Jump to content


Photo

Michael Schumacher (merged)


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
20758 replies to this topic

#20701 ivand911

ivand911
  • Member

  • 8,152 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 29 May 2012 - 13:12

We can say MS car have 66% failure rate. Great. He will be failure champion.

Grand Prix Date Team Grid Race Position Points Total
Australian 18 Mar 2012 Mercedes 4 Ret 0 0
Malaysian 25 Mar 2012 Mercedes 3 10 1 1
Chinese 15 Apr 2012 Mercedes 2 Ret 0 1
Bahrain 22 Apr 2012 Mercedes 22 10 1 2
Spanish 13 May 2012 Mercedes 8 Ret 0 2
Monaco 27 May 2012 Mercedes 6 Ret 0 2


At least he have 100% points finish.

Edited by ivand911, 29 May 2012 - 13:13.


Advertisement

#20702 MikeTekRacing

MikeTekRacing
  • Member

  • 5,828 posts
  • Joined: October 04

Posted 29 May 2012 - 13:36

Sure MS had ample room before Grosjean hit him. Mainly because nobody drives there, for the simple reason it's a dead end road on the very left. I remember thinking "uh-oh" when Schumacher veered left - he would have had to find a way back into the pack at some point which would have become... interesting. :D Unfortunately Grosjean too care of him before we got to see it.

you missed the part where grosjean was so slow ms would pass him easily way before the turn in.
the speed difference was quite big

#20703 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 28,523 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 29 May 2012 - 13:50

you missed the part where grosjean was so slow ms would pass him easily way before the turn in.
the speed difference was quite big


I don't think he was that much faster and would have run out of road before the turn in.

#20704 Schumacher7

Schumacher7
  • Member

  • 776 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 29 May 2012 - 14:32

I don't think he was that much faster and would have run out of road before the turn in.

Wrong.

#20705 MikeTekRacing

MikeTekRacing
  • Member

  • 5,828 posts
  • Joined: October 04

Posted 29 May 2012 - 14:33

he still had about 70 meters at the moment of the contact. just before the contact he was halfway on Grosjean's sidepod and gaining ground very quickly (remember he started 1 car length behind grosjean so he's made up 1.5 car lengths by that point)

Edited by MikeTekRacing, 29 May 2012 - 14:34.


#20706 schubacca

schubacca
  • Member

  • 800 posts
  • Joined: May 10

Posted 29 May 2012 - 14:40

Doesn't it feel that some would have us believe that EVERY contact is MS's fault?




#20707 Group B

Group B
  • Member

  • 13,984 posts
  • Joined: March 02

Posted 29 May 2012 - 14:43

Doesn't it feel that some would have us believe that EVERY contact is MS's fault?

Some would have us believe famine, global warming, world recession and the ebola virus are MS' fault.

#20708 halifaxf1fan

halifaxf1fan
  • Member

  • 4,846 posts
  • Joined: March 09

Posted 29 May 2012 - 15:47

Some would have us believe famine, global warming, world recession and the ebola virus are MS' fault.



What about the Kennedy assassination as well!  ;)


In this case though the contact wasn't Schumacher's fault imo.

#20709 Group B

Group B
  • Member

  • 13,984 posts
  • Joined: March 02

Posted 29 May 2012 - 15:50

What about the Kennedy assassination as well! ;)

Grassy knoll ...

#20710 MightyMoose

MightyMoose
  • RC Forum Host

  • 1,145 posts
  • Joined: July 10

Posted 29 May 2012 - 18:02

Grassy knoll ...

I heard from a source that Michael was seen driving a white Fiat through a Paris tunnel in 1997, unsurprisingly it looked like it had been involved in a little bump.

#20711 mkoscevic

mkoscevic
  • Member

  • 680 posts
  • Joined: June 10

Posted 29 May 2012 - 18:17

I heard from a source that Michael was seen driving a white Fiat through a Paris tunnel in 1997, unsurprisingly it looked like it had been involved in a little bump.


Matt Bishop, perhaps?

#20712 MightyMoose

MightyMoose
  • RC Forum Host

  • 1,145 posts
  • Joined: July 10

Posted 29 May 2012 - 18:31

Matt Bishop, perhaps?

:lol: Or Mohammed Al Fayed.... MS is in the payroll of the British Royal Family - it's the German lineage you see.

#20713 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 28,523 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 29 May 2012 - 23:13

Wrong.


Wow, such an insightful post. :rolleyes:

#20714 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 28,523 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 29 May 2012 - 23:18

he still had about 70 meters at the moment of the contact. just before the contact he was halfway on Grosjean's sidepod and gaining ground very quickly (remember he started 1 car length behind grosjean so he's made up 1.5 car lengths by that point)


I suspect that Grosjean had to lift because of Alonso moving around, but regardless I still think that due to the nature of the track he would have run out of room before getting past.

#20715 ivand911

ivand911
  • Member

  • 8,152 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 30 May 2012 - 06:54

I suspect that Grosjean had to lift because of Alonso moving around, but regardless I still think that due to the nature of the track he would have run out of room before getting past.

At least he know where the brake is. For some it not exist. They should give sedatives at the start to some rookies. RG is second reason for Michael to have bad results. First is technical failure.


#20716 MightyMoose

MightyMoose
  • RC Forum Host

  • 1,145 posts
  • Joined: July 10

Posted 30 May 2012 - 10:10

At least he know where the brake is.

He didn't know where to apply it in Spain. :p

Relax, I'm only pulling your leg, but it's rather easy when you make such a sweeping statement!

#20717 Hacklerf

Hacklerf
  • Member

  • 2,339 posts
  • Joined: March 07

Posted 30 May 2012 - 10:13

Saw this on the Schumacher facebook page

"1. Australia - Gearbox failure -> 5th position at least possible = 10 points.
2. Malaysia - Grosjean spun -> by his pace 5th position again at least possible = 10 points
3. China - wheel nut failure -> 2nd place at least possible = 18 points
4. Bahrain - DRS failiure in qualifying -> his pace at the race was good enough for 5th place = 10 points
5. Spain - Senna crash - easily could end at 5th place = 10 points
6. Monaco - Fuel pressure - without penalty he would win the race = 25 points. From 6th place without Grosjean and car failure his pace and strategy was enough for a podium 3rd place = 15 points.


This makes me sad

#20718 Ferrari_F1_fan_2001

Ferrari_F1_fan_2001
  • Member

  • 3,420 posts
  • Joined: May 01

Posted 30 May 2012 - 10:51

This makes me sad


It's money, pride, kudos and image down the drain for Mercedes too. All that money and investment and they can't field two reliable cars at the same time on the same track. Had Mercedes got their act together for ALL the races this year, either Nico or Schumacher could have been leading the WDC.....

Instead they are 4th and 18th or whatever they are. :rolleyes:

#20719 IceSkyrim

IceSkyrim
  • Member

  • 867 posts
  • Joined: December 11

Posted 30 May 2012 - 12:23

Schumacher is just reaping the fruits that he sow.

If Schumy haven't dived into Senna's back, and got punished, MS would start from pole and finish in the flag, first.

Instead, he got punished and had to start in the midle of the pack.

The new generation of drivers [Maldo, Groo, Perez, Kamui, Senna, etc] won't cut some slack to Schumacher.
Quite the oposite, daring to trade paint with Schumy must be some kind of rite of passage from a rookie to a mature F1 driver.



Advertisement

#20720 MikeTekRacing

MikeTekRacing
  • Member

  • 5,828 posts
  • Joined: October 04

Posted 30 May 2012 - 12:37

they're trading wheels, not paint ;)

#20721 TheBunk

TheBunk
  • Member

  • 4,083 posts
  • Joined: May 11

Posted 30 May 2012 - 12:57

Saw this on the Schumacher facebook page

"1. Australia - Gearbox failure -> 5th position at least possible = 10 points.
2. Malaysia - Grosjean spun -> by his pace 5th position again at least possible = 10 points
3. China - wheel nut failure -> 2nd place at least possible = 18 points
4. Bahrain - DRS failiure in qualifying -> his pace at the race was good enough for 5th place = 10 points
5. Spain - Senna crash - easily could end at 5th place = 10 points
6. Monaco - Fuel pressure - without penalty he would win the race = 25 points. From 6th place without Grosjean and car failure his pace and strategy was enough for a podium 3rd place = 15 points.

So he would by now have a total of 83 points or 73 points(depens how you think Monaco would pay out) and would have been leading the championship or 2nd place!"



Gawd, this makes it even more depressing. So we know he has the form, however after these first 6 races, does he still have the motivation given the utterly sh*te lack of reliability and blunders?


Thats a bit optimistic. But it all costed a good chunk of points, thats for sure. Nevertheless, 3 straight wins and hes back :)


Some would have us believe famine, global warming, world recession and the ebola virus are MS' fault.


:up: :lol:

#20722 BetaVersion

BetaVersion
  • Member

  • 689 posts
  • Joined: May 12

Posted 30 May 2012 - 16:23

Schumacher is just reaping the fruits that he sow.

If Schumy haven't dived into Senna's back, and got punished, MS would start from pole and finish in the flag, first.

Instead, he got punished and had to start in the midle of the pack.

The new generation of drivers [Maldo, Groo, Perez, Kamui, Senna, etc] won't cut some slack to Schumacher.
Quite the oposite, daring to trade paint with Schumy must be some kind of rite of passage from a rookie to a mature F1 driver.


He wouldn't win even if started on pole, because the car broke again.

#20723 TheBunk

TheBunk
  • Member

  • 4,083 posts
  • Joined: May 11

Posted 30 May 2012 - 16:32

daring to trade paint with Schumy must be some kind of rite of passage from a rookie to a mature F1 driver.


Yes, its not every day you can rub wheels with a guy that won more titles than all those guys combined probably will ever win.



#20724 IceSkyrim

IceSkyrim
  • Member

  • 867 posts
  • Joined: December 11

Posted 30 May 2012 - 16:38

Yes, its not every day you can rub wheels with a guy that won more titles than all those guys combined probably will ever win.

As long as you qualify poorly and stays within the reach of rookies :rolleyes:

#20725 TheBunk

TheBunk
  • Member

  • 4,083 posts
  • Joined: May 11

Posted 30 May 2012 - 16:48

As long as you qualify poorly and stays within the reach of rookies :rolleyes:


Currently the qual stats are 3 - 3 with his qualifying specialist teammate Rosberg, so Michael Schumacher must be doing something right, being old, past it, and at 80% of his old speed and all.

#20726 F1Champion

F1Champion
  • Member

  • 3,116 posts
  • Joined: September 01

Posted 30 May 2012 - 17:06

It is depressing that he points tally isn't better, if it were and he was in the hunt, I think he would have been performing even better than he is now. Give him competition and a WDC race, and he'll thrive. Mercedes really ought to sort out their reliability. I'm not 100% sure the fuel pump at Monaco was not due to Grosjean but for Mercedes to admit that it would have happened anyway makes me think that it would have otherwise they could have used RG as an excuse.

#20727 Diablobb81

Diablobb81
  • Member

  • 3,964 posts
  • Joined: August 09

Posted 30 May 2012 - 17:07

As long as you qualify poorly and stays within the reach of rookies :rolleyes:


So i guess you didn't watch any quali this year.

#20728 ivand911

ivand911
  • Member

  • 8,152 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 30 May 2012 - 18:05

Posted Image

#20729 Schumacher7

Schumacher7
  • Member

  • 776 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 30 May 2012 - 18:17

Before anyone says Schumacher was hardly alongside he was up in line with the front wheels before he braked when he saw Grosjean coming at him.

#20730 ali.unal

ali.unal
  • Member

  • 3,558 posts
  • Joined: June 09

Posted 30 May 2012 - 19:00

I'm really shocked to read Edd Straw's last column on Plus Autosport. He "blatantly" defends Schumacher and concludes that his comeback was not a failure. It's very very odd to hear that from Straw, but here it is:

At the age of 43, he's still a competitive grand prix driver capable of setting a pole position time at Monaco and perhaps even winning the race. That's a lot better than the majority will ever achieve at their peak.

His comeback has added a lot to F1 and even if he never gets another chance to win, which is very possible, he will always have that memory of what happened on that Saturday afternoon in Monte Carlo as a monument to the fact he can still, on his day, roll back the years. One performance doesn't make a second career, but he is far from the only middling driver on the grid who is capable of that kind of showing if everything comes right.

http://plus.autospor...-is-no-failure/

#20731 libano

libano
  • Member

  • 235 posts
  • Joined: April 10

Posted 30 May 2012 - 19:32

Posted Image


this just confirms that grosjean overreacted. he had plenty of space to the right, there was absolutely no reason for him to squash MSC into the wall like this. nerves, inexperience, whatever you want to call it. he's on a learning curve.

#20732 aditya-now

aditya-now
  • Member

  • 7,447 posts
  • Joined: June 02

Posted 31 May 2012 - 13:11

I'm really shocked to read Edd Straw's last column on Plus Autosport. He "blatantly" defends Schumacher and concludes that his comeback was not a failure. It's very very odd to hear that from Straw, but here it is:


http://plus.autospor...-is-no-failure/


What's wrong with that article?

Edd Straw is right - Michael's comeback was definitely no failure. MS showed time and again streaks of brilliance - the only difference between his first and his second career is that now Michael is not able to provide brilliance on a consistent basis.

And were he to start winning again - who knows? There is still fire in him, there is still life in the old lion.


#20733 Jovanotti

Jovanotti
  • Member

  • 3,566 posts
  • Joined: October 11

Posted 31 May 2012 - 13:35

this just confirms that grosjean overreacted. he had plenty of space to the right, there was absolutely no reason for him to squash MSC into the wall like this. nerves, inexperience, whatever you want to call it. he's on a learning curve.

Discussed 1000 times before...watch an onboard, he was only there because he touched Alonso before...

Edited by Jovanotti, 31 May 2012 - 13:35.


#20734 ivand911

ivand911
  • Member

  • 8,152 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 31 May 2012 - 15:33

Where Gene work, will tell you everything? Is he Spanish too? Was the interview given to Spanish site?
I rest my case. It is BS. Who is Mark Gene? Go ask what Badoer think. Go ask what Massa think. I am sure that Gene revelation come very spontaneous at opening of Ferrari store in Madrid. :lol: :rotfl:
What this have to do with this thread? Is this troll effort? I don't see anyone putting it in Alonso thread? So ,why it is here?

This article is more interesting that Ferrari PR shit there:
http://www.autosport...t.php/id/100018

Edited by ivand911, 31 May 2012 - 15:57.


#20735 spacekid

spacekid
  • Member

  • 2,678 posts
  • Joined: April 11

Posted 31 May 2012 - 17:36

I echo the sentiments regards Alonso - I think he's the most complete driver out there, and at both their peaks? Very, very close.

I think he makes fewer mistakes than Michael. I also think there's no way Michael would have sat behind Petrov in Abu-Dhabi. He would have either got past, or crashed trying. Thats the difference between the two drivers for me - sometimes Michaels approach works, sometimes it doesn't.

I favour the more 'direct' style of always going for it (and sometimes making a mistake), but its a personal thing.

#20736 ali.unal

ali.unal
  • Member

  • 3,558 posts
  • Joined: June 09

Posted 31 May 2012 - 17:42

What's wrong with that article?

Edd Straw is right - Michael's comeback was definitely no failure. MS showed time and again streaks of brilliance - the only difference between his first and his second career is that now Michael is not able to provide brilliance on a consistent basis.

And were he to start winning again - who knows? There is still fire in him, there is still life in the old lion.

There is nothing wrong at that article. I do share the points thereof, but I think you misunderstood me due to lack of context.

Edd Straw is not known as a Schumacher fan or -let's say- admirer for that matter. He also hasn't been very appriciative about the achievements of the man. Therefore, I was shocked to read those lines from Straw. It could have been from Noble, but not Straw (I would have thought). Apparantly I was wrong. That was a well-balanced drawn picture of what's been happening.

#20737 1Devil1

1Devil1
  • Member

  • 3,541 posts
  • Joined: May 12

Posted 31 May 2012 - 17:55

I think he makes fewer mistakes than Michael. I also think there's no way Michael would have sat behind Petrov in Abu-Dhabi. He would have either got past, or crashed trying. Thats the difference between the two drivers for me - sometimes Michaels approach works, sometimes it doesn't.


I believe you will never see a performance like Hungary 1998 from Alonso he would have collected a secure second place with the knowledge the championship race is not over like he nearly did in 2010. Four races before the end he told the press I am confident I only have to be on the podium the next races and my chance will come. Michael had always this all or nothing approach to win except he was leading the championship by miles. And this created one of his best race than he was a beast!

#20738 ClubmanGT

ClubmanGT
  • Member

  • 1,722 posts
  • Joined: May 06

Posted 31 May 2012 - 18:03

And despite all those mistakes in 2006, the moment Michael Schumacher lost the world title was when his Ferrari died at Suzuka.

#20739 Cr0aker

Cr0aker
  • Member

  • 38 posts
  • Joined: March 10

Posted 31 May 2012 - 19:00

Schumacher waves to crowd

Laughed my ass off at this.

Advertisement

#20740 Schumacher7

Schumacher7
  • Member

  • 776 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 31 May 2012 - 20:02

Schumacher waves to crowd

Laughed my ass off at this.

I can't see it, is it the roman salute by any chance, made me chuckle as well? :rotfl:

#20741 Sakae

Sakae
  • Member

  • 19,256 posts
  • Joined: December 03

Posted 31 May 2012 - 20:19

What's wrong with that article?

Edd Straw is right - Michael's comeback was definitely no failure. MS showed time and again streaks of brilliance - the only difference between his first and his second career is that now Michael is not able to provide brilliance on a consistent basis.

And were he to start winning again - who knows? There is still fire in him, there is still life in the old lion.

Hmm, some of us have never doubt him, and "knew" this all along, whereas some other people... :D

#20742 aditya-now

aditya-now
  • Member

  • 7,447 posts
  • Joined: June 02

Posted 31 May 2012 - 22:18

I can't see it, is it the roman salute by any chance, made me chuckle as well? :rotfl:


You can see that salute also in German history, app. 70 years back in time - a very unfortunate photograph IMHO.
Or executed just at the right moment by the photographer....


#20743 aditya-now

aditya-now
  • Member

  • 7,447 posts
  • Joined: June 02

Posted 31 May 2012 - 22:19

Hmm, some of us have never doubt him, and "knew" this all along, whereas some other people... :D


Different lanes for different brains, Sakae.  ;)


#20744 BRK

BRK
  • Member

  • 3,666 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 31 May 2012 - 23:30

The Michael Schumacher thread is probably not the best choice of camping site for Alonso fans.



Crazy race, thought it was going to be a lap 1 DNF with those two retards -one in the Ferrari and the rookie in the Lotus- trying to win the race at the first corner, amazing the car survived the impact. After the Raikkonen train took off it was impossible he'd have gotten anywhere near the podium (unless it had rained) , wouldn't have been happy with a points finish so the retirement wasn't a massive disappointment.

Mercedes must be awfully proud to be treating Michael as a second driver, second rate parts, second rate service and a retirement streak that reflects that. Shame they couldn't ruin his qualifying at the one track DRS isn't that important.

He's going to need a string of podiums or wins to get back in contention in the teammate battle; tough ask in a season as random and inconsistent as this one.

#20745 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 28,523 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 31 May 2012 - 23:34

The Michael Schumacher thread is probably not the best choice of camping site for Alonso fans.



Crazy race, thought it was going to be a lap 1 DNF with those two retards -one in the Ferrari and the rookie in the Lotus- trying to win the race at the first corner, amazing the car survived the impact. After the Raikkonen train took off it was impossible he'd have gotten anywhere near the podium (unless it had rained) , wouldn't have been happy with a points finish so the retirement wasn't a massive disappointment.

Mercedes must be awfully proud to be treating Michael as a second driver, second rate parts, second rate service and a retirement streak that reflects that. Shame they couldn't ruin his qualifying at the one track DRS isn't that important.

He's going to need a string of podiums or wins to get back in contention in the teammate battle; tough ask in a season as random and inconsistent as this one.


What a stupid line. You might as well say the same about MS. If he hadn't tried to gain places at the start he wouldn't have got hit.

#20746 Disgrace

Disgrace
  • RC Forum Host

  • 13,163 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 31 May 2012 - 23:38

What a stupid line. You might as well say the same about MS. If he hadn't tried to gain places at the start he wouldn't have got hit.


The very essence of a racing incident. :up:

#20747 exmayol

exmayol
  • Member

  • 556 posts
  • Joined: July 10

Posted 31 May 2012 - 23:47

In the essense RG has ruined 2 of MS races so far without a single warning. MS ruined Senna Jr race and got a penalty right away. The later accident was labeled as "avoidable" hence the penalty. Well I fail to see how former RG stunts were unavoidable...

#20748 jj2728

jj2728
  • Member

  • 2,877 posts
  • Joined: January 04

Posted 31 May 2012 - 23:48

The Michael Schumacher thread is probably not the best choice of camping site for Alonso fans.



Crazy race, thought it was going to be a lap 1 DNF with those two retards -one in the Ferrari and the rookie in the Lotus- trying to win the race at the first corner, amazing the car survived the impact. After the Raikkonen train took off it was impossible he'd have gotten anywhere near the podium (unless it had rained) , wouldn't have been happy with a points finish so the retirement wasn't a massive disappointment.

Mercedes must be awfully proud to be treating Michael as a second driver, second rate parts, second rate service and a retirement streak that reflects that. Shame they couldn't ruin his qualifying at the one track DRS isn't that important.

He's going to need a string of podiums or wins to get back in contention in the teammate battle; tough ask in a season as random and inconsistent as this one.


Now come on BRK, I would have expected more from you. It was a start line incident plain and simple. Monaco, in years past, has been notorious for that. And Schumacher is surely not on the receiving end of second rate anything. His run of bad luck has served him no good at all, but to imply that Mercedes his giving him second tier treatment is a bit shallow don't you think?


#20749 Muz Bee

Muz Bee
  • Member

  • 2,531 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 01 June 2012 - 04:31

The Michael Schumacher thread is probably not the best choice of camping site for Teflonslow fanboys.



Crazy race, thought it was going to be a lap 1 DNF with those two retards -one in the Ferrari and the rookie in the Lotus- trying to win the race at the first corner, amazing the car survived the impact. After the Raikkonen train took off it was impossible he'd have gotten anywhere near the podium (unless it had rained) , wouldn't have been happy with a points finish so the retirement wasn't a massive disappointment.

Mercedes must be awfully proud to be treating Michael as a second driver, second rate parts, second rate service and a retirement streak that reflects that. Shame they couldn't ruin his qualifying at the one track DRS isn't that important.

He's going to need a string of podiums or wins to get back in contention in the teammate battle; tough ask in a season as random and inconsistent as this one.

This is a really dumb post from someone who should know better. I know you're not stupid enough to try to explain how/why M-B team are giving Michael second rate equipment and service. I can understand your disappointment at opportunities lost but it is most assuredly luck. Sometimes luck is with you, sometimes against you. Michael has had plenty of good luck in the past, it all comes around over time. Once a Ferrari driver qualified on the front row almost every race of the season and never won a race, mainly a string of DNFs. Now that's bad luck.

I would point out that the act of crashing into Senna in Spain effectively wrecked TWO of his six races anyway.

#20750 KavB

KavB
  • Member

  • 1,279 posts
  • Joined: June 10

Posted 01 June 2012 - 06:43

This is a really dumb post from someone who should know better. I know you're not stupid enough to try to explain how/why M-B team are giving Michael second rate equipment and service. I can understand your disappointment at opportunities lost but it is most assuredly luck. Sometimes luck is with you, sometimes against you. Michael has had plenty of good luck in the past, it all comes around over time. Once a Ferrari driver qualified on the front row almost every race of the season and never won a race, mainly a string of DNFs. Now that's bad luck.

I would point out that the act of crashing into Senna in Spain effectively wrecked TWO of his six races anyway.

Which Ferrari driver was that?