Most impressive rookie so far 2011
#1
Posted 11 June 2011 - 20:19
#3
Posted 11 June 2011 - 20:24
I have to say Maldonado has impressed me in the last few weeks, however my expectation of him was really low so it's easier to get impressed.
#4
Posted 11 June 2011 - 20:26
#5
Posted 11 June 2011 - 20:39
#6
Posted 11 June 2011 - 20:42
#7
Posted 11 June 2011 - 20:45
Maldonado is doing pretty good lately, but I still haven't forgotten how much he was crashing earlier on.
Its a shame Perez is out for these two races.
#8
Posted 11 June 2011 - 20:56
Atleast the 10 year trend isnt completely obliterated - 91 - Schumacher/Hakkinen, 01 - Raikkonen, Alonso, Montoya 11 - .....etc
#9
Posted 11 June 2011 - 21:00
2, Sergio Pérez
3, Pastor Maldonado
4, Jérôme D'Ambrosio
Albeit Maldonado has surprised me in comparison to Barrichello, but I still feel Barri has lost his motivation when being consigned to a crappy car...
#10
Posted 11 June 2011 - 21:17
#11
Posted 11 June 2011 - 21:20
kobayashi imo is still a rookie and doing a good job, its hard for me to decide wether i should choose him oe di resta as often these drivers are neglected during the race making it hard to come to a proper judgement
It isnt Kobayashis first season so no,he isnt a rookie.Di Resta is performing better that i hoped he would,so Di Resta is the answer.
Edited by mursuka80, 11 June 2011 - 21:21.
#12
Posted 11 June 2011 - 21:20
#13
Posted 11 June 2011 - 21:22
#14
Posted 11 June 2011 - 21:34
1: Maldonado.
2: Perez.
3: di Resta.
#15
Posted 11 June 2011 - 21:41
#16
Posted 11 June 2011 - 21:44
Perez has been very promising, Maldonado has seemed better against Rubens than Hulkenberg did, and D'Ambrosio has performed strongly against Glock (whom I rate very highly) but I'd have to say Di Resta has been the most complete so far.
#17
Posted 11 June 2011 - 21:48
Maldonado has been the most error-prone of them all and apart from a very good Monaco GP weekend, I fail to see where he's been impressive. Actually it seems to me that it's more Barrichello loosing out motivation and speed as a result rather than Maldonado doing better compared to Hulkenberg last year. As for D'Ambrosio it's hard to compare with Glock at Virgin as the car is such a mess.
Overall I would say Di Resta, no doubt.
#18
Posted 11 June 2011 - 21:55
All four have been pretty impressive, I think. A good batch.
Perez has been very promising, Maldonado has seemed better against Rubens than Hulkenberg did, and D'Ambrosio has performed strongly against Glock (whom I rate very highly) but I'd have to say Di Resta has been the most complete so far.
Although, having said that, Di Resta is in maybe the best position to make a strong impression, having both a good car and a team-mate who has been a little over-rated over the last few seasons. One of the others might look as good in a Force India against Sutil.
#19
Posted 12 June 2011 - 09:42
Hoping Force India can produce a slightly better car so he has more chances of points
Advertisement
#20
Posted 12 June 2011 - 09:45
You need to look up the word Rookie, this is Koba's third season he has raced in, he is not a rookie.kobayashi imo is still a rookie and doing a good job
#21
Posted 12 June 2011 - 09:47
#22
Posted 12 June 2011 - 09:55
#23
Posted 12 June 2011 - 10:23
#24
Posted 12 June 2011 - 10:25
Perez has put in some great drivers and has great potential
Di Resta has put Sutil in the shade and been fast and consistent, largely error free
Maldonado has been fast, albeit crash-happy, and has overshadowed Barrichello
D'Ambrosio hasn't been bad either
#25
Posted 12 June 2011 - 11:19
Given the fact that Di Resta has come from DTM its even more impressive. Should F1 take more drivers from other non-single seater series?
#26
Posted 12 June 2011 - 11:29
#27
Posted 12 June 2011 - 11:36
Maldonado. He has out-qualified his team-mate - a championship contender in 2009 let's not forget - in, I think, four of the seven races so far, including three consecutively. He drove a superb race in Monaco. Perez and di Resta have had some good performances, but neither has really caught my eye like Maldonado did in Monaco, except perhaps Perez in Australia. I think it's unfair to try to judge D'ambrosio because the car is so bad. With that in mind:
1: Maldonado.
2: Perez.
3: di Resta.
Whereas Di Resta has only outqualified Sutil in 6 out of 7 - Don't quite follow your logic...
#28
Posted 12 June 2011 - 11:37
#29
Posted 12 June 2011 - 11:57
#30
Posted 12 June 2011 - 12:08
#31
Posted 12 June 2011 - 12:09
#32
Posted 12 June 2011 - 12:13
Good batch this year id say
#33
Posted 12 June 2011 - 14:14
Maldonado, in the other hand, is making the overated Hulkenberg looks really crappy atm. The most funny thing is people making excuse for the Hulk by claiming Rubens lost motivation.
F1 fact: Maldonado >>> Hulkenberg
PS: What a fraud GP2 is. Koba and Buemi looked crappy there but are good. Hulk looked better compared to Pastor but he isn't.
Edited by Kubiccia, 12 June 2011 - 14:15.
#34
Posted 12 June 2011 - 14:16
lol at the hype towards DiResta. Sutil is a average driver, so nothing exceptional to beat him.
Maldonado, in the other hand, is making the overated Hulkenberg looks really crappy atm. The most funny thing is people making excuse for the Hulk by claiming Rubens lost motivation.
F1 fact: Maldonado >>> Hulkenberg
PS: What a fraud GP2 is. Koba and Buemi looked crappy there but are good. Hulk looked better compared to Pastor but he isn't.
Lol. Hulkenberg is like 5 x better than MAL though. MAL just has the money. Williams need the $ mucho.
How many yrs did MAL had to win the GP2 champ?
Edited by HAM, 12 June 2011 - 14:17.
#35
Posted 12 June 2011 - 14:17
Edited by HAM, 12 June 2011 - 14:18.
#36
Posted 12 June 2011 - 14:28
Lol. Hulkenberg is like 5 x better than MAL though. MAL just has the money. Williams need the $ mucho.
How many yrs did MAL had to win the GP2 champ?
I think it's fair to say that in all probability Hulkenberg is better than Maldonado, but I think the problem is that you go for this view that since Hulkenberg is better than Maldonado, therefore Maldonado must be rubbish.
It's easy to say we'd take a very good talent over a good talent and money, but we've not got people to pay.
Edited by ryan86, 12 June 2011 - 14:29.
#37
Posted 12 June 2011 - 14:35
He has plenty of races to screw up massively in so let's wait and see...
#38
Posted 12 June 2011 - 14:43
I would say perez, he did a superb job in australia and who knows what he could have done in monaco when he managed to get into q3... kobayashi was 5th in that race, starting from 13th.. sooo.
#39
Posted 12 June 2011 - 14:45
This. Some people have an agenda to fill. They think that because Maldonado is a pay driver he is by default worse than Hulkenberg. Claiming Barrichello has lost motivation to make Hulkenberg look better is just ridiculous and completely impossible to prove.lol at the hype towards DiResta. Sutil is a average driver, so nothing exceptional to beat him.
Maldonado, in the other hand, is making the overated Hulkenberg looks really crappy atm. The most funny thing is people making excuse for the Hulk by claiming Rubens lost motivation.
F1 fact: Maldonado >>> Hulkenberg
PS: What a fraud GP2 is. Koba and Buemi looked crappy there but are good. Hulk looked better compared to Pastor but he isn't.
#41
Posted 12 June 2011 - 15:03
He was only 5th because of the safety car. I like Kobayashi but I don't actually think it was one of his better races. As for Perez, we'll never know but at the end of the day he did make an error.I would say perez, he did a superb job in australia and who knows what he could have done in monaco when he managed to get into q3... kobayashi was 5th in that race, starting from 13th.. sooo.
Edited by KateLM, 12 June 2011 - 15:05.
#42
Posted 12 June 2011 - 15:30
DiResta did what exactly to earn this much praise?
I would say perez, he did a superb job in australia and who knows what he could have done in monaco when he managed to get into q3... kobayashi was 5th in that race, starting from 13th.. sooo.
Lets see
Won championships in earlier open and closed cars
Achieved points in his first two races and finished ahead of his teamate in a good few of those races.
Out qualified his teamate six times out of seven quali sessions.
Doing this all without costing his team thousand of dollars in repair bills.
I really don't give a toss what "could have been done" in Monaco ... im glad Perez is ok .. but what could have been done by Perez in Monaco vs what has been done by Di Resta since the season started are different kettles of fish altogether. It was very obvious that the Saubers were tuned in for Monaco and its tyre management is among the best of the grid. Added points for the way Di Resta handles himself ... even after his only bad race and in the face of his stepfathers suicide he stayed classy. Serious showing of maturity there.
This is not to take anything away from Perez .. Hes a damn talented bloke .. but Di Resta has clearly earned the accolades hes getting so far .. in a Force India for gods sake .. Yes that team that now has some unknown Technical Director and had its crucial technical department essentially poached by Lotus last year.
Pastor has yet do earn any respect in my book. In my opinion from what Rubens has been saying to the press he cant be bothered as the car really is a piece of tripe .. Its no excuse obviously .. but i really do not believe Maldonado is in "seasoned driver" mode as yet .. You don't turn in on someone overtaking you on the inside ... yes it can be argued that Lewis was being way too aggressive .. however .. Williams NEEDED those points .. get the damn car home and get points rather than crash it trying to defend 1 position.
Di Resta and to a slightly lesser extent Perez have been driving like seasoned f1 pilots this season. Maldonado is not as bad as Petrov last year.. it might get worse it might get better but at the moment ..Di Resta is clearly earning his place as the best rookie. The tables may turn and someone else may bubble to the top but .. right now ..its clearly obvious the guy appears to be the real deal.
#43
Posted 12 June 2011 - 15:42
as for me Perez is more "active" on track , 2-3 years and he will know what he can do and what he cant do in F1.
he indeed crashes alot but still I have very good opinion about him , alittle bit of experience and hes gonna give us thrills race by race...
#44
Posted 12 June 2011 - 15:50
I would like to point out though to the people who are crediting Ruben's lack of motivation for why Maldonado has outperformed at times recently, then I think it's only fair to consider the off track dramas for Sutil as a contributing factor in his performance against Di Resta. I highly doubt Sutil is having a purple patch with his own form.
#45
Posted 12 June 2011 - 18:45
I think they've all done a pretty good job. Di Resta consistently the most impressive and doesn't come across like a rookie at all. Maldonado seems to be the most improved and if the trend continues he might have a surprisingly bright future.
I would like to point out though to the people who are crediting Ruben's lack of motivation for why Maldonado has outperformed at times recently, then I think it's only fair to consider the off track dramas for Sutil as a contributing factor in his performance against Di Resta. I highly doubt Sutil is having a purple patch with his own form.