Rookies: 4 races, no points
#1
Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:33
Now we had four races, no points by a rookie - a record?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:42
What's the record? How long did it take until a rookie scored a point in a season?
Now we had four races, no points by a rookie - a record?
No idea what the record is, but 4 races is nowhere close. Charles Pic didn't score at all last year so that's a whole season at least.
It's much harder for the back of the field teams to pickup points these days due to the reliability they all now enjoy.
#3
Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:45
I think he/she meant no points by any of the rookies.No idea what the record is, but 4 races is nowhere close. Charles Pic didn't score at all last year so that's a whole season at least.
It's much harder for the back of the field teams to pickup points these days due to the reliability they all now enjoy.
#4
Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:48
Caterham and Marussia, when was the last time any of their driver gathered points?
#5
Posted 25 April 2013 - 09:49
#6
Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:19
I think he/she meant no points by any of the rookies.
Yes, that's the point. Any of the rookies.
#7
Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:34
1990 had new point-scorers with Bernard (2 races before) and Suzuki (1 race+16DNPQ before) in 4th and 8th race.
1998 only new point-scorer was Magnussen who had one full season and one race before. 7th race of the season.
#8
Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:38
#9
Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:46
- David Brabham (Brabham)
- Gary Brabham (Life)
- Gianni Morbidelli (Scuderia Italia, Minardi)
- Claudio Langes (EuroBrun)
- Gregor Foitek (Brabham, Onyx), although he had DNQ in 1989 with EuroBrun and Rial
Rookies 1998:
- Esteban Tuero (Minardi)
- Toranosuke Takagi (Tyrrell)
#10
Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:53
Caterham and Marussia, when was the last time any of their driver gathered points?
It this a tricky question?
I mean, both teams have never scored.
#11
Posted 25 April 2013 - 13:35
#12
Posted 25 April 2013 - 13:36
Considering you only got points when you finished in the top 6 back in the days i'd say it's more than 4 races.
But back in those days there was the likelyhood of only 10 cars (or less) finishing a race. Not the 18 we seem to have race after race now, which is part of the reason new teams can never really break into F1 as they need to score points to get money.
#13
Posted 25 April 2013 - 13:45
But back in those days there was the likelyhood of only 10 cars (or less) finishing a race. Not the 18 we seem to have race after race now, which is part of the reason new teams can never really break into F1 as they need to score points to get money.
you don't need to score points to get money (the last 2 years what decided who got the last tranche of money was a 12th place finish)
#14
Posted 25 April 2013 - 13:57
#15
Posted 25 April 2013 - 14:43
Then there's Nicola Larini, who did score points, but only after 69 stars.
Edited by Jackmancer, 25 April 2013 - 14:44.
#16
Posted 25 April 2013 - 16:45
You could still count Grosjean as a rookie since he hasn't completed a full season and he has 26 points. Not bad in just four races.
What
#17
Posted 25 April 2013 - 16:51
You could still count Grosjean as a rookie since he hasn't completed a full season and he has 26 points. Not bad in just four races.
Tenuous in the extreme!
#18
Posted 25 April 2013 - 16:56
Other than that they were being lapped.
#19
Posted 25 April 2013 - 18:37
But in his Ferrari races he could have snatched his first point, really.
Just like Fisichella did
Also, remember that Alonso only got a single top 10 in his first season. When 10 drivers finished.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 25 April 2013 - 18:42
It was Bottas actually.The only one that has had a chance to score points was Gutierrez in Malaysia.
Other than that they were being lapped.
#21
Posted 25 April 2013 - 18:43
Considering you only got points when you finished in the top 6 back in the days i'd say it's more than 4 races.
Reliability means it was easier to get a top 6 then than a top 10 now, I'd suggest
#22
Posted 25 April 2013 - 19:48
VDG, Chilton and Bianchi won't unless there's a sizeable level of attrition (6 or 7 faster car retiring)
#23
Posted 25 April 2013 - 19:58
It was Bottas actually.
It was both lol, Gutierrez would have had a chance had he pitted one last time but for some reason Sauber decided to stretch the last stint. Bottas fnished 11th, close to Vergne
#24
Posted 25 April 2013 - 20:35
#25
Posted 25 April 2013 - 20:39
Until we see full grids again, I'd like to see third (perhaps older spec) cars used to assess young drivers, but can't see Bernie ever letting that happen unless we lost a couple more teams.
#26
Posted 25 April 2013 - 22:50
I think I read that about 50% of all finishers scored points then and it's about the same now.
That might be true. You only need 2 retirements to get a 50% today. And that's what you have. While you had 26 cars most of the time when you had 6 point scorers, you could get away with 14 retirements in a single race, and still have 50%
However, let's pretend that each car in each team runs at the same speed. And the retirements is only happening among those who get's points. Today two retirements means that if there is a gap between team 6 and 7, you will see 6 teams run away with the points. If you have 10 retirements in a race. You could have the 15th and 16th fastest car, and pick up a double point finish. With more retirements, and still just top 6 with points.
Edited by Myrvold, 25 April 2013 - 22:52.
#27
Posted 25 April 2013 - 22:55
#28
Posted 26 April 2013 - 01:31
1993 - 78.1%
1994 - 72.9%
1995 - 76.4%
2002 - 82.3% (last year of 6)
2003 - 81.25% (first year of 8)
2010 - 73.6%
2011 - 75.3%
2012 - 70%
Obviously I've only done 8 of the 20 years in the period, because it's half two in the morning, but the figures look pretty consistent.
#29
Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:13
Just a few calculations of how many of the points scoring positions the top 5 teams in that years constructors championship took.
1993 - 78.1%
1994 - 72.9%
1995 - 76.4%
2002 - 82.3% (last year of 6)
2003 - 81.25% (first year of 8)
2010 - 73.6%
2011 - 75.3%
2012 - 70%
Obviously I've only done 8 of the 20 years in the period, because it's half two in the morning, but the figures look pretty consistent.
Interesting stats, thanks
#30
Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:35
You could still count Grosjean as a rookie since he hasn't completed a full season and he has 26 points. Not bad in just four races.
Did you miss all of last season?
#31
Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:37
Technically he hasn't completed a full season because he was suspended in Monza.Did you miss all of last season?
#32
Posted 26 April 2013 - 14:14
Luca Badoer did 58 races and never scored a point. Not his fault though, he once retired due mechanical failure en route to 4th place. But in his Ferrari races he could have snatched his first point, really.
Then there's Nicola Larini, who did score points, but only after 69 stars.
Under current rules Badoer would have scored points in his 4th race, and 9 further times in his career, and Larini would have scored 9 times before his 2nd place in start 69.
Gregor Foitek (spit) had a 7th, and the rest only had 2 finishes between them, poor chaps.Rookies 1990:
- David Brabham (Brabham)
- Gary Brabham (Life)
- Gianni Morbidelli (Scuderia Italia, Minardi)
- Claudio Langes (EuroBrun)
- Gregor Foitek (Brabham, Onyx), although he had DNQ in 1989 with EuroBrun and Rial
Rookies 1998:
- Esteban Tuero (Minardi)
- Toranosuke Takagi (Tyrrell)
Tuero was 8th in his 4th race, and Takagi had two 9th placed finishes.
#33
Posted 26 April 2013 - 16:19
Interesting stats, thanks
1993 - 78.1%
1994 - 72.9%
1995 - 76.4%
1996 - 85.4%
1997 - 80.3%
1998 - 87.5%
1999 - 82.3%
2000 - 81.3%
2001 - 82.3%
2002 - 82.3% (last year of 6)
2003 - 81.25% (first year of 8)
2004 - 81.25%
2005 - 75%
2006 - 82.6%
2007 - 83.8% (McLaren counted as a Top 5 team)
2008 - 75%
2009 - 72.8%
2010 - 73.6%
2011 - 75.3%
2012 - 70%
#34
Posted 26 April 2013 - 17:22
1993 - 78.1%
1994 - 72.9%
1995 - 76.4%
1996 - 85.4%
1997 - 80.3%
1998 - 87.5%
1999 - 82.3%
2000 - 81.3%
2001 - 82.3%
2002 - 82.3% (last year of 6)
2003 - 81.25% (first year of 8)
2004 - 81.25%
2005 - 75%
2006 - 82.6%
2007 - 83.8% (McLaren counted as a Top 5 team)
2008 - 75%
2009 - 72.8%
2010 - 73.6%
2011 - 75.3%
2012 - 70%
As a backmarker-fan, do you bother to check on teams 7-11?
#35
Posted 26 April 2013 - 17:33
As a backmarker-fan, do you bother to check on teams 7-11?
Subtract from 100
#36
Posted 26 April 2013 - 18:00
Year 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th Others 1993 5.2 6.25 5.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 1994 4.15 6.25 7.3 4.15 3.1 2.1 1995 6.9 9.8 2 2.9 1 0 2010 9 7.9 5.8 3.7 0 0 2011 9 7.4 7.4 1.5 0 0 2012 8 10 7.5 5 0 0
Just done a few years Row 1993 and Column 6th means that the team that finished 6th in 1993 took 5.2% of available points scoring poisitions. Obviously over the past few years the new teams (Lotus/Virgin/HRT) have failed to score, but that's always been true of the team adrift at the back (Pacific/Forti/Lola/Coloni).
#37
Posted 26 April 2013 - 18:47
Year 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th Others 1993 5.2 6.25 5.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 1994 4.15 6.25 7.3 4.15 3.1 2.1 1995 6.9 9.8 2 2.9 1 0 2010 9 7.9 5.8 3.7 0 0 2011 9 7.4 7.4 1.5 0 0 2012 8 10 7.5 5 0 0
Just done a few years Row 1993 and Column 6th means that the team that finished 6th in 1993 took 5.2% of available points scoring poisitions. Obviously over the past few years the new teams (Lotus/Virgin/HRT) have failed to score, but that's always been true of the team adrift at the back (Pacific/Forti/Lola/Coloni).
Thanks! Great work mr.!
#38
Posted 26 April 2013 - 21:53
Year 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th Others 1993 5.2 6.25 5.2 2.1 2.1 2.1 1994 4.15 6.25 7.3 4.15 3.1 2.1 1995 6.9 9.8 2 2.9 1 0 1996 5.2 4.15 3.1 1.05 0 0 1997 7.8 6.9 2.9 1 1 0 1998 5.2 3.1 3.1 1.05 0 0 1999 6.25 4.15 5.2 1 1 0 2000 8.8 3.9 3.9 2 0 0 2001 6.9 3.9 3.9 2.9 1 0 2010 9 7.9 5.8 3.7 0 0 2011 9 7.4 7.4 1.5 0 0 2012 8 10 7.5 5 0 0
Added a few more years, though the gneral patterns appear to continue.
#39
Posted 26 April 2013 - 22:25
Advertisement
#40
Posted 26 April 2013 - 23:52
I'm curious how long we will wait to another group of rookies like in the late 00's where to F1 came Hamilton, Vettel, Rosberg, Kubica, rookies with great performance from the go.
With today's limited testing it has to be harder for someone to show that level of performance straight off.