Prediction game - are Button's career heights over?
#1
Posted 08 July 2013 - 13:19
Are the best days of Button's career over or can he still reach the heights he has had? By heights I mainly think of three seasons in which he finished in the first three in the overall standings.
2004 - though no win, very consistent all year, lots of podiums and a strong third place in the championship.
2009 - World Champion
2011 - though a long way behind Vettel, finished second in the championship, beating the rest of the opposition including team-mate Hamilton.
Will he add another height to this list? Will Button ever finish in Top Three in the championship again?
In 2009-2012 Button was among frontrunning drivers and a semiregular race winner. During that time-frame he collected 14 race wins, which averages 3.5 wins per season.
The question is not whether Button ever wins a race again or not, because anything can happen in a single random event. The matter is if the days of Button as a driver being a major force in F1, who consistently competes for podiums, is over?
McLaren has been in decline and is in a transition phase to Honda. Will McLaren be a frontrunner in 2014? 2015 with Honda? Will Button stay at McLaren long enough until the glory days come back? Can Button do like Barrichello and wait a long time before getting an Indian summer season late in his career? Barrichello finished 3rd in 2009 at the age of 37, for the first time as a major player since 2004, when he was second.
Share your thoughts, predict the future and have some fun.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 08 July 2013 - 13:22
However, he will need a car that is able to get those positions.
#3
Posted 08 July 2013 - 13:23
Edited by Vesuvius, 08 July 2013 - 13:23.
#4
Posted 08 July 2013 - 13:28
It is possible for him to be in Top-3 again because of the major regulation changes in 2014. Too many unknowns and any of the top teams could luck in with the right chassis, power unit and tyre combination.Will he add another height to this list? Will Button ever finish in Top Three in the championship again?
In 2009-2012 Button was among frontrunning drivers and a semiregular race winner. During that time-frame he collected 14 race wins, which averages 3.5 wins per season.
#5
Posted 08 July 2013 - 13:29
Edited by topical, 08 July 2013 - 13:30.
#6
Posted 08 July 2013 - 13:30
Ok, here is some food for thought. Jenson Button, 33 years of age, former WDC, but currently lies tenth in the championship after McLaren-Mercedes has dropped the ball massively.
Are the best days of Button's career over or can he still reach the heights he has had? By heights I mainly think of three seasons in which he finished in the first three in the overall standings.
2004 - though no win, very consistent all year, lots of podiums and a strong third place in the championship.
2009 - World Champion
2011 - though a long way behind Vettel, finished second in the championship, beating the rest of the opposition including team-mate Hamilton.
Will he add another height to this list? Will Button ever finish in Top Three in the championship again?
In 2009-2012 Button was among frontrunning drivers and a semiregular race winner. During that time-frame he collected 14 race wins, which averages 3.5 wins per season.
The question is not whether Button ever wins a race again or not, because anything can happen in a single random event. The matter is if the days of Button as a driver being a major force in F1, who consistently competes for podiums, is over?
McLaren has been in decline and is in a transition phase to Honda. Will McLaren be a frontrunner in 2014? 2015 with Honda? Will Button stay at McLaren long enough until the glory days come back? Can Button do like Barrichello and wait a long time before getting an Indian summer season late in his career? Barrichello finished 3rd in 2009 at the age of 37, for the first time as a major player since 2004, when he was second.
Share your thoughts, predict the future and have some fun.
It'll totally depend on the car and seeing as he is driving for a team that are capable of going from having the fastest car at the end of one season to having one of the worst with a fundamentally flawed concept in just a few months, not to mention the Merc/Honda upheaval due, I'd say predictions are at best going to be stabs in the dark.
A nice idea, but in practice not possible IMHO.
Edited by Burtros, 08 July 2013 - 13:30.
#7
Posted 08 July 2013 - 13:36
#8
Posted 08 July 2013 - 13:36
Of course he's still capable of being a major force. He's just 33. Webber won his first race when he was 33.
#9
Posted 08 July 2013 - 14:11
#10
Posted 08 July 2013 - 14:50
If he has the car, he can do it, if not then not. Same as everyone else.
#11
Posted 08 July 2013 - 14:52
#12
Posted 08 July 2013 - 17:14
2009 - World Champion
A career height certainly, but how much of a performance peak was 2009 actually? The second half of this season belonged to team-mate RB who was goldie, but oldie.
#13
Posted 08 July 2013 - 19:31
#14
Posted 08 July 2013 - 19:32
#15
Posted 08 July 2013 - 19:40
#16
Posted 08 July 2013 - 19:57
But if we're talking about his career in a frontline team (even if they have produced a turkey this year), then absolutely not. 33 is not old at all these days, and Jenson is as fit as they come. He's a fair few years younger than Webber, and Webber probably could have chosen to hang around a year or so more if he had wanted to. Button has several good years still ahead of him providing he that's what he wants. It would take something very drastic for McLaren to want to get rid of him.
#17
Posted 08 July 2013 - 20:08
#18
Posted 08 July 2013 - 20:23
#19
Posted 08 July 2013 - 20:24
Advertisement
#20
Posted 08 July 2013 - 20:32
#21
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:03
And after your clarification it's still a mighty stupid thing to say. Barrichello got 33 points in the second half of the season. Button got 27. Barrichello didn't even make it to 2nd in the championship.Button became WDC in a very strange year, and spent most of the second half of said year doing everything possible not to win the title - and before I get jumped on about the car, I mean his performance relative to Barrichello.
#22
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:06
Well maybe you need better glasses then as he was second in the championship for instance in 2011.I can't see him finishing in the top 3 in a championship unless he has a blindingly quick car like Brawn and the McLaren of 2012, even in 2012 he didn't finish in the top 3.
#23
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:09
I can't see him finishing in the top 3 in a championship unless he has a blindingly quick car like Brawn and the McLaren of 2012, even in 2012 he didn't finish in the top 3.
Yes, but that's because although the McLaren was fast, it had bad reliability, making it the third best car overall (as seen in the WCC rankings). Meaning 5th was actually pretty much where the car deserved to be. Hamilton slightly overperformed it, whereas Massa and Webber massively underperformed in their cars.
#24
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:13
Yes, but that's because although the McLaren was fast, it had bad reliability, making it the third best car overall (as seen in the WCC rankings). Meaning 5th was actually pretty much where the car deserved to be. Hamilton slightly overperformed it, whereas Massa and Webber massively underperformed in their cars.
Funny thing is that I don't remember Button's McLaren being particularly unreliable. He retired a couple of times, but that was it. Most of the time he was just slow and this is where points were lost.
#25
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:15
You still didn't answer me - are Alonso's careers highlights over?Funny thing is that I don't remember Button's McLaren being particularly unreliable. He retired a couple of times, but that was it. Most of the time he was just slow and this is where points were lost.
#26
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:20
Well maybe you need better glasses then as he was second in the championship for instance in 2011.
Aye, when there where only two teams fighting for multiple wins, and his team mate having a blunder of a season, and Webber being Webber.
That's the reason why I didn't inclue 2011...
As for McLaren having reliability problems in 2012, Button only had two, that being in Bahrain when he was running 8th, and in Monza while in second. The majority of reliability and operational problems went towards Hamilton. So I wouldn't say 5th is where the car should have been considering Button had far less problems than Hamilton and the car was good enough for the championship in my opinion.
#27
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:22
Somehow I have a strange feeling that he'll retire from F1 as a champion, like Mansell and Prost.
oh Mansell doesnt count
#28
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:23
I can't see him finishing in the top 3 in a championship unless he has a blindingly quick car like Brawn and the McLaren of 2012, even in 2012 he didn't finish in the top 3.
Brawn was blindingly quick for only the first 6/7 races + Monza.
#29
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:30
In other words it really didn't fit your self imposed view of the man (it was too good for that) so you discarded it and counted only the results where they meet your low opinion of him? Classy.
Funny thing is, Button also came third in 2004, and he wasn't driving a Ferrari that year. I wonder what excuse he has for that one.
#30
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:32
In other words it really didn't fit your self imposed view of the man (it was too good for that) so you discarded it and counted only the results where they meet your low opinion of him? Classy.
Considering that most of the top drivers didn't have the tools at the disposal to be in the top 3 or where off form, then I think my opinions fair enough. A bit like Coulthard from 2001.
Hence, I also said, blindingly quick car, and the McLaren in 2011 wasn't one, while the Brawn and McLaren of 2012 were.
I see you also brought Alonso into this with another poster who thought similar as me about Button's career in the top 3, not sure why, as it has nothing to do with the thread.
#31
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:35
Funny thing is, Button also came third in 2004, and he wasn't driving a Ferrari that year. I wonder what excuse he has for that one.
Check my last post, for that one on why I mentioned only those two seasons.
Do I have an excuse for that one? No, I don't, that was in my opinion, his best season.
Add to that, it's not as if he's going to be in his peak once McLaren get up and running.
#32
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:44
That said if Mac made the car of the year next year then he might well do it.. Perez is way rash and while he may in fact be even quicker than JB he will throw it away over and over.
#33
Posted 08 July 2013 - 21:53
Isn't it the same for everyone? It's somewhat funny to remember that he is the last WDC before Vettel started his steamroller. They all have to have a thing or two falling for them - the right car, the right teammate and so on.Barring a huge dose of luck I do not see him being a real championship force in future no. He is not at all rubbish, but it all has to fall right for him.
#34
Posted 08 July 2013 - 22:13
#35
Posted 08 July 2013 - 22:17
#36
Posted 08 July 2013 - 23:01
Jenson's fitness certainly can't be questioned either. He's likely the fittest driver in F1 and has even become a legitimate world-class triathlete.
Motivation could be an issue, and I could see him not wanting to continue if he was stuck in a car as bad as this year. But his performance hasn't suffered much this season - so far he's quicker than his charging young teammate and is still gathering whatever points are possible. In a sorted car I suspect the difference between Button and Perez would be even more pronounced.
I've put forth a theory that perhaps he doesn't see himself driving for more than 3 or 4 more years, and because of that I think there's a chance that he'll jump to Ferrari to replace Massa next season. Crazy, I know, but I get a weird vibe from his press dealings this year. Taking on Alonso is just the kind of challenge to fuel his fires, and if Kimi heads to Red Bull the Scuderia is going to need another points scoring machine in the other car.
Edited by tkulla, 08 July 2013 - 23:02.
#37
Posted 08 July 2013 - 23:30
Alonso and Raikkonen's ages are not too dissimilar, but I think there is a point in starting to ask these questions about them too. Of course we have seen that retirement age is often more like at the 37 mark, so there is a bit to go. But if Ferrari doesn't make quick changes nor produces a great car for 2014, it is crunch time for Alonso to really add more titles. Raikkonen takes on Vettel in a new team for himself and as an elder driver. Maybe a 25-y-o Kimi could match Vettel, but he will be new to the team and I don't see it happening. Also I don't think the chances are very big Kimi is going to add another title. And with every year the younger blokes of Vettel, Hamilton and Rosberg are going to gain an advantage. I know Prost and Mansell won titles at a pretty old age, but let's be honest, they had rocketships as well compared to the competition.
A lot in this thread seems to hinge on "depends on car". Well, with this rhetoric we put a lot of trust in McLaren to produce a rocketship next year after an apalling season. Brawn/Honda did it for 2009, but what are the chances of that to really happen? Personally I don't see McLaren having it in them to beat Red Bull. Or even some other teams. They must really get fortunate with a great engine then. Then again Mercedes will be the A-priority team, while McLaren is already on its way out of the relationship with Mercedes.
I know we are recently discussing a lot about Ferrari and that they are passive to really get above competition. Frankly McLaren doesn't inspire me with confidence either. So I am asking this question about Button. What made the Brawn/Red Bull miracle possible in 2009? Because they had been really aggressive in getting together a team. Especially Honda. I lost count how many new people they hired in 2007. It looked like they changed the whole design team. About McLaren I have heard about losses and Ferrari is status quo.
Edited by sopa, 08 July 2013 - 23:37.
#38
Posted 08 July 2013 - 23:44
I know we are recently discussing a lot about Ferrari and that they are passive to really get above competition. Frankly McLaren doesn't inspire me with confidence either. So I am asking this question about Button. What made the Brawn/Red Bull miracle possible in 2009? Because they had been really aggressive in getting together a team. Especially Honda. I lost count how many new people they hired in 2007. It looked like they changed the whole design team. About McLaren I have heard about losses and Ferrari is status quo.
I think it was a combination of two things - Red Bull and Honda/Brawn were in the unique situation of being completely out of contention for the title in 2008, yet having the funds available outside of the WCC money to give up entirely on that year's championship and focus on new regulation changes for 2009. As well as that, the two main title contenders for 2008 were fighting for the championship right down to the last lap of the last race, so their development for 2009 was delayed, allowing well-funded teams like Honda and RBR to breach the gap.
#39
Posted 09 July 2013 - 00:22
To a certain extent is depends on the car but not completely. If Button gets a competitive car he will be outclass by Alonso, Hamilton, Vettel and Kimi given that they are in competitive cars too. If he gets a rocket ship then yes and it will be more the car.As it almost completely depends on the car, it's about whether he will have the material or not.
Of course he's still capable of being a major force. He's just 33. Webber won his first race when he was 33.
Edited by speng, 09 July 2013 - 00:25.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 09 July 2013 - 00:32
He doesn't need a rocketship, but he does need a car which suits him.
To me the main question mark is over the McLaren team, assuming he stays with them (which seems most likely). Will this season act as a wakeup call, and motivate McLaren to fix long-standing problems with their race operations, as well as strengthening their design team? If that happens, and Honda deliver a strong power unit, Jenson will have a very good chance of another WDC.
#41
Posted 09 July 2013 - 00:35
Tkulla, I know you're a Button fan and should know him more than most of us. Well, have you read these team-change things out of him in the past too? Like the departure from Brawn to McLaren or even the Williams/Honda affair? And doesn't he have a contract with McLaren for 2014?
Good post.
I'd be surprised if he doesn't have a performance-based out clause. And yes, there are some parallels. He distanced himself a bit from Brawn after that season and then the rumors of contract negotiations came out. I would expect Jenson to be pumping up the team and being that beacon of positivity that he can be when he's trying to keep everyone moving forward. He's not really doing that and it makes me wonder why not.
Alonso and Raikkonen's ages are not too dissimilar, but I think there is a point in starting to ask these questions about them too. Of course we have seen that retirement age is often more like at the 37 mark, so there is a bit to go. But if Ferrari doesn't make quick changes nor produces a great car for 2014, it is crunch time for Alonso to really add more titles. Raikkonen takes on Vettel in a new team for himself and as an elder driver. Maybe a 25-y-o Kimi could match Vettel, but he will be new to the team and I don't see it happening. Also I don't think the chances are very big Kimi is going to add another title. And with every year the younger blokes of Vettel, Hamilton and Rosberg are going to gain an advantage. I know Prost and Mansell won titles at a pretty old age, but let's be honest, they had rocketships as well compared to the competition.
I'm really hoping that Kimi lines up alongside Seb next year. I think Kimi still "has it" and will give Vettel a run for his money. I rate Vettel highly (as I do Kimi) and I am really curious to see how they compare head to head.
A lot in this thread seems to hinge on "depends on car". Well, with this rhetoric we put a lot of trust in McLaren to produce a rocketship next year after an apalling season. Brawn/Honda did it for 2009, but what are the chances of that to really happen? Personally I don't see McLaren having it in them to beat Red Bull. Or even some other teams. They must really get fortunate with a great engine then. Then again Mercedes will be the A-priority team, while McLaren is already on its way out of the relationship with Mercedes.
I don't think it's likely that Mclaren will build a rocketship either. From Jenson's perspective it's a lost year as a Mercedes customer, then a switch to Honda and a year of teething problems, and then maybe a chance. That's possibly two-plus more years in the midfield, which I'd imagine isn't appealing to him at this point.
I know we are recently discussing a lot about Ferrari and that they are passive to really get above competition. Frankly McLaren doesn't inspire me with confidence either. So I am asking this question about Button. What made the Brawn/Red Bull miracle possible in 2009? Because they had been really aggressive in getting together a team. Especially Honda. I lost count how many new people they hired in 2007. It looked like they changed the whole design team. About McLaren I have heard about losses and Ferrari is status quo.
I have a feeling that Ferrari is putting a lot of eggs in the new regulation "basket" and has been for a while. Overcoming Red Bull's advantage by evolution wasn't likely so it would make sense for to look forward to a big rules change to try to topple them. Jense may be thinking the same...
#42
Posted 09 July 2013 - 00:37
To a certain extent is depends on the car but not completely. If Button gets a competitive car he will be outclass by Alonso, Hamilton, Vettel and Kimi given that they are in competitive cars too. If he gets a rocket ship then yes and it will be more the car.
If Button were to go to Ferrari next year and outscore him, would you believe in him then or continue with this nonsense? Surely the last three years against Lewis has convinced you that Button is top tier?
#43
Posted 09 July 2013 - 02:01
and if he goes to Red Bull for 2014 he will be competitive for sure, he may even be able to match or beat Vettel in the same car with the right setup (as he did with Hamilton in 2011)
Edited by HammyHamiltonFan, 09 July 2013 - 02:02.
#44
Posted 09 July 2013 - 04:08
#45
Posted 09 July 2013 - 04:42
The topic is about whether Jenson Button can still achieve at the highest level or not. We already did one of these topics for Fernando Alonso a while back, other drivers can of course be mentioned but please keep JB as the main focus of discussion here, thank you.
#46
Posted 09 July 2013 - 05:59
He still has maybe 5 years yet? Give him a decent car and he definitely can be WDC again. If he had replaced Webber instead of going to macca...who knows what he could have done..
Edited by Rocket73, 09 July 2013 - 06:03.
#47
Posted 09 July 2013 - 06:58
#48
Posted 09 July 2013 - 11:58
I was channeling TickTickBoom there but i tend to agree ;)
#49
Posted 09 July 2013 - 19:45
He is a bit of a paradox. He isn't as good as Alonso, Hamilton, Kimi or Vettel but he is way ahead of the likes of Massa, Webber and Rosberg (though he is improving). As a result, I don't see him losing his seat at the F1 table anytime soon unless he chooses to go.
By my reckoning it will be 2016, once chinks with the Honda engine have been ironed out, before McLaren are able to produce an unbeatable car again. If they do I have no doubt Button will be at the front. But is Button prepared to wait until then?
Edited by Dunc, 09 July 2013 - 19:46.
#50
Posted 09 July 2013 - 20:27
I'd be surprised if he doesn't have a performance-based out clause. And yes, there are some parallels. He distanced himself a bit from Brawn after that season and then the rumors of contract negotiations came out. I would expect Jenson to be pumping up the team and being that beacon of positivity that he can be when he's trying to keep everyone moving forward. He's not really doing that and it makes me wonder why not.
I'm really hoping that Kimi lines up alongside Seb next year. I think Kimi still "has it" and will give Vettel a run for his money. I rate Vettel highly (as I do Kimi) and I am really curious to see how they compare head to head.
I don't think it's likely that Mclaren will build a rocketship either. From Jenson's perspective it's a lost year as a Mercedes customer, then a switch to Honda and a year of teething problems, and then maybe a chance. That's possibly two-plus more years in the midfield, which I'd imagine isn't appealing to him at this point.
I have a feeling that Ferrari is putting a lot of eggs in the new regulation "basket" and has been for a while. Overcoming Red Bull's advantage by evolution wasn't likely so it would make sense for to look forward to a big rules change to try to topple them. Jense may be thinking the same...
Good analysis on all points. I agree Jenson is in an awkward, unmotivating position and it shows. The Ferrari option is intriguing, a bit wishful thinking as there's been absolutely zero noises in the press about it but makes some sense. Although I am not entirely sure Fernando would like that!