Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Williams to end relationship with Renault?


  • Please log in to reply
105 replies to this topic

#101 Owen

Owen
  • Member

  • 13,178 posts
  • Joined: September 06

Posted 31 May 2013 - 12:43

Unmistakably true. And I don't really reckon that Mercedes power will make Williams the force they were in the 80s and first half of the 90s. I'd say they need an exclusive, McLaren-Honda-esque manufacturer deal for that.

The same goes for Lotus, by the way: whether they stay with Renault or opt for Honda come 2016, they will be behind Red Bull respectively McLaren in the picking order.

yeh, you can't beat a works deal.

Advertisement

#102 Bleu

Bleu
  • Member

  • 6,258 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 31 May 2013 - 13:38

Williams didn't go with Peugeot because there was a plan to build French "super-team". With Renault leaving as the engine manufacturer the only option was Peugeot. They were with Jordan at the time, I think the deal was actually longer than into 1997. But with the negotiations Jordan got the Mugen-Honda engines left out by Prost.

And as seen, the French team plan didn't go well at all: 10 points in three seasons.

Edited by Bleu, 31 May 2013 - 13:39.


#103 BigCHrome

BigCHrome
  • Member

  • 4,049 posts
  • Joined: July 10

Posted 31 May 2013 - 17:55

True. But Williams Renault 2 is a bit of a shadow compared to the original Williams Renault era.
Oh well. Good luck to them anyway - most F1 fans would be happy to see them do well for whatever reason.


Williams had a respectable season last year. It was never going to be anywhere near the original Williams Renault era as long as they don't have big sponsors.

Unmistakably true. And I don't really reckon that Mercedes power will make Williams the force they were in the 80s and first half of the 90s. I'd say they need an exclusive, McLaren-Honda-esque manufacturer deal for that.

The same goes for Lotus, by the way: whether they stay with Renault or opt for Honda come 2016, they will be behind Red Bull respectively McLaren in the picking order.


I dont think works deals are going to be that important, even with the new V6t engines.

#104 August

August
  • Member

  • 3,277 posts
  • Joined: March 10

Posted 01 June 2013 - 09:14

Maybe badged just as Williams AMG?


I doubt. I think the AMG belongs to be with Mercedes, not with Williams.

But I got an idea, Merc could badge their works team's engines as AMG, to make the chassis name Mercedes AMG, like in the official team name.

#105 lustigson

lustigson
  • Member

  • 5,911 posts
  • Joined: March 01

Posted 01 June 2013 - 09:23

But I got an idea, Merc could badge their works team's engines as AMG, to make the chassis name Mercedes AMG, like in the official team name.

That's quite a good idea, indeed: Mercedes–AMG

And the customer teams would then simply be McLaren–Mercedes (2014 only), Force India–Mercedes and now Williams–Mercedes.

#106 Clatter

Clatter
  • Member

  • 44,754 posts
  • Joined: February 00

Posted 02 June 2013 - 20:02

Williams had a respectable season last year. It was never going to be anywhere near the original Williams Renault era as long as they don't have big sponsors.



I dont think works deals are going to be that important, even with the new V6t engines.


Big sponsors don't guarantee a good car. They have the funds to design and build a car, you have to look to those do the designing for the poor results.