oh give over. His job is a motorsport commentator, not a historian. Anyway, he corrected himself immediately.
On Topic: I never thought i would say this back in the spring, but - i vastly prefer Sky's coverage now. Presenters and Commentary team are much better. The Edwards/DC has not worked out that well imho and they tend to just say what they see rather than look at the race as a whole. Now that Brundle is back as a pundit, he lets Croft do all the 'Ooooooh, Ahhhhh' bits while he studies the monitors and actually thinks of interesting things to say/inform the viewer.
No way, after watching Sky for the first half I started to the pre/after shows on BBC and the actual race on Sky (when possible). Yes the race commentary is better than on BBC but the presenters on BBC are much better! With Sky it is the same boring stuff again and again and again - all very serious and the just talk about the race and not much else. On BBC the are much more fun and joke around - they also talk about other stuff going on in F1 and not just regurgitate the same old stuff!
But I guess which one you prefer will depend on what your after, so really not one is better than the other. I have to say both are fine to watch, which is great!