*** 2013 Malaysia F1: The race story in graphs ***
#1
Posted 25 March 2013 - 16:04
Advertisement
#2
Posted 25 March 2013 - 16:37
Thanks for posting.
#3
Posted 25 March 2013 - 16:57
Actually, I'm glad to see lap charts.
Edited by DrProzac, 25 March 2013 - 16:58.
#4
Posted 25 March 2013 - 16:59
#5
Posted 25 March 2013 - 17:05
#6
Posted 25 March 2013 - 18:27
#7
Posted 25 March 2013 - 18:32
#8
Posted 25 March 2013 - 19:46
- Mercs had a good pace until last stints, cruising at the end. LH lead it longer, but rosberg is faster than most people give him credit for
- Webber leaded the race the most, deserved victory.
- Grosjean's race pace this weekend was better overall compared to KR's
Edited by tabovilla, 25 March 2013 - 19:49.
#9
Posted 25 March 2013 - 20:02
#10
Posted 25 March 2013 - 20:21
#11
Posted 25 March 2013 - 20:31
Gro vs Kimi - they were blocked quite a lot, especially Raikkonen, so this chart may not be the best indicator of their relative pace.
Yep, remember also that Kimi went off twice and that could have damaged the car and reduced pace. On the other hand Kimi had the newer parts on the car.
#12
Posted 25 March 2013 - 20:34
#13
Posted 25 March 2013 - 20:51
Webber leaded the race the most, deserved victory.
That makes absolutely no sense.
#14
Posted 25 March 2013 - 22:56
#15
Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:41
great post, hope you're going to continue for the rest of the season. Most of the teams seem to have quite evenly matched drivers except sauber and torro rosso.
Thanks everyone for your support and yes I will post these graphs after each race. Suggestions are welcome too.
#16
Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:42
Bianchi has done exceedingly well in the last 2 races. If he continues at this rate, I am pretty sure his progress to a better team would come sooner than later.Meh, didn't really like the last chart, but well, I guess there aren't many Marussia fans like me around! ;P
#17
Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:43
Kimi is a rally driver so is used to a bit of off road action!Yep, remember also that Kimi went off twice and that could have damaged the car and reduced pace. On the other hand Kimi had the newer parts on the car.
#18
Posted 26 March 2013 - 09:52
#19
Posted 26 March 2013 - 10:02
Advertisement
#20
Posted 26 March 2013 - 12:35
Thank you.
#21
Posted 26 March 2013 - 12:49
#22
Posted 28 March 2013 - 11:40
If I do the winner's avg lap time as reference, then I would either have to plot everyone else's avg lap time too (which would be meaningless since we know the race result) or I will plot actual lap times against this avg lap time and I would have a sea of points above and below this.Could you change the graphs to use winners average lap time as the reference? Because I hate it when all the cars jump up and down when the leader pits. Also, the evolution of lap times during the race cannot be seen from your graphs.
Thank you.
Not sure if I am visualizing it clearly but would appreciate if you could expand on your comments. I can surely plot any graph since all the data is already present.
#23
Posted 28 March 2013 - 11:58
Not sure if I am visualizing it clearly but would appreciate if you could expand on your comments. I can surely plot any graph since all the data is already present.
Instead of using the gap to the leader as reference, use the difference to the leaders average laptime multiplied by the lapnumber. If the average winning laptime is 1:30 then after 10 laps the reference is at 15 minutes. If the leader has completed the first 10 laps in 14:50 he would be 10 seconds up on the reference. If he is going slow he will drop away, if he is fast he will gain. And of course they would be a drop when he pits. In the end the reference and the winning driver should converge.
That way it would be possible to visualise the pace of the race. Also pitstops would make more sense, since the gap is plotted to a constant pace rather than a leader whose position changes when he pits.
#24
Posted 28 March 2013 - 12:21
#25
Posted 28 March 2013 - 18:09
#26
Posted 28 March 2013 - 18:23
http://en.mclarenf-1.com/
Select the race you want to analyse, then choose "history graph" and select the drivers, laps and the "compare to" selection.
The "head to head" analysis is also very interesting!
#27
Posted 28 March 2013 - 19:58
There is already a website that provides exactly what is shown in this thread!
http://en.mclarenf-1.com/
Select the race you want to analyse, then choose "history graph" and select the drivers, laps and the "compare to" selection.
The "head to head" analysis is also very interesting!
I find the graphs in this thread a little more readable, although the main graph could be improved.
On the McLaren fansite you mentioned, the black background makes some of the traces hard to see, but otherwise it's good.
#28
Posted 29 March 2013 - 19:26
Graph history race Malaysia GP 2013 (link)I find the graphs in this thread a little more readable, although the main graph could be improved.
On the McLaren fansite you mentioned, the black background makes some of the traces hard to see, but otherwise it's good.
- Sebastian Vettel
- Mark Webber
- Nico Rosberg
- Lewis Hamilton
#29
Posted 29 March 2013 - 22:42
#30
Posted 29 March 2013 - 22:55
Graph history race Malaysia GP 2013 (link)
compared to driver #1 Sebastian Vettel
- Sebastian Vettel
- Mark Webber
- Nico Rosberg
- Lewis Hamilton
That illustrates my point, the trace for Nico Rosberg is barely visible on my monitor. I don't understand why some websites use a black background.
I hope the OP continues with these much more readable graphs.
#31
Posted 29 March 2013 - 23:03
That's because Nico was stuck behind Lewis for god knows how long. His pace was much better though.Mercedes pilots on extremely similar pace :-)
#32
Posted 30 March 2013 - 00:16
Edited by AlexS, 30 March 2013 - 00:17.
#33
Posted 14 April 2013 - 10:51