Testing the memories
#1
Posted 03 May 2011 - 06:55
#3
Posted 03 May 2011 - 07:22
No chassis number? Isn't that a bit suspicious?
It would only be suspicious if all racing drivers were wealthy millionaires. From what I have learned there were a lot of cars imported to NZ/Australia with Chassis numbers removed to avoid paying tax duty on them (up to 120% of the value of the car!!) Or they would take the chassis number off and send it back attached to a "junk" chassis which meant they could claim the tax back. If the govt wasnt so bloody greedy on the tax duty at the time life would be so much simpler now. The car is authentic as it was registered by the importer as a road legal car, and has been continually registered for the entire time in NZ (since 1965) we still have the original import papers and the number plates!
#4
Posted 03 May 2011 - 07:37
If so, have you tried via Classic Team Lotus ?
#5
Posted 03 May 2011 - 09:36
#6
Posted 03 May 2011 - 11:03
#7
Posted 03 May 2011 - 13:57
agraham@lotuscars.com
Nothing surprises me about Lotus any more!
Edit: just a minute, the 20 was a Formila Junior- "road legal", now that does surprise me.
Edited by elansprint72, 03 May 2011 - 13:59.
#8
Posted 03 May 2011 - 14:20
Lotus archivist:
agraham@lotuscars.com
Nothing surprises me about Lotus any more!
Edit: just a minute, the 20 was a Formila Junior- "road legal", now that does surprise me.
Well, the Lotus 51 FF was marketed with wings and head-lights as an option, although I doubt that was seriously meant.
#9
Posted 03 May 2011 - 15:38
I think that "road legal" has a slightly different meaning in New Zealand. As I understand it, it is a legal requirement for all vehicles in New Zealand to be road registered and carry number plates. I have seen old pictures of cars temporarily imported for the "Tasman" races (or whatever David McKinney would have us call them) carrying temporary number plates. That doesn't mean they were legally roadworthy in the British sense.Lotus archivist:
agraham@lotuscars.com
Nothing surprises me about Lotus any more!
Edit: just a minute, the 20 was a Formila Junior- "road legal", now that does surprise me.
#10
Posted 03 May 2011 - 16:31
Well, the Lotus 51 FF was marketed with wings and head-lights as an option, although I doubt that was seriously meant.
Wasn't that a one-off show car, put together only for Graham Arnold to do some publicity stuff in? Having sat in a 51FF myself, I'm very surprised that GA managed to fit into it, he can't have been very comfortable.
#11
Posted 03 May 2011 - 17:22
#12
Posted 04 May 2011 - 05:17
#13
Posted 04 May 2011 - 08:35
Well, the Lotus 51 FF was marketed with wings and head-lights as an option, although I doubt that was seriously meant.
There were publicity shots of a 51 being driven through London complete with headlights and cycle-type wings.
#14
Posted 04 May 2011 - 09:54
Most probably the LOTUS 51R based on the Lotus 51, a Formula Ford single seat car. It was done for the 1968 Racing Car Show. The car was often pictured with Graham Arnold behind the wheel, he was Lotus' sales manager/director at the time. The factory car had a flower power paint scheme and with a price of GBP 1085 one was supposedly sold to an American customer. It was photographed in a number of locations in the UK including central London.
The original Lotus 51 road legal car ended up in a Lotus dealer in Glasgow. It was eventually purchased in 1970 for hillclimbing and ended up some years later fitted with a twin cam. It had cycle wings, an electric fan, lights and a horn. It carried the horn for all of its first users ownership. The car was white when purchased with iirc a red stripe and that I believe was the original colours.
The original promotional announcement was in Autosport in around 1968
The first competitive user of the Lotus does occasionally post on this board, so I will ask him to post the full history of the car.
The Peter Sellars/ James Bond Casino Royale Lotus was definately green in the film and predated Formula Ford by some 2 years.
#15
Posted 09 May 2011 - 07:10
By paulieg83 at 2011-05-09
By paulieg83 at 2011-05-09
By paulieg83 at 2011-05-08
By paulieg83 at 2011-05-08
By paulieg83 at 2011-05-08
By paulieg83 at 2011-05-08
#16
Posted 09 May 2011 - 08:23
There's an entry for him with #115 in the January 9th, 1971 NZ Grand Prix programme for the race 6 'City of Auckland Centenary Race' for Formula C Racing Cars. There's also reference of a Lotus 22 in the same race - #36 Robbie (RJ) Booth.
Doesn't mention reference to colours, but the above might help when trying to identify period photos.
Stephen
#17
Posted 09 May 2011 - 08:37
The sequence of colours given by Paulie doesn't fit either of the 22s raced in NZ but might fit Ross Payne's 31 (and who can tell the difference between the bodies of a 22 and a 31?). Payne's car was certainly green when it first raced in NZ, and was converted to FF fairly early on: I'm afraid I don't recall its colours then, except that I'm fairly sure it started off green (which doesn't help at all )
#18
Posted 21 May 2011 - 05:17
Also on the matter of registering race cars, I have spoken to my father about this and from what he recalls his race car had to be registered because in those days there was no government accident compensation (known as ACC) in NZ and registering your car gave you liability insurance in case you hurt any spectators while racing or going to the track. This was in the days when you could be sued for personal injury, Now with the advent of ACC it is no longer required.
The beauty about this car is that 90% of it is original parts that were put on the car when manufactured and the rest were period modifications, so we luckily only have to repair and restore the car as is, not try and reverse engineer the car back to what it was.
Has anyone out got any memories of a light blue Lotus 20 around the traps in the early 60's. I am sure someone would remember something!
Edited by PaulieG, 21 May 2011 - 07:42.