DRS change: Only against cars with same amount of pitstops
#1
Posted 30 June 2013 - 18:52
Advertisement
#2
Posted 30 June 2013 - 18:54
#3
Posted 30 June 2013 - 18:55
Or you could make things simpler and just do away with the gimmicks.
Right.
Gimmicking the use of a gimmick is just going to lead to confusion.
#4
Posted 30 June 2013 - 18:56
That would be my first choice. Still, they'd need to change the aero regs in that case. I seriosuly do not understand why they did not go that route. Instead they have this idea that racing is better if they use the horsepowers to press the car down rather than to move it forward.Or you could make things simpler and just do away with the gimmicks.
Edited by ardbeg, 30 June 2013 - 18:57.
#5
Posted 30 June 2013 - 18:58
I seriosuly do not understand why they did not go that route.
Many, many threads with reasons. Basically too much vested interest and investment.
#6
Posted 30 June 2013 - 19:15
That's the thing - it is a dead end investment. More energy, more noise, nothing you can really use for developing better personal transport vehicles. Spending millions of dollars on polishing a design that basically belong to 1976 is not a solid investment.Many, many threads with reasons. Basically too much vested interest and investment.
Edited by ardbeg, 30 June 2013 - 19:16.
#7
Posted 30 June 2013 - 19:19