains a lot!