Brands circuit changes
#1
Posted 12 December 2011 - 18:05
http://www.stevespla...brandshatch.pdf
Advertisement
#2
Posted 12 December 2011 - 18:12
Idiots...
Plans have been submitted to the local council for Graham Hill Bend to be altered out of all recognition
http://www.stevespla...brandshatch.pdf
#3
Posted 12 December 2011 - 18:14
Idiots...
I agree , why , oh why
#4
Posted 12 December 2011 - 18:15
A travesty to one of the UK's most famous and historic circuits!Plans have been submitted to the local council for Graham Hill Bend to be altered out of all recognition
http://www.stevespla...brandshatch.pdf
Question: Why?
Answer: So that BH can then join the rest of the UK sanitized circuits i.e. Mallory Park, Silverstone, Snetterton et al.
:cynic mode on: perhaps it's for better positioning of the cameras for coverage of BSB/WSB diesel events. :cynic mode off:
crap.
Edited by exclubracer, 12 December 2011 - 18:19.
#5
Posted 12 December 2011 - 18:24
#6
Posted 12 December 2011 - 18:43
http://www.thebikein...h-changes-2012/
Jonathan Palmer, Motorsport Vision boss: “At the moment, Graham Hill is neither fast enough to be a real challenge on a Superbike or slow enough to be a place for a safe overtake. The plans we have submitted will make the track between Druids and it totally straight and the actual corner a contstant radius left.
“It will maximise overtaking on the Indy circuit but that will also affect laptimes on the full GP circuit and we are due to come here three times in 2012. Nothing will move on it until the end of next year, subject to the plans being approved by the local authority.”
Any Comments?
#7
Posted 12 December 2011 - 18:59
Imagine a brake failure to say a fast truck as it hammers down the hill from Druids. The new hairpin means it could cross over to Paddock and collide with other competitors.
Yeh
Great TV- blazing inferno- death - great for the Sun front page.
If they could build a ramp to take the blazing truck into the crowd at Paddock even better
It's got my vote could take over from 'Strictly Cum Wa**ing', 'Britains Got Sh*g All Talent', 'Rabbits got Myxomatosis on Ice'.
I want to promote 'Death Race 2012'
If we could get the Scottish idiot Junky Stewart to build a 100 foot high armco barrier between the down hill plunge and the paddock tunnel and give the punters the oppotunity to vote for the best attempt at clearing it then 'quids in'.
I haven't been so excited since Carmelo Expletive sunk his sword into the heart of GP racing when he announced MotoLawnmower to replace the 125s.
Had to reduce the emotions to post - What a load of bollocks - I'm so 'xcited
#8
Posted 12 December 2011 - 19:05
Yeh
Great TV- blazing inferno- death - great for the Sun front page.
If they could build a ramp to take the blazing truck into the crowd at Paddock even better
It's got my vote could take over from 'Strictly Cum Wa**ing', 'Britains Got Sh*g All Talent', 'Rabbits got Myxomatosis on Ice'.
I want to promote 'Death Race 2012'
If we could get the Scottish idiot Junky Stewart to build a 100 foot high armco barrier between the down hill plunge and the paddock tunnel and give the punters the oppotunity to vote for the best attempt at clearing it then 'quids in'.
I haven't been so excited since Carmelo Expletive sunk his sword into the heart of GP racing when he announced MotoLawnmower to replace the 125s.
Had to reduce the emotions to post - What a load of bollocks - I'm so 'xcited
Perxactly , Tony , another well thought out statement ..................
#9
Posted 12 December 2011 - 19:19
#10
Posted 12 December 2011 - 19:32
Yeh
Great TV- blazing inferno- death - great for the Sun front page.
If they could build a ramp to take the blazing truck into the crowd at Paddock even better
It's got my vote could take over from 'Strictly Cum Wa**ing', 'Britains Got Sh*g All Talent', 'Rabbits got Myxomatosis on Ice'.
I want to promote 'Death Race 2012'
If we could get the Scottish idiot Junky Stewart to build a 100 foot high armco barrier between the down hill plunge and the paddock tunnel and give the punters the oppotunity to vote for the best attempt at clearing it then 'quids in'.
I haven't been so excited since Carmelo Expletive sunk his sword into the heart of GP racing when he announced MotoLawnmower to replace the 125s.
Had to reduce the emotions to post - What a load of bollocks - I'm so 'xcited
Calm down Tony, you're on the money yet again
Although I agree with you 100%, don't be giving yourself a dose of the vapours!!
#11
Posted 12 December 2011 - 22:44
#12
Posted 12 December 2011 - 22:59
I saw the plans recently, words fail me, just awful, how can this be for real?
#13
Posted 13 December 2011 - 09:55
to consider ripping up a track and changing a complete corners for television purposes and to see the spectactle of 2 droneathones passing each other is thick to say the least, its not just the bikes that are going to the dogs they are doing it to the circuits aswell!
the problem is most of the people on the comittee who will have "decided" this most likely have never been on a track or tried to race on one, what they dont realise is you actually change the whole nature of the circuit, not just one or two corners.
look at donington - what a success that was, or mallory park where they added those chicanes for rider safety then dont go there anymore because they made it worse and they claim its unsafe.
its not enough now to just get extra drive onto a straight or to be quicker mid corner as this wont be picked up on tv by knee down man, it seems the only way you can pass these days is making lunges on the brakes then have an inquiry afterwards about what went wrong when the 5 bike accident occurs.
then you have to either blame the bike or the rider with the teams running about half assaulting each other as the new style of the sport has no morals, then after the 4th big accident happens at the same modified corner you ban the circuit as its too dangerous and shift it to magny cours in france so the tv and the money plush teams can enjoy the holiday after going to assen.
remember the only track they have to get rid of is knockhill and you no longer have the BRITISH championship, what youll have is a money driven, tv enhanced championship where half the rounds will be at one or two tracks and the rest scattered around mainland europe.
you think it cant get worse then it happens, you really cant script all this
#14
Posted 13 December 2011 - 12:37
#15
Posted 13 December 2011 - 14:51
to those that know best. This plan really is a disaster waiting to happen and the ruination of one of the last half decent circuits
left in the UK.
#16
Posted 13 December 2011 - 15:21
Why can't these idiots stick to what they do best, propping up a bar with their buddies, and leave the serious business
to those that know best. This plan really is a disaster waiting to happen and the ruination of one of the last half decent circuits
left in the UK.
How true , and very well said , Rod
#17
Posted 13 December 2011 - 15:43
That corner was only altered about 5 years a go, there was nothing wrong with how it was then!!
#18
Posted 13 December 2011 - 17:14
Its still got to go before the local planners, I presume Kent county council? if enough people write to them email them etc it might get thrown out?
That corner was only altered about 5 years a go, there was nothing wrong with how it was then!!
Sevenoaks Council, the application is here
http://pa.sevenoaks....l=LTCRIABK8V000
You can make a comment on the application on that page.
Edited by Tonka, 13 December 2011 - 17:17.
#19
Posted 13 December 2011 - 17:43
Sevenoaks Council, the application is here
http://pa.sevenoaks....l=LTCRIABK8V000
You can make a comment on the application on that page.
Thanks for that, have made my objection known, please do the same guys.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 13 December 2011 - 17:45
I saw the plans recently, words fail me, just awful, how can this be for real?
Sterling can you mobilize the troops on the TNF forum, & lets let the planning department know how we feel?
#21
Posted 13 December 2011 - 19:19
#22
Posted 13 December 2011 - 19:42
The modification to the esses at Donington were necessary to meet the MSA safety requirements for run off in front of the hospitality units there. It made the pit straight quicker and Redgate entry slightly faster (catching a few out!) but the changes have been met in general with satisfactory remarks.
If Brands/MSV carry out this plan of change I am sure it will take out the enjoyment of that particular part of the track where the drivers are going at it balls out sometimes 2 or 3 abreast.... oh well!
#23
Posted 13 December 2011 - 20:29
Sterling can you mobilize the troops on the TNF forum, & lets let the planning department know how we feel?
Hi Graham, it is not just 7Oaks Council ( usually pretty strict !) but MSV and Dr Jonathan Palmer...................that has to be a good way to let the company know that competitors and enthusiasts for 40/50 years object to the changes, but then.........maybe we just are not the target audience anymore....................
#24
Posted 13 December 2011 - 21:42
in the mean time , can I suggest that the planing department are bombarded with communications that emphasise the character of Brands and how the proposal, if approved, will radically alter the character of this now almost lone old style circuit. I think too that the safety issue can be shown to be bogus since there is nothing but a substantial expanse of grass on the outside of Bottom Bend.
Remember, he has to get it past the planners. Please do get emailing/writing.
Edited by Russell Burrows, 13 December 2011 - 22:11.
#25
Posted 13 December 2011 - 22:56
shocking idea to alter Graham hill bend out of recocnition like that.... I have however heard via other sources that the plug has been pulled on the idea...lets hope so..
#26
Posted 14 December 2011 - 10:14
Suitable comment submitted!!Plans have been submitted to the local council for Graham Hill Bend to be altered out of all recognition
http://www.stevespla...brandshatch.pdf
#27
Posted 14 December 2011 - 10:55
Edited by rd500, 14 December 2011 - 10:55.
#28
Posted 14 December 2011 - 11:03
#29
Posted 14 December 2011 - 12:12
Suitable comment submitted!!
I posted a comment on the Sevenoaks planning website yesterday, but presumably it is nailed on the back of a toilet door down in the Municiple Office Dungeons, 'cause it aint on their website.
Bigger Bastards than Palmer
#30
Posted 14 December 2011 - 12:15
Sadly this proposed "improvement" will obliterate the sole remaining tarmac from the original pre-Druids layout.
#31
Posted 14 December 2011 - 12:32
Brands Hatch has a worldwide reputation for the sweeping and flowing nature of the circuit layout and, while i'm not one to normally disagree with progress for the sake of worthy evolution, i'm disgusted by the short-sightedness of this design proposal. The nature of the circuit as a whole (especially the short 'Indy' circuit) will be fundamentally altered by this stop-start-stop-start section which is out of character with the rest of the circuit as a whole in any configuration, and sending traffic back toward the Paddock Bend entry on this new section would be positively dangerous.
I have no good points to raise in terms of this proposal aside of more camera time for sponsors at low speed through this section, and if this is deemed 'a good thing' then i fear we have forgotten what 'racing' means in 'motor racing'.
Yours, disgusted of Aycliffe
#32
Posted 14 December 2011 - 14:46
http://www.motorspor...contact-us.aspx
I don't know if he or any of his companies are on Twitter. I can't find them.
#33
Posted 14 December 2011 - 15:20
Not much point on RC - better on TNF. Anyone want to start it or...Tonka's Brands alert on the car thead can't be accessed and a rumour has started that its all been dropped anyway. A man could become suspicious.
#34
Posted 14 December 2011 - 15:25
Not much point on RC - better on TNF. Anyone want to start it or...
Go for it Mike
#35
Posted 14 December 2011 - 16:38
Done! If it has been dropped I wonder why the story where Palmer was commenting was in the press last Friday the 9thGo for it Mike
#36
Posted 14 December 2011 - 18:39
Done! If it has been dropped I wonder why the story where Palmer was commenting was in the press last Friday the 9th
Nice one Mike, hope the car boys that don't like the plan can register their objections too.
#37
Posted 14 December 2011 - 23:18
#38
Posted 15 December 2011 - 10:15
The page has been taken down.Sevenoaks Council, the application is here
http://pa.sevenoaks....l=LTCRIABK8V000
You can make a comment on the application on that page.
#39
Posted 15 December 2011 - 10:19
Advertisement
#40
Posted 15 December 2011 - 10:58
with the funny handshakes.
D'you mean the one where you count your fingers after?
#41
Posted 15 December 2011 - 15:00
D'you mean the one where you count your fingers after?
And check your pockets for your wallet after!
#42
Posted 15 December 2011 - 15:20
It's back up now. I wouldn't believe its been knocked on the head until it comes from the council.Interesting, hopefully its dead & buried? But I don't trust these planners & high flying business people with the funny handshakes.
#43
Posted 15 December 2011 - 20:48
Imagine a brake failure to say a fast truck as it hammers down the hill from Druids. The new hairpin means it could cross over to Paddock and collide with other competitors.
After they build the tarmac staircase, I suppose? Have you been to Brands Hatch? There's a bit of an elevation difference, you know!
#44
Posted 16 December 2011 - 06:38
D'you mean the one where you count your fingers after?
And your watch
Edited by tonyed, 16 December 2011 - 06:39.
#45
Posted 17 December 2011 - 00:14
I don't see a great significance in this issue. If the owners think the re profiling of the corner will be beneficial they probably have given it some thought.
For the wider public Brands Hatch is of no concern since it lost F1 status. It remains a fairly dangerous old track which seems to be unsuitable even for F2 as the Surtees death indicates. Several crash zones are deadly for open wheel race cars. Cars leaving the track due to driver or technical faults will hit the barriers at high speed levels raising concerns that drivers will be exposed to massive impact shocks and that wheels can be separated and return to the circuit.
QUOTE
Erm...F1 status??...F2?...open wheel race cars?...driver or technical faults?...wheels can be separated...blah blah blah
Do you you seriously believe that you 'four wheeled johnnies' are the only ones who have any interest in the configuration of the UK's most historic race circuit?
With the greatest respect... get a life.
To add...FFS
Edited by exclubracer, 17 December 2011 - 00:17.
#46
Posted 17 December 2011 - 00:42
Do you you seriously believe that you 'four wheeled johnnies' are the only ones who have any interest in the configuration of the UK's most historic race circuit?
With the greatest respect... get a life. To add...FFS
Mick, that's one of the posts from the Racing Comments thread about Brands?
#47
Posted 17 December 2011 - 00:47
Correct Mike, I just copied over here for info...Mick, that's one of the posts from the Racing Comments thread about Brands?
Just to add... Mike, did you see my comment re Rob Gourlay on the 'career moves' thread?
O/T, sorry!
Edited by exclubracer, 17 December 2011 - 00:53.
#48
Posted 17 December 2011 - 01:26
I hadn't seen it Mick & you could very well, be right...Just to add... Mike, did you see my comment re Rob Gourlay on the 'career moves' thread?
O/T, sorry!
#49
Posted 17 December 2011 - 09:43
Has anyone heard any comments from Palmer in the last week?
#50
Posted 17 December 2011 - 12:51
Has anyone heard any comments from Palmer in the last week?
Not recently but this earlier...I guess "a contstant radius left" is another way of saying hairpin - btw. the spelling error is theirs, not mine!
Jonathan Palmer, Motorsport Vision boss: “At the moment, Graham Hill is neither fast enough to be a real challenge on a Superbike or slow enough to be a place for a safe overtake. The plans we have submitted will make the track between Druids and it totally straight and the actual corner a contstant radius left.