Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Potential solutions to dominant teams


  • Please log in to reply
59 replies to this topic

#51 Al.

Al.
  • Member

  • 1,449 posts
  • Joined: June 01

Posted 17 March 2015 - 19:03

What about a new slower tyre compound that the leaders have to put on in the race, but only if they are 30< seconds ahead of 3rd place and that time gap is no greater than the points gap between 1st to 5th in the WDC, but only if - when equalised - the tyre change wouldn't produce a lap time slow than 107% of the current average laptime during that race up until the end the of previously completed lap, not including laps with pit stops or incidents.

 

I just think F1 needs something like that that fans can understand just sitting at home watching casually.

 

:rotfl:  :rotfl:  :rotfl:  :rotfl:  :rotfl:  :rotfl:

 

You should write the rules for next year.  :drunk:  



Advertisement

#52 JHSingo

JHSingo
  • Member

  • 8,961 posts
  • Joined: June 13

Posted 17 March 2015 - 19:09

Has success ballast and reversed grids been suggested yet?  ;)



#53 David Lightman

David Lightman
  • Member

  • 1,427 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 17 March 2015 - 20:32

Isn't that big gold chain Lewis was wearing after the race a stealth form of success ballast?



#54 Kristian

Kristian
  • Member

  • 4,365 posts
  • Joined: June 05

Posted 17 March 2015 - 23:52

Ah this takes me back 13 years... 

 

http://news.bbc.co.u...one/2311983.stm



#55 McLaren

McLaren
  • Member

  • 1,123 posts
  • Joined: January 10

Posted 17 March 2015 - 23:54

How you can not beat car that always in the garage?

 

By her car also being in the garage for repair works!!!   ;)



#56 phoenix101

phoenix101
  • Member

  • 295 posts
  • Joined: September 11

Posted 18 March 2015 - 01:56

Hanidcapping is a good method, and most forms of racing should have it. But handicapping needs to be according to a system voted upon by the participants, and they shouldn't be adjusting the handicap during the season, especially not on a race by race basis like some touring car series.

 

No one benefits when one team runs away with the show. They are optimizing performance under irrelevant rules. Loosen the technical regulations and handicap. It's better for the teams and the fans.



#57 purplehaireddolphin

purplehaireddolphin
  • Member

  • 312 posts
  • Joined: June 13

Posted 18 March 2015 - 15:51

If you want handicapping, how about this?

 

Apply it to pitstops, so if you win, each pitstop at the next race is extended by 2.5 secs, if you finish 2nd, each pit stop is extended by 1.8 secs, if you finish 10th each pitstop is extended by 0.1 sec

 

 

Yeah, I know, I'll say it before anyone else does, it's stupid idea. But at least it's workable



#58 Atreiu

Atreiu
  • Member

  • 17,232 posts
  • Joined: May 07

Posted 18 March 2015 - 16:49

Very workable.



#59 DampMongoose

DampMongoose
  • Member

  • 2,258 posts
  • Joined: February 12

Posted 19 March 2015 - 22:17

Isn't that big gold chain Lewis was wearing after the race a stealth form of success ballast?


Don't take the mickey, he spent all day at Cromer on the 2p push machines to win enough prize tickets for that chain!

Advertisement

#60 DampMongoose

DampMongoose
  • Member

  • 2,258 posts
  • Joined: February 12

Posted 19 March 2015 - 22:22

With the current rules. Just reduce/increase the fuel flow rate by a degree based on championship position. An artificial way to create equality and spice things up thats so crap, it would suit f1 perfectly. Along with race winners having to drive with a half empty Evian bottle rolling in the footwell.