Jump to content


Photo
* * * - - 6 votes

New Pirelli tyres and DRS - a disaster for F1 and racing? Part 2 [merged]


  • Please log in to reply
2617 replies to this topic

#2601 pingu666

pingu666
  • Member

  • 8,586 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 15 October 2013 - 22:29

there's the sharp edges on the wings too



Advertisement

#2602 ExFlagMan

ExFlagMan
  • Member

  • 1,422 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 16 October 2013 - 07:06

The rules used to state that the front wing endplates had to have a minimum thickness of something like 10mm and have a rounded profile to minimise damaged to tyres during contact - this was back in the days of simple single plane wings and end plates. Not sure if it has been changed/updated to reflect the zillions of parts now present on the wings. Looking at the drawings in Autosport most of the wing parts do not seem to be very thick or have a rounded profile.

#2603 SenorSjon

SenorSjon
  • Member

  • 1,331 posts
  • Joined: March 12

Posted 16 October 2013 - 09:42

The driving position isn't helping either. There is no way a driver can see the front end of the car.



#2604 David1976

David1976
  • Member

  • 809 posts
  • Joined: September 08

Posted 16 October 2013 - 09:54

Frankly, in my opinion, today's Pirelli tyres are a joke.

 

They are so fragile that drivers prefer not to attack.  Drivers dare not to lock up in a race so as to avoid huge wear/punctures.  Bring back Bridgestone!  Or any manufacturer capable of making F1 quality tyres for that matter.

 

It's a sad day when drivers do not drive anywhere near the limits of their cars capability because their tyres are sub standard.  



#2605 vista

vista
  • Member

  • 525 posts
  • Joined: April 13

Posted 26 October 2013 - 18:31

Interesting comments from Alonso regarding the "randomness" of the Pirelli tyres:

 

http://www.dailymail...elli-tyres.html

 

"Set to set, it's a random tyre and you need to be lucky with the set you put on tomorrow."

 

I heard something similar last year from Button, I think; the tyres have different behaviour from set to set - even the same compounds. It highlights yet another flaw from the current tyres. 

 

When that is said, I think it is entertaining and good for the excitement when one tyre is very bad and the other a "proper" race tyre (more or less) as we see this weekend. We see different strategies which mix things up a bit. And the medium tyre is a good race tyre so it's not like Barcelona but more like China. 

 



#2606 David1976

David1976
  • Member

  • 809 posts
  • Joined: September 08

Posted 29 October 2013 - 11:19

Interesting comments from Alonso regarding the "randomness" of the Pirelli tyres:

 

http://www.dailymail...elli-tyres.html

 

"Set to set, it's a random tyre and you need to be lucky with the set you put on tomorrow."

 

I heard something similar last year from Button, I think; the tyres have different behaviour from set to set - even the same compounds. It highlights yet another flaw from the current tyres. 

 

Pirelli have not done a great job this time in F1.  Have we ever had so many complaints about tyres?

Tyre fragility is not the way to encourage close racing.

 

I am also tired (no pun intended) of hearing Paul Hembrey pass the buck and blame drivers and the teams.  Next year it will be even more critical.  Can you imagine the tryes lasting with all of the extra torque the new power plants are going to produce?

 

If the tyres have random characteristics because of poor quality control that is deeply concerning.



#2607 SenorSjon

SenorSjon
  • Member

  • 1,331 posts
  • Joined: March 12

Posted 29 October 2013 - 11:29

No worries. Next year they will be crawling around to save fuel. The Pirelli's could be able to cope with that.



#2608 Massa_f1

Massa_f1
  • Member

  • 3,285 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 29 October 2013 - 11:42

Interesting comments from Alonso regarding the "randomness" of the Pirelli tyres:

 

http://www.dailymail...elli-tyres.html

 

"Set to set, it's a random tyre and you need to be lucky with the set you put on tomorrow."

 

I heard something similar last year from Button, I think; the tyres have different behaviour from set to set - even the same compounds. It highlights yet another flaw from the current tyres. 

 

When that is said, I think it is entertaining and good for the excitement when one tyre is very bad and the other a "proper" race tyre (more or less) as we see this weekend. We see different strategies which mix things up a bit. And the medium tyre is a good race tyre so it's not like Barcelona but more like China. 

 

 

I think it has been obvious for a while that the tyres are random from set to set, even on the same kind of tyre. 

 

Why can't the FIA let Pirelli test in Texas during the week between the final race, and then again in Brazil after the final race weekend. I remember F1 doing that in 98 when everybody was going to Bridgestone for the first time. Didn't they stay in Japan and test, and even drivers who had moved teams could jump in their new teams car. Just 24 hours after the final race. FIA really need to let Pirelli do something, because they appear to have no clue what they are doing without testing a proper up to date F1 car.



#2609 SenorSjon

SenorSjon
  • Member

  • 1,331 posts
  • Joined: March 12

Posted 29 October 2013 - 12:39

Back then, testing was normal and F1 was more of a sport than it is these days.



#2610 ReeVe

ReeVe
  • Member

  • 178 posts
  • Joined: October 13

Posted 29 October 2013 - 12:58

I think it has been obvious for a while that the tyres are random from set to set, even on the same kind of tyre. 

 

Why can't the FIA let Pirelli test in Texas during the week between the final race, and then again in Brazil after the final race weekend. I remember F1 doing that in 98 when everybody was going to Bridgestone for the first time. Didn't they stay in Japan and test, and even drivers who had moved teams could jump in their new teams car. Just 24 hours after the final race. FIA really need to let Pirelli do something, because they appear to have no clue what they are doing without testing a proper up to date F1 car.

 

presumably cause it costs money to test, team personnel are exhausted, and they will do it next year anyways, with some planning



#2611 nosecone

nosecone
  • Member

  • 737 posts
  • Joined: January 13

Posted 29 October 2013 - 15:00

Interesting comments from Alonso regarding the "randomness" of the Pirelli tyres:

 

http://www.dailymail...elli-tyres.html

 

"Set to set, it's a random tyre and you need to be lucky with the set you put on tomorrow."

 

I heard something similar last year from Button, I think; the tyres have different behaviour from set to set - even the same compounds. It highlights yet another flaw from the current tyres. 

 

When that is said, I think it is entertaining and good for the excitement when one tyre is very bad and the other a "proper" race tyre (more or less) as we see this weekend. We see different strategies which mix things up a bit. And the medium tyre is a good race tyre so it's not like Barcelona but more like China. 

 

 

 

The randomness could be caused by temperature. I remember a story in 2012(?) where they had to bring new tyres to a GP because the others got to cold on the flight to this GP. At those tyres who had to cope with cold temperatures some pieces of rubber delaminated. Thus you have to hope that your tyres were in a rather warm area in the airplane. This is horrible and shocking. You should believe that F1 is hightech and not a random product

 

another case: di Resta made 56 laps on the medium tyre in Canada. While Vettel the race winner Vettel did no more than 33 laps on the medium. I admit that the FI was a very tyre conserving car and that they tried ofthen very unusual strategies, but i doubt he had made it if he had the same tyre like all others. Di Resta used the mediums for 56 laps at the start of the race and not at the end where the car is lighter. He also had almost the same drop off like Vettel.

 

http://en.mclarenf-1...gp=899&hid=1_14 you see the gap is continuely increasing and before his pit stop he drove on his 56lap old tyres even faster than Vettel on his 33laps old tyres. i agree that this map is a bit inaccurate - Vettel didn't even use the softs according to this.

 

http://en.mclarenf-1...ta#.Um_M1BCmZHc here the lap times. His lap times became even faster towards the end. Either he hit the miracolous sweet spot of the Pirelli or he had a set of hard tyres which just had the name mediums


Edited by nosecone, 29 October 2013 - 15:05.


#2612 Snic

Snic
  • Member

  • 562 posts
  • Joined: July 11

Posted 06 April 2014 - 18:02

Hamilton admitted that this was the first race in years he could treat his car like a go-kart and push and defend. 

 

Real racing is back on the menu!



#2613 Disgrace

Disgrace
  • RC Forum Host

  • 9,464 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 06 April 2014 - 18:08

This race just demonstrated how the pecking order of circuits has been completely reversed. All of the circuits which provided a poor spectacle pre-2011 (Bahrain, Abu Dhabi, Hungary) are now providing good races. Until DRS is banned, traditionally good circuits such as Spa and Canada will remain artificially at the bottom of the barrel for racing unfortunately.



#2614 Snic

Snic
  • Member

  • 562 posts
  • Joined: July 11

Posted 06 April 2014 - 18:09

I HATE DRS with a passion but I have to say at least it's just about letting cars get alongside at the moment and not just breeze past



#2615 Disgrace

Disgrace
  • RC Forum Host

  • 9,464 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 06 April 2014 - 18:20

I HATE DRS with a passion but I have to say at least it's just about letting cars get alongside at the moment and not just breeze past

 

Given that the FIA systematically deploy DRS zones in the primary overtaking areas on the circuit, regardless of circuit, breezing past is always going to be result of DRS on the "good" circuits. Whether this is the real root problem isn't really tested as there's only one good example in three seasons of the FIA deploying it elsewhere on the circuit. That was Germany '11 and it was a cracker.



#2616 eronrules

eronrules
  • Member

  • 3,170 posts
  • Joined: January 12

Posted 06 April 2014 - 18:34

good to see cars pushing like hell, pirelli finally have delivered a tire formula that doesn't distract from the racing aspect.

 

good to see too that DRS is getting more and more refined. 

 

i wrote earlier at other thread how the tilek dromes were coming alive with the new formula. TBH, DRS and Pirelli has nothing to do with old classic circuits being boring and  all.

 

the reason is simple, the old circuit layouts are simple and more aero dependent, they have negative camber corners, fast broad sweeps, and less of an challenge for these generation of cars,

 

the modern circuits employ fast, medium, slow corners with technical bits added along with longish straight which posses much challage to the car and drivers. that's what we've been seeing post Pirelli era. thing don't look too rosy for old circuits like monza or spa i'm afraid.

 

perhaps that's for the better, let's not drown in nostalgia. embrace the future.  :up:



#2617 Lights

Lights
  • Member

  • 9,302 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 06 April 2014 - 21:01

I feel like Pirelli are being overlooked right now, they did well with tires so far this year. Not too much nonsense with some cars behaving completely different on a certain tire than another car, the drivers look like they're able to push more, and there's way less tire marbles off the racing line making fights better.



#2618 kimster89

kimster89
  • Member

  • 617 posts
  • Joined: May 13

Posted 06 April 2014 - 21:05

Yes pirelli did awesome job. And it still degrades enough for 2 or 3 stop races and different strategies