How about the opening post ?Does it say that in the rules? Or are you just going by what sounds good?
Ferrari Flexy Floor
#51
Posted 19 April 2013 - 23:10
Advertisement
#52
Posted 19 April 2013 - 23:18
You are correct, but to gain an advantage the flexing has to be controlled and consistent, and relating to load, rather than vibration. On this occasion the flexing is obviously the result of vibration.
Oh I agree this flexing is due to vibrations. It looks to me that the kerbs are perfectly spaced to allow oscillation at natural frequency. But the comment was made that a floor flexing would kill aero and that's not true.
#53
Posted 19 April 2013 - 23:22
How about the opening post ?
The floor cannot be infinitely rigid mate. There's video of other cars and their floors flexing as well. I think this is a non-issue for scrutineers and don't think we'll see any rival teams make a big deal about it.
#54
Posted 19 April 2013 - 23:23
How bout it?How about the opening post ?
And do you also think the Sauber is illegal after seeing the GIF of it?
Are you really going to be so stubborn despite everything thats been pointed out to you?
#55
Posted 19 April 2013 - 23:30
Don't put all cars inside the same bag, Jason.The floor cannot be infinitely rigid mate. There's video of other cars and their floors flexing as well. I think this is a non-issue for scrutineers and don't think we'll see any rival teams make a big deal about it.
There are two exhaust concepts derrived from 2012 cars: the McLaren and Sauber types.
Since the Sauber inpired exhaust extends its sidepods further back, the floor tends to be more rigid [Redbull and Lotus].
All others have more carved sidepods below and therefore more 'playable' floor surface.
Edited by V3TT3L, 19 April 2013 - 23:32.
#56
Posted 19 April 2013 - 23:31
I don't FLEX that much.Are you really going to be so stubborn despite everything thats been pointed out to you?
#57
Posted 19 April 2013 - 23:36
Don't put all cars inside the same bag, Jason.
There are two exhaust concepts derrived from 2012 cars: the McLaren and Sauber types.
Since the Sauber inpired exhaust extends its sidepods further back, the floor tends to be more rigid [Redbull and Lotus].
All others have more carved sidepods below and therefore more 'playable' floor surface.
I think Sauber's exhaust is more similar to Ferrari than RB or Lotus. In the link I posted on the last page, you can see Mercedes floor flexing as well. Not trying to be argumentative, I would have the same view as I do now if it was RB or Lotus we were speaking of. I assume we'll possibly find out more tomorrow maybe.
#58
Posted 19 April 2013 - 23:48
I meant to say RBR and Lotus are inspired in Sauber'12 exhaust.I think Sauber's exhaust is more similar to Ferrari than RB or Lotus. In the link I posted on the last page, you can see Mercedes floor flexing as well. Not trying to be argumentative, I would have the same view as I do now if it was RB or Lotus we were speaking of. I assume we'll possibly find out more tomorrow maybe.
Sauber'13 exhaust is inspired in McLaren'12.
Sauber Invented but shifted to another concept in 2013.
#59
Posted 20 April 2013 - 00:08
I meant to say RBR and Lotus are inspired in Sauber'12 exhaust.
Sauber'13 exhaust is inspired in McLaren'12.
Sauber Invented but shifted to another concept in 2013.
Right, I understood what you meant, but in the current McLaren-esque exhaust spec it was flexing as was the Mercedes. I honestly believe we would see all the cars floors flexing when going over the kerbs.
#61
Posted 20 April 2013 - 00:51
About time we had this kind of threads about Ferrari... Forza!!!
#62
Posted 20 April 2013 - 02:04
#63
Posted 20 April 2013 - 02:30
Thank you ! That was the image.
Ferrari's Harley Shake version
He's just run over a harsh kerb. Even the rear wing is shaking.
Nice try though
#64
Posted 20 April 2013 - 02:52
#65
Posted 20 April 2013 - 07:01
#66
Posted 20 April 2013 - 07:22
A lot of natural frequency vibrations occurring there. The girl on the right wins BTW (Frequencies more.........more matched).Front wings flexing is one thing, but is there a rule specifically against "twerking"?
#67
Posted 20 April 2013 - 08:05
A lot of natural frequency vibrations occurring there. The girl on the right wins BTW (Frequencies more.........more matched).
#68
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:18
I don't think even Ferrari and Alonso would want to win this way.Don't be naive man.
Scrut is held before the FP1.
Ferrari can change floors/parts along/among/between the sessions.
#69
Posted 20 April 2013 - 09:33
#70
Posted 20 April 2013 - 14:52
The Ferrari does seem to flex more visually in the clips but that is really not something concrete to judge anything because the clips are lowish quality and the cars are exiting a low speed corner on some pretty harsh kerbs. Whack a camera on the cars and lets see properly how much the parts are flexing.
#71
Posted 20 April 2013 - 20:26
Obviously flexing parts is a big issue and one that's not going to go away quickly considering how strong an advantage they can give. And of course it is impossible to build anything absolutely rigid. Perhaps the FIA could change it's method of scrutineering towards fitting cameras on random cars in set positions over the weekend and feeding the data into a computer model, to judge how much parts flex under high speeds.
The Ferrari does seem to flex more visually in the clips but that is really not something concrete to judge anything because the clips are lowish quality and the cars are exiting a low speed corner on some pretty harsh kerbs. Whack a camera on the cars and lets see properly how much the parts are flexing.
Not you Tsarwash, but some tifosi saying that Ferrari CAN'T build a stiff floor...
All they have to do is apply more carbom fiber layers and some reinforcements like the steel plate in the borders and some vertical ellements to provide 3D rigid structure.
Edited by V3TT3L, 20 April 2013 - 20:29.
#72
Posted 20 April 2013 - 20:36
I agree. This is such a nonsense thread. Ferrari doing not wrong and lots right. Good to see them up there this year, could be on for wdc which is exciting.The floor cannot be infinitely rigid mate. There's video of other cars and their floors flexing as well. I think this is a non-issue for scrutineers and don't think we'll see any rival teams make a big deal about it.
#73
Posted 20 April 2013 - 20:52
#74
Posted 21 April 2013 - 02:07
I have no idea how to build an F1 car. I wouldn't know where to start.Not you Tsarwash, but some tifosi saying that Ferrari CAN'T build a stiff floor...
All they have to do is apply more carbom fiber layers and some reinforcements like the steel plate in the borders and some vertical ellements to provide 3D rigid structure.
#75
Posted 21 April 2013 - 05:11
I have no idea how to build an F1 car. I wouldn't know where to start.
#76
Posted 21 April 2013 - 05:37
Building an F1 car is not so difficult. All you need is an engine, a gearbox, brakes and a transmission while building a chassis around it. Then you need a KERS with an exhaust on the back. Front wing and rear wing are accessories, a fuel tank is optional.I have no idea how to build an F1 car. I wouldn't know where to start.
#77
Posted 21 April 2013 - 11:32
#78
Posted 21 April 2013 - 11:39
riding over those bumps is enough to flex your front teeth out! Flexy rear wing as well
#79
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:26
Advertisement
#80
Posted 21 April 2013 - 12:55
FERRARI ILLEGAL SUPER DRS!!@!##!
Well their "super DRS" just cost them the race.
#81
Posted 21 April 2013 - 14:16
The irony...
The jelly bean wing self destructed today.
#82
Posted 21 April 2013 - 14:21
The irony...
The jelly bean wing self destructed today.
The irony is that Bell ends don't design race cars but plenty profer observations of which most are total tripe.
#83
Posted 21 April 2013 - 14:29
The irony...
The jelly bean wing self destructed today.
The DRS failed, not the floor.
#84
Posted 21 April 2013 - 14:37
Look at the rear wing.The DRS failed, not the floor.
All those vibrations - MIGHT - led to fatigue in the DRS actuator material.
#85
Posted 21 April 2013 - 14:51
Look at the rear wing.
All those vibrations - MIGHT - led to fatigue in the DRS actuator material.
Go and have a look at a Boeing 777 wing stress test and just have a rethink about your whole perception on material fatigue.
#86
Posted 21 April 2013 - 14:54