Jump to content


Photo
* * * - - 24 votes

Mercedes-AMG 2013 W04


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
3997 replies to this topic

#3751 JensonWDC

JensonWDC
  • Member

  • 478 posts
  • Joined: February 08

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:49

Malaysia will be the real test. hot temperature and fast corners. Can´t see them touching Ferrari, Lotus and RBR there tbh

Advertisement

#3752 rileyl

rileyl
  • Member

  • 462 posts
  • Joined: February 06

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:50

Very good result, was always going to go backwards.

Shame nico couldn't finish the race too for some good points.


I hope for a podium, however, just no chance! I think the team try to do a 2 stop race but the car fail. However, I have a feeling that the car's been set-up more towards to wet by the thick rear wing.

#3753 CHIUNDA

CHIUNDA
  • Member

  • 1,461 posts
  • Joined: July 10

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:50

Just wondering whether Mercedes would have raced Massa if they would have gone for a three stopper right from the off. It looked racey against Webber's Red Bull so at least the car is not too far away from the Ferrari and Energy Drink maker. But Lotus ... wow! Class of one.

#3754 MaxisOne

MaxisOne
  • Member

  • 1,395 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:51

I kept warning people about the hype ... been closely watching this team far too long to hype the team based on testing and quali pace.. They have always been decent when the tanks are empty.. They always get murdered in the race. However i think they have massively improved in tyre management since last season... they just need pace and better starts.

They are on the right path. That's all i can ask from the team at this point.

#3755 Markn93

Markn93
  • Member

  • 4,396 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:52

Don't know but HAM didn't show up on the top 5 speed trap. Did they give him a too long 7th gear?

Also, it just seems overall they don't get enough grip from the tyres, which might suggest a lack of downforce.

No one thought that after quali. Let's wait to see the status quo in 'normal' conditions. Malaysia might be the first indication of it.

#3756 baddog

baddog
  • Member

  • 24,302 posts
  • Joined: June 99

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:53

Same as last year then. Oh well.

#3757 MortenF1

MortenF1
  • Member

  • 20,294 posts
  • Joined: June 01

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:53

Feels amazing that fifth is slightly dissapointing, so overall, positive signs from all at AMG Mercedes! Would they have been closer had they gone for three stops from the off? 45.5 seconds down at the flag.

Edited by race addicted, 17 March 2013 - 07:54.


#3758 choyothe

choyothe
  • Member

  • 2,312 posts
  • Joined: March 12

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:54

Exactly. This has to be a cause for worry. Did the tyres take longer to warm up?

They said they were going to bring parts to Malaysia, I think they are indeed lacking downforce to Ferrari/Lotus/RBR.


I thought they just took it much easier than the others in the opening laps, as shown by both being able to stretch out the first stint so long.

#3759 molpid

molpid
  • Member

  • 317 posts
  • Joined: February 13

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:54

-very good tyre management on heavy fuel load but shity later on
- race pace seemed to be kinda equal [perhaps hamilton a tad quicker, but most of the time they had a ~5 sec difference]

Advertisement

#3760 femi

femi
  • Member

  • 6,768 posts
  • Joined: March 04

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:59

Don't know but HAM didn't show up on the top 5 speed trap. Did they give him a too long 7th gear?

Also, it just seems overall they don't get enough grip from the tyres, which might suggest a lack of downforce.


Grip was an issue, NR confirmed that. He described the experience as "strange".
I am taking a lot of postitives away though. I think the team tried to play it safe, whatever that means.

LH was able to display good pace towards the end, he very easily kept Webber behind in a straight fight and was catching Massa fast but on heavy fuel, it was a different story which might be due to setup - trying to preserve tyres. They were able to go long on the SS than most.

#3761 Coral

Coral
  • Member

  • 2,990 posts
  • Joined: January 07

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:59

Oh, so much doom and gloom! It's really unwarranted. Mercedes look as if they have a good base to work with. Remember before the start of the winter testing? Most people were predicting that Mercedes would be stuck in the midfield...or even as low as 15th. But one of them finished in front of a Red Bull! I reckon expectations have been built up a little too high since testing. And remember that this is not one of Lewis's best tracks...wait until Nurburgring, Montreal, etc. Yes Mercedes have a way to go but I think that there is much cause for optimism. :)

#3762 pinkypants

pinkypants
  • Member

  • 1,507 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:59

Agreed with the previous poster that look where McLaren are - they had an amazing end to 2012 but this year they are back to 2009 levels.

I'm very happy with 5th, if Mercedes can sort their reliability issues out. Remember Lewis out scored the 2nd RBR!

I think pace wise at the moment, we'd have to say Lotus > Ferrari/RBR > Mercedes > McLaren. We're a lot further up the order than I expected going into this season.

Real question is now if Mercedes have the depth and resources to drive development throughout the season and not get leap frogged by McLaren.

Edited by pinkypants, 17 March 2013 - 08:00.


#3763 peroa

peroa
  • Member

  • 9,127 posts
  • Joined: March 05

Posted 17 March 2013 - 07:59

It was an OK start, Q pace is good, race pace was also pretty good but the strategy didn't go like they hoped, seemed to me that they couldn't get the tyres working properly in the 2nd stint which then compromised them into a 3 stop when they were out of sequence with the leaders.
However, IMHO they could've got FM if everything went perfectly, P4 was max.

#3764 ivand911

ivand911
  • Member

  • 8,152 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:01

Nico has alternator problem?, battery got empty. Lauda says.

#3765 BernieEc

BernieEc
  • Member

  • 2,131 posts
  • Joined: August 11

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:05

I think P4/P5 was the best result. I don't think race pace is that bad. its a bit better than the red bulls IMHO

#3766 slmk

slmk
  • Member

  • 4,398 posts
  • Joined: April 11

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:07

Agreed with the previous poster that look where McLaren are - they had an amazing end to 2012 but this year they are back to 2009 levels.

I'm very happy with 5th, if Mercedes can sort their reliability issues out. Remember Lewis out scored the 2nd RBR!

I think pace wise at the moment, we'd have to say Lotus > Ferrari/RBR > Mercedes > McLaren. We're a lot further up the order than I expected going into this season.

Real question is now if Mercedes have the depth and resources to drive development throughout the season and not get leap frogged by McLaren.


If anything, Force India is faster than McLaren.

Mercedes has got an increased budget this year so that might help. I'm curious as to how the car was so slow on the straights...

#3767 baddog

baddog
  • Member

  • 24,302 posts
  • Joined: June 99

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:11

Mac history would lead one to expect a resurgence there. Ferrari and Redbull are clearly faster than Merc. Lotus look like being as good and have the tyre advantage. I cant see where merc are well off.. is being clearly better than the midfielders such a great achievement for a team with this backing and such great drivers?

#3768 slmk

slmk
  • Member

  • 4,398 posts
  • Joined: April 11

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:15

Mac history would lead one to expect a resurgence there. Ferrari and Redbull are clearly faster than Merc. Lotus look like being as good and have the tyre advantage. I cant see where merc are well off.. is being clearly better than the midfielders such a great achievement for a team with this backing and such great drivers?


Compared to where they were last year in Brazil, yes.

Also, their qualifying pace/mechanical grip means great starting positions in tracks like Singapore/Monaco/Hungary where it is very hard to overtake.

#3769 jjcale

jjcale
  • Member

  • 7,929 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:16

Race pace: Too early to tell one way or the other .... this race was all about looking after tyres - in unusual conditions.

On quali pace they are very decent. With a better strategy and a better start they might have been on the podium today.

Reliability is still a big worry.

Edited by jjcale, 17 March 2013 - 08:17.


#3770 Hanzo

Hanzo
  • Member

  • 741 posts
  • Joined: July 12

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:16

I really don´t know what to think of this result...
The image was quite good. But I think the general positivism is in great part due to the "Lewis factor"
If people had to analyse this same race result but with Schumacher retiring and Nico fifth, the opinions would be slightly different... or maybe not :well:

#3771 aray

aray
  • Member

  • 2,751 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:18

though result may not be as good as you expected from quali result,it is still solid...moreover Oz is hardly a yardstick for pace....so you guys have very stable base to work with...:up:

#3772 slmk

slmk
  • Member

  • 4,398 posts
  • Joined: April 11

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:18

Race pace: Too early to tell one way or the other .... this race was all about looking after tyres - in unusal conditions.

On quali pace they are very decent. With a better strategy and a better start they might have been on the podium today.

Reliability is still a big worry.


Top speed and grip levels as well. Encouraging that they got 5 more laps out of the SS tyres but still, they were too slow at the start and their top speed in straights is just poor, they were sitting ducks out there.

#3773 1Devil1

1Devil1
  • Member

  • 3,538 posts
  • Joined: May 12

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:20

Mac history would lead one to expect a resurgence there. Ferrari and Redbull are clearly faster than Merc. Lotus look like being as good and have the tyre advantage. I cant see where merc are well off.. is being clearly better than the midfielders such a great achievement for a team with this backing and such great drivers?

:up:

They are at the same level as last year at this point. Good raw speed but tire management seems to be a problem. I am happy the hype is gone - don't look back some pages here, Lewis the winner or podium would be a realistic aim some users really believed. It's a good result for Mercedes after the last races in 2012 however not for dreamers who thought this car is a beast. Lewis seems to be okay with it, looking forward to the next race, I like his new approach, he definitely know his chances will raise in 2014

#3774 peroa

peroa
  • Member

  • 9,127 posts
  • Joined: March 05

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:20

Top speed and grip levels as well. Encouraging that they got 5 more laps out of the SS tyres but still, they were too slow at the start and their top speed in straights is just poor, they were sitting ducks out there.

What's wrong with the top speed? Seem you're confusing things a bit.

#3775 jrg19

jrg19
  • Member

  • 6,118 posts
  • Joined: December 11

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:20

Finished ahead of a car that won the race and a car that is the fastest qualifier.

#3776 kedia990

kedia990
  • Member

  • 402 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:23

Agreed with the previous poster that look where McLaren are - they had an amazing end to 2012 but this year they are back to 2009 levels.

I'm very happy with 5th, if Mercedes can sort their reliability issues out. Remember Lewis out scored the 2nd RBR!

I think pace wise at the moment, we'd have to say Lotus > Ferrari/RBR > Mercedes > McLaren. We're a lot further up the order than I expected going into this season.

Real question is now if Mercedes have the depth and resources to drive development throughout the season and not get leap frogged by McLaren.


Lotus > Ferrari > RBR > Mercedes > Force India > McLaren :blush:
I think Ferrari is definitely ahead on race pace compared to RBR, and that's what matters.
Force India is decidedly better than McLaren on race pace. In fact I think FI cocked up Sutil's strategy, costing him a top 5 finish.

What I'm keen to know is the effect of temperatures on car performance. For some reason I think Ferrari would stay consistent, with FI being the most fickle.

#3777 peroa

peroa
  • Member

  • 9,127 posts
  • Joined: March 05

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:25

:up:

They are at the same level as last year at this point. Good raw speed but tire management seems to be a problem. I am happy the hype is gone - don't look back some pages here, Lewis the winner or podium would be a realistic aim some users really believed. It's a good result for Mercedes after the last races in 2012 however not for dreamers who thought this car is a beast. Lewis seems to be okay with it, looking forward to the next race, I like his new approach, he definitely know his chances will raise in 2014

I think in terms of degradation things looked OK, seems to me that they didn't get the balance right between the SS and medium usage. They were treating the SSofts perfectly with this setup but then it wasn't optimal for the mediums, at least not in the second stint.

You can compare it to Sutil, he had a perfect setup for the mediums but just burned through the SS in a couple of laps without showing great pace on them.

Edited by peroa, 17 March 2013 - 08:26.


#3778 Alx09

Alx09
  • Member

  • 1,282 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:29

race pace was also pretty good


Are you sure about that?

#3779 mlsnoopy

mlsnoopy
  • Member

  • 2,356 posts
  • Joined: June 10

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:29

What's wrong with the top speed? Seem you're confusing things a bit.


Top speed without the DRS.

Advertisement

#3780 alframsey

alframsey
  • Member

  • 1,780 posts
  • Joined: August 10

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:30

Overall I'm very pleased with this start to the season, loads of positives! Tyres didn't fall away at any point, race pace looked good in places and look strong in both wet and dry qualy. Much better than I had anticipated pre season, many did say that a lot in here were setting themselves up for only disappointment with all the hype. Only worry really is reliability I guess...

#3781 peroa

peroa
  • Member

  • 9,127 posts
  • Joined: March 05

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:31

Top speed without the DRS.

What was wrong with it?


#3782 peroa

peroa
  • Member

  • 9,127 posts
  • Joined: March 05

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:32

Are you sure about that?

I don't know what you expected, but so far so good.

Edited by peroa, 17 March 2013 - 08:32.


#3783 Dalin80

Dalin80
  • Member

  • 494 posts
  • Joined: July 10

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:34

What's wrong with the top speed? Seem you're confusing things a bit.


I don't have any figures to hand and maybe there were other factors like fuel / engine saving on the go but the mercs did appear slow(er) on the straights, the red bull hardly famous for its top speed walked past with a DRS boost.

My live timing kept dying so we will have to wait until the FIA release various bits of data to know for sure.

#3784 thomin

thomin
  • Member

  • 35 posts
  • Joined: March 11

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:34

Keep in mind that everybody is still learning about the tires. Melbourne is an unusual circuit and the temperatures were unexpected. Coupled with little experience with the tires, it was always going to be somewhat of a lottery.

I'm not saying that Mercedes is a top 3 team (yet  ;) ), they're probably not, but I don't think they're as far back as it might look like after today's race.

If Mercedes is still that much slower come Barcelona, then I'm ready to acknowledge that this season won't be much better than the last three, but not before then.

#3785 SunnyENTP

SunnyENTP
  • Member

  • 717 posts
  • Joined: August 12

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:34

I wont be surprised if Mercedes stop speed was the one of the worst.

#3786 Mauseri

Mauseri
  • Member

  • 7,562 posts
  • Joined: March 05

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:36

I'm sure Mercedes will be much stronger in the next round. This week they were quick alrteady, but didn't get it together.

#3787 Coral

Coral
  • Member

  • 2,990 posts
  • Joined: January 07

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:37

Finished ahead of a car that won the race and a car that is the fastest qualifier.

:up:

This! I don't really get the miserable atmosphere on this thread. Lewis seemed pretty happy after the race, and it could be worse...he could have been driving a McLaren. It's always assumed that McLaren will be resurgent but that's not much good if they have two very poor qualifiers. Once Mercedes get their race pace sorted, Lewis's excellent qualifying skills should put Mercedes right up there. There is much to be positive about IMO. :)



#3788 Shiroo

Shiroo
  • Member

  • 4,012 posts
  • Joined: October 12

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:37

I don't know what you expected, but so far so good.

starting 3rd, while winner 7th and finishing 45sec behind him is good race pace?

#3789 peroa

peroa
  • Member

  • 9,127 posts
  • Joined: March 05

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:38

I don't have any figures to hand and maybe there were other factors like fuel / engine saving on the go but the mercs did appear slow(er) on the straights, the red bull hardly famous for its top speed walked past with a DRS boost.

My live timing kept dying so we will have to wait until the FIA release various bits of data to know for sure.

... and fresher tyres.


#3790 alframsey

alframsey
  • Member

  • 1,780 posts
  • Joined: August 10

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:49

I think the biggest issue today was Lewis trying to go for a two stopper which masked his pace for a lot of the race, anyway Lewis seems happy and Nico seemed upbeat despite his issue so so far so good imo.

#3791 undersquare

undersquare
  • Member

  • 18,929 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:57

I am a bit disappointed that it looked the 4th fastest car. Although a lot of the race its laptimes looked competitive, at some stages it was hopelessly slower and easy meat for the other cars.

I have a question mark about its fuel consumption/exhaust/mapping and hence start weight, I don't know if we'll hear anything about that.

But it looks like it won't take much to move up. I could see the balance of power changing race by race among the top 5 teams.

#3792 MortenF1

MortenF1
  • Member

  • 20,294 posts
  • Joined: June 01

Posted 17 March 2013 - 08:58

Feels amazing that fifth is slightly dissapointing, so overall, positive signs from all at AMG Mercedes! Would they have been closer had they gone for three stops from the off? 45.5 seconds down at the flag.


..the question is, how much did it compromise them, not going for three stops from the off, but changing from a two-stopper? Ten seconds?

I feel a positive vibe, and I'm a bit surprised about the wet towels in this thread, 'cause the base on which to work from this year, is better. This car is for real, and the one that struggled in the midfield last year, was not.

#3793 jrg19

jrg19
  • Member

  • 6,118 posts
  • Joined: December 11

Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:00

This car has more development potential, from a visual armchair point of view. There are a lot of bits and bobs some other teams seem to be exploiting.

#3794 peroa

peroa
  • Member

  • 9,127 posts
  • Joined: March 05

Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:03

..the question is, how much did it compromise them, not going for three stops from the off, but changing from a two-stopper? Ten seconds?

I feel a positive vibe, and I'm a bit surprised about the wet towels in this thread, 'cause the base on which to work from this year, is better. This car is for real, and the one that struggled in the midfield last year, was not.

I reckon Massa was up for grabs.

#3795 slmk

slmk
  • Member

  • 4,398 posts
  • Joined: April 11

Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:03

What's wrong with the top speed? Seem you're confusing things a bit.


Poor speed all over. Look here..

http://en.mclarenf-1...e...;s=7191&p=5

Either they were geared too long (improbable) or their DRS is one of the very best, as they were topping speed trap in qualifying and FPs.

Edited by slmk, 17 March 2013 - 09:05.


#3796 femi

femi
  • Member

  • 6,768 posts
  • Joined: March 04

Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:05

I think the biggest issue today was Lewis trying to go for a two stopper which masked his pace for a lot of the race, anyway Lewis seems happy and Nico seemed upbeat despite his issue so so far so good imo.



Initially going for a 2 stopper was not LH but team strategy. I am not suggesting LH disagreed with it but he indirectly made the call for the switch to 3 stops. He told the team a couple of laps after the first stop that he would not be able to get to the end of the race on those tyres.

One thing for sure, that car tyre management can't be bad for going that long on the SS. Even the Lotus didn't do it. They just have to find more speed. The car's straight line speed was relatively poor. We know the engine is probably the most powerful out there so I think either they were managing fuel, gearing, or drag or any combination of these.

What do you guys think?

Edited by femi, 17 March 2013 - 09:10.


#3797 Dalin80

Dalin80
  • Member

  • 494 posts
  • Joined: July 10

Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:05

According to mclarens data for top speeds, using hamiltons data.

Sector 1

269.7 kmh

best was 274.2 (vergne), average around 270


sector 2

283.8 kmh

best was 291.9 (massa), average around 287


sector 3

294.7 kmh

best was 306.1 (webber), average around 299


Lewis's fastest lap was 05s short of the best but only 0.25 off the rest of the podium places.


#3798 MortenF1

MortenF1
  • Member

  • 20,294 posts
  • Joined: June 01

Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:06

Poor speed all over. Look here..

http://en.mclarenf-1...e...;s=7191&p=5


Strange I think. Tempting to say their 7th was geared for Q, but you know, the engineers take into account the car will be full of fuel and 150kgs heavier at race-start. :stoned:

#3799 alframsey

alframsey
  • Member

  • 1,780 posts
  • Joined: August 10

Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:07

Initially going for a 2 stopper was not LH but team strategy. I am not suggesting LH disagreed with it but he indirectly made the call for the switch to 3 stops. He told the team a couple of laps after the first stop that he would not be able to get to the end of the race on those tyres.

One thing for sure, that car tyre management can't be bad for going that long on the SS. Even the Lotus didn't do it. They just have to find more speed. The car's straight line speed was relatively poor.

When I said Lewis I didn't mean it was his decision, I was just speaking in general terms about the team :p I agree about the tyre management point though, looked rather good imo.

Advertisement

#3800 meddo

meddo
  • Member

  • 1,679 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 17 March 2013 - 09:15

Race pace wasn't that bad. Just chech Vettel vs. Hamilton on that mclaren page. It was just one of them strange calls from the pitwall. Pound for pound, race pace was equal with RB. Lotus is just in another universe.