Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 2 votes

The worst racing engines ever thread.


  • Please log in to reply
85 replies to this topic

#1 Rasputin

Rasputin
  • Member

  • 960 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 20 April 2015 - 17:51

The Life Racing 3.5 W12 was pretty bad;

 

3707008770_5c0d6b6af3.jpg



Advertisement

#2 Imateria

Imateria
  • Member

  • 2,424 posts
  • Joined: January 14

Posted 20 April 2015 - 17:53

Good luck in finding something to top that.



#3 GoldenColt

GoldenColt
  • Member

  • 6,254 posts
  • Joined: December 13

Posted 20 April 2015 - 17:54

The Life Racing 3.5 W12 was pretty bad;

 

3707008770_5c0d6b6af3.jpg

 

And just to give people in here an idea of how bad it was, I recommend this article:

 

http://www.f1fanatic...tival-of-speed/



#4 Rasputin

Rasputin
  • Member

  • 960 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:01

Good luck in finding something to top that.

387c6dfaec55e26ef77275d57ceefdc9.jpg



#5 Henri Greuter

Henri Greuter
  • Member

  • 12,860 posts
  • Joined: June 02

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:02

Good luck in finding something to top that.

 

Not at F1  but I can top it.

 

 

1954 Studebaker V8 at Indy.

 

Built bij JC Agajanian as an alternative on the Offy. On the first attempt to crank it up the starter shaft broke and they couldn't get it running.

Was put aside and never seen again.....

 

Within F1 I nominate other engines of the same category:

 

- Subari-Motori Moderni Flat V12

- Porsche V12 as used by Footwork

 

Henri



#6 Dan333SP

Dan333SP
  • Member

  • 4,681 posts
  • Joined: March 10

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:04

image6.img.640.medium.jpg

 

 

 

In all seriousness, this is up there too, the Subaru flat 12 in the Coloni-

 

http://dp.subaru.com...ge_inline7.aspx


Edited by Dan333SP, 20 April 2015 - 18:05.


#7 Tourgott

Tourgott
  • Member

  • 1,149 posts
  • Joined: December 13

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:04

387c6dfaec55e26ef77275d57ceefdc9.jpg

 

f1-renault-1.6-turbo-engine-designboom02



#8 JHSingo

JHSingo
  • Member

  • 8,930 posts
  • Joined: June 13

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:05

The Lotus IndyCar engine.

 

So far off the pace that Jean Alesi and Simona de Silvestro were lapped, and subsequently black flagged, after just nine laps of the Indianapolis 500 in 2012.

 

The Honda F1 engine is phenomenal in comparison to that absolute disaster.


Edited by JHSingo, 20 April 2015 - 18:07.


#9 Rasputin

Rasputin
  • Member

  • 960 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:06

H16.jpeg



#10 Dan333SP

Dan333SP
  • Member

  • 4,681 posts
  • Joined: March 10

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:07

The 1.5L supercharged BRM V16 was pretty miserable as well. The H-16 gets a pass because it lasted long enough to win a single race in '66. I also remember the Hart V10 in the back of the '99 Arrows. It was hopelessly underpowered and made the worst crackling noise when off throttle, sounded like it was in the process of ripping itself to shreds.



#11 chunder27

chunder27
  • Member

  • 5,775 posts
  • Joined: October 11

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:14

I was going to mention the Subaru and Porsche engines!

 

The Hart V10 was a good motor actually certainly powered Rubens to a few results.

 

I never rated the Alfa flat 12, was never a good motor, so heavy and hard to design a car round.

 

The Lambo V12 was never that good either, but I forgive it for sounding marvellous!

 

Moteri Moderni V6 turbo?  WOuldnt you have loved to see that engine in a decent chassis to see if was any good?

 

Alfa V8? Again though could have been good in some cars. Oh and what about the Alfa 4 that never was?



#12 BRG

BRG
  • Member

  • 25,883 posts
  • Joined: September 99

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:14

The Yamaha engine of 1989 which was inflicted on the blameless Zakspeed F1 team was pretty dire.  I recall at the Silverstone tyre test, it blew, so the team laboriously fitted a new one in the pits, fired it up only for it to blow up after about 5 seconds. 


Edited by BRG, 20 April 2015 - 18:15.


#13 emmanuelrubi

emmanuelrubi
  • Member

  • 1,058 posts
  • Joined: November 13

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:25

The worst pairing
The most crash prone pairing
The worst engine

If this topics go this way im not gonna be surprise to see "the gp with the worst hot dogs"

Edited by emmanuelrubi, 20 April 2015 - 18:38.


#14 Dan333SP

Dan333SP
  • Member

  • 4,681 posts
  • Joined: March 10

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:26

I was going to mention the Subaru and Porsche engines!

 

The Hart V10 was a good motor actually certainly powered Rubens to a few results.

 

I never rated the Alfa flat 12, was never a good motor, so heavy and hard to design a car round.

 

The Lambo V12 was never that good either, but I forgive it for sounding marvellous!

 

Moteri Moderni V6 turbo?  WOuldnt you have loved to see that engine in a decent chassis to see if was any good?

 

Alfa V8? Again though could have been good in some cars. Oh and what about the Alfa 4 that never was?

 

Maybe the 3.5L version was decent for its time, but the 3.0L engine in the '98-'99 Arrows (I think they self-branded the engines as TWR or something?) was a derivative of the Hart-designed Yamaha V10 and was nowhere near competitive.



#15 David Lightman

David Lightman
  • Member

  • 1,427 posts
  • Joined: September 09

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:30

The 1994 Peugeot in the back of the McLaren was pretty dire, ask Martin Brundle about the British Grand Prix :D



#16 Clrnc

Clrnc
  • Member

  • 6,652 posts
  • Joined: March 15

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:33

And just to give people in here an idea of how bad it was, I recommend this article:

 

http://www.f1fanatic...tival-of-speed/

WTF  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

 

That takes some beating. 

 

I doubt anybody can find anything worse than this. 



#17 ninetyzero

ninetyzero
  • Member

  • 706 posts
  • Joined: November 14

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:37

Has anyone done the Honda/Renault joke yet? *checks thread* Oh damn it someone has...



#18 Lazy

Lazy
  • Member

  • 6,708 posts
  • Joined: June 10

Posted 20 April 2015 - 18:56

Has anyone done the Honda/Renault joke yet? *checks thread* Oh damn it someone has...

I think the thread was made so as to be able to do that joke.



#19 JuanPablo

JuanPablo
  • Member

  • 237 posts
  • Joined: November 14

Posted 20 April 2015 - 19:40

The Yamaha engine used by Jordan in 1992. It was free so saved money over paying for the Ford V8. Other than that it was a horrid lump of sh!te.

The subsequent Jordan Hart cars were a big improvement.

Advertisement

#20 Baddoer

Baddoer
  • Member

  • 3,512 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 20 April 2015 - 19:48

2000 Peugeot was quite bad.

1990 Subaru was B12, not V12 by the way


Edited by Baddoer, 20 April 2015 - 19:50.


#21 muelte

muelte
  • Member

  • 931 posts
  • Joined: March 09

Posted 20 April 2015 - 20:02

The Life Racing 3.5 W12 was pretty bad;

 

3707008770_5c0d6b6af3.jpg

 

:rotfl: At least it sounded good

 

 



#22 Atreiu

Atreiu
  • Member

  • 17,232 posts
  • Joined: May 07

Posted 20 April 2015 - 20:12

"At Silverstone it failed to pre-qualify by 19 seconds" 

 

I really laughed.

 

:)



#23 ensign14

ensign14
  • Member

  • 61,702 posts
  • Joined: December 01

Posted 20 April 2015 - 21:21

Good luck in finding something to top that.

 

The MGN W12.  Tested in an AGS, it was fitted in the back of a Norma at Le Mans one year.  They couldn't even get it to fire up.



#24 TheSnowman

TheSnowman
  • New Member

  • 20 posts
  • Joined: March 15

Posted 20 April 2015 - 21:48

The Porsche 3512 from 1991

por-v12.jpg

It wasn't a racing engine. It was a truck engine. 



#25 HP

HP
  • Member

  • 19,631 posts
  • Joined: October 99

Posted 20 April 2015 - 22:34

f1-renault-1.6-turbo-engine-designboom02

Ho-r-ren-dous



#26 micktosin

micktosin
  • Member

  • 1,026 posts
  • Joined: February 11

Posted 20 April 2015 - 23:26

And just to give people in here an idea of how bad it was, I recommend this article:

http://www.f1fanatic...tival-of-speed/

That's so funny. Goodness me.

#27 AlexS

AlexS
  • Member

  • 6,277 posts
  • Joined: September 03

Posted 20 April 2015 - 23:31

Those Peugeots in Mclaren were spectacular:

 



#28 garagetinkerer

garagetinkerer
  • Member

  • 3,620 posts
  • Joined: October 13

Posted 20 April 2015 - 23:51

The worst pairing
The most crash prone pairing
The worst engine

If this topics go this way im not gonna be surprise to see "the gp with the worst hot dogs"

It is all part of the experience, so why ever not if permitted by forum rules. It also gives a heads up to future visitors to a grand-prix. I'm particularly finicky about my food, and used to travel a fair bit for a plate of food which i preferred, and would still do. :p

 

What is amusing is that while there are those of us who suggest the Renault V6 to be amongst the worst engines in F1, but then there are those of us here, who suggest that Horner is not handling it right :p



#29 Spillage

Spillage
  • Member

  • 10,251 posts
  • Joined: May 09

Posted 20 April 2015 - 23:55

To be fair to the Life, the car was regularly 15+ seconds off the pace with a Judd engine in the back...

 

But still, difficult to look beyond it. There's some footage of the car actually moving somewhere on youtube, and it's unbelievably slow. Fred Flintstone's car had more horsepower.



#30 noikeee

noikeee
  • Member

  • 23,156 posts
  • Joined: February 06

Posted 20 April 2015 - 23:56

The current Renault engine is certainly a little embarassing for current standards but far far more competitive, and even far more reliable (despite all the problems!) than some gems of then...

 

The Life W12 will take some beating.  :lol:



#31 garagetinkerer

garagetinkerer
  • Member

  • 3,620 posts
  • Joined: October 13

Posted 21 April 2015 - 00:07

Those Peugeots in Mclaren were spectacular:

 

Early 00's Mercedes engines were also quite, mmm, toasty. Hey, i'm a tifoso, what were you expecting? Of course i enjoyed every single roast, more still when Raikkonen kept his foot on the pedal to make sure nothing survived.

 

Renault V10 110o in early 00's were also pretty poor. They were getting lapped like nobody's business. 



#32 BlinkyMcSquinty

BlinkyMcSquinty
  • Member

  • 862 posts
  • Joined: October 14

Posted 21 April 2015 - 04:11

The initial turbo engines by Renault. They were called the "yellow teapot" because they regularly blew up in a cloud of steam.

 

HkhCJdB.png

 

Eventually Renault got them sorted out, but for the first few years, they just blew up.



#33 Rob G

Rob G
  • Member

  • 11,609 posts
  • Joined: April 01

Posted 21 April 2015 - 04:18

The JAP engine that powered Harry Schell's Cooper in the 1950 Grand Prix of Monaco wasn't a bad racing engine. However, it was a really bad Formula 1 engine, considering that it only had two cylinders and a capacity of just 1100cc at a time when the limit was 4500cc. Even the supercharged engines were allowed 1500cc.



#34 Brazzers

Brazzers
  • Member

  • 1,479 posts
  • Joined: March 14

Posted 21 April 2015 - 04:42

The early Mercedes engine when Kimi was at McLaren. Those things especially when Kimi was behind the wheel blew up or had some sort of niggling issues. 

 

This isn't the worst engine but considering the reputation and aspirations of what McLaren and Mercedes were aiming for in the early 00's it didn't really deliver until 07 onwards.



#35 Rasputin

Rasputin
  • Member

  • 960 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 21 April 2015 - 06:56

The Pederzani brothers' 1972-73 home-buiit Tecno 3.0 flat 12 was a truly terrible beast, at least 50 Hp down on power and 50 kg overweight, all compared to the Cosworth V8.

 

cf0e4fd2deb9d65df4654c53c6c8c16f.jpg

 

14657256641_ae29d93ca4_b.jpg



#36 Risil

Risil
  • Administrator

  • 61,331 posts
  • Joined: February 07

Posted 21 April 2015 - 12:56

The worst pairing
The most crash prone pairing
The worst engine

If this topics go this way im not gonna be surprise to see "the gp with the worst hot dogs"

 

http://www.foxsports...troversy-032715

 

Are the new hot dogs genuinely tasty? Or is this the insidious NASCAR press control machine at work again?



#37 Tsarwash

Tsarwash
  • Member

  • 13,725 posts
  • Joined: August 10

Posted 21 April 2015 - 13:52

To be fair to the Life, the car was regularly 15+ seconds off the pace with a Judd engine in the back...
 
But still, difficult to look beyond it. There's some footage of the car actually moving somewhere on youtube, and it's unbelievably slow. Fred Flintstone's car had more horsepower.

In Monza the car was 33 seconds off the pace.

#38 mclarensmps

mclarensmps
  • Member

  • 8,597 posts
  • Joined: February 02

Posted 21 April 2015 - 13:56

This forum is starting to look like the click bait ads at the bottom of website news articles. And it's worked... look, I'm here. Ugh... No more.



#39 blackmme

blackmme
  • Member

  • 984 posts
  • Joined: September 08

Posted 21 April 2015 - 14:06

The Porsche 3512 from 1991
por-v12.jpg
It wasn't a racing engine. It was a truck engine.


Yep I agree, given the lineage, engineering capabilities and budget (although there is some doubt about this bit) the results were a disaster. It's okay to poke fun at Life, Motori Moderni et al but this was Porsche who superglued two de-turboed v6's together nose to nose and took the power off from the middle!

Regards Mike

Advertisement

#40 Dan333SP

Dan333SP
  • Member

  • 4,681 posts
  • Joined: March 10

Posted 21 April 2015 - 14:08

This forum is starting to look like the click bait ads at the bottom of website news articles. And it's worked... look, I'm here. Ugh... No more.

 

 

Try these 7 weird tricks to make Renault engines more reliable! F1 engineers hate this!



#41 Alfisti

Alfisti
  • Member

  • 39,658 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 21 April 2015 - 14:45

Try these 7 weird tricks to make Renault engines more reliable! F1 engineers hate this!

Gold jerry, GOLD. 



#42 thiscocks

thiscocks
  • Member

  • 1,489 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 21 April 2015 - 15:21

:rotfl: At least it sounded good

 

 

Only 10krpm on tacho! No wonder it struggled to make 400bhp. Great looking and sounding though.

 

The 1.5L supercharged BRM V16 was pretty miserable as well. The H-16 gets a pass because it lasted long enough to win a single race in '66. I also remember the Hart V10 in the back of the '99 Arrows. It was hopelessly underpowered and made the worst crackling noise when off throttle, sounded like it was in the process of ripping itself to shreds.

Nah, BRM V16 was a great engine which produced comfortably more hp than its rivals when it was working- just plagued with misfire problems. H16 was miles worse. Heavy and underpowered from begining to end.


Edited by thiscocks, 21 April 2015 - 15:23.


#43 BoschKurve

BoschKurve
  • Member

  • 1,525 posts
  • Joined: September 12

Posted 21 April 2015 - 15:38

I don't feel like searching for pictures, but I'd like to nominate the entire crop of current F1 engines. :up:



#44 Szoelloe

Szoelloe
  • Member

  • 7,054 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 21 April 2015 - 15:43

The early Mercedes engine when Kimi was at McLaren. Those things especially when Kimi was behind the wheel blew up or had some sort of niggling issues. 

 

This isn't the worst engine but considering the reputation and aspirations of what McLaren and Mercedes were aiming for in the early 00's it didn't really deliver until 07 onwards.

 

 

It wasn't the engine, in all fairness. It was Newey's packaging that did that engine in. It would have been mighty otherwise.



#45 Andrew Hope

Andrew Hope
  • Member

  • 7,911 posts
  • Joined: October 09

Posted 21 April 2015 - 16:18

Here is a video of the Life F190 in action.

 

Skip to 9:40 and the first two cars to drive past have racing engines in them, and the third car to drive past is Bruno Jack O'Malley, who doesn't.

 



#46 demet06

demet06
  • Member

  • 126 posts
  • Joined: December 13

Posted 21 April 2015 - 17:52

The Peugot engines in the back of the McLaren's in the 90's were pretty bad. They'd blow up on a regular basis issuing huge amounts of smoke. The press release was always that the car was retired because of an oil leak. Which was true enough as the oil was leaking out of a huge hole in the engine block where at least one piston had escaped!



#47 thiscocks

thiscocks
  • Member

  • 1,489 posts
  • Joined: October 07

Posted 22 April 2015 - 12:44

387c6dfaec55e26ef77275d57ceefdc9.jpg

You'll have to delete that by the end of the season/next season



#48 Jimisgod

Jimisgod
  • Member

  • 4,954 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 22 April 2015 - 12:49

What's the most unreliable F1 engine ever? http://www.thechecke...rst-f1-engines/

#49 Rasputin

Rasputin
  • Member

  • 960 posts
  • Joined: February 10

Posted 22 April 2015 - 13:52

The 1966 Maserati V12 was one ugly contraption;

 

donington-014a.jpg



#50 BoschKurve

BoschKurve
  • Member

  • 1,525 posts
  • Joined: September 12

Posted 22 April 2015 - 14:05

The Peugot engines in the back of the McLaren's in the 90's were pretty bad. They'd blow up on a regular basis issuing huge amounts of smoke. The press release was always that the car was retired because of an oil leak. Which was true enough as the oil was leaking out of a huge hole in the engine block where at least one piston had escaped!

 

I'm going to take offense on this

 

This has become one of the biggest on-going myths in F1 history - that the Peugeot V10's were garbage and that McLaren was somehow reduced as a contender. 

 

Yes the engines certainly did explode, however McLaren scored 8 podiums between Brundle and Hakkinen over the course of 1994.

 

The switch to Mercedes Ilmor power (because they were just Ilmor engines with Merc valve covers) was horrendous for results. They had 2 podiums for the whole year. Ron's been disingenuous about the whole McLaren-Peugeot thing for the last twenty years and somehow the media along with the fans still buy the idea that there was no success to be had with the Peugeot V10's. I'd wager any amount of money that had Merc not come calling with a large bag of Deutsche Marks that trumped the large bag of Francs, McLaren would have been running the Peugeot engines for 1995, and would have scored a win. Instead they suffered through many more Mercedes engine explosions for the next decade.