Jump to content


Photo
* * * - - 2 votes

Rookies: 4 races, no points


  • Please log in to reply
39 replies to this topic

#1 HistoryFan

HistoryFan
  • Member

  • 7,839 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:33

What's the record? How long did it take until a rookie scored a point in a season?
Now we had four races, no points by a rookie - a record?

Advertisement

#2 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 44,735 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:42

What's the record? How long did it take until a rookie scored a point in a season?
Now we had four races, no points by a rookie - a record?


No idea what the record is, but 4 races is nowhere close. Charles Pic didn't score at all last year so that's a whole season at least.

It's much harder for the back of the field teams to pickup points these days due to the reliability they all now enjoy.

#3 Zava

Zava
  • Member

  • 7,116 posts
  • Joined: September 10

Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:45

No idea what the record is, but 4 races is nowhere close. Charles Pic didn't score at all last year so that's a whole season at least.

It's much harder for the back of the field teams to pickup points these days due to the reliability they all now enjoy.

I think he/she meant no points by any of the rookies.

#4 Sin

Sin
  • Member

  • 2,042 posts
  • Joined: December 12

Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:48

it's not like any of them have a car that is really awesome to drive into the points.... only Bottas and Gutierrez have a slight chance, but even Hülkenberg has to really fight the C32 to an extreme to at least get points in that car.... sooo I understand Esteban not gathering points... didn't follow the Williams situation alot...

Caterham and Marussia, when was the last time any of their driver gathered points?

#5 rjsports

rjsports
  • Member

  • 573 posts
  • Joined: December 12

Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:49

Considering you only got points when you finished in the top 6 back in the days i'd say it's more than 4 races.

#6 HistoryFan

HistoryFan
  • Member

  • 7,839 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:19

I think he/she meant no points by any of the rookies.


Yes, that's the point. Any of the rookies.


#7 Bleu

Bleu
  • Member

  • 6,241 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:34

No rookies scored points in 1990 or 1998.

1990 had new point-scorers with Bernard (2 races before) and Suzuki (1 race+16DNPQ before) in 4th and 8th race.
1998 only new point-scorer was Magnussen who had one full season and one race before. 7th race of the season.

#8 HistoryFan

HistoryFan
  • Member

  • 7,839 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:38

Thank you :up:

#9 HistoryFan

HistoryFan
  • Member

  • 7,839 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:46

Rookies 1990:
- David Brabham (Brabham)
- Gary Brabham (Life)
- Gianni Morbidelli (Scuderia Italia, Minardi)
- Claudio Langes (EuroBrun)
- Gregor Foitek (Brabham, Onyx), although he had DNQ in 1989 with EuroBrun and Rial

Rookies 1998:
- Esteban Tuero (Minardi)
- Toranosuke Takagi (Tyrrell)

#10 Showty

Showty
  • Member

  • 2,183 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:53

Caterham and Marussia, when was the last time any of their driver gathered points?


It this a tricky question?

I mean, both teams have never scored.




#11 Cavani

Cavani
  • Member

  • 905 posts
  • Joined: March 12

Posted 25 April 2013 - 13:35

3 rookies that can never score points in their cars , 2 that have shitty cars

#12 7MGTEsup

7MGTEsup
  • Member

  • 2,474 posts
  • Joined: March 11

Posted 25 April 2013 - 13:36

Considering you only got points when you finished in the top 6 back in the days i'd say it's more than 4 races.


But back in those days there was the likelyhood of only 10 cars (or less) finishing a race. Not the 18 we seem to have race after race now, which is part of the reason new teams can never really break into F1 as they need to score points to get money.

#13 EthanM

EthanM
  • Member

  • 4,819 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 25 April 2013 - 13:45

But back in those days there was the likelyhood of only 10 cars (or less) finishing a race. Not the 18 we seem to have race after race now, which is part of the reason new teams can never really break into F1 as they need to score points to get money.


you don't need to score points to get money (the last 2 years what decided who got the last tranche of money was a 12th place finish)

#14 Opaque

Opaque
  • Member

  • 44 posts
  • Joined: March 13

Posted 25 April 2013 - 13:57

You could still count Grosjean as a rookie since he hasn't completed a full season and he has 26 points. Not bad in just four races.

#15 Jackmancer

Jackmancer
  • Member

  • 3,226 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 25 April 2013 - 14:43

Luca Badoer did 58 races and never scored a point. Not his fault though, he once retired due mechanical failure en route to 4th place. But in his Ferrari races he could have snatched his first point, really.

Then there's Nicola Larini, who did score points, but only after 69 stars.

Edited by Jackmancer, 25 April 2013 - 14:44.


#16 charly0418

charly0418
  • Member

  • 3,289 posts
  • Joined: October 12

Posted 25 April 2013 - 16:45

You could still count Grosjean as a rookie since he hasn't completed a full season and he has 26 points. Not bad in just four races.


What

#17 onemoresolo

onemoresolo
  • Member

  • 952 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 25 April 2013 - 16:51

You could still count Grosjean as a rookie since he hasn't completed a full season and he has 26 points. Not bad in just four races.


Tenuous in the extreme!

#18 charly0418

charly0418
  • Member

  • 3,289 posts
  • Joined: October 12

Posted 25 April 2013 - 16:56

The only one that has had a chance to score points was Gutierrez in Malaysia.
Other than that they were being lapped.

#19 Myrvold

Myrvold
  • Member

  • 15,972 posts
  • Joined: December 10

Posted 25 April 2013 - 18:37

But in his Ferrari races he could have snatched his first point, really.


Just like Fisichella did :)

Also, remember that Alonso only got a single top 10 in his first season. When 10 drivers finished.

Advertisement

#20 skywing

skywing
  • Member

  • 706 posts
  • Joined: April 10

Posted 25 April 2013 - 18:42

The only one that has had a chance to score points was Gutierrez in Malaysia.
Other than that they were being lapped.

It was Bottas actually.

#21 pacificquay

pacificquay
  • Member

  • 6,267 posts
  • Joined: March 07

Posted 25 April 2013 - 18:43

Considering you only got points when you finished in the top 6 back in the days i'd say it's more than 4 races.




Reliability means it was easier to get a top 6 then than a top 10 now, I'd suggest

#22 joshb

joshb
  • Member

  • 3,387 posts
  • Joined: March 11

Posted 25 April 2013 - 19:48

I think Gutierrez and Bottas have the cars to score points when there's a 2 or 3 retirements- I think one of them has had a 12th or 13th and in recent races retirements have been low
VDG, Chilton and Bianchi won't unless there's a sizeable level of attrition (6 or 7 faster car retiring)

#23 charly0418

charly0418
  • Member

  • 3,289 posts
  • Joined: October 12

Posted 25 April 2013 - 19:58

It was Bottas actually.


It was both lol, Gutierrez would have had a chance had he pitted one last time but for some reason Sauber decided to stretch the last stint. Bottas fnished 11th, close to Vergne

#24 ryan86

ryan86
  • Member

  • 1,100 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 25 April 2013 - 20:35

I think I read that about 50% of all finishers scored points then and it's about the same now.

#25 hogstar

hogstar
  • Member

  • 553 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 25 April 2013 - 20:39

Can see Bottas scoring points if Williams' upgrades at Barcelona have the desired effect. It's going to be a tough year for rookies this season.

Until we see full grids again, I'd like to see third (perhaps older spec) cars used to assess young drivers, but can't see Bernie ever letting that happen unless we lost a couple more teams.

#26 Myrvold

Myrvold
  • Member

  • 15,972 posts
  • Joined: December 10

Posted 25 April 2013 - 22:50

I think I read that about 50% of all finishers scored points then and it's about the same now.


That might be true. You only need 2 retirements to get a 50% today. And that's what you have. While you had 26 cars most of the time when you had 6 point scorers, you could get away with 14 retirements in a single race, and still have 50%

However, let's pretend that each car in each team runs at the same speed. And the retirements is only happening among those who get's points. Today two retirements means that if there is a gap between team 6 and 7, you will see 6 teams run away with the points. If you have 10 retirements in a race. You could have the 15th and 16th fastest car, and pick up a double point finish. With more retirements, and still just top 6 with points.

Edited by Myrvold, 25 April 2013 - 22:52.


#27 PayasYouRace

PayasYouRace
  • Racing Sims Forum Host

  • 46,300 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 25 April 2013 - 22:55

I did an analysis of points scorers:finishers over the past 20 years or so a couple of years ago. Finding it on here would be a pain but it did show that the ratio is more or less the same given modern reliability rates.

#28 ryan86

ryan86
  • Member

  • 1,100 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 26 April 2013 - 01:31

Just a few calculations of how many of the points scoring positions the top 5 teams in that years constructors championship took.
1993 - 78.1%
1994 - 72.9%
1995 - 76.4%
2002 - 82.3% (last year of 6)
2003 - 81.25% (first year of 8)
2010 - 73.6%
2011 - 75.3%
2012 - 70%

Obviously I've only done 8 of the 20 years in the period, because it's half two in the morning, but the figures look pretty consistent.

#29 onemoresolo

onemoresolo
  • Member

  • 952 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:13

Just a few calculations of how many of the points scoring positions the top 5 teams in that years constructors championship took.
1993 - 78.1%
1994 - 72.9%
1995 - 76.4%
2002 - 82.3% (last year of 6)
2003 - 81.25% (first year of 8)
2010 - 73.6%
2011 - 75.3%
2012 - 70%

Obviously I've only done 8 of the 20 years in the period, because it's half two in the morning, but the figures look pretty consistent.


Interesting stats, thanks :up:

#30 UPRC

UPRC
  • Member

  • 4,716 posts
  • Joined: February 99

Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:35

You could still count Grosjean as a rookie since he hasn't completed a full season and he has 26 points. Not bad in just four races.


Did you miss all of last season? :confused:

#31 skywing

skywing
  • Member

  • 706 posts
  • Joined: April 10

Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:37

Did you miss all of last season? :confused:

Technically he hasn't completed a full season because he was suspended in Monza. :p

#32 Youichi

Youichi
  • Member

  • 3,429 posts
  • Joined: January 04

Posted 26 April 2013 - 14:14

Luca Badoer did 58 races and never scored a point. Not his fault though, he once retired due mechanical failure en route to 4th place. But in his Ferrari races he could have snatched his first point, really.

Then there's Nicola Larini, who did score points, but only after 69 stars.


Under current rules Badoer would have scored points in his 4th race, and 9 further times in his career, and Larini would have scored 9 times before his 2nd place in start 69.

Rookies 1990:
- David Brabham (Brabham)
- Gary Brabham (Life)
- Gianni Morbidelli (Scuderia Italia, Minardi)
- Claudio Langes (EuroBrun)
- Gregor Foitek (Brabham, Onyx), although he had DNQ in 1989 with EuroBrun and Rial

Rookies 1998:
- Esteban Tuero (Minardi)
- Toranosuke Takagi (Tyrrell)

Gregor Foitek (spit) had a 7th, and the rest only had 2 finishes between them, poor chaps.

Tuero was 8th in his 4th race, and Takagi had two 9th placed finishes.

#33 ryan86

ryan86
  • Member

  • 1,100 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 26 April 2013 - 16:19

Interesting stats, thanks :up:


1993 - 78.1%
1994 - 72.9%
1995 - 76.4%
1996 - 85.4%
1997 - 80.3%
1998 - 87.5%
1999 - 82.3%
2000 - 81.3%
2001 - 82.3%
2002 - 82.3% (last year of 6)
2003 - 81.25% (first year of 8)
2004 - 81.25%
2005 - 75%
2006 - 82.6%
2007 - 83.8% (McLaren counted as a Top 5 team)
2008 - 75%
2009 - 72.8%
2010 - 73.6%
2011 - 75.3%
2012 - 70%



#34 Myrvold

Myrvold
  • Member

  • 15,972 posts
  • Joined: December 10

Posted 26 April 2013 - 17:22

1993 - 78.1%
1994 - 72.9%
1995 - 76.4%
1996 - 85.4%
1997 - 80.3%
1998 - 87.5%
1999 - 82.3%
2000 - 81.3%
2001 - 82.3%
2002 - 82.3% (last year of 6)
2003 - 81.25% (first year of 8)
2004 - 81.25%
2005 - 75%
2006 - 82.6%
2007 - 83.8% (McLaren counted as a Top 5 team)
2008 - 75%
2009 - 72.8%
2010 - 73.6%
2011 - 75.3%
2012 - 70%


As a backmarker-fan, do you bother to check on teams 7-11?

#35 PayasYouRace

PayasYouRace
  • Racing Sims Forum Host

  • 46,300 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 26 April 2013 - 17:33

As a backmarker-fan, do you bother to check on teams 7-11?


Subtract from 100  ;)

#36 ryan86

ryan86
  • Member

  • 1,100 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 26 April 2013 - 18:00

Year  6th  7th   8th  9th  10th  Others
1993  5.2  6.25  5.2  2.1  2.1  2.1
1994  4.15 6.25  7.3  4.15 3.1  2.1
1995  6.9  9.8   2	2.9  1	0
2010  9	7.9   5.8  3.7  0	0
2011  9	7.4   7.4  1.5  0	0
2012  8	10	7.5  5	0	0


Just done a few years Row 1993 and Column 6th means that the team that finished 6th in 1993 took 5.2% of available points scoring poisitions. Obviously over the past few years the new teams (Lotus/Virgin/HRT) have failed to score, but that's always been true of the team adrift at the back (Pacific/Forti/Lola/Coloni).

#37 Myrvold

Myrvold
  • Member

  • 15,972 posts
  • Joined: December 10

Posted 26 April 2013 - 18:47

Year  6th  7th   8th  9th  10th  Others
1993  5.2  6.25  5.2  2.1  2.1  2.1
1994  4.15 6.25  7.3  4.15 3.1  2.1
1995  6.9  9.8   2	2.9  1	0
2010  9	7.9   5.8  3.7  0	0
2011  9	7.4   7.4  1.5  0	0
2012  8	10	7.5  5	0	0


Just done a few years Row 1993 and Column 6th means that the team that finished 6th in 1993 took 5.2% of available points scoring poisitions. Obviously over the past few years the new teams (Lotus/Virgin/HRT) have failed to score, but that's always been true of the team adrift at the back (Pacific/Forti/Lola/Coloni).


Thanks! :) Great work mr.! :D

#38 ryan86

ryan86
  • Member

  • 1,100 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 26 April 2013 - 21:53

Year  6th  7th   8th  9th  10th  Others
1993  5.2  6.25  5.2  2.1  2.1  2.1
1994  4.15 6.25  7.3  4.15 3.1  2.1
1995  6.9  9.8   2	2.9  1	0
1996  5.2  4.15  3.1  1.05 0	0
1997  7.8  6.9   2.9  1	1	0
1998  5.2  3.1   3.1  1.05 0	0
1999  6.25 4.15  5.2  1	1	0 
2000  8.8  3.9   3.9  2	0	0
2001  6.9  3.9   3.9  2.9  1	0
2010  9	7.9   5.8  3.7  0	0
2011  9	7.4   7.4  1.5  0	0
2012  8	10	7.5  5	0	0

Added a few more years, though the gneral patterns appear to continue.

#39 alecc

alecc
  • Member

  • 2,191 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 26 April 2013 - 22:25

I'm curious how long we will wait to another group of rookies like in the late 00's where to F1 came Hamilton, Vettel, Rosberg, Kubica, rookies with great performance from the go.

Advertisement

#40 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 44,735 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 26 April 2013 - 23:52

I'm curious how long we will wait to another group of rookies like in the late 00's where to F1 came Hamilton, Vettel, Rosberg, Kubica, rookies with great performance from the go.


With today's limited testing it has to be harder for someone to show that level of performance straight off.