John Wyer and Alan Mann Racing
#1
Posted 05 February 2012 - 20:45
What am I missing, please ?
GRAHAM R
Advertisement
#2
Posted 05 February 2012 - 22:13
I don't think Mann and Wyer got on that well with each other.
#3
Posted 06 February 2012 - 06:01
#4
Posted 06 February 2012 - 06:32
He may also have thought that the money Ford spent a few years later on the F3L programme would have been better spent on his GT40s.
A lot of speculation there but I've always thought the the Ford section of Wyer's book was rather defensive about FAVO and his role in it.
#5
Posted 06 February 2012 - 08:50
#6
Posted 06 February 2012 - 09:15
Alan Mann Racing gets very scant mention in John Horsman's "Racing in the Rain" too. Reading between the lines there was some bad feeling by J. Wyer over the refusal by Ford to allow JWAE any DFV engines for the M2 gulf-Mirage, "...since all Cosworth production was reserved for the F1 teams , except for two or three engines set aside for (Len) Bailey's new creation the Ford F3L Prototype Group 6 (Alan Mann Racing) car." This left JWAE scratching around for an engine, they plumped for the BRM V12 "the only commercially-available F1 engine" they looked at and rejected the V12 Gurney-Weslake and the Brabham Repco "which, in retrospect, we should have chosen".Hhmmm. Maybe we will learn more from Alan's autobiography, which is now with his publishers, and will apparently be on the market later this year ....
Reading Horseman it is clear that J. Wyer was a somewhat difficult character and it is also astonishing just how much friction there was between JWAE, Ford UK and Ford USA outfits; throw Shelby and Holman Moody into the mix and it is a wonder that the GT40 did anything at all.
I have been looking for a copy of "The Certain Sound" for some years, it seems that it is necessary to take out a mortgage in order to purchase even a battered copy.
Edited by elansprint72, 06 February 2012 - 18:07.
#7
Posted 06 February 2012 - 09:40
I have been looking for a copy of "The Certain Sound" for some years, it seems that it is necessary to take out a mortgage in order to purchase even a battered copy.
Some years ago "That Certain Sound" used to be in all the 'bargain' sections of the motoring bookshop ads in Motor Sport, and I always used to think to myself "must get a copy of that some time". And then all of a sudden...
#8
Posted 06 February 2012 - 15:55
Alan Mann Racing gets very scant mention in John Horsman's "Racing in the Rain" too. Reading between the lines there was some bad feeling by JW over the refusal by Ford to allow JWAE any DFV engines for the M2 gulf-Mirage, "...since all Cosworth production was reserved for the F1 teams , except for two or three engines set aside for (Len) Bailey's new creation the Ford F3L Prototype Group 6 (Alan Mann Racing) car." This left JWAE scratching around for an engine, they plumped for the BRM V12 "the only commercially-available F1 engine" they looked at and rejected the V12 Gurney-Weslake and the Brabham Repco "which, in retrospect, we should have chosen".
I have both the Wyer & Horsman books & I tend to agree that JWAE were displeased not to have received the DFV engines for the Mirage. However, having just read Pritchard's Ford Versus Ferrari, where there are sections describing Alan Mann Racing's efforts, including the F3L, the engines allocated were all well below par & JWAE were probably better off not having them.
#9
Posted 06 February 2012 - 17:06
#10
Posted 06 February 2012 - 17:35
#11
Posted 06 February 2012 - 17:47
Alan Mann Racing was engaged to build and run "small" Fords at a time when the main works supported teams were switching to the 7-litre cars. John Wyer had always argued that the lightweight car was the better option and he may have thought that his Ford Advanced Vehicles should have run that programme. The fact that AMR was not successful could have increased his resentment.
He may also have thought that the money Ford spent a few years later on the F3L programme would have been better spent on his GT40s.
I can't remember where I read it (Wyer's book or ?), but I recall reading some quote somewhere that Wyer said something to the effect of "In retrospect, Ford should have let us (JWAE) take over the F3L program" (paraphrase).
It did seem that JW felt that they could have done a better job than AMR on the F3L, although as has been pointed out in this thread, once they got the DFV, they had lots of vibration problems in long-distance races.
Edited by Emery0323, 06 February 2012 - 17:48.
#12
Posted 06 February 2012 - 18:04
Willment was a director and he suggested the name but I don't think he was heavily involved in the company. Wyer was the major shareholder and the chairman of the company. I doubt whether they ever said what JW stood for, but there is no doubt who was the senior person in the company.The JW in JWAE was John Willment not John Wyer.
Wyer may have believed that Ford should have let JWAE run the F3L programme, but I think it unlikely that the DFV car would have been more successful than the GT40s in 1968-69.
#13
Posted 06 February 2012 - 18:35
Willment was a director and he suggested the name but I don't think he was heavily involved in the company. Wyer was the major shareholder and the chairman of the company. I doubt whether they ever said what JW stood for, but there is no doubt who was the senior person in the company.
Wyer may have believed that Ford should have let JWAE run the F3L programme, but I think it unlikely that the DFV car would have been more successful than the GT40s in 1968-69.
Horsman says that Willment was brought in by Wyer to provide some financial security; there is no mention of him being involved in the building or racing side of things.
The flat-plane DFV tended to rattle things around and the Weslake engine, whilst smooth, would often not start and if it did it would run on less than all twelve. Not a happy time. I vaguely remember reading about all of this in Motoring News.
It is interesting re-reading all of this again, however, it is always interesting when folks, who were there at the time, all tell different versions of the same story; this illustrates how important it is for journalists not to only talk to one person where many parties are involved. Thus are legends and myths made.
#14
Posted 06 February 2012 - 20:52
#15
Posted 06 February 2012 - 21:08
Never mind it was still a very very special meeting.
#16
Posted 06 February 2012 - 21:30
Wyer may have believed that Ford should have let JWAE run the F3L programme, but I think it unlikely that the DFV car would have been more successful than the GT40s in 1968-69.
Agreed, JW's record with the GT40s in 1968-69 speaks for itself. The comment was noteworthy primarily in that it suggested an intramural rivalry / turf battle within the Ford camp, with Wyer feeling he'd been slighted by Ford management. The F3L had so many teething troubles, it would have taken a massive effort to make it a winner!
#17
Posted 07 February 2012 - 07:01
I hadn't heard that. Could you tell us more?John Wyer had made a pigs ear of the GT40 programme in 1965 and as a result was PNG at Ford.It was the hard work by John Willment who persuaded Ford to go back into business with John Willment Automobile Engineering.
#18
Posted 07 February 2012 - 17:11
A bit like Rootes/Chrysler, with people like Alan Fraser and George Bevan dealing direct with Board members rather than through Marcus Chambers and later Des O'Dell.
Stuart Turner's arrival at Ford seems to have ended it. IIRC he says something like "We just didn't understand each other: there was no chemistry" about him and Alan Mann in his book. I'm sure I've seen an Alan Mann quote along the lines "He didn't like me and I didn't like him".
#19
Posted 07 February 2012 - 22:17
Incidentally, it was the poisonous internal politics within the Ford multiple-approach racing programme that so disaffected Phil Hill that he eagerly signed-up with Jim Hall and Chaparral Cars for 1966. He still remained very firm friends with John Wyer until the latter passed away. Old 'Death Ray' had sympathised with his decision.
DCN
Edited by Doug Nye, 07 February 2012 - 22:22.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 07 February 2012 - 23:19
Incidentally, it was the poisonous internal politics within the Ford multiple-approach racing programme that so disaffected Phil Hill that he eagerly signed-up with Jim Hall and Chaparral Cars for 1966. He still remained very firm friends with John Wyer until the latter passed away. Old 'Death Ray' had sympathised with his decision.
DCN
All of this was way before my time, but they do say hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, perhaps Mr Fords fury at being scorned by Mr Ferrari poisoned the whole of Fords Le Mans enterprise right from the start.
If I have interpreted Ford's Le Mans program correctly Ford didn't set out to win Le Mans they set out to humiliate Ferrari, IMHO the latter objective with a 'throw all the money it takes' approach and 'stock block dogma' blinded Ford from a rational approach that might have achieved the same outcome in the long run.
I believe it cost Ford just £100,000 pounds to dominate Formula One from 1968 to 1982 has anyone ever calculated how much it cost Ford to win Le Mans four times ?
#21
Posted 07 February 2012 - 23:46
John Wyer said $2.2m in 1964, $4.5m in 1965 and $7m in both 1966 and 1967. Ford weren't really sponsors of the JWAE programme but they did provide an operating subsidy for the support of GT40 private owners. The sums involved were trivial compared with 1964-67.I believe it cost Ford just £100,000 pounds to dominate Formula One from 1968 to 1982 has anyone ever calculated how much it cost Ford to win Le Mans four times ?
I have never seen any evidence, but I would be very surprised if the £100k paid to Cosworth was Ford's only expenditure on Formula One in the late 60s. The Tyrrells weren't the same colour as the Ford badge by coincidence.
#22
Posted 08 February 2012 - 00:45
John Wyer said $2.2m in 1964, $4.5m in 1965 and $7m in both 1966 and 1967. Ford weren't really sponsors of the JWAE programme but they did provide an operating subsidy for the support of GT40 private owners. The sums involved were trivial compared with 1964-67.
I have never seen any evidence, but I would be very surprised if the £100k paid to Cosworth was Ford's only expenditure on Formula One in the late 60s. The Tyrrells weren't the same colour as the Ford badge by coincidence.
Wow ! That's $ twenty million in four years ! No wonder the pressure was on for anyone taking Henry's Benjamins, competition for them was probably not conducive to friendly relations between the rival organisations, let alone the various Ford departments administering them !
I'd always wondered about the shade of blue chosen by Tyrrell, in 1973, might have been '74 I remember having a press hand out or similar suggesting Tyrrell were working with an annual budget of a piffling £ 600 k in those times probably less than $1.2 million which presumably included a hefty sum of French Francs from Elf ?
Dividing the 20 million Ford spent on Le Mans by one years Tyrrell budget is 16 teams for a year or 16 years of sponsorship for Tyrrell, seems a way over the odds price to have paid for 4 Le Mans victories. Does anyone have any data on what sort of budgets Porsche or Ferrari might have been spending around the '64 to '67 period ?
#23
Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:15
one of the reasons that the Porsche family got tossed out of the company was that Ferry found out F. Piech spent about 15% of the firms profit on Le Mans.Wow ! That's $ twenty million in four years ! No wonder the pressure was on for anyone taking Henry's Benjamins, competition for them was probably not conducive to friendly relations between the rival organisations, let alone the various Ford departments administering them !
I'd always wondered about the shade of blue chosen by Tyrrell, in 1973, might have been '74 I remember having a press hand out or similar suggesting Tyrrell were working with an annual budget of a piffling £ 600 k in those times probably less than $1.2 million which presumably included a hefty sum of French Francs from Elf ?
Dividing the 20 million Ford spent on Le Mans by one years Tyrrell budget is 16 teams for a year or 16 years of sponsorship for Tyrrell, seems a way over the odds price to have paid for 4 Le Mans victories. Does anyone have any data on what sort of budgets Porsche or Ferrari might have been spending around the '64 to '67 period ?
#24
Posted 08 February 2012 - 01:31
one of the reasons that the Porsche family got tossed out of the company was that Ferry found out F. Piech spent about 15% of the firms profit on Le Mans.
Any idea what kind of sums we are talking about ?
#25
Posted 08 February 2012 - 18:24
Any idea what kind of sums we are talking about ?
look it up this evening.
#26
Posted 08 February 2012 - 18:24
Any idea what kind of sums we are talking about ?
look it up this evening.
#27
Posted 08 February 2012 - 21:43
#28
Posted 08 February 2012 - 22:33
DCN
#29
Posted 09 February 2012 - 01:39
Well I would - but for the fact mine sounds too silly...
DCN
#30
Posted 10 February 2012 - 13:02
I very much look forward to reading that. I wonder if he'll cover the events of April '68?Hhmmm. Maybe we will learn more from Alan's autobiography, which is now with his publishers, and will apparently be on the market later this year ....
Several writers have referred to Jim Clark being booked to drive an Alan Mann F3L at Brands on 7 April, but (words to the effect of...) Clark, offended by the lack of confirmation, elected instead to drive the Lotus 48 at Hockenheim. Interestingly, I've never read anything about Hill being double-booked that day. Nor have I ever sensed in any other race that Clark could 'elect' to drive for Chapman.
This chapter wasn't covered in the Motor Sport article, and I have heard that Mann has not wanted to speak about it. I wonder whether he will present his version of events in his autobiography?
Rgds
Paul