Time for Hamilton to be banned
#1
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:16
#3
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:19
Lewis came off the corner much quicker and got squeezed! He is the Simoncelli of F1 at the moment
#4
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:19
#5
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:20
#6
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:20
ThisAfter Canada I think one race out would do him good.
#7
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:20
#8
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:21
#9
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:21
#10
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:22
#11
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:22
#12
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:22
#13
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:23
#14
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:24
#15
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:25
.
#16
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:30
#17
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:30
#18
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:31
#19
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:32
Advertisement
#20
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:32
No, it's a worthy enough topic. Although I question the initiator's motives...Stupid topic.
The worry I have is that overtaking is hard enough as is. Hamilton tried three overtakes today that went wrong. Webber was a start shemozz, on a damp track, racing incident. The second saw Schumacher cynically push him onto the grass. The third was Button's one-or-two moves. The miasma of the Schumacher Rule. It needs a rethink - get rid of the moving rule, make someone stick to the line they're on when someone's overtaking, after all you can get them back, if you're better than them, on the same terms...
#21
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:35
No, it's a worthy enough topic. Although I question the initiator's motives...
The worry I have is that overtaking is hard enough as is. Hamilton tried three overtakes today that went wrong. Webber was a start shemozz, on a damp track, racing incident. The second saw Schumacher cynically push him onto the grass. The third was Button's one-or-two moves. The miasma of the Schumacher Rule. It needs a rethink - get rid of the moving rule, make someone stick to the line they're on when someone's overtaking, after all you can get them back, if you're better than them, on the same terms...
Some how methinks you would be calling for Webber to be banned should the situation be reversed...
#22
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:36
Webber has a LOT more previous. Hamilton has precisely one incident - and that in the last race.Some how methinks you would be calling for Webber to be banned should the situation be reversed...
#23
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:37
#24
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:38
Webber has a LOT more previous. Hamilton has precisely one incident - and that in the last race.
Ah ok then...
#25
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:39
Great topic.
#26
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:39
YepStupid topic.
#27
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:40
Banned for his team mate making an error and not seeing him? That would be odd. Hamilton's a racer, he knows he can't just sit behind Button and watch the front pack get away. He made a decent move, his team mate cut him off.
And the crash with Webber? And the speed limit? And the wreckless driving around with a broken car? I wonder what he could have achieved in the full race distance.
#28
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:40
#29
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:41
#30
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:41
The usual backlash which will drag on for weeks.
Lewis came off the corner much quicker and got squeezed! He is the Simoncelli of F1 at the moment
Haha, good comparison, both very talented and fast but magnetic to incidents.
Lewis will absolutely have to change after this race.
#31
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:42
#32
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:43
No, it's a worthy enough topic. Although I question the initiator's motives...
The worry I have is that overtaking is hard enough as is. Hamilton tried three overtakes today that went wrong. Webber was a start shemozz, on a damp track, racing incident. The second saw Schumacher cynically push him onto the grass. The third was Button's one-or-two moves. The miasma of the Schumacher Rule. It needs a rethink - get rid of the moving rule, make someone stick to the line they're on when someone's overtaking, after all you can get them back, if you're better than them, on the same terms...
So what were your motives for starting this thread then? http://forums.autosp...howtopic=126880
#33
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:44
#34
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:45
did you make the same complaint when ensign started a thread like this about Webber?
Lewham really needs to be taught a lesson - seems he hasn't learnt anything - even though he CONTINUALLY tells us he will learn from this....lol
OP - this is a Lewis love fest site, you won't get a fair result
Edited by Raelene, 12 June 2011 - 17:48.
#35
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:45
And the crash with Webber? And the speed limit? And the wreckless driving around with a broken car? I wonder what he could have achieved in the full race distance.
#36
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:46
#37
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:47
#38
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:49
For the reasons stated. Webber has been a positive danger with his "overtake me and I will crash you out" attitude. That's the antithesis of racing. I could keep everyone behind me at Monaco in a Lada with that sort of driving.So what were your motives for starting this thread then? http://forums.autosp...howtopic=126880
#39
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:49
Advertisement
#40
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:49
So ban? No. For his own good does he need to curb his eagerness to pass at any chicnk of a gap? Yes.
Edited by P123, 12 June 2011 - 17:50.
#41
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:50
For the reasons stated. Webber has been a positive danger with his "overtake me and I will crash you out" attitude. That's the antithesis of racing. I could keep everyone behind me at Monaco in a Lada with that sort of driving.
ROFLMAO - and you don't reckon that's lewham's attitude!!!!!!
#42
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:50
You mean like overtaking a car on a warm up lap?lol thread makes me laugh , seriously ban , Micheal has committed bigger sins & got away
#43
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:51
No. Before Monaco this year, name three incidents where Hamilton punted someone off whilst racing.ROFLMAO - and you don't reckon that's lewham's attitude!!!!!!
#44
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:51
Webber has a LOT more previous. Hamilton has precisely one incident - and that in the last race.
Webber has been in F1 for 10 years, Hamilton 4 years so it's no surprise Webber has had more previous. But when did Webber last get a penalty?
As for claiming Lewis has had ONE incident?
#45
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:51
#46
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:52
Haha, good comparison, both very talented and fast but magnetic to incidents.
Lewis will absolutely have to change after this race.
I agree with the talented and fast but anyone who knows anything about motogp realises
that Simoncelli is being targeted by other drivers who quite frankly are just as aggressive.
I remember the whole grid ganging up on patrese and making his life a misery..it happens.
When you break down each individual incident Hamilton has been involved in recently, they can be viewed
Both ways. Problem for him is how many he has been involved in!
#47
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:53
#48
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:55
His interview with BBC just stinks of PR bull$hit, i'd like to know what Hamilton really thinks of it
#49
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:55
Webber hardly ever gets penalized. It's the nature of things. Schumacher didn't get penalized for twice cheating to try to get the title (tippexing out "vice-champion" doesn't count) let alone the billion other incidents. Benetton didn't get penalized for software cheating and so on. Looking at penalties is a bit like saying Jack the Ripper never existed.Webber has been in F1 for 10 years, Hamilton 4 years so it's no surprise Webber has had more previous. But when did Webber last get a penalty?
#50
Posted 12 June 2011 - 17:57
It just wasn't his day today. I thought button could've given him a bit more space and Lewis' move on webber was coming from quite far back.
His interview with BBC just stinks of PR bull$hit, i'd like to know what Hamilton really thinks of it
What else is he meant to say? Putting Button on blast will only attract more armchair experts slating that Hamilton is the anti-christ. This thread is as stupid as the Webber one after OZ last year calling for him to be banned, I think it should be closed personally.