Need help on a research paper, please help!
#1
Posted 01 October 2002 - 13:41
What i need are history, articles, facts and opinions that supports this thesis. Any help or comments will be appreciated! Thanks!
Justin
Advertisement
#2
Posted 01 October 2002 - 13:47
If he's not too busy... and maybe Mike Argetsinger too.
#3
Posted 01 October 2002 - 15:15
#4
Posted 01 October 2002 - 15:32
#5
Posted 01 October 2002 - 15:42
BTW the topic you picked is very much in the news. You just have to hunt for it a little.
#6
Posted 01 October 2002 - 17:14
Originally posted by Dennis David
The France family owns NASCAR. I did a short search on "NASCAR and the France family" and found loads of stuff. Try Google using other combinations such as "The businesws of NASCAR". Your post reminded me of my school days so don't take offense. Where do you live? I agree that most HS libraries are sad affairs but any public library should have books on your subject.
BTW the topic you picked is very much in the news. You just have to hunt for it a little.
Compare and contrast the dominance the France family have in stock-car racing to that that the McMahons have in pro-wrestling... (although I don't think any of the Frances are steroid-users on the same level as, er, "amateur bodybuilder" Vince McMahon!)
Something I wrote earlier this year:
> Nobody has to watch. That's not the point atall. The point is not
> manipulating the race to ensure that people watch. That way lies
> NASCAR and, ultimately, WWF.
>
I'd argue that NASCAR is already nearer the WWF than the FIA these days.
I mean -
- readily identifiable "good guys" and "bad guys" with silly nicknames,
just like the WWF.
- controlled by one autocratic, slightly cranky family (just like the
WWF, though I think there's less anabolic steroids and boob jobs in the
France family than the McMahons)
- regular "screw jobs" from the organisers to make sure the right guys
"win" (oops. sorry. perfectly legitimate aero rule changes and yellow
flags because of "debris on the track") - just like the WWF.
- a points structure that's almost incomprehensible, like the WWF's
"rules" for who gets a chance at the title.
- at least lately, plenty of car crashes in both!
Fortunately the WWF hasn't yet adopted restrictor plate rules to make
things boring. Instead, it has William Regal matches.
All we need is Richard Petty to come out of retirement and play Ric
Flair to the France family's McMahons, and the ghost of Ironhead to come
back to be their Hulk Hogan and the two would be indistinguishable.
Sure, I admire the WWF performers. I admire the NASCAR drivers too. They
all put in an amazing show and just as I'm willing to call any man
who'll be suplexed through a table onto concrete both brave and
foolish, I'll call any man who'll do 500 miles balls-to-the-wall
round Daytona with 40-odd rednecks brave and foolish.
What's this got to do with F1? At the moment, relatively little. But,
with Bernie going down the PPV and licensing-the-rights-to-everythign
route (which is how Vinny Mac makes his money) who knows....
Anyway, Forza Rob van Dam! Forza Dudley Boyz! Forza Chris Jericho!
pete
#7
Posted 01 October 2002 - 18:16
Motor racing probably started off as a sport (for the very wealthy) or a means of manusfacturers and those involved with supplying the manufacturers with parts (tyres, plugs, fuel) to promote product.
So it was always somewhere between a "not for profit" sport, a professional sport and a business.
In modern times Formula One has certainly, to my mind, become something of a WWF, but it sets out to be a platform for product promotion, and also supplies the "fans" with entertainment.
I think the sport part is no longer applicable.
#8
Posted 01 October 2002 - 21:50
As I said, you need a bit of Buford and Argetsinger help...
Use the search feature, put in each name as the poster and nominate 'show as posts' in the options, use the keywords George and/or CART for Buford's posts, NASCAR for Mike Argetsinger's...
#9
Posted 01 October 2002 - 22:11
The technology boom that took place in the 1970s that revolutionized the sport in terms of speed and kicked off many of the safety concerns that have ultimately resulted in chicanes, restrictor plates, barn door wings at a set angle and rev limiters, and sanatized cookie cutter point and squirt race tracks, had to be paid for. At the point race purses stopped paying the costs, it turned business. When was that? Early to mid 1970s. There is a thread "Bob Anderson" on the front page of the Nostolgia Forum where Doug Nye posted an interview he had with Anderson (independant F1 racer) where Anderson talks about how he financed his team (which was just his wife and himself and a couple buddies) through full seasons of F1 on starting money, and minor accessory sponsorships.
This was mid 1960s. So you could still do F1 then with just a wife, two buddies, and a car you bought with an underpowered engine. He also comments there will not be many like him for long because it was almost impossible to do. No kidding, huh?
So I would say it was technology, and the need to fund it, which screwed up racing in general. Drivers became interchangeable, cars became the same, tracks were emasculated or abandoned for weak substitutes, budgets crossed the million dollar a year mark, then quadrupled, then blew into the over 100 million a year range in F1 and 15 million or more range in NASCAR and CART. Sport got lost somewhere along the way.
#10
Posted 01 October 2002 - 23:44
That's a chicken or the egg argument, I know... but a valid one.
#11
Posted 02 October 2002 - 02:38
#12
Posted 02 October 2002 - 06:14
hmm....true in the teens,twentys,thirtys.....until the present day...is there any differance between NASCAR the WWF and the traveling racing "circuses"promoted in the very earliest days of the century?....the only addition i can think of is television....
#13
Posted 02 October 2002 - 08:02
And you had NO chance of getting into European racing for a long long time without patronage, it's just come full circle. Even to the point of Damon Hill et al getting into F1 via test driving, reminiscent of the likes of Nazzaro getting their jobs via mechanicry.
And, Pete, what's wrong with William Regal matches? I should give you a bloody good hiding, sunshine.
#14
Posted 02 October 2002 - 08:03