Should heads roll at Ferrari?
#1
Posted 06 April 2011 - 13:30
#3
Posted 06 April 2011 - 13:34
It's only been one race.
And uhm, Ferrari's march towards dominance started in part when they stopped having satelite operations in other countries.
Actually I have a third reason.
It's only been one race.
#4
Posted 06 April 2011 - 13:34
#5
Posted 06 April 2011 - 13:38
#6
Posted 06 April 2011 - 13:38
Jp
#7
Posted 06 April 2011 - 13:39
#8
Posted 06 April 2011 - 13:46
#9
Posted 06 April 2011 - 13:57
I thought Ferrari's more sucessfull period in F1 in recent years was when a lot of the cars were made in the UK (anyone remember that?).
Wrong. That was because of John Barnard. in 90's.
#10
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:03
Flavio? Is that you?Looks like another dodgy year for Ferrari. As Mclaren make huge steps forward and Red Bull continue to lead the way, is it time for Ferrari to wield the axe? I thought Ferrari's more sucessfull period in F1 in recent years was when a lot of the cars were made in the UK (anyone remember that?). Is it time to even consider moving Ferrari out of Italy to the home of most F1 teams in the UK?
Wow...they finished fourth in the first race and heads should roll? Ferrari's most successful period in F1 in recent years was when Ferraris were made in Italy (as they always have been), and the rest of the crap cars were made in England. Why aren't there threads about everyone other than Red Bull and McLaren giving up on this season and the next and concentrating on 2013 turbo cars? McLaren hasn't won a constructor's championship in 13 years. Maybe they should pack up and move to Bahrain. By your logic, it couldn't hurt.
This thread gets my vote for the most ridiculous trolling thread so far this year...maybe ever.
Edited by CONOSUR, 06 April 2011 - 14:07.
#11
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:06
Looks like another dodgy year for Ferrari. As Mclaren make huge steps forward and Red Bull continue to lead the way, is it time for Ferrari to wield the axe? I thought Ferrari's more sucessfull period in F1 in recent years was when a lot of the cars were made in the UK (anyone remember that?). Is it time to even consider moving Ferrari out of Italy to the home of most F1 teams in the UK?
Yeah the John Barnard/Peter Windsor (Guildford) era was a great success wasn't it
Very poor trolling
#12
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:06
#13
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:08
#14
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:10
#15
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:12
Exactly. Typical fan-based knee jerk reaction. A team of their calibre will be back on song very soon, and when I say soon, I mean this weekend in all likelihood!Stupid thread. Talk about dodgy year after one race.
#16
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:14
Going by your definition of what constitutes a dodgy year, the whole of Mclaren should have been decapitated a long time ago (not just heads rolling ). Remind me, what have they achieved in the last 10 or 12 years? One drivers title?
Oh and that could be extended to pretty much all the teams on the grid..., because obviously they are producing dodgy cars year in, year out.
Looks like another dodgy year for Ferrari. As Mclaren make huge steps forward and Red Bull continue to lead the way, is it time for Ferrari to wield the axe? I thought Ferrari's more sucessfull period in F1 in recent years was when a lot of the cars were made in the UK (anyone remember that?). Is it time to even consider moving Ferrari out of Italy to the home of most F1 teams in the UK?
#17
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:15
Exactly. Typical fan-based knee jerk reaction.
What, like all the screaming McLaren fans during testing?
#19
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:19
Very amusing thread.
Who are "Ferrari" anyway? The last bunch of employees have been and gone, now it's another lot.
Maybe in a few races time the shareholders will have to start thinking about it. As well as Bernie and Todt, obviously.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:22
Yeh, just like that. There will be always be people quick to react and make a judgement, regardless of the colour of the team they support.What, like all the screaming McLaren fans during testing?
#21
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:23
#22
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:28
If heads should roll at Ferrari, what on earth is going to happen to the entire mclaren design team? Seppoku?
Dopey troll.
Edited by Andy865, 06 April 2011 - 14:29.
#23
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:29
But I say this only looking at 2008-2010. It's obviously way too early to say that 2011 is disaster already.
#24
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:30
This and Rodlamas and Freya calling the F150 trash.
Mods, please close the thread. It's just asking for trouble.
#25
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:33
And Ferrari shifting base out of Italy? Might as well run customer cars from McLaren with Mercedes engines while they're at it.
#26
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:34
Is it time to even consider moving Ferrari out of Italy to the home of most F1 teams in the UK?
wtf...
#27
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:40
#28
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:41
#29
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:49
#30
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:50
Yes, heads should roll at Ferrari.
No absolutely not! I love the current team, the drivers who deserve their drives, the feud with the BBC, the strategist role, traffic lights, the happy family with team orders, it's all great. Don't change a thing .
Bernie will move some talent in soon anyway, no worries.
#31
Posted 06 April 2011 - 14:55
#32
Posted 06 April 2011 - 15:09
We have only had one example of team orders... Germany.No absolutely not! I love the current team, the drivers who deserve their drives, the feud with the BBC, the strategist role, traffic lights, the happy family with team orders, it's all great. Don't change a thing .
Still bitter that Bernie considers Ferrari an essential part of F1 and not McLaren...Bernie will move some talent in soon anyway, no worries.
#33
Posted 06 April 2011 - 15:11
Castrol predictor has Alonso for race in P2.
Heads should roll at Castrol!
#34
Posted 06 April 2011 - 15:14
#35
Posted 06 April 2011 - 15:17
#36
Posted 06 April 2011 - 15:18
Agreed.Ferrari were at their best when they let foreigners run their team while having all their engineers under 1 roof. Montezemolo wanted to prove that they could be just as good when Italians are in charge of everything....it's not really working out that way though
#37
Posted 06 April 2011 - 15:21
But they're not. I think all that was missing in Melbourne was finesse in the set-up and better understanding of tyres. They aren't that far away, and I put them right in the mix with the best of the rest teams.
#38
Posted 06 April 2011 - 15:22
Because there can be only one, right?Knee jerk reaction? No that would be the should Lewis Hamilton move thread?
Besides, shuffling management around tends to be something best done with planning so people can be 'absorbed' in their new role rather than just planted there at short notice and told, "Be better than the last guy!"
Firing a bunch of people at this point is not the way forward and could actually prove to be counter productive.
Edited by Seanspeed, 06 April 2011 - 15:24.
#39
Posted 06 April 2011 - 15:27
Advertisement
#40
Posted 06 April 2011 - 15:32
#41
Posted 06 April 2011 - 16:34
#42
Posted 06 April 2011 - 16:36
#43
Posted 06 April 2011 - 16:43
We have only had one example of team orders... Germany.
Still bitter that Bernie considers Ferrari an essential part of F1 and not McLaren...
Nah, Kovy was quite happy with Germany, he knew he was only in that position because the team had left Lewis out to save Kovy queueing. That was teamwork, not stitching one driver up on the say-so of the other, demotivating him and then talking about how he has to raise his game.
Ferrari is Bernie's team. The FIA's team. The extra money team. The one that's managed and funded to keep the money flowing in. Does it represent Enzo these days? I don't think so.
Anyway we'll see, the car could well be a contender. If not, Bernie might have to shake things up.
#44
Posted 06 April 2011 - 16:46
Well, given the end of the world is 2012, next year, there's really not much Ferrari can do now.
Like Bernie would let a little thing like that stop F1
#45
Posted 06 April 2011 - 16:46
#46
Posted 06 April 2011 - 16:50
Sly swipes aside, both teams are great assets to the sport but the truth of the matter is, F1 could survive without either. I don't think there are many people arrogant enough to claim otherwise, and Bernie's opinions are best taken with a pinch of salt as I'm sure you are aware.Still bitter that Bernie considers Ferrari an essential part of F1 and not McLaren...
#47
Posted 06 April 2011 - 16:55
Bla bla bla, the evil red team ******* on poor old Massa who wasn't a title contender.Nah, Kovy was quite happy with Germany, he knew he was only in that position because the team had left Lewis out to save Kovy queueing. That was teamwork, not stitching one driver up on the say-so of the other, demotivating him and then talking about how he has to raise his game.
Smells of sour grapes. I suppose you think you should earn as much as the more experienced guy in the company. Does McLaren represent Bruce these days? Anyway, Bernie does what is good for F1 and having Ferrari around is good... Don't you think so?Ferrari is Bernie's team. The FIA's team. The extra money team. The one that's managed and funded to keep the money flowing in. Does it represent Enzo these days? I don't think so.
Anyway we'll see, the car could well be a contender. If not, Bernie might have to shake things up.
#48
Posted 06 April 2011 - 17:09
Bla bla bla, the evil red team ******* on poor old Massa who wasn't a title contender.
Smells of sour grapes. I suppose you think you should earn as much as the more experienced guy in the company. Does McLaren represent Bruce these days? Anyway, Bernie does what is good for F1 and having Ferrari around is good... Don't you think so?
Well Felipe was supposed to be contributing to the WCC, so it all worked out for the best, afaic
Yes I do think having Ferrari around is good .
#49
Posted 06 April 2011 - 17:21
Like Bernie would let a little thing like that stop F1 ;)
How could I forget!
#50
Posted 06 April 2011 - 17:31
You right, Felipe was supposed to be contributing to the WCC but he wasn't even doing that prior to Germany. On average he scored 6.7 points per race prior to Germany. Alonso was close to 10 and this was with plenty errors.Well Felipe was supposed to be contributing to the WCC, so it all worked out for the best, afaic
Yes I do think having Ferrari around is good .
Edited by Ferrari2183, 06 April 2011 - 17:43.