The technology of ABS and traction and stability control needs to kept in paerspective.
I tried to bring that perspective to this thread back in post #16 where I said (in part), "I also accept that in the electronic days of F1 that they developed systems that couldn't be beaten. The real problem was that these systems cost far more than the cost of 99.9% of the total cost of cars bought today.
So, if you really are good enough and can prove, it switch off the factory electronics for best performance on your evey day driver. Otherwise leave it on because even the factory settings will beat your performance. The proof only can come from lap time on the track."
The ultimate in such systems have a cost beyond the cost of most cars on the road today. It is easy to understand why the book keepers will not allow the engineers a free hand in road car technology and why F1 and most racing bodies insist on drivers making the difference in lap times.
If you think F1 is dull now just let the boffins have a free hand and drivers will become redundant and the boffs will load their latest programmes into an enormous computer game that we tune our computers into to see who is going to win instead of turning our TVs on.
Come to think of it, if Bernie lives long enough we won't have anybody at all watching from most of the tracks' stands.
Regards