Haha, strange force of habit when I drive in km/h myself these daysI think we all are if they're doing over 300mph!
Edited by MichaelPM, 13 April 2013 - 08:33.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 08:30
Haha, strange force of habit when I drive in km/h myself these daysI think we all are if they're doing over 300mph!
Edited by MichaelPM, 13 April 2013 - 08:33.
Advertisement
Posted 13 April 2013 - 08:59
Posted 13 April 2013 - 09:36
It was only a risky decision because not every thing panned out as planned. If the car did not experience brake issue, he could probably start 7th ahead of Button and Ricciardo, and be in the lead and be running his own race from lap 5 (or whatever) onwards. Starting 9th, the risks of getting mugged by the midfield cars at the start is a lot higher and he could lose a lot of times behind them or trying to overtake them.Interesting to see what tomorrow beings. I'm not sure rb expected to be 9th even with choice of tyres. I think they were aiming for 6-7. A lot can happen in the pack, vettel could go forward two places or he could get mugged on the back straight and lose 4. It's a risky decision I think.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 09:43
Posted 13 April 2013 - 09:47
Given the ultimate pace of the car, I thought that gambling for primes were really the best thing they could have done. Of course, nobody anticipates the brake issue that Sebastian experienced on his hot lap which forced him to start behind Ricciardo and Button. The start is always a crap shoot and he could get stucked behind Button or any of the midfield runners, but it is a risk that they have to take. This is a damage limitation weekend for Vettel and RBR.I was hoping he'd do a run on the scrubbed Q2 softs and then a run on his last set of new tyres, but looking at the times, top 5 all in the 1:34s, probably not the worst thing to do as I don't think Seb had a high 34 in there.
But its risky in the midfield, some really awkward corners in there and he has a trait of making bad starts here, and generally when midpack
Posted 13 April 2013 - 11:41
Posted 13 April 2013 - 13:45
Nice one.A good one from Kimi in the Press conferance
Q: (Luis Fernando Ramos – Racing Magazine) To all of you: we have a kind of racing now which is all about managing and controlling your pace, whereas if you go back to 2008 with different aerodynamics and refuelling, it was a sprint all the time. Which type of racing was more challenging and which type of racing did you enjoy more?
KR: It makes no difference, because this is what we have and you'd better like it or do something else.
Bjørn
Posted 13 April 2013 - 15:49
A good one from Kimi in the Press conferance
Q: (Luis Fernando Ramos – Racing Magazine) To all of you: we have a kind of racing now which is all about managing and controlling your pace, whereas if you go back to 2008 with different aerodynamics and refuelling, it was a sprint all the time. Which type of racing was more challenging and which type of racing did you enjoy more?
KR: It makes no difference, because this is what we have and you'd better like it or do something else.
Bjørn
Edited by halifaxf1fan, 14 April 2013 - 03:57.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 15:54
Luis Fernando Ramos probably put alot of thought and effort into asking that question - only to have it trashed by a Kimi one liner.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 16:38
Kimi reminds me of Karl Pilkington sometimes.A good one from Kimi in the Press conferance
Q: (Luis Fernando Ramos – Racing Magazine) To all of you: we have a kind of racing now which is all about managing and controlling your pace, whereas if you go back to 2008 with different aerodynamics and refuelling, it was a sprint all the time. Which type of racing was more challenging and which type of racing did you enjoy more?
KR: It makes no difference, because this is what we have and you'd better like it or do something else.
Bjørn
Posted 13 April 2013 - 17:10
Edited by 4L3X, 13 April 2013 - 17:11.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 17:12
Kimi reminds me of Karl Pilkington sometimes.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 17:50
A good one from Kimi in the Press conferance
Q: (Luis Fernando Ramos – Racing Magazine) To all of you: we have a kind of racing now which is all about managing and controlling your pace, whereas if you go back to 2008 with different aerodynamics and refuelling, it was a sprint all the time. Which type of racing was more challenging and which type of racing did you enjoy more?
KR: It makes no difference, because this is what we have and you'd better like it or do something else.
Bjørn
Edited by Vesuvius, 13 April 2013 - 17:50.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 21:53
No, I think that is still Chris Amons titleWeber must be the unluckiest driver ever.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 22:10
Luis Fernando Ramos probably put alot of thought and effort into asking that question - only to have it trashed by a Kimi one liner.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 22:15
Because Kimi is such an obnoxious dick with zero interpersonal skills or emotional intelligence.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 22:40
A good one from Kimi in the Press conferance
Q: (Luis Fernando Ramos – Racing Magazine) To all of you: we have a kind of racing now which is all about managing and controlling your pace, whereas if you go back to 2008 with different aerodynamics and refuelling, it was a sprint all the time. Which type of racing was more challenging and which type of racing did you enjoy more?
KR: It makes no difference, because this is what we have and you'd better like it or do something else.
Bjørn
Posted 13 April 2013 - 22:50
Bolded is a pragmatic answer from a driver who is focusing on managing situation, rather than concerning himself whether another tire would be more to his liking, and it therefore doesn't addresses various concerns in this thread. He might have been more thoughtful had he qualified in midfield or lower due to tire performance, or lack of thereof.
Posted 13 April 2013 - 22:52
Advertisement
Posted 14 April 2013 - 02:33
Luis Fernando Ramos probably put alot of thought and effort into asking that question - only to have it trashed by a Kimi one liner.
Posted 14 April 2013 - 03:55
Actually, he should be applauded, because he managed to answer the question in one short 'cutting the Gordian Knot' answer. Everything is there in that one-liner.