Montoya tries to put Kimi in the grass
#1
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:30
#3
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:32
#4
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:33
Heh. Just as I thought: the silence is deafening.Originally posted by LuckyStrike1
puuurrrleaaaaaaaseeeeeeeeeeeeeee
So tell me, Mr. LuckyStrike1, sir: can you honestly tell me you would not have complained had Michael Schumacher done exactly what Montoya did to Kimi? Yes or no.
#5
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:34
#6
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:35
Originally posted by Teez
Heh. Just as I thought: the silence is deafening.
So tell me, Mr. LuckyStrike1, sir: can you honestly tell me you would not have complained had Michael Schumacher done exactly what Montoya did to Kimi? Yes or no.
We would have already seven threads about this and Ronzo would have been frantically firing up his "I need a clarification" e-mail to race stewards and FIA.
#7
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:36
BTW - I never saw any faults with Magny-Cours and SChumi and Kimi, just for your records.
Jeezz - sometimes some Schumacher fans really can be paranoid ;)
#8
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:37
#9
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:40
Originally posted by Teez
I'm curious where all the anti-Schumacher troops are. Why aren't they busy complaining about Motor-Mouth Montoya's attempt to punt Kimi into the grass? Can you imagine the number of posts about it there would be had Michael done exactly what JPM did?
Jeeez. You are PATHETIC. Thanks god there are more drivers different than MS on the grid so that we can appreciate these racing battles without someone getting into the grass, gravel. Kimi and JPM had a terrific battle and they were FAIR. Your attacks on JPM have become quite predictable and quite boring. Please move on....
#10
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:49
#11
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:53
#12
Posted 28 July 2002 - 14:58
BTW, what caused Kimi's retirement anyway, driver error again?
#13
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:12
He spun out, but there were some loose body parts seen after his tyre blow out. So his car was damagedOriginally posted by KinetiK
BTW, what caused Kimi's retirement anyway, driver error again?
#14
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:13
I'm glad I wasn't disappointed.
#15
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:13
The question is where are all anti-JPMs? Do they exist?Originally posted by Teez
I'm curious where all the anti-Schumacher troops are.
Why would anti-Schumachers cry about great battle?
#16
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:14
Originally posted by HP
He spun out, but there were some loose body parts seen after his tyre blow out. So his car was damaged
Yeah, I just saw the McLaren news pop up on Atlas, no driver error at all. Good, we'll have a real fight in 2004 between Kimi, Juan and the ever present Michael.
#17
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:14
Until we see the team quotes, it's too early to speculate. After having to drive the car almost a complete lap with a disintegrating tire, his retirement could have been caused by that earlier damage...that just got worse as the race progresses.Originally posted by KinetiK
BTW, what caused Kimi's retirement anyway, driver error again?
#18
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:16
Originally posted by HP
He spun out, but there were some loose body parts seen after his tyre blow out. So his car was damaged
The rear end of the left sidepod, including the winglets, were pretty heavily damaged. I wouldn't be surprised if that caused unbalance during cornering, or even secondary damage to the suspension.
#19
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:25
Originally posted by Teez
Let me be clear. I have no problem with Motor-Mouth's move on Kimi. The purpose of this thread is to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the anti-Schumacher brigade. I'm convinced that if Michael pulled the exact same move on Kimi this forum would be crawling under the weight of dozens of posts and at least six threads about what an unfair bastard Schumacher is and how he tried to run poor Kimi off the track.
I'm glad I wasn't disappointed.
I think you present a very sad image of yourself here. If I were you - a Ferrari and Schumi fan god forbid ;) - I would celebrate a Schumacher victory today and his fifth title since the week ago. Not go on in a stupid thread looking like a bad looser and a bad winner no matter what. Instead you complain about something no one really understands what it is. Is Jerez 97 really such a bad memory for you or is it sour grapes over how the title was clinched this year at Magny-Cours and the Austria fiasco or what is it?
Advertisement
#20
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:26
Originally posted by Teez
Let me be clear. I have no problem with Motor-Mouth's move on Kimi. The purpose of this thread is to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the anti-Schumacher brigade. I'm convinced that if Michael pulled the exact same move on Kimi this forum would be crawling under the weight of dozens of posts and at least six threads about what an unfair bastard Schumacher is and how he tried to run poor Kimi off the track.
I'm glad I wasn't disappointed.
Teez in wonderland
What the hell are u talking about, chill out. Michael Shumacher has nothing to do with Montoya overtaking Kimi, don´t drag your paranoia into this. "Anti-shumacher brigade", please get a grip.
Montoya´s move on Kimi was clean and he gave him enough space, it´s called racing.
#21
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:27
#22
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:28
Originally posted by LuckyStrike1
I think you present a very sad image of yourself here.................. or what is it?
Does seem a bit compulsive/obsessive about Montoya, doesn't he?
#23
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:29
#24
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:31
Originally posted by Teez
Alien and LuckyStrike1: I'll archive your posts for future reference. Thanks!
archive this.
'get help'.
#25
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:31
Originally posted by Teez
I'm curious where all the anti-Schumacher troops are. Why aren't they busy complaining about Motor-Mouth Montoya's attempt to punt Kimi into the grass? Can you imagine the number of posts about it there would be had Michael done exactly what JPM did?
Just think how big this thread would have been if it was Schumacher that did that to Kimi. It is racing, but most on this forum will jump at anything that Schumacher does.
#26
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:32
Teez
Let me be clear. I have no problem with Motor-Mouth's move on Kimi. The purpose of this thread is to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the anti-Schumacher brigade. I'm convinced that if Michael pulled the exact same move on Kimi this forum would be crawling under the weight of dozens of posts and at least six threads about what an unfair bastard Schumacher is and how he tried to run poor Kimi off the track.
I'm glad I wasn't disappointed.
teez is right, people finds all the time absurd conpiracies for MS, no matter what he does, so it was a good comparison today's JPM move on Kimmi as an example. I also thing he did nothing wrong, just what he is suppose to do, racing.
logic quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Teez
I'm curious where all the anti-Schumacher troops are.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is where are all anti-JPMs? Do they exist?
Why would anti-Schumachers cry about great battle?
you got a point, why would anti-Schumachers cry about great battle, the strange thing is they do, all the time, whenever MS is involved, wins, pass or just don't do anything, still they cry.
#27
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:34
Originally posted by Teez
Alien and LuckyStrike1: I'll archive your posts for future reference. Thanks!
Well then I might give you a little tip of the search engine on this BB. You can actually go and search for posts from any of the members here and see what they write. It's all in the archive. Now with a three-week break to the next GP, I sugges you go and search for posts so your archive for "future reference" can get really big. Enjoy and good luck to you
#28
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:35
Originally posted by B747
teez is right, people finds all the time absurd conpiracies for MS, no matter what he does, so it was a good comparison today's JPM move on Kimmi as an example.
Compared to what? I don't get it.
#29
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:38
This is quite apparent.Originally posted by LuckyStrike1
I don't get it.
#30
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:38
Originally posted by LuckyStrike1
Compared to what? I don't get it.
Compared to what Michael did to Kimi at Magny Cours.
#31
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:42
kyStrike1 quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by B747
teez is right, people finds all the time absurd conpiracies for MS, no matter what he does, so it was a good comparison today's JPM move on Kimmi as an example.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compared to what? I don't get it.
comparted to any normal situation in a race involving MS, the fact that it involves MS seems to be enough to create all kind of conpiracys and accusations against him, no matter he is in the receiving end or viceversa, if he is not involved things are considered what they usually are, normal racing situations.
#32
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:42
I tell you this, if it was Montoya and Williams who had the season Ferrari and Schumacher are having (minus Austrian fiasco) I would be happy and enjoying it right now instead of being paranoid ...
#33
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:43
Originally posted by Teez
This is quite apparent.
Yeah well I don't think your posts here has made much sense, that's all.
#34
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:44
#35
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:48
#36
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:49
Originally posted by Teez
Let me be clear. I have no problem with Motor-Mouth's move on Kimi. The purpose of this thread is to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the anti-Schumacher brigade. I'm convinced that if Michael pulled the exact same move on Kimi this forum would be crawling under the weight of dozens of posts and at least six threads about what an unfair bastard Schumacher is and how he tried to run poor Kimi off the track.
I'm glad I wasn't disappointed.
You are dead right. THe level of hypocrisy by some of the forumers in here is pathetic. However I found nothing wrong with MS move a week ago and I found nothing wrong with JPM:s today. It was a brilliant, brilliant overtaking move. I'm really impressed with this guys fighting spirit.
#37
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:51
MS didn't push Kimi off the track he was already there. JPM did push Kimi off today on the exit but that's racing. I thought Kimi actually drove better than JPM there despite the fact that he lost his position. I have noticed that a lot of JPM's passes rely on the other driver lifting off or taking evasive action to avoid a collision.Originally posted by KinetiK
Montoya could have given Kimi more room on the final bend there I suppose but without that bit of grass to slow Kimi up the battle would have continued for corners more. JPM did what he had to do to pass Kimi, it's no different than what MS did in order to pass Kimi in France.
#38
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:53
Originally posted by B747
I am enjoying very much this seasons!
Good, you should. Because I will enjoy Montoyas titles when they come ;)
#39
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:54
Originally posted by GDoering
MS didn't push Kimi off the track he was already there. JPM did push Kimi off today on the exit but that's racing. I thought Kimi actually drove better than JPM there despite the fact that he lost his position. I have noticed that a lot of JPM's passes rely on the other driver lifting off or taking evasive action to avoid a collision.
No he didn't push him off. It was fair racing between them two where they werer fair but tough too each other.
Advertisement
#40
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:56
that's probably why they're called anti-schumachersOriginally posted by B747
you got a point, why would anti-Schumachers cry about great battle, the strange thing is they do, all the time, whenever MS is involved, wins, pass or just don't do anything, still they cry.
as far as i'm concerned this thread is no better than any anti-MS thread
#41
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:58
notice one thing, and maybe thats why this post make a lot of sense, in any anti-Schumacher thread there are a thousand insults and accusations against him before any real argument or fact can be seen, no matter the title of this thread, there is no one insulting Montoya, instead you see most MS fans and some anti-JPM praising him for his racing, so this thread could call to reflect about how unfair is the attack on MS most of the time, notice does Prost did mention some days ago something about MS been attacked because of been the best.
#42
Posted 28 July 2002 - 15:59
It was really simple : FAIR and CLEAN fighting. They gave eachother room when it was needed.
#43
Posted 28 July 2002 - 16:02
Originally posted by B747
LuckyStrike1
notice one thing, and maybe thats why this post make a lot of sense, in any anti-Schumacher thread there are a thousand insults and accusations against him before any real argument or fact can be seen, no matter the title of this thread, there is no one insulting Montoya, instead you see most MS fans and some anti-JPM praising him for his racing, so this thread could call to reflect about how unfair is the attack on MS most of the time, notice does Prost did mention some days ago something about MS been attacked because of been the best.
What I have noticed here that there seems to be some MS fans that instead of taking pleasure in succes starts a thread with the content being that if it had been MS this and that and bla bla bla would have been said. Why start it in the first place?
But maybe that is because I'm not anti anything in F1. I just happen to be pro a team and a few drivers that I like more than the others.
#44
Posted 28 July 2002 - 16:02
I'm not saying it wasn't fair but watch the pass again and tell me where was Kimi supposed to go but into the grass? I'm pretty sure he didn't drive into the grass because that's the fastest route around that corner.Originally posted by LuckyStrike1
No he didn't push him off. It was fair racing between them two where they werer fair but tough too each other.
#45
Posted 28 July 2002 - 16:04
Great. So since you're not in the target group of "anti-Schumachers" why is it that you seem to be taking such offense at this thread?Originally posted by LuckyStrike1
But maybe that is because I'm not anti anything in F1. I just happen to be pro a team and a few drivers that I like more than the others.
#46
Posted 28 July 2002 - 16:04
But great racing though!!! No big problems, the move jpm pulled on kimi seemed similar to what ms did to kimi at magny, only kimi was rejoining the track at magny.
#47
Posted 28 July 2002 - 16:04
Most people are referring to the corner before Kimi had to lock up his brakes. The reason JPM was ahead at that corner was because he pushed Kimi onto the grass.Originally posted by AndreasNystrom
Im a big fan of Raikkonen, but doesnt think JPM did anything wrong at all. He just locked the door. I think Kimi knew he wasnt able to make it, it just looked a bit more dramatic due to the wheel lock.
It was really simple : FAIR and CLEAN fighting. They gave eachother room when it was needed.
#48
Posted 28 July 2002 - 16:06
I thought the pass was exciting, hard yet fair. However, the thought did cross my mind that had it been Montoya and Schumacher vs. Montoya and Raikkonen this forum would have been in an uproar with all the usual suspects in full fury.
#49
Posted 28 July 2002 - 16:06
BTW: Ralf does not deserve that ride. I was not impressed with his drive today. He deserved what position he finished in. Strike that down to another bad weekend for Ralf. Juan was also not up to the task this weekend, but that is the first weekend in a while. every now and again isn't too bad. Ralf was setting fastest lap after fasteset lap and didn't dent Michaels lead at all. He was a pussy through traffic and wasn't commited to any of the passes that he was making. Shame.
#50
Posted 28 July 2002 - 16:06
LuckyStrike1
Why start it in the first place?
have you notice that the most entertaining ones are this kind of threads? (whenever they don't get violent) I just enjoy them.