Oulton Park Masters cancelled
#1
Posted 22 March 2013 - 16:10
Prevailing weather cionditions has unfortunately meant that this meeting has been cancelled.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 22 March 2013 - 16:24
All
Prevailing weather cionditions has unfortunately meant that this meeting has been cancelled.
Thanks Phil. At least I can have a lie in tomorrow
#3
Posted 22 March 2013 - 17:38
Roger Lund
edit If Ray Bell is reading this I know the distances are nothing compared to the journeys which he and Bob Levitt et al used to make, but at last they got some racing to see.
Edited by bradbury west, 23 March 2013 - 00:23.
#4
Posted 22 March 2013 - 18:08
PAR
#5
Posted 22 March 2013 - 18:22
#6
Posted 22 March 2013 - 18:27
#7
Posted 22 March 2013 - 19:21
#8
Posted 22 March 2013 - 19:41
PAR
#9
Posted 22 March 2013 - 19:44
#10
Posted 22 March 2013 - 20:14
David
#11
Posted 22 March 2013 - 22:44
#12
Posted 23 March 2013 - 02:00
I hope the weather clears a little for the Easter Weekend GT and BTCC season openers. Just enough to let them run at least!
#13
Posted 23 March 2013 - 13:34
David
#14
Posted 23 March 2013 - 13:47
#15
Posted 23 March 2013 - 14:56
#16
Posted 23 March 2013 - 15:02
As is it one not to be missed
2012.....
PAR
#17
Posted 23 March 2013 - 17:00
Phil will the meeting we re - arranged for later in the year?
As is it one not to be missed
2012.....
PAR
Not a huge entry last year but it was more than made up for by the quality. I was hoping this year would be the same
#18
Posted 23 March 2013 - 23:14
Am I allowed to mention that there is no sign of snow in Kuala Lumpur? There's a passable chance of rain, though...
#19
Posted 24 March 2013 - 23:17
The big issues came when we saw them ploughing and a salt spreader behind.
Pretty quickly the discussion amongst owners / competitors turned to whether anyone would risk running their cars on the salt.
The cynical of us were in disbelief that MSV were so desperate to get the circuit open so they could declare it operational and take our testing fees. Ultimately, everyone I spoke to took the decision not to test cars on the salt due to the horrific damage it would have caused.
We decided to stay Friday night and see how things developed weather wise but by mid-afternoon with aeronautic forecasts predicting 40cm of snow starting from around 4.30pm and going for 14 hours, we all took the decision to hit the road and head home. Masters announced the cancellation of the meeting soon after.
I was stunned that the circuit would use salt given the impact it will have on a race car. Unbelievable.
It was also clear that MSV would have held Masters liable for the track hire regardless of weather leaving Masters between a rock and a hard place.
I'm all for a boycott of any circuit that uses salt. The damage to our beautiful toys is unimaginable and salt has no place on a race circuit. For the sake of them gaining a little revenue by declaring the circuit open, imagine the many many thousands of pounds damage they cause!
Advertisement
#20
Posted 25 March 2013 - 10:52
MSV website reads: "... regretfully the decision has been made to postpone the Masters Raceday tomorrow (23 March)."Phil will the meeting we re - arranged for later in the year?
To me, "postponement" means that it will be rescheduled, but I can't see that being an easy option with the historic racing calendar the way it is these days.
#21
Posted 25 March 2013 - 11:03
MSV website reads: "... regretfully the decision has been made to postpone the Masters Raceday tomorrow (23 March)."
To me, "postponement" means that it will be rescheduled, but I can't see that being an easy option with the historic racing calendar the way it is these days.
May be it is postponed until March 2014?
PAR
#22
Posted 25 March 2013 - 15:54
I suspect that may the most likely. Looking at Oulton's calendar, the only Saturday without an event scheduled is the 5th October. This falls a week before Masters' meeting at Jerez so probably not a realistic alternative. Beyond that, the other alternatives would be from late October onwards.May be it is postponed until March 2014?
PAR
#23
Posted 25 March 2013 - 18:23
____________________
From: Jonathan Palmer
Date: Monday, 25 March 2013 11:53
To: Roger Wills
Subject: RE: Salt on Oulton Park
Roger
You are obviously looking at this just from your perspective - which I can quite understand! You need to appreciate though that this was a very difficult, unusual situation and our circuit team worked very hard to do what they considered was the best thing overall.
Had grit salt not been used, the circuit would have not been safe to use that day for anyone - it would have remained too icy. Some 30 cars did actually test and indeed were very appreciative of the efforts made to get the circuit usable, which happened by 11.00 I think. We were very conscious of the long journeys many people had to get to Oulton Park.
Clearly a significant number of people did want to test and accepted the consequences of salt use. I can however fully appreciate that some of the historic fraternity have very valuable cars that they really don't want salt contamination to affect, even though I understand it can be washed off pretty well. .
Obviously we need to learn from this as we don't want to disappoint anyone. Perhaps in future MSV should consult with those like you who will only want to test if any snow/ice/frost is left to go naturally and see if we can offer an insurance against the risk that this may mean the cancellation of a test day – one that might have been acceptable to others who would accept salt use in the event of such weather.
Kind regards
Jonathan
Jonathan Palmer
Chief Executive
MSV Group Ltd
www.msv.com
#24
Posted 26 March 2013 - 02:19
#25
Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:07
... and there is a huge source of brine (calcium chloride) five or six miles from Oulton! It would not take too much imagination to send the MSV John Deere over there with the trailer-tanker.They could try Calcium Chlroride, which comes in liquid form and is not so corrosive as Sodium Chloride. I remember hearing that someone in Austria once tried some unsaleable wine which worked quite well.
#26
Posted 26 March 2013 - 10:43
Brine is normally sodium chloride and I think the salt-mines of Cheshire yield that. Naturally occurring CaCl2 is quite rare.... and there is a huge source of brine (calcium chloride) five or six miles from Oulton! It would not take too much imagination to send the MSV John Deere over there with the trailer-tanker.
#27
Posted 26 March 2013 - 12:24
That's as I understand it too, AllanBrine is normally sodium chloride and I think the salt-mines of Cheshire yield that.
#28
Posted 26 March 2013 - 16:34
I hope that either the organising club or MSV had some form of inclement weather insurance.
#29
Posted 26 March 2013 - 18:03
Brine is normally sodium chloride and I think the salt-mines of Cheshire yield that. Naturally occurring CaCl2 is quite rare.
I really must stop believing what I read on the internet!
Calcium Chloride Manufacturing Process
Solvay Process
Chemical Process of high purity limestone and salt brine to produce soda ash and Calcium Chloride
CaCO3 + 2NaCl ---> Na2CO3 + CaCl2
Produces a wide range of concentrations of both High Grade Liquid and Dry forms
HCl Process
Reaction of HCl and Limestone (or other source of Calcium)
Produces a wide range of concentrations of both High Grade Liguid and Dry forms
Natural Brine
Often pumped out of underground naturally occuring sources
Strength of liguid generally weaker and often inconsistent
Contains impurities primarily in the form of other Chlorides
Rarely find capability of producing Dry Forms
Strengthened Brine
Natural Brine is processed generally with heat to increase concentration and consistency
Brine Purification
Natural Brine is processed to remove impurities
Bi-Product
Calcium Chloride can be produced as a bi-product or waste of a chemical process
And the supplier is:
http://en.wikipedia....hemicals_Europe
#30
Posted 26 March 2013 - 20:30