Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Have Ferrari made a huge mistake with Alonso's engine allocation?


  • Please log in to reply
16 replies to this topic

Poll: Have Ferrari made a huge mistake with Alonso's engine allocation? (36 member(s) have cast votes)

Should Ferrari have put a sixth PU into Fernando's car?

  1. Yes (21 votes [58.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 58.33%

  2. No (15 votes [41.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 41.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 MotorsportFerrari

MotorsportFerrari
  • Member

  • 215 posts
  • Joined: July 14

Posted 21 November 2014 - 15:49

Alonso lost a fresh engine in Italy which upset the whole plan in terms of PU allocation. Ferrari then didn't want to use a sixth one, so he hardly let Alonso did any lap in practacies in Austin, Brazil and had to pary for the PU to pull through.

 

Alonso had another failure today which led to missing the most important practice session. He has just told he won't be able to do many laps tomorrow, because they have to save the engine. This means two handicaps: firstly he will arrive in qualy with only a few laps in his bag, secondly another defensive approach in the race. 

 

Why didn't Ferrari put a new PU in Austin where overtaking isn't that hard. And anyway: Alonso has no chance for the title or for a win or even for a 3rd place in the championship. They would have let him enjoy his last races in scarlet.



Advertisement

#2 Balnazzard

Balnazzard
  • Member

  • 2,038 posts
  • Joined: January 13

Posted 21 November 2014 - 16:05

Well since Ferrari has nothing to lost, nothing to gain, what does it matter? And Im quite sure Alonso himself doesnt much enjoy driving for positions 5-7 anyways. So no big deal in my opinion.



#3 ch103

ch103
  • Member

  • 2,039 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 21 November 2014 - 17:31

Nah - Ferrari haven't botched anything.  That award goes to Lotus, and Romain Grosjean. 



#4 HeadFirst

HeadFirst
  • Member

  • 6,121 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 21 November 2014 - 18:30

Ferrari made a huge mistake alright, it's called the F14. And while the loyal tifosi are busy trying to figure out how to blame Fernando and Kimi for this travesty (whilst bowing down to Seb The Saviour), the truth is so painfully obvious that one wonders if the good ship Ferrari will ever surface again, or will it continue on a slow painful dive to the depths of the F1 Sea.



#5 wj_gibson

wj_gibson
  • Member

  • 3,921 posts
  • Joined: January 05

Posted 21 November 2014 - 18:38

Right now I think McLaren-Honda to be a much more likely threat to Merc over the next two or three years (assuming F1 limps on that long) than Ferrari.

#6 jstrains

jstrains
  • Member

  • 3,225 posts
  • Joined: March 12

Posted 21 November 2014 - 19:11

Ferrari does not care of Alonso anymore. Why should they?

#7 kimster89

kimster89
  • Member

  • 1,413 posts
  • Joined: May 13

Posted 21 November 2014 - 19:15

Ferrari doesnt care about Alonso now. Why would they waste money on him with giving him new PU.



#8 HeadFirst

HeadFirst
  • Member

  • 6,121 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 21 November 2014 - 19:34

Ferrari doesnt care about Alonso now. Why would they waste money on him with giving him new PU.

 

Apparently they don't care about results either. What would they do with the PU otherwise??? Do they need an anchor for "The Good Ship Ferrari"?



#9 MrPodium

MrPodium
  • Member

  • 693 posts
  • Joined: January 12

Posted 21 November 2014 - 19:47

Well since Ferrari has nothing to lost, nothing to gain, what does it matter? And Im quite sure Alonso himself doesnt much enjoy driving for positions 5-7 anyways. So no big deal in my opinion.

 

Because Ferrari are supposed to care to ensure their drivers have the best equipment available to them, every race. Or does that apply only if their car suffers from understeer?


Edited by MrPodium, 21 November 2014 - 19:48.


#10 jstrains

jstrains
  • Member

  • 3,225 posts
  • Joined: March 12

Posted 21 November 2014 - 21:33

Well the position in WCC is secure, the one who secured is leaving, so why bother. They could not miss the last GP

#11 warp

warp
  • Member

  • 1,437 posts
  • Joined: November 13

Posted 21 November 2014 - 21:45

Ferrari made a huge mistake alright, it's called the F14. And while the loyal tifosi are busy trying to figure out how to blame Fernando and Kimi for this travesty (whilst bowing down to Seb The Saviour), the truth is so painfully obvious that one wonders if the good ship Ferrari will ever surface again, or will it continue on a slow painful dive to the depths of the F1 Sea.

 

Speaking as a Tifoso, I blame it on the awful car that was made. Not even two drivers of the caliber of Fernando Alonso and Kimi Raikkonen (no less) have been able to drag this mule up the mid-field.

 

No, Sebastian is no saviour. The saviours should be the engineers working on the F15 already. Ferrari will still drag in the mid-field the next year, possibly the next two and then probably will bounce back.

 

Loyal Tifosi survived the late 80's and early 90's... We will survive this time.

(Not so sure about F1 itself, lol)

 

Probably Ferrari did not wanted to face a Roman-esque penalty and will carry on with this PU. Pity for Alonso, but probably changing it means an even greater handicap. Also, it makes no sense to put more money into it when season is over, places secured, Alonso leaving, etc.



#12 KOMORI

KOMORI
  • Member

  • 743 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 21 November 2014 - 22:13

It's sad seeing such a great driver struggling with such a rubbish car...

http://wtf1.co.uk/al...-dhabi-onboard/

#13 DampMongoose

DampMongoose
  • Member

  • 2,258 posts
  • Joined: February 12

Posted 21 November 2014 - 22:33

Ferrari are doing ok. At least they're turning up at all the races. Hasn't always been the case.

#14 Tombstone

Tombstone
  • Member

  • 1,392 posts
  • Joined: April 10

Posted 21 November 2014 - 23:53

The saviours should be the engineers working on the F15 already. 

 

At the risk of 180˚ thread drift, perhaps they will call it the F15A in deference to their close partnership a few years ago.

 

Albeit FISA became the FIA in '93.



#15 warp

warp
  • Member

  • 1,437 posts
  • Joined: November 13

Posted 22 November 2014 - 00:16

At the risk of 180˚ thread drift, perhaps they will call it the F15A in deference to their close partnership a few years ago.

 

Albeit FISA became the FIA in '93.

 

I just pulled it out of my arse to be honest. I have no clue how the next year's car will be named.

 

It was Project 666 so far, I think.



#16 currupipi

currupipi
  • Member

  • 1,686 posts
  • Joined: May 09

Posted 22 November 2014 - 01:40

Well the position in WCC is secure, the one who secured is leaving, so why bother. They could not miss the last GP


If this is the attitude the mighty ferrari have about racing then alonso should just park it on the first lap, save some money on gas , what a pathetic team

#17 HP

HP
  • Member

  • 19,646 posts
  • Joined: October 99

Posted 22 November 2014 - 03:39

It's sad seeing such a great driver struggling with such a rubbish car...

http://wtf1.co.uk/al...-dhabi-onboard/

And there are people who tell us that a great driver will make any rubbish car look good. The man itself established that while driving a Minardi. So if it looks that bad to you, the man has to take part of the blame, as we know he can do better in substandard cars.

 

That being said, there are also reports from technical minded people out there that will say that the Ferrari is not as bad as it looks, once the PU is sorted out. Next years car should suit Kimi more, plus main focus at this time is next years car, what did you expect? A miracle? Alonso in his last race for Ferrari (for the time being) driving circles around everyone?