Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

What would it take for F1 not to be considered the pinnacle of motorsport?


  • Please log in to reply
53 replies to this topic

Poll: What would it take for F1 not to be considered the pinnacle of motorsport? (108 member(s) have cast votes)

What would it take for F1 not to be considered the pinnacle of motorsport?

  1. Another series to have drivers that are perceived to be better (28 votes [17.07%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.07%

  2. Another series to have cars that are perceived to be more technologically advanced (33 votes [20.12%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.12%

  3. Another series to have cars that are faster over a lap (60 votes [36.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 36.59%

  4. F1 to have hardly any teams left (23 votes [14.02%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.02%

  5. Nothing, short of F1 folding (13 votes [7.93%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.93%

  6. Other (specify in thread) (7 votes [4.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.27%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#51 Kalmake

Kalmake
  • Member

  • 4,492 posts
  • Joined: November 07

Posted 30 October 2014 - 18:07

It's not surprising if Can-Am and Group C were faster than F1. They should be, as they have the fundamental advantage of closed wheels and wider chassis. Le Mans prototypes are just not allowed to be faster than F1 for political reasons.


Edited by Kalmake, 30 October 2014 - 18:09.


Advertisement

#52 Nonesuch

Nonesuch
  • Member

  • 15,870 posts
  • Joined: October 08

Posted 30 October 2014 - 18:13

If later today Autosport would announce that Alonso, Hamilton, Vettel, Ricciardo, Bottas, Rosberg and Kimi will drive Indycar next season - which series would get most attention?

 

All at once would no doubt bring a lot of viewers over to that other series, but one by one? I wouldn't be so sure.

 

How many McLaren fans started watching NASCAR because Montoya started driving in the United States?

 

The drivers leave one by one, get replaced, and F1 goes on - for better or worse.

 

The funny thing was that I'm pretty sure WEC were driving faster lap times on some of the same circuits as F1 was visiting last year, for instance Bahrain.

 

I don't think that is true.

 

WEC Pole 2013: 1:42.449

WEC Fastest lap 2013: 1:44.183

 

F1 Pole 2013: 1:32.330

F1 Fastest lap 2013: 1:36.961

 

F1 Pole 2014: 1:33.185

F1 Fastest lap 2014: 1:37.020


Edited by Nonesuch, 30 October 2014 - 18:13.


#53 nosecone

nosecone
  • Member

  • 1,938 posts
  • Joined: January 13

Posted 30 October 2014 - 18:23

For me a racing series needs a mixture of several things to be considered as the pinnacle.

 

  • good drivers: not neccessarily the best drivers but one driver of the top5 racedrivers has to drive in that series. Maybe Ogier is the best driver in the world but F1 is still the pinacle (IMO)
  • technically advanced cars: I'd even go that far saying that the pinnacle of motorsports needs to have the fastest cars on 1 lap
  • needs car manufacturers: I somehow love the idea of car manufacturers compeeting. It makes it look more professional (even though private teams could achieve the same level of perfection with the same budget)
  • needs a big audience: LIVE TV coverage in many countries
  • Number of Races per season: My pinnacle needs more than 15 races peer season
  • ... (I'm sure i missed something)

 

It could of course be that the "pinnacle of motorsports" is just a tag that is claimed by F1. But there are many other reasons that put F1 over other series( IMO), such as the history, glamour and other things



#54 PlatenGlass

PlatenGlass
  • Member

  • 4,703 posts
  • Joined: June 14

Posted 31 October 2014 - 18:51

While it's easy to go faster, it's never without compromise in safety. Ovals and tight street courses are more dangerous than the Tilkedromes.
 
They can already advertise as "fastest" thanks to the speedway tracks anyway.

Maybe, but I think given the safety requirements for ovals, the cars should be safe enough to go round street courses at a higher speed than F1 cars.