Surtees 1972
#1
Posted 11 November 2003 - 15:44
Dan
Advertisement
#2
Posted 12 November 2003 - 12:52
#3
Posted 12 November 2003 - 15:04
#4
Posted 12 November 2003 - 16:37
Originally posted by ian senior
In 1974, he had a deal with a manufacturer of hi-fi that on paper promised a good budget. I think he moved the team into new premises on the strength of it. The money, or most of it, never came through, although to be fair the 1974 car wasn't much cop either.
Is this the Bang & Olufsen #19 car that Matchbox replicated as a 1/32 scale styrene kit?
#5
Posted 13 November 2003 - 09:55
Its a pity that Alan Henry's biography of Surtees doesn't cover the Surtees Team in much depth at all, though he does say that the ill-fated Bang and Olufsen sponsorship debacle was a major contributor to the demise of the team.
#6
Posted 13 November 2003 - 11:37
#7
Posted 13 November 2003 - 13:46
#8
Posted 13 November 2003 - 13:55
Originally posted by Mallory Dan
Thanks for all the above, some of which are new to me, though I also remember the Matchbox/B&O TS16 model. I've heard before of the money issue in F1, but what about the F2 cars. The TS10 was really good, why didn't the next years car, TS15, do so well? Anyone have any knowledge of this ??
Don't think there was much wrong with the TS15 that a works BMW engine wouldn't have cured. But the only way to obtain such an engine was to get hold of the March 733 to which it was usually attached.
#9
Posted 13 November 2003 - 16:08
Originally posted by ian senior
Don't think there was much wrong with the TS15 that a works BMW engine wouldn't have cured. But the only way to obtain such an engine was to get hold of the March 733 to which it was usually attached.
You could buy a 73S group 6 car, which March mainly built to use up the 50 (IIRC) BMW engines they had to guarantee they could shift, and re-engine that with your FVC or BDG...
#10
Posted 13 November 2003 - 16:34
Back to Surtees matters, on the engine front, I think Ian's right, thats the reason the TS15 lagged in 73. Didn't Watson have a few gos in 74 with a TS15A BMW, not too well as I recall. But on the F5000 matter, though I know it was getting towards its last legs, the TS11 having gone so well here in 72, why did no-one want one, or Surtees make a newer version in 73 ?
#11
Posted 13 November 2003 - 20:52
Neville
#12
Posted 13 November 2003 - 21:30
#13
Posted 13 November 2003 - 22:55
Originally posted by Mallory Dan
Anyone know how many 732s and 73Ss March built that year, the Lawrence book I'm sure says much less than 50. What about March's guarantee then, how did Max and Robin get out of that one!
Back to Surtees matters, on the engine front, I think Ian's right, thats the reason the TS15 lagged in 73. Didn't Watson have a few gos in 74 with a TS15A BMW, not too well as I recall. But on the F5000 matter, though I know it was getting towards its last legs, the TS11 having gone so well here in 72, why did no-one want one, or Surtees make a newer version in 73 ?
Lawrence says 14 F2s and 19 sportscars. If you assume the works and some of the better-heeled customers took 2 engines per car it's not that hard to get to 50 engines...
(thinks - marchives.com might say more... too late to go ferretting there tonight...)
#14
Posted 14 November 2003 - 00:00
Lawrence says 14 F2s and 19 sportscars...
Yep, that's what Marchives says.
#15
Posted 22 March 2013 - 01:03