Yes i understand that but thats in the cycle of the tyres but Schumacher never came back at Rosberg towards the end of his stint.
Rosberg was quicker because he's a better driver around Shanghai, it's one of his best circuits and one of Schumacher's worst.
He also didn't say Schumacher was driving slower than he could have gone, there was just a trend last season when Schumacher would fall back a bit on higher fuel and then as the levels came down catch back up.
But then you're just trying to bait people aren't you?
Is it wrong to question the view of some that Schumacher could have beat Rosberg inspite of his obvious lack of pace in his first stint?