http://www.telegraph...l-di-Resta.html
Controversy and the hamiltons, constant bedfellows
Edited by robefc, 30 July 2012 - 22:06.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:05
Edited by robefc, 30 July 2012 - 22:06.
Advertisement
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:09
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:14
di resta needs to worry about his pace compared to Hulkenberg more than a few quid.He's got a long career to get that money back, but wouldn't look as good if Hulk beats him over the season.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:17
Can i mess with your money and see how you like it, eh ?
Edited by pinkypants, 30 July 2012 - 22:19.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:17
di resta needs to worry about his pace compared to Hulkenberg more than a few quid.He's got a long career to get that money back, but wouldn't look as good if Hulk beats him over the season.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:18
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:18
I think a jury / judge will decide whether any "mess"ing has gone on, until then we only have allegations. I think people should keep that in mind as making statements such as he did / has incorrectly handled Di Resta's money is essentially defamation.
Edited by robefc, 30 July 2012 - 22:19.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:18
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:20
Well, you just echo what Paul has already said himself in that article: "I am fully focused on my racing. At the end of the day it is results that count for me and that is what will drive me forward, we have had a good year up to now and our aim is to carry that forward.”di resta needs to worry about his pace compared to Hulkenberg more than a few quid.He's got a long career to get that money back, but wouldn't look as good if Hulk beats him over the season.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:21
I think a jury / judge will decide whether any "mess"ing has gone on, until then we only have allegations. I think people should keep that in mind as making statements such as he did / has incorrectly handled Di Resta's money - if Hamilton wins his case you could be liable for a defamation lawsuit!
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:22
di resta needs to worry about his pace compared to Hulkenberg more than a few quid.He's got a long career to get that money back, but wouldn't look as good if Hulk beats him over the season.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:24
Keep telling yourself these things.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:41
Hamilton, the father of Lewis Hamilton, has brought a case for wrongful termination of contract and loss of earnings, while di Resta alleges he dismissed Hamilton after learning he had been misled over a multi-million pound deal with the Energy Drink company Go Fast
http://www.telegraph...l-di-Resta.html
Controversy and the hamiltons, constant bedfellows
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:42
Hamilton, the father of Lewis Hamilton, has brought a case for wrongful termination of contract and loss of earnings, while di Resta alleges he dismissed Hamilton after learning he had been misled over a multi-million pound deal with the Energy Drink company Go Fast
http://www.telegraph...l-di-Resta.html
Controversy and the hamiltons, constant bedfellows
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:45
Well, they Went FastGo Fast? The same company that sponsored Matthew Wilson and Henning Solberg in WRC. For... one race. Then suddently all the cash just went away.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 22:49
I am saying it as a warning to others as this is an open legal case in an English court - I'll refer it to the mods as ultimately the autosport forums that may end up being liable as they are giving people a platform to air their views
Posted 30 July 2012 - 23:09
stolen you mean to deprive a person of the ownership/use of what is theirs?to be stolen 1 million euros has nothing to do with his pace baby. "A few quid" lol. So he gets ripped off and must shut up because of his driving? Amazing.
Edited by itsademo, 30 July 2012 - 23:13.
Posted 30 July 2012 - 23:14
Posted 30 July 2012 - 23:15
I think a jury / judge will decide whether any "mess"ing has gone on, until then we only have allegations. I think people should keep that in mind as making statements such as he did / has incorrectly handled Di Resta's money - if Hamilton wins his case you could be liable for a defamation lawsuit!
Theres no shortage of stupid things said on here, but this just trumped them all.I am saying it as a warning to others as this is an open legal case in an English court - I'll refer it to the mods as ultimately the autosport forums that may end up being liable as they are giving people a platform to air their views
Posted 31 July 2012 - 06:42
That's exactly what I was thinking aboutGo Fast? The same company that sponsored Matthew Wilson and Henning Solberg in WRC. For... one race. Then suddently all the cash just went away.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 06:52
stolen you mean to deprive a person of the ownership/use of what is theirs?
clearly Di Resta did not have any of that money and from what we hear neither did anyone else so no stealing of anything but to haters.
BTW you cant see how his performance could impact on his worth to advertisers?
At best (for haters) you have a manager not maximising the worth of their client at worst for you a driver too imature to recognise his perfomance effects his worth to others!!
fact is most likely between those two options and/or a simple counter suite to try to deflect the fact he wanted more than he was worth and had to blame anyone other than himself and his performance
The situation is made more delicate by the fact that Di Resta has been taking guidance from the Sports Partnership, a company set up by Lewis Hamilton’s McLaren team-mate Jenson Button and his manager Richard Goddard.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 07:15
Go Team Hamilton! I've always wanted a proper reason to dislike di resta, other than him being the dullest man alive, and here it is!
Posted 31 July 2012 - 07:33
Posted 31 July 2012 - 07:57
do you really need me to explain what to most is clear?wtf are you talking about
to be stolen 1 million euros has nothing to do with his pace baby. "A few quid" lol. So he gets ripped off and must shut up because of his driving? Amazing.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 08:06
The situation is made more delicate by the fact that Di Resta has been taking guidance from the Sports Partnership, a company set up by Lewis Hamilton’s McLaren team-mate Jenson Button and his manager Richard Goddard.
DiResta simply wanted out of the contract - pastures new and all that. Trying to counter sue is a just a red herring.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 08:17
Posted 31 July 2012 - 08:28
Most likely explanation.I'm a bit confused by the article. Is the complaint from Di Resta that:
a. Hamilton snr failed to secure the Go Fast contract; or
b. Hamilton snr claimed to Di Resta that it would cost €2m to buy back his image rights from FI, whereas FI said it would cost only €1m - ie Hamilton intended to take €2m off Di Resta, give €1m to FI and trouser the remaining €1m?
If the former, I struggle to see where the case is.
If the latter, "After hearing nothing for some time" rather suggests that Hamilton snr wasn't doing much to put his nefarious plan into action.
Seems possible to me that FI gave an answer of €2m first time asked, got no response for a while so decided to lower the price on second time of asking in the hope of getting paid.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 08:29
Go Team Hamilton! I've always wanted a proper reason to dislike di resta, other than him being the dullest man alive, and here it is!
Posted 31 July 2012 - 08:32
I'm a bit confused by the article. Is the complaint from Di Resta that:
a. Hamilton snr failed to secure the Go Fast contract; or
b. Hamilton snr claimed to Di Resta that it would cost €2m to buy back his image rights from FI, whereas FI said it would cost only €1m - ie Hamilton intended to take €2m off Di Resta, give €1m to FI and trouser the remaining €1m?
If the former, I struggle to see where the case is.
If the latter, "After hearing nothing for some time" rather suggests that Hamilton snr wasn't doing much to put his nefarious plan into action.
Seems possible to me that FI gave an answer of €2m first time asked, got no response for a while so decided to lower the price on second time of asking in the hope of getting paid.
Edited by as65p, 31 July 2012 - 08:43.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 08:36
Edited by bourbon, 31 July 2012 - 08:38.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 08:41
I'm a bit confused by the article. Is the complaint from Di Resta that:
a. Hamilton snr failed to secure the Go Fast contract; or
b. Hamilton snr claimed to Di Resta that it would cost €2m to buy back his image rights from FI, whereas FI said it would cost only €1m - ie Hamilton intended to take €2m off Di Resta, give €1m to FI and trouser the remaining €1m?
If the former, I struggle to see where the case is.
If the latter, "After hearing nothing for some time" rather suggests that Hamilton snr wasn't doing much to put his nefarious plan into action.
Seems possible to me that FI gave an answer of €2m first time asked, got no response for a while so decided to lower the price on second time of asking in the hope of getting paid.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 08:42
GoFast not progressing with the contract negotiations, making there be little to no point in progressing negotiations with FI for the purchase of image rights to enable the conclusion of the GoFast contract. Which would also fit well with people's impression here that GoFast were highly unlikely to pay that kind of money to sponsor a driver.On a sidenote, "not doing much" would fit well with ...
Posted 31 July 2012 - 09:12
Posted 31 July 2012 - 09:12
Posted 31 July 2012 - 09:27
This is rather embarrassing for A. Hamilton. He should have tried to handle the matter on the down low, through arbitration or something. Making the whole thing into a public scandal is ridiculous and looks bad on him.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 09:30
Jenson, through his management company, is involved. Jenson is a past master in wriggling out of contracts, so my take is DiResta is just making a counter claim, spurious though it seems and is besmurching AH's reputation in the process.
Very poor form indeed
Posted 31 July 2012 - 09:41
he's defending himself in a suit filled by AH ... it's poor form to state your case when you are being sued? Cmon
Posted 31 July 2012 - 13:09
Go Team Hamilton! I've always wanted a proper reason to dislike di resta, other than him being the dullest man alive, and here it is!
Advertisement
Posted 31 July 2012 - 13:27
That and he's completely over rated. Had his ass handed to him by Sutil and now Hulkenberg.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 16:06
27 points vs 19 points...
Di Resta is more consistent than Hulkenberg at the moment.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 16:31
Edited by johnmhinds, 31 July 2012 - 16:34.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 16:44
Posted 31 July 2012 - 16:54
That and he's completely over rated. Had his ass handed to him by Sutil and now Hulkenberg.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 16:55
Well it depends what comes out about it. We have a dodgy sponsor involved and VJ Mallya.Can't imagine anyone hiring Hamilton as their manager again after this.
This makes it seem that he either did something wrong, or he was so untrusted by his client they thought he was doing something wrong. Either way he looks bad.
He could have just let everyone assume that DiResta has just chosen to go with Button's management as they spend time together training etc. and had his ear bent.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 16:58
I'm firmly in the "DiResta is a dullard" camp, and fed up of Sky almost constantly interviewing him, I dont even think he's that great a driver, certainly not worthy of the hype, but then we've seen that before.
That said, he's more than entitled to defend himself, and i hope he does, by the way, was it my imagination or was that Telegraph article edited to remove the name of company based in Grenada ?.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 16:58
Can't imagine anyone hiring Hamilton as their manager again after this.
This makes it seem that he either did something wrong, or he was so untrusted by his client they thought he was doing something wrong. Either way he looks bad.
He could have just let everyone assume that DiResta has just chosen to go with Button's management as they spend time together training etc. and had his ear bent.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 17:16
Hold on, your a Kimi fan, labelling another driver a 'dullard'......
As for the Telegraph article, the original reference to the Grenada based company and the value of money said to have been transfered to it has been removed from the article.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 17:32
One of the strongest pairings on the grid in my opinion. Can't believe DIR is facing criticism for being one of the very few who bother to go out their way on the grid to help the television pundits help the fans! The team are certainly delighted with him and I would imagine the sponsers are glad to have someone who is half articulate and presentable.
Posted 31 July 2012 - 17:36
This!
DiResta has gone way down in my estimations for besmirching AH.
At least Button had the class and grace to buy himself out of his contract without resorting to underhand tactics.
Edited by P123, 31 July 2012 - 17:38.