Bianchi Will Single-Handedly Get Marussia 10th Place
#51
Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:32
But yeah if he'd stay another year at Marussia he would risk the same fate as Kova. I just don't think he'll stay. Although it's hard to imagine which team will take him, everyone seems to be running away scared of Ferrari engines. Sauber?
Advertisement
#52
Posted 02 April 2013 - 11:37
#53
Posted 02 April 2013 - 13:03
I don't get the enthusiasm for Bianchi. Took two years to win F3 Euroseries despite being at ART
Better than Bottas, who couldn't manage it in two attempts. And not even Lewis got it in his first season
He's erratic, for sure, but has done little wrong in his F1 career so far.
#54
Posted 02 April 2013 - 13:14
Bianchi's best bet is to replace Massa, but I just don't see that happening the way Massa is driving now. For every other seat there's guys above him in he depth chart either through bigger pockets or proven ability.
#55
Posted 02 April 2013 - 13:20
#56
Posted 02 April 2013 - 13:48
#57
Posted 02 April 2013 - 14:26
Come to think of it, with the Mercedes and McLaren seats taken, HĂĽlkenberg's switch from Mercedes to Ferrari engines doesn't seem so sideways after all!
#58
Posted 02 April 2013 - 16:12
#59
Posted 02 April 2013 - 16:49
Advertisement
#60
Posted 02 April 2013 - 18:03
I've never predicted a rookie to get worse over time so there's that....Perhaps the OP might be willing to share his track record of predicting rookie performances.;)
#61
Posted 02 April 2013 - 18:14
anyone counted how many times Alonso outqualified Massa last year? back in 2010 it looked like Massa was good aswell in the beginning of the season and then kaboomMassa isn't under threat, he just outqualified Alonso 4 times in a row. If they stuck with him by the middle of 2012 when he was finishing 10 places behind Alonso, there's no way he's going to leave now.
#62
Posted 02 April 2013 - 18:36
Caterham is supposed to really improve their car for Barcelona so let's wait until then.
This is what I heard as well. Can't remember the source to be honest but the gist was that Caterham are racing in pretty much a launch spec and the 'real' 2013 car won't arrive until a few races in when we get back to Europe.
That said this is a team that make their living telling us they're just around the corner from grabbing points. You have to admire their optimism but it is all a bit like the boy who cried wolf...
Hasn't it statistically closed up on last year? In another thread someone posted Aus times and there's no doubt Marussia are in much better shape.
#63
Posted 02 April 2013 - 18:56
True, but then Lewis won GP2 in his first season. Bianchi did two seasons there then dropped down to FR3.5 and failed there too. Still, a couple of reasonable F1 outings and he is being hyped up even more than Paul di Resta.Better than Bottas, who couldn't manage it in two attempts. And not even Lewis got it in his first season
#64
Posted 02 April 2013 - 18:57
This is what I heard as well. Can't remember the source to be honest but the gist was that Caterham are racing in pretty much a launch spec and the 'real' 2013 car won't arrive until a few races in when we get back to Europe.
Hmmm OK for those not keeping up....
Marussia are currently beating the 2012 Caterham with a shiny new paint job:) Unsurprising really as they weren't too far behind it last year, and now have a new car and KERS. If they weren't beating it they would have a real problem...
Caterham are putting all of their resources this year into next year's car - however in the 4th/5th race we will start to see new parts based on that research.
However, it's great to see Marussia move forward!
#65
Posted 02 April 2013 - 19:16
The 2013 Caterham is pretty distinctively different than last year's car.Hmmm OK for those not keeping up....
Marussia are currently beating the 2012 Caterham with a shiny new paint job:) Unsurprising really as they weren't too far behind it last year, and now have a new car and KERS. If they weren't beating it they would have a real problem...
Caterham are putting all of their resources this year into next year's car - however in the 4th/5th race we will start to see new parts based on that research.
However, it's great to see Marussia move forward!
#66
Posted 02 April 2013 - 20:31
Bianchi is fast, but he can be easily found out, when he finally gets into a good car. Like Fisichella was. After all, Bianchi wasn't a standout, when he was in top teams in feeder series. Many drivers can look good at the back, where there are no proper rivals in similarly performing cars.
Edited by sopa, 02 April 2013 - 20:32.
#67
Posted 03 April 2013 - 00:16
#68
Posted 03 April 2013 - 09:30
True, but then Lewis won GP2 in his first season. Bianchi did two seasons there then dropped down to FR3.5 and failed there too. Still, a couple of reasonable F1 outings and he is being hyped up even more than Paul di Resta.
You're being far too harsh, that almost implies a driver must be useless if he merely comes 2nd or 3rd instead of 1st in their feeder series seasons. I could look at it instead from a glass half-full perspective: Bianchi has finished within the top 3 for the past 4 years in 3 different categories - implying a strong level of adaptability. Could've been champion of 2 of them if not for a last race intentional shunt from his title rival. Ferrari retain faith in him, rumours were he was considerably quicker than PĂ©rez in their sim. He is beating his F1 team-mate in a more dominant fashion than pretty much every other driver at the moment (perhaps apart from Hulkenberg vs Gutierrez). Of course there's going to be a bit of hype.
That is however the glass half-full version. The truth is most likely somewhere in the middle - he is at least mildly talented, but flattered by the current circumstances and his not 100% flawless junior record does instill caution. His F1 career is just 2 races long, it's been great so far but we need more races, and a better measuring stick as a team-mate somewhere in the future.
#69
Posted 03 April 2013 - 11:40
Exactly. A lot of people are getting carried away with a couple of mildly successful outings in F1.That is however the glass half-full version. The truth is most likely somewhere in the middle - he is at least mildly talented, but flattered by the current circumstances and his not 100% flawless junior record does instill caution. His F1 career is just 2 races long, it's been great so far but we need more races, and a better measuring stick as a team-mate somewhere in the future.
My point was that Bianchi does not have an absolutely outstanding pre-F1 record; not a poor record, certainly, but hardly the stuff to suggest he is the next great hope for F1. Those who dismiss pre-F1 careers as irrelevant presumably prefer to make their judgements based on.... what exactly? The colour of his eyes? His winning smile? Who knows.
#70
Posted 03 April 2013 - 11:53
#71
Posted 04 April 2013 - 14:54
Never said anything like that.So it is valid to compare drivers who drive different cars if they are backmarkers but we cannot apply the same comparison with the top teams?
#72
Posted 04 April 2013 - 16:07
So it is valid to compare drivers who drive different cars if they are backmarkers but we cannot apply the same comparison with the top teams?
Don't you know it's 99% driver and 1% car?
#73
Posted 04 April 2013 - 16:10
Regards attritional races, yes, it may throw up a freak result but the balance of probability still favours Marussia as they have the faster car.
#74
Posted 04 April 2013 - 16:11
Exactly. A lot of people are getting carried away with a couple of mildly successful outings in F1.
My point was that Bianchi does not have an absolutely outstanding pre-F1 record; not a poor record, certainly, but hardly the stuff to suggest he is the next great hope for F1. Those who dismiss pre-F1 careers as irrelevant presumably prefer to make their judgements based on.... what exactly? The colour of his eyes? His winning smile? Who knows.
His F1 performances.
#75
Posted 04 April 2013 - 20:22
And for the previous two or three years BEFORE he reached F1? People have been talking Bianchi up for a long time. And anyway, just two F1 races don't really make much of a statistical set. It needs at least double figures, surely?His F1 performances.
#76
Posted 04 April 2013 - 21:16
And for the previous two or three years BEFORE he reached F1? People have been talking Bianchi up for a long time. And anyway, just two F1 races don't really make much of a statistical set. It needs at least double figures, surely?
He was in the same position as Bottas at the start of the year really. Identified early as potential "star" material. Started off well, had a bit of a slump at the higher levels which introduced some doubts, then got his F1 chance anyway. He's handled it a lot better than I thought he would, at least.
#77
Posted 07 April 2013 - 12:03
I suspect the 2012 crop will be seen, in retrospect, as an absolute bumper field of talent - Frijns, Bianchi and da Costa all look like F1 stars of the future. Maybe the Frijns-Bianchi clash in the final event will be viewed like Macau in 1990, a precursor of a great rivalry ahead. When was the last time that could have been said of the GP2 field? 2006?
#78
Posted 09 April 2013 - 07:10