Last year Williams was the surprise team. Which team do you think will be the surprise team (Good or bad ) for 2015.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 14:52
Last year Williams was the surprise team. Which team do you think will be the surprise team (Good or bad ) for 2015.
Advertisement
Posted 02 February 2015 - 14:54
Last year Williams was the surprise team. Which team do you think will be the surprise team (Good or bad ) for 2015.
Force India, because they'll turn up.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 14:55
McLaren because they will win the WCC and WDC. Hopefully I can say that for real soon
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:04
Ferrari to surprise in peak performance
Mercedes to surprise in the lack of performance (poor tyre wear)
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:05
Lotus and STR
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:05
Ferrari to surprise in peak performance
Mercedes to surprise in the lack of performance (poor tyre wear)
Sounds like wishful thinking to me
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:05
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:10
Looks like Ferrari might spring a surprise to two if they are as strong as today suggested on their longer runs. They need to be sure of what direction they want to go in aero wise though.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:13
Ferrari to surprise in peak performance
Mercedes to surprise in the lack of performance (poor tyre wear)
"Amen" usually accompanies a prayer
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:14
Ferrari will surprise. WDC goes to Mercedes, but Ferrari will challenge them in WCC. Bottas will finally win but it will not surprise anyone..
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:15
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:20
I think Lotus might surprise a few. I think they might give williams a run for their money
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:29
Sauber based on days one and two of testing. However, I would never accuse them of running the car light to attract sponsorhip. Even thought I just did.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:33
Sauber will become consistant points scorers.
Ferrari will get a few podiums.
McLaren are going to be even worse than 2013 and 2014.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:44
Posted 02 February 2015 - 15:55
Yeah it is an interesting question. Because each season has some surprises (both good and bad).
For the record, I don't consider Ferrari a "surprise" like some claim. I think they always had the potential to challenge/finish top3 in WCC. Consisering the resources and other stuff I think Ferrari should never be completely written off in terms of Top 3 potential in WCC.
However, I don't see anybody giving a serious run for Mercedes money at this stage, so no surprises there.
The only ones I can possibly think of being positive surprises are somebody among Lotus, Force India, Toro Rosso and Sauber.
Because Merc is expected to be top, Red Bull pretty good, Williams was already good last year and Ferrari/McLaren are big teams with big expectations, so there you go. The only surprise there would be if anyone could match or at least run Mercedes very close this year.
Negative surprise? Many possibilities. Williams, McLaren or Ferrari are the most likely possibilities though.
The bottom teams though? Still too early to call. If, say, Sauber, can get at least half-regular points, they would have exceeded expectations. Likewise if Lotus can get anywhere near their 2013 form, or Toro Rosso can replicate their 2008 season, or Force India can improve even further on last year and finish in top 5 in the constructors. But it is still too early to tell any of these can possibly happen.
Of course, there is also the possiblity of a doomsay scenario, that someone among Sauber, Force India or Lotus will go bankrupt and doesn't finish the season... But considering the financial state of the game, I am unsure if this would even qualify as a surprise...
Personally... Some seasons see greater surprises (2009 being a prime example), some season fewer surprises. I have a feeling 2015 will be relatively uneventful in the surprise stakes, at least in terms of general competitive form - if we discount potential "surprise race results", which can always happen.
Edited by sopa, 02 February 2015 - 15:59.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:01
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:02
Lotus for me, if their car doesn't get crashed anyway.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:03
Toro Rosso
Car will be a surprise
Drivers will be a surprise
Advertisement
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:07
"Amen" usually accompanies a prayer
OkayI have to hand it to you that was a good reply
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:19
I wouldn't really see Lotus doing well as a surprise considering some of the cars they've produced in recent times plus a Mercedes engine.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:22
Lotus would be my pick.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:24
Lotus doing well wouldn't be that much of a surprise; it was more their dismal 2014 that stood out for all the wrong reasons.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:27
Lotus doing well wouldn't be that much of a surprise; it was more their dismal 2014 that stood out for all the wrong reasons.
I don't know. Lotus lost so many key people, just like Sauber.
In the Sauber thread there was discussion that they had lost form due to big teams snatching their talented engineers.
Also depends, what we do mean by "well". If Lotus finishes in top 3 in WCC, like Williams last year, I think it would be quite a huge achievement. But if they can be around the level of last year's McLaren and Force India and get around/close to 200 points for the constructors championship, it would not really be unexpected. In 2013 they got in excess of 300 points. I am sceptical they can be that good. They also have Maldonado in the car, which has a bad effect on the points accumulation potential.
Edited by sopa, 02 February 2015 - 16:28.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:27
Lotus doing well wouldn't be that much of a surprise; it was more their dismal 2014 that stood out for all the wrong reasons.
Depends on just how well they do.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:42
Ferrari is looking unusually on it, which leads me to one of two conclusions:
1) The headless chicken talk over the winter was needless hyperbole generated by FA's departure and FA was in fact a nutter to leave.
or
2) They're really in trouble and are doing their best to mask it from the rest of the grid (or if it makes you feel better, they're acting like jilted lovers and doing glory runs to stick it to FA while they can).
And there's always the third (and by far least popular) option, which is that the Ferrari actually suits SV better than it suited FA and he's able to get more out of it thus far, assuming parts of both of the above are true and making a rather large (or 'chasmic'?) leap from just two sessions. Would spend most of the year laughing my a-55 off if this longshot actually turns out to be the case.
F1 needs more logic-defying Indycar-style WTF moments anyway; the kinda stuff that takes the words away from even the yappiest commentators. I miss that.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 16:45
Ferrari is looking unusually on it, which leads me to one of two conclusions:
1) The headless chicken talk over the winter was needless hyperbole generated by FA's departure and FA was in fact a nutter to leave.
or
2) They're really in trouble and are doing their best to mask it from the rest of the grid (or if it makes you feel better, they're acting like jilted lovers and doing glory runs to stick it to FA while they can).
And there's always the third (and by far least popular) option, which is that the Ferrari actually suits SV better than it suited FA and he's able to get more out of it thus far, assuming parts of both of the above are true and making a rather large (or 'chasmic'?) leap from just two sessions. Would spend most of the year laughing my a-55 off if this longshot actually turns out to be the case.
F1 needs more logic-defying Indycar-style WTF moments anyway; the kinda stuff that takes the words away from even the yappiest commentators. I miss that.
Another conclusion is that the design team led by James Allison has actually been able to concentrate on their jobs. And the change of management positions hasn't affected them as much as many people thought it would. Though the effect could come in later as well... like an aftershock or -wave.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 17:08
Ferrari is looking unusually on it, which leads me to one of two conclusions:
1) The headless chicken talk over the winter was needless hyperbole generated by FA's departure and FA was in fact a nutter to leave.
or
2) They're really in trouble and are doing their best to mask it from the rest of the grid (or if it makes you feel better, they're acting like jilted lovers and doing glory runs to stick it to FA while they can).
And there's always the third (and by far least popular) option, which is that the Ferrari actually suits SV better than it suited FA and he's able to get more out of it thus far, assuming parts of both of the above are true and making a rather large (or 'chasmic'?) leap from just two sessions. Would spend most of the year laughing my a-55 off if this longshot actually turns out to be the case.
F1 needs more logic-defying Indycar-style WTF moments anyway; the kinda stuff that takes the words away from even the yappiest commentators. I miss that.
I doubt any of it has anything to do with Alonso to be honest.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 18:20
Or they're just getting on with their program and are neither in great nor awful shape.Ferrari is looking unusually on it, which leads me to one of two conclusions:
1) The headless chicken talk over the winter was needless hyperbole generated by FA's departure and FA was in fact a nutter to leave.
or
2) They're really in trouble and are doing their best to mask it from the rest of the grid (or if it makes you feel better, they're acting like jilted lovers and doing glory runs to stick it to FA while they can).
And there's always the third (and by far least popular) option, which is that the Ferrari actually suits SV better than it suited FA and he's able to get more out of it thus far, assuming parts of both of the above are true and making a rather large (or 'chasmic'?) leap from just two sessions. Would spend most of the year laughing my a-55 off if this longshot actually turns out to be the case.
F1 needs more logic-defying Indycar-style WTF moments anyway; the kinda stuff that takes the words away from even the yappiest commentators. I miss that.
Edited by Seanspeed, 02 February 2015 - 18:21.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 18:32
Lotus and Sauber in a positive way, mostly in the hands of Grosjean and Nasr though.
Force India in a negative way. This lack of testing is not going to help them, because they were always a team that scored the majority of their points in the early part of the season.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 18:37
Ferrari is looking unusually on it, which leads me to one of two conclusions:
1) The headless chicken talk over the winter was needless hyperbole generated by FA's departure and FA was in fact a nutter to leave.
or
2) They're really in trouble and are doing their best to mask it from the rest of the grid (or if it makes you feel better, they're acting like jilted lovers and doing glory runs to stick it to FA while they can).
And there's always the third (and by far least popular) option, which is that the Ferrari actually suits SV better than it suited FA and he's able to get more out of it thus far, assuming parts of both of the above are true and making a rather large (or 'chasmic'?) leap from just two sessions. Would spend most of the year laughing my a-55 off if this longshot actually turns out to be the case.
F1 needs more logic-defying Indycar-style WTF moments anyway; the kinda stuff that takes the words away from even the yappiest commentators. I miss that.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 19:00
I'm thinking Lotus will have the biggest improvement from last year and I'll say Sauber based on Ferrari and them running consistent laps so far. Leads me to believe Ferrari's unit is going to have good reliablity and a better jump in performance than Renault.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 19:14
I think the biggest surprise will be that Mercedes won't be a second a lap quicker at every race.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 19:28
I think the biggest surprise will be that Mercedes won't be a second a lap quicker at every race.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 21:47
Lotus and STR
This.
Posted 02 February 2015 - 23:51
Mercedes > Ferrari = Red Bull > Williams = Lotus > Sauber = McLaren = Toro Rosso
Posted 03 February 2015 - 00:02
I think the biggest surprise will be that Mercedes won't be a second a lap quicker at every race.
Posted 03 February 2015 - 00:19
McLaren by finishing some races and scoring some points.
Posted 03 February 2015 - 00:42
looking at the hype Sauber is getting so far, i can see them being a big let down among some posters here
i mean, when was the last time Sauber wasnt great in pre-season testing?
Advertisement
Posted 03 February 2015 - 00:47
Ferrari don't really count as a surprise, but before this week I couldn't imagine them coming good and now I do. By "good" I mean being either best of the rest behind Merc, or at least caught up with Red Bull and/or Williams. That actually seems possible now. Which is only logical given their massive resources that someday they might eventually nail it again, but I wasn't seeing this coming after the total management cluster**** they went under the past year.
Posted 03 February 2015 - 00:55
looking at the hype Sauber is getting so far, i can see them being a big let down among some posters here
i mean, when was the last time Sauber wasnt great in pre-season testing?
last year was a disaster lol
Posted 03 February 2015 - 01:53
I have zero sense of how the Honda will do so McLaren will be a surprise regardless of what actually happens.
Posted 03 February 2015 - 02:43
Lotus will probably be the most improved team this year. They have some good people, and they can't really do worse than last year, plus the new PU should help them after they get the bugs sorted out.
I think people are reading too much into the laptimes from the first 2 days of testing though. Times during winter testing have never really meant much, especially the first few days where they are really just shaking down their cars looking for issues.
Based on last year's 2nd day of testing Mclaren and Ferrari were going to be fighting each other for the title, and Red Bull was one of the slowest and least reliable teams in F1. http://live.autospor...tary.php/id/692
The year before that Lotus was going to be challenged for the championship by Force India and Toro Rosso (who were faster than Red Bull). Lotus did turn out to have a really good car in the end. Force India and STR, not so much. http://www.formula1....13/2/14254.html
Posted 03 February 2015 - 03:18
Red Bull will surprise whether it's negative or positive, it'll be a surprise nonetheless.
Notable mentions to Ferrari and McLaren will be a surprise in disappointment.
Posted 03 February 2015 - 05:00