He is not a rookie
Semantics really, but I consider anyone a rookie who hasn't been driving for several seasons .
Maldo, Hulk, Grosjean, Perez etc ., all rookies in my book .
Posted 21 February 2013 - 09:37
He is not a rookie
Advertisement
Posted 21 February 2013 - 10:29
Semantics really, but I consider anyone a rookie who hasn't been driving for several seasons .
Maldo, Hulk, Grosjean, Perez etc ., all rookies in my book .
Posted 21 February 2013 - 17:09
Wow! You had a rookie finish 3rd last year!Semantics really, but I consider anyone a rookie who hasn't been driving for several seasons .
Maldo, Hulk, Grosjean, Perez etc ., all rookies in my book .
Posted 21 February 2013 - 17:33
Posted 22 February 2013 - 01:03
Bottas is a rookie and Maldonado has a tendency of going backward in the races in case he does not crash while doing that.Williams. Second year with the new technical team that has already propelled them forward and potentially their strongest driver line-up since Webber/Rosberg.
Edited by Mauseri, 22 February 2013 - 01:04.
Posted 22 February 2013 - 04:49
Posted 22 February 2013 - 05:40
When? He doesn't particularly strike me as a Trulli.Bottas is a rookie and Maldonado has a tendency of going backward in the races in case he does not crash while doing that.
Posted 22 February 2013 - 09:51
I don't have statistics to support my claim but that's the overall impression I got last year. I'm not talking about a few exceptional races but the tendency.When? He doesn't particularly strike me as a Trulli.
In Singapore he made a mistake on the first lap, but then was able to match the race leaders in pace.
In Abu Dhabi his KERS failed, but still finished 5th.
Edited by Mauseri, 22 February 2013 - 09:51.
Posted 22 February 2013 - 10:18
There was no such tendency.Maldonado has a tendency of going backward in the races in case he does not crash while doing that.
Posted 22 February 2013 - 11:54
I hope so too!maldonado, bottas and williams will deliver
Posted 22 February 2013 - 12:53
Wow! You had a rookie finish 3rd last year!
Posted 22 February 2013 - 13:02
Williams is an old fine team.
Posted 22 February 2013 - 13:46
THIS +1Agreed; I have high hopes for Williams, and it was great to see them getting back on track in 2012 - no pun intended .
It's a bit OT, but I wished Kobayashi and Petrov were around this season, fun to watch and always good for surprises .
Speaking of have-beens, Sutil still might get a seat, that's a dark horse right there !
Posted 22 February 2013 - 16:41
Posted 22 February 2013 - 17:49
So yes, if he can get his racecraft sorted out and stop making silly errors, I don't see why he can't give Kimi a run for his money.
Posted 22 February 2013 - 18:59
You answered your own question.If you had been that balanced the first time around nobody would have complained IMHO. Using words like gro "humiliated" rai at some times just makes you sound like an idiot fanboy. As idiot as those you are crusading against...
Edited by Kingshark, 23 February 2013 - 18:08.
Posted 22 February 2013 - 19:11
You answered your own question.
Posted 23 February 2013 - 03:43
You do realize that Grosjean came extremely close to being Lotus' first race winner in Valencia before his car conked out, right?
Its your opinion, but I dont feel its very well founded. Its not a bunch of nonsense that a lot of people are tipping him for good things this year. Most people recognize talent when they see it. For some reason, you cant.
Edited by BackOnTop, 23 February 2013 - 07:53.
Posted 23 February 2013 - 15:09
Even with Vettel's retirement from the lead, Grosjean was still far from winning Valencia. Fernando Alonso was legitimately in front...
Advertisement
Posted 23 February 2013 - 18:14
Sorry for my forgetfulness to enable my signature before posting.There´s no questions in that post. He´s stating that your first post on the matter was rubbish and far from any real event, while your second one is perfectly sensible and fairly close to reality.
And your answer bolding a part of the first one, still trying to sell a ridiculous and fictional point tells a lot about where you stand in this.
My sig writes:If you had been that balanced the first time around nobody would have complained IMHO. Using words like gro "humiliated" rai at some times just makes you sound like an idiot fanboy. As idiot as those you are crusading against...
Now you better see where I'm coming from.People who keep bringing the phrase "fanboy" in to an argument to force their point remind me of most homophobics.
They keep harping on about the sanctimonity of it all..... But deep down they fancy a bit of willy.......
Edited by Kingshark, 23 February 2013 - 18:14.
Posted 23 February 2013 - 19:43
Regarding my comment about Grosjean humiliating Raikkonen. This is not a fanboy comment. There were certain occasions where this held true. Australia qualifying, European GP, Singapore and Japan qualifying. I'm not denying the fact that Raikkonen was undoubtedly the better Lotus driver of 2012, but there were occasions where Grosjean made him look very poor.
Posted 24 February 2013 - 00:23
Regarding my comment about Grosjean humiliating Raikkonen. This is not a fanboy comment. There were certain occasions where this held true. Australia qualifying, European GP, Singapore and Japan qualifying.
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:58
Regarding my comment about Grosjean humiliating Raikkonen. This is not a fanboy comment. There were certain occasions where this held true. Australia qualifying, European GP, Singapore and Japan qualifying. I'm not denying the fact that Raikkonen was undoubtedly the better Lotus driver of 2012, but there were occasions where Grosjean made him look very poor
Secondly, why the hell is everyone naming Lotus as a dark horse, when so many people tip Kimi for the 2012 championship? Those two are quite contradictory.
Edited by BackOnTop, 24 February 2013 - 07:37.
Posted 24 February 2013 - 07:05