http://www.youtube.c...eature=youtu.be
DCN
Edited by Doug Nye, 08 March 2013 - 18:37.
Posted 08 March 2013 - 18:32
Edited by Doug Nye, 08 March 2013 - 18:37.
Advertisement
Posted 08 March 2013 - 18:47
Having just cited this in a presentation on internet misinformation to the 7th Connoisseurship Symposium at the Collier Museum in Naples, FL, I feel the following is important to share with all like-minded enthusiasts... I am confident you will all agree that it is as important today as it was when first filmed.
http://www.youtube.c...eature=youtu.be
DCN
Posted 08 March 2013 - 20:08
Posted 08 March 2013 - 20:11
Edited by plannerpower, 08 March 2013 - 20:12.
Posted 08 March 2013 - 20:11
Posted 08 March 2013 - 20:17
Posted 08 March 2013 - 20:18
Posted 08 March 2013 - 20:45
Posted 08 March 2013 - 20:56
The difference is, with this one you can tell from the first frame it's supposed to be funny, and it therefore doesn't succeed as well as the earlier versionI think Chrysler upstaged them with this:
Posted 09 March 2013 - 00:27
Posted 09 March 2013 - 01:22
Posted 09 March 2013 - 03:40
Posted 09 March 2013 - 07:49
Well, I think it's a gross misuse of spurving bearings.
Posted 09 March 2013 - 11:52
Posted 09 March 2013 - 12:30
See post number 8.Any other TNFer remember details of this thing??
Posted 09 March 2013 - 12:47
See post number 8.
Posted 09 March 2013 - 12:51
Posted 09 March 2013 - 13:50
Advertisement
Posted 09 March 2013 - 17:30
You fools! Surely, it's obvious, even to those of you who possess little scientific knowledge, exactly why the Encabulator failed to make any impression?
Dingle arms! This idiot is suggesting the use of DINGLE ARMS! My God, that technology went out with the Ark! I'm in no doubt whatsoever that the Turbo Thingummy would now be ruling our lives, if only they'd thought more seriously about using this archaic equipment, already banned in some Southern States.
My nurse has just told me I have to return to my room now and lie down for a while.
Posted 09 March 2013 - 18:09
Posted 09 March 2013 - 18:28
I'll be looking over your shoulder AllenMy challenge now is to sneak this into a corner of OldRacingCars.com, perhaps when describing the difference in specification between Formule France in 1970 and Formule Renault in 1971, and see how long it takes to be copied to Wikipedia.
Posted 09 March 2013 - 21:37
The "Energy Polariser" did not do Peter Brock's credibility much good at all, although his 'believers' stood by him.Thanks CP. That's it Relieved my memory wasn't playing tricks. The Brock "Energy Polariser"! I see its written up on Wiki - "The device was based on the principles of orgone pseudoscience" whatever that is. I note with a laugh that you had to adjust tyre pressures when using it! Very rare to see engineers believing in such nonsense.
Posted 10 March 2013 - 10:40
Posted 10 March 2013 - 11:48
Having just cited this in a presentation on internet misinformation to the 7th Connoisseurship Symposium at the Collier Museum in Naples, FL, I feel the following is important to share with all like-minded enthusiasts... I am confident you will all agree that it is as important today as it was when first filmed.
http://www.youtube.c...eature=youtu.be
DCN
Posted 10 March 2013 - 12:40
I'm sure I've still got a couple of Spurving bearings in the garage, I'll just nip outside and have a look, I may be some time.......
Posted 11 March 2013 - 00:28
My challenge now is to sneak this into a corner of OldRacingCars.com, perhaps when describing the difference in specification between Formule France in 1970 and Formule Renault in 1971, and see how long it takes to be copied to Wikipedia.
Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:13