Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Malaysia Pole Time and Will Manor get inside 107% if they get on track?


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Ar558

Ar558
  • Member

  • 50 posts
  • Joined: March 15

Posted 20 March 2015 - 22:50

I have been looking at what I think the pole time will be in Sepang, this is even harder to estimate then a lot of the  tracks as there was no dry Quali last year. If you take the P3 fastest times from last year on all the races where they had dry Quali the Pole time was 1.19% faster than the Fastest P3 time. If you apply this to Malaysia 2014 you get a 1:37.827 for last years pole. As for the year on year improvement we don't have much data to go on (especially due to wet Aus quali in 2014) but I think if you compare both the P3 times 14-15 and the fastest lap you get a decrease of about 1.66% in laptime. Apply this to the Psuedo pole time  from 14 and you get a 1:36.203. 

 

As For the 107% time that based on the above is a 1:42.937 At the last race which Marussia Qualified in 2014 (RUS) Chilton was 4.951% of LH's Q1 time. If you add the 1.66% Merc have added that puts Manor 6.6% ish off the pace assuming they can the car to run as well as they did in Russia (which would be v difficult) plus the drivers don't know the car or the circuit and we don't know if the 2015 mods to the 2014 cars have had a significant effect on performance. I would put that if they get to run properly they have about a 20% chance of getting a car below 107%

 

Thoughts


Edited by Ar558, 20 March 2015 - 23:11.


Advertisement

#2 Scuderia312

Scuderia312
  • Member

  • 135 posts
  • Joined: August 14

Posted 20 March 2015 - 22:54

Why are you creating seperate topics for every single detail about the GP weekend?



#3 pdac

pdac
  • Member

  • 17,266 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 20 March 2015 - 22:58

If they get on the track, I'm sure they will make 107%



#4 Ar558

Ar558
  • Member

  • 50 posts
  • Joined: March 15

Posted 20 March 2015 - 23:11

Why are you creating seperate topics for every single detail about the GP weekend?

 

It's Fun to speculate  :cool:



#5 Ferrari_F1_fan_2001

Ferrari_F1_fan_2001
  • Member

  • 3,420 posts
  • Joined: May 01

Posted 20 March 2015 - 23:12

Are the tyres faster this year than last?

#6 Scuderia312

Scuderia312
  • Member

  • 135 posts
  • Joined: August 14

Posted 21 March 2015 - 00:10

Are the tyres faster this year than last?

I doubt there is a significant difference.



#7 superden

superden
  • Member

  • 4,185 posts
  • Joined: May 11

Posted 21 March 2015 - 00:11

If they get on track then ...







... no, it's no good. I don't care.

#8 AlexS

AlexS
  • Member

  • 6,341 posts
  • Joined: September 03

Posted 21 March 2015 - 00:14

Will Mclaren? it was at 106% in Australian GP i think.


Edited by AlexS, 21 March 2015 - 00:19.


#9 Scuderia312

Scuderia312
  • Member

  • 135 posts
  • Joined: August 14

Posted 21 March 2015 - 00:19

Will Mclaren? it was at 106% in Australian i think.

And solar eclipse was a week too early for McLaren, that won't help with their overhearing power unit :)



#10 Otaku

Otaku
  • Member

  • 1,715 posts
  • Joined: March 11

Posted 21 March 2015 - 00:37

Will Mclaren? it was at 106% in Australian GP i think.

 

The slowest McLaren was 3.9% slower than the fastest Mercedes in Q1, so no, way less than 6%..

 

 

Lewis: 1:28.586

Jenson: 1:31.422 (+3.2%)

KMag: 1:32.037 (+3.9%)

===========================

107%: 1:34.787


Edited by Otaku, 21 March 2015 - 00:40.