Jump to content


Photo

Formula Three in 1971


  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 BritishV8

BritishV8
  • Member

  • 160 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 10 May 2011 - 21:12

I know next to nothing about Formula Three, but I want to learn...


Please help me understand restrictor plate rules for Formula Three in 1971.

As I've read, 1971 F3 rules at the start of the season permitted 1.6L engines IF they breathed through a 20mm restriction...

Should I understand that to be a SINGLE 20mm restriction, or was it in fact a 20mm restriction per cylinder/throttle?

I've also read that the rule was altered in mid season (mid August?) and that the 20mm spec was increased to 24mm. Can someone please confirm or refute that?

A photo might be worth a thousand words here, but I haven't found one that shows the induction system on these 1.6L engines.

How much power do you guys figure these engines produced, before and after the rule change?

Thanks!

Advertisement

#2 Tim Murray

Tim Murray
  • Moderator

  • 24,604 posts
  • Joined: May 02

Posted 10 May 2011 - 22:02

According to my FIA Yearbooks for 1971 and 1973 (I don't have 1972) the restrictor size specified for 1971 was 20 mm. This haad been increased to 21.5 mm for 1973, but I don't know exactly when the change occurred. The air for all cylinders had to pass through the single restrictor.

#3 alansart

alansart
  • Member

  • 4,420 posts
  • Joined: March 07

Posted 11 May 2011 - 06:41

A photo might be worth a thousand words here, but I haven't found one that shows the induction system on these 1.6L engines.


This was taken around 1972. Not sure if it's any help.

Posted Image



#4 DogEarred

DogEarred
  • Member

  • 21,433 posts
  • Joined: June 10

Posted 11 May 2011 - 08:17

This was taken around 1972. Not sure if it's any help.

Posted Image

Definately one restrictor at the forward end of the intake manifold.
If the the intake manifold happened not to be sealed very well after the restrictor, then extra air could find it's way into the engine with a possible performance increase.
But I think the scrutineers had a fairly good hold on this with a presure test.

#5 Stephen W

Stephen W
  • Member

  • 15,577 posts
  • Joined: December 04

Posted 11 May 2011 - 08:23

I was at Aintree two weeks ago & a Lotus 59 F3 was there competing. It was fitted with the restrictor box BUT the inlet restrictor had been removed - a simple process just a few grub screws. Cars running in the Historic F3 have to still run with the restrictor so when it 'races' it is fitted and when it 'sprints' it is removed.

Simples!

:wave:

#6 alansart

alansart
  • Member

  • 4,420 posts
  • Joined: March 07

Posted 11 May 2011 - 08:43

March 743.

Posted Image

With the advent of tea bags is there now a shortage of tea strainers to fit in front of the restrictors :)

Edited by alansart, 11 May 2011 - 14:50.


#7 Red Socks

Red Socks
  • Member

  • 617 posts
  • Joined: January 08

Posted 11 May 2011 - 09:14

According to my FIA Yearbooks for 1971 and 1973 (I don't have 1972) the restrictor size specified for 1971 was 20 mm. This haad been increased to 21.5 mm for 1973, but I don't know exactly when the change occurred. The air for all cylinders had to pass through the single restrictor.

21.5 in 1972.

#8 llmaurice

llmaurice
  • Member

  • 431 posts
  • Joined: May 04

Posted 11 May 2011 - 09:29

I'm certain that the ex. Keegan car pictured is a 734 therefore a 2.0 litre car .
We ran the ex.Bev Bond car for 2 seasons (713) and whilst they are nice cars they lack serious performance and are in fact slower than even Historic FF1600 cars .
Its a pity that there aren't enough folks willing to bring out their 1600 F3 cars as I'm sure that if they could run a stand alone series they would be very popular instead of running well at the rear of the Classic F3 C/Ship when competing with the 2.0 litre cars .
We did suggest that the cars be allowed to run larger restrictor orifice for better performance but this was decided against so with an 18 stone driver we decided to move on .
Nice cars however and definitely run faster with no wings .

#9 paulsenna1

paulsenna1
  • Member

  • 265 posts
  • Joined: July 04

Posted 11 May 2011 - 14:48

I'm certain that the ex. Keegan car pictured is a 734 therefore a 2.0 litre car .


Simon Hadfield's Rupert Keegan March is a 743.


#10 alansart

alansart
  • Member

  • 4,420 posts
  • Joined: March 07

Posted 11 May 2011 - 14:50

Simon Hadfield's Rupert Keegan March is a 743.


Yes it is.

Original post corrected :blush:


#11 BritishV8

BritishV8
  • Member

  • 160 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 11 May 2011 - 15:22


Very helpful - thank you!

#12 pete53

pete53
  • Member

  • 725 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 11 May 2011 - 16:01

The increase to 21.5 came into effect August 1971.

#13 Charles E Taylor

Charles E Taylor
  • Member

  • 213 posts
  • Joined: December 07

Posted 11 May 2011 - 16:15

F3 1971


To give you some information.


In 1971 the first few races held had 1600cc engines with a 20mm restrictor. If I remember correctly the first 3 or 4 races. The first race in the UK at Mallory Park had only 4 enteries and the race was run with the Forumla Fords. The engines were very underpowered at 20mm.

Very quicky there was a re-think and the restrictor size was increased to 21.5mm. That is where it remained until the 2000cc formula was introduced in 1974.

Some information can be found here

Go to Races-1971 etc.

There was some great racing in the UK. Walker, Williamson, Bond, Hunt, Maskell, Sutcliffe etc.



I hope this helps.



Charlie