A good one.
Now I know where you are from. You are from Gabrovo!
So you are not sure why it is that you agree with me, just to make me happy!
Usually you don't take a decision before knowing the facts? Well, the facts are Rosberg - Schumi 9 : 2 in qualifying, Rosberg - Schumi 94 : 38 in the WDC standings and Rosberg - Schumi 8 : 3 in race classification (retirements counted).
So it is not so unwise of you to agree with me that Nico is better than Michael in MGP car.
Yet I know what the problem is: you still do not know the excuses for Michael to justify his terrible showing this year. This is what you call "I usually don't take decision before knowing the facts".
I am from Ruse.
I don't know the facts what happen in the team, but I know Ross knows so no problem there. I know you don't like to go in details much. What you see is enough for you. Little first signal behaviour if you ask me. But that is you. I want to see what is below surface. But that is me. I ask same questions in this same post and you didn't answer. Can you explain me why they have different set up in Qualy in Hungary? Nico have set up for qualy , Michael have set up for race. Who could finish better in Qualy? How to expect similar results with different set up? Any idea? What was MGP team thinking to experiment with Michael set up? Why, when they found good set up with Nico, they didn't use the same set up for Michael. They don't need points or better starting position, experiments/tests are more important?
Edited by ivand911, 06 August 2010 - 15:03.