Jump to content


Photo

Attention everyone: how to post your images


  • Please log in to reply
341 replies to this topic

#151 fw07c

fw07c
  • Member

  • 156 posts
  • Joined: January 06

Posted 30 August 2008 - 15:26

Thanks Rewind very much

Advertisement

#152 Twin Window

Twin Window
  • Nostalgia Host

  • 6,605 posts
  • Joined: May 04

Posted 03 September 2008 - 22:00

Perhaps people with a photo-posting problem could actually read the immensely helpful content of this thread before simply submitting their query?

Ray Bell in particular has gone to extraordinary lengths to explain, and in simple terms, how to overcome almost any given problem a member is ever likely to face!

It's a complete affront to his and others labours to ignore this, so in future I shall delete anyone's question if it has already been amply answered already earlier in this thread.

You have been warned!


#153 Pils1989

Pils1989
  • Member

  • 1,111 posts
  • Joined: December 02

Posted 12 March 2009 - 14:17

My apologies if I didn't see it mentioned in the thread already but does any one know a simple freeware for Mac to add decent watermarks to pictures, please?
I don't own a copy of Photoshop Pro anymore to be able to play with layers.
Thank you!

EDIT: I would like to be able to add a watermark across the picture

#154 vashlin

vashlin
  • Member

  • 321 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 12 March 2009 - 15:35

I, too, would be very interested in knowing a simple way to add watermarks to photos (using a PC).

Lin

#155 Bauble

Bauble
  • Member

  • 1,040 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 12 March 2009 - 20:05

Lin,
You could download Picasa from the Google web site, it is a free photo editing suite which also gives you a free web site. You can 'export pictures' tto the web or to a folder on your pc and add a watermark as you do so. It appears as a script of your choice in the bottom left hand corner, not across the full photo.

I f you need any advice just ask. (picasweb.google.co.uk/rbmapics) my own site from which you can download picasa for yourself and see what it looks like.

#156 Hieronymus

Hieronymus
  • Member

  • 2,031 posts
  • Joined: May 02

Posted 15 March 2009 - 17:19

Looks like imageshack is of no use anymore, so let's try this:

Posted Image

#157 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 53,396 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 15 March 2009 - 21:13

Originally posted by Hieronymus
Looks like imageshack is of no use anymore, so let's try this:

Posted Image


I'll definitely look at that... but why do you say Imageshack is of no use any more?

I just used it this morning to post two pics, no problem whatever. It will upload more than one pic at once now, too.

#158 David McKinney

David McKinney
  • Member

  • 14,156 posts
  • Joined: November 00

Posted 15 March 2009 - 21:16

I hope he's not responding to a comment I made earlier
I should have made clear it was my error - and I have since posted as easily (if also as slowly) as ever

#159 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 53,396 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 24 March 2009 - 16:01

Originally posted by Hieronymus
Looks like imageshack is of no use anymore, so let's try this:

Posted Image


I tried Postimage tonight when I had problems hooking up to Imageshack... which was actually a problem relating to my satellite connection going slow on me more than anything...

One thing I don't like about it (which you don't find out until you use it...) is that, like Tinypic, the filename you use for your picture is lost in the uploading. They give your picture a filename all their own.

So why is this a problem?

Well, particularly on TNF, there will come a time when the picture is lost, not having been used for some time or whatever. And then someone will revive a thread and the picture might be needed.

In the past I've always been able to re-post such pictures by finding them from my filename, which is part of the string used by Imageshack (or my ISP-based web space), but when that filename is taken away it might be hard to find the pic to repost it.

This is also an issue with the recent change to Atlas (well, relatively recent...) that prevents editing after a certain time. It's no longer possible to go back and edit a new string in there to restore a pic to a particular post, it has to be put into a new post.

Advertisement

#160 Twin Window

Twin Window
  • Nostalgia Host

  • 6,605 posts
  • Joined: May 04

Posted 24 March 2009 - 18:38

Originally posted by Ray Bell

This is also an issue with the recent change to Atlas (well, relatively recent...) that prevents editing after a certain time. It's no longer possible to go back and edit a new string in there to restore a pic to a particular post, it has to be put into a new post.

Good point about file names being bastardised as that would give me exactly the same problem.

Regarding 'lost' images in old-ish threads and the fact that only I can edit them these days (not of my doing, I hasten to add...) members can always go through the hosting process and then send me the appropriate URL (as generated by ImageShack, or whoever) and, providing I'm given a link to the precise post, I can then stick it in their post for them.

#161 vashlin

vashlin
  • Member

  • 321 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 25 March 2009 - 13:10

Originally posted by Bauble
Lin,
You could download Picasa from the Google web site, it is a free photo editing suite which also gives you a free web site. You can 'export pictures' tto the web or to a folder on your pc and add a watermark as you do so. It appears as a script of your choice in the bottom left hand corner, not across the full photo.

I f you need any advice just ask. (picasweb.google.co.uk/rbmapics) my own site from which you can download picasa for yourself and see what it looks like.


Bauble,

Just now seeing this. Thanks so much for the information!

It looks like something I actually might be able to manage and will give it a try this weekend when I have some time to work on it.

:up: Lin

#162 Bauble

Bauble
  • Member

  • 1,040 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 25 March 2009 - 14:19

Bets of luck Lin, I find picasa easy to use now I have some experience of using it, but it can take a bit of practice.

Once you have downloaded 'picasa' on to your PC and opened it for the first time you wll see, near the bottom right hand corner of the screen, it searching for all of the pictures on the hard drive, which it list's on the left hand side of the screen.
When you select individual pictures or folders the pictures appear in a box at the bottom left of screen, you can then 'hold' them and from there upload them on to your own picasaweb.google.co.uk web site by clicking the upload button next to the box. You can add a watermark at that stage.
If you are as technically brilliant as I am these simple instructions will be a complete mystery to you!!!

Once the pictures are loaded onto your free picasa site you can post them on to a forum by following the instructions on the right hand side of the page, but I needed help from an expert to do this.

You can post a 'link' or a string of gobblededook that opens the picture when posted on a forum.

This option is selected from the second of the two options shown in the instructions. You need to highlight the whole string that runs in the 'box' (you will see what I mean when/if you get that far) you must 'copy' this using the clipboard facility on your PC and paste it into 'notebook' or similar. Then comes the dodgy bit as you have to isolate the appropriate parts of the string and paste it into your post.

I hope this helps but I suggest that once you have proceeded as far as you can (assuming you are like me, relatively incompetent) you can come back and ask for more advice.

I shall keep an eye on this thread over the weekend so feel free to shout if you want to.

Kind regards,

Bauble.

#163 vashlin

vashlin
  • Member

  • 321 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 25 March 2009 - 16:11

:drunk:

Wow. I think I'll need to give myself some time to try this as I would imagine, my technical "brilliance" being fairly dim, I "ll need some assistance. But it sounds like it would be worth trying. I see people's watermarked photos and wonder how this is accomplished. There is supposedly a way with Adobe Photoshop but I must not have the ability to figure that one out. :confused:

I will proceed SLOOOWLY and see how Picasa works. (Like the name, BTW).

Here's hoping.


Lin

#164 Bauble

Bauble
  • Member

  • 1,040 posts
  • Joined: January 09

Posted 25 March 2009 - 16:57

Slooooowly Indeed, us techy idiots have to stick together.

#165 vashlin

vashlin
  • Member

  • 321 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 01 April 2009 - 01:02

Have downloaded Picasa. The download is amazingly easy and slick.

Am still finding my way around. Haven't yet tried to export an album but I am really liking it so far.

Seems very user-friendly. Thanks, Bauble, for leading me to it. :up:

Lin

#166 Twin Window

Twin Window
  • Nostalgia Host

  • 6,605 posts
  • Joined: May 04

Posted 27 April 2009 - 11:38

Checking for weirdness...

#167 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 53,396 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 28 April 2009 - 10:59

It's here...

Just check this picture!

Posted Image

#168 Twin Window

Twin Window
  • Nostalgia Host

  • 6,605 posts
  • Joined: May 04

Posted 28 April 2009 - 11:24

Originally posted by Ray Bell

It's here...

Just check this picture!

How very odd!

However it has come to my attention that the switch-over to the new software is imminent (in fact the proposed date is today!), so I imagine that could account fot the various anomalies which cropped-up yesterday (members having log-in problems being the other)...

#169 RTH

RTH
  • Member

  • 5,704 posts
  • Joined: January 03

Posted 08 May 2009 - 15:55

Very thankfully we have had full size photo posting facility restored. but please everyone do , after you have scanned in or downloaded your photos , go to your photo software and resize your pictures to 800 pixels or less before taking them to imageshack or whatever so that when they are posted up on the forum they do not go over the page , which does upset some people, that way we can keep the full screen width photos which are so much better.

#170 Pete Lyons

Pete Lyons
  • Member

  • 37 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 17 July 2009 - 19:44

Vashlin wrote: "I see people's watermarked photos and wonder how this is accomplished. There is supposedly a way with Adobe Photoshop..."

Yes indeed, and it's not difficult. I'm sure there are other ways of doing it—there always are in Photoshop—but here is how I've taught myself to do it (in CS; I have just upgraded to CS4 but am not up to speed in that version yet):

The basic idea is, you're going to add a "Text Layer" and then, optionally, decrease that layer's "opacity."

1. With your image open, make a duplicate and save it with an extra few letters in the filename. This is so you don't mess up the original image and also so you can find the new one later, when time comes to post it to the forum. Let's say the image's name is "Photo" and you'll rename the copy "PhotoFORUM"

2. With the new image open, resize it to the 800 pixels max width requested by Mr. Hinton and save again. (After resizing, your picture might be improved by judicious use of Unsharp Mask.)

3. Hit the F7 key or pull down the Windows tab and click on "Layers." A box will appear, in which at the moment you see only one layer indicated.

4. In your Tools pallet, click on the "T" or Text tool. ONCE YOU START TYPING, this will create a second Layer, which will appear in the Layers box above the first one. This new layer is tinted blue, indicating it's the one you can work on.

5. Type your desired watermark info. It might be "Photo Copyright John Smith"

6. The text that appeared on the screen can now be adjusted in several ways—repositioned, enlarged or reduced, changed to a different type font, adjusted in color or grayscale tone. (Such parameters can also be set in advance once you learn how.) Play around and learn by doing, or consult a formal PhotoShop tutorial. Don't worry about ruining your original image while you're experimenting, that's why you made the copy.

7. The optional final step is reducing the text layer's opacity, so it doesn't spoil the viewer's appreciation of the picture but still watermarks it as your work. Do this via the Opacity percentage slider at the top of the Layers box. As an example, for this sort of presentation I am fond of the font Papyrus at a text size of 60 points, with opacity somewhere between 10 and 30 percent, depending how well the underlying image shows through.

8. Once you're sure you're happy, pull down the Layers tab and "flatten" the image. (ONCE YOU DO THIS, FURTHER CHANGES ARE IMPOSSIBLE. But you can always start over again).

Save one last time. Your special, watermarked FORUM image is now ready to be posted.



#171 Pete Lyons

Pete Lyons
  • Member

  • 37 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 17 July 2009 - 21:06

As an example, the watermark on the picture below reads "petelyons © com", with the copyright symbol enlarged about three-fold over the rest of the text and the whole text layer reduced to about 15 percent opacity.

Posted Image

If someone can suggest a superior method of watermarking, I'd be keen to hear about it!

Anybody want to ID the picture? For extra points, how about the players?

#172 vashlin

vashlin
  • Member

  • 321 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 17 July 2009 - 21:31

Pete,

Thanks so much for the info. I just saved and printed it as I'll need to refer to it FREQUENTLY as I work through it. Will try it this weekend. I never would have figured that out myself. But it does seem doable.

Gary and I enjoyed so much chatting with you and Lorna at the Glen Open House last October.

Lin



#173 Pete Lyons

Pete Lyons
  • Member

  • 37 posts
  • Joined: April 09

Posted 18 July 2009 - 00:02

Ah... yes. Wasn't that a good event.
Thanks,

#174 tonyb

tonyb
  • Member

  • 363 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 18 July 2009 - 11:22

8. Once you're sure you're happy, pull down the Layers tab and "flatten" the image. (ONCE YOU DO THIS, FURTHER CHANGES ARE IMPOSSIBLE. But you can always start over again).

I don't use CS but PE6/7 - that has the usual Ctrl+Z to undo the last operation as with most Windows apps so you should be able to reverse the flatten operation (and further previous ops) in CS as well I would guess?

There's also an online free facility if of any use - I quickly did this one, you can place the image where you want and in various formats. Note sure how many you can do for free though....

Posted Image

Oops, oi can't spell :drunk:

#175 vashlin

vashlin
  • Member

  • 321 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 18 July 2009 - 18:54

I have used Pete's excellent step-by-step instructions and feel I've finally gotten the idea!

Started out with something easy - one of Gary's B&W photos of Lauda from the Glen.

This is my first effort, not a watermark tho' I did play with the opacity and will use it for color pics. I've always liked Papyrus myself and used it with this photo.
(I'll post the pic on Personal photos from the paddock.)

The instructions were so good that it all feel into place very quickly. Now I'll go back and really play with it.

Thank you.

Lin




#176 Ian G

Ian G
  • Member

  • 1,022 posts
  • Joined: July 09

Posted 24 July 2009 - 03:04

Thanks Fella's(& Ray)sorted it out.

Edited by Ian G, 12 August 2009 - 08:08.


#177 WDH74

WDH74
  • Member

  • 1,117 posts
  • Joined: March 03

Posted 07 September 2009 - 22:06

Is there a way to post images that does not involve using Imageshack? I am growing tired of it going to sponsor websites after I've uploaded (I'm not double clicking on anything, either, it seems to happen if you leave it alone for more than a minute) and not allowing you to go back to your images. Plus, I already have a Flickr account, and dont' really fancy having to search through two computers and an external hard drive in order to find an image I've already got hosted there. Other fora don't have an issue with Flickr-why this one? Is there a step I'm missing?

Imageshack's issues are most frustrating-I used it for years but stopped when I got the Flickr account. Especially as I'm finally returning to this forum on a regular-ish basis after a long hiatus.

-William

PS-apologies if instructions for hosting via Flickr were covered-I did not see it in this thread, but that doesn't mean it wasn't mentioned elsewhere.

#178 Frank S

Frank S
  • Member

  • 2,155 posts
  • Joined: September 02

Posted 08 September 2009 - 00:47

Is there a way to post images that does not involve using Imageshack? I am growing tired of it going to sponsor websites after I've uploaded (I'm not double clicking on anything, either, it seems to happen if you leave it alone for more than a minute) and not allowing you to go back to your images. Plus, I already have a Flickr account, and dont' really fancy having to search through two computers and an external hard drive in order to find an image I've already got hosted there. Other fora don't have an issue with Flickr-why this one? Is there a step I'm missing?

Imageshack's issues are most frustrating-I used it for years but stopped when I got the Flickr account. Especially as I'm finally returning to this forum on a regular-ish basis after a long hiatus.

-William

PS-apologies if instructions for hosting via Flickr were covered-I did not see it in this thread, but that doesn't mean it wasn't mentioned elsewhere.

Posted Image

Seems pretty straightforward. Copy URL from your choice of All Sizes, select the Insert Image icon, paste the URL, OK.


What next? Let's see if Insert Link will be useful:
Posted Image

That takes two URLS, one for the original size, one for the thumbnail size. Works good if you want to take the time.

(url="http://farm3.static....4b46fb873_t.jpg[/img][/url)
Correct the "(" and ")" to "[" and "]" to make it right.

Edited by Frank S, 08 September 2009 - 00:53.


#179 WDH74

WDH74
  • Member

  • 1,117 posts
  • Joined: March 03

Posted 08 September 2009 - 02:42

Let's see....

Posted Image

Well hot damn tamales! Success! Thanks, Frank! I now see my error-I was using the "share" link over on the right side of the main page you get when you click on a photo. It offers the option of linking, the HTML, or blogging. It didn't occur to me to use the "All Sizes" section. Learnt sump'n new today!

-William

Advertisement

#180 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 53,396 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 10 September 2009 - 04:56

Hmmm...

I'd like to know how you were getting to sponsor websites if not double clicking. Perhaps you were clicking in the wrong place? I never get them. Never.

#181 WDH74

WDH74
  • Member

  • 1,117 posts
  • Joined: March 03

Posted 11 September 2009 - 04:37

Hmmm...

I'd like to know how you were getting to sponsor websites if not double clicking. Perhaps you were clicking in the wrong place? I never get them. Never.


Haven't the faintest, Ray. It happened each time I tried to upload. The final time I hadn't touched the keyboard when it popped up. I wouldn't have cared except for the fact that I couldn't back out of the ad, or close it, or anything-my screen of uploaded photos was just gone. I hate to admit that I haven't posted any pictures-or anything, really-in many months here, so the eccentricities of the new software, plus changes in ImageShack, are all new to me.

No real matter, since Frank got me sorted out on posting from my Flickr page (which has a lot of stuff that's not on my computer).

-William

#182 Frank S

Frank S
  • Member

  • 2,155 posts
  • Joined: September 02

Posted 16 November 2009 - 02:26

When I use Flickr.com as the resource location for photos, I ignore their admonition to use Option One. I could never make it work. I just "grab the URL" and put it in the place the site I want it to appear on designates. On TNF I click the "Insert Image" button, and ctrl-v the URL there.

When I pick the size of Flickr image to get the URL, I try to keep the TNF ones at 800 pixels on the long side. Anything smaller than that loses too much impact; much more makes some TNFers nervous for some reason.

Any road, my procedure for the Mamie pic would be:
Choose original size
Highlight and copy the URL
(http://farm3.static....fcef0c83a_o.jpg)

Go to the TNF Reply box
Click the Insert Image button
ctrl-v the http
OK.



I don't know why anyone would want to look at this, but here it is:

Posted Image


third try ( this is how it looks in the page source code; why doesn't it work here?)
<img src="http://farm3.static....cef0c83a_o.jpg" border="0" class="linked-image" />

in the "edit" screen, copying the "img" line above:
Posted Image

Edited by Frank S, 16 November 2009 - 22:01.


#183 David Beard

David Beard
  • Member

  • 4,875 posts
  • Joined: July 02

Posted 15 December 2009 - 22:07

Flickr is another alternative, although earlier attempts of mine failed for some reason.

Posted Image

A shot found there of of our Gary C...before he painted his helmet ?

#184 sandy

sandy
  • Member

  • 1,064 posts
  • Joined: August 03

Posted 13 February 2010 - 20:33

In the Ships Nostalgia forum you simply go to the site - click on upload photos - click on browse - select photo from My Pictures - click in site window - click submit - done!

No bloody Image Shack or Photobucket.

Edited by sandy, 13 February 2010 - 20:34.


#185 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 53,396 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 13 February 2010 - 20:58

Clearly a decision was made many years ago by the owners of this bulletin board to not allow direct posting of pics to the fora...

Some BBs allow it, some don't. Most allow the system used here, I use two that don't, they only allow pics to be put onto their server. Then they have size limitations that hinder me at times.

There are things that have been decided for us and we have to work with them... I don't see it as so hard to post pics to a server for linking, I generally use Imageshack and suffer very few problems. If a picture isn't accessed in twelve months, true, it will evaporate. Some fall off the perch before that, but in my experience it's very few. As I keep the pics I post on file elsewhere, I can usually replace them if they're troublesome, but I can't recall having to replace any in a long time.

We did have a system here where webspace was available to members for this use. That was handy, but that was dispensed with and created a lot of old threads with broken links.

#186 pru.net

pru.net
  • New Member

  • 19 posts
  • Joined: May 09

Posted 22 April 2010 - 15:21

Why does it need to read all these pages to not understand how to insert a photo in a post ?

That's certainly why there are so few photos in your forum.

#187 David McKinney

David McKinney
  • Member

  • 14,156 posts
  • Joined: November 00

Posted 22 April 2010 - 21:57

That and the fact that it was set up as a discussion forum :)

Gradually photos were introduced to illustrate points or settle arguments, though now of course there are myriad threads devoted solely to displaying photos

#188 pru.net

pru.net
  • New Member

  • 19 posts
  • Joined: May 09

Posted 23 April 2010 - 15:33

Hello David,

I am not asking for a photo-only forum, not encouraging copyright infrigements either but just firmly believe the old saying "a photo is worth a thousand words" and regret posting a photo here being so complicated. Proofs are this very thread and the rarity of photos.

Just look at FerrariChat (No advertisement here) but their system is very simple.

#189 vashlin

vashlin
  • Member

  • 321 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 23 April 2010 - 16:15

"...rarity of photos." Really? Do you think so?

It was a desire to post and share some of my photos that prompted me to join this forum.

There was some initial confusion on my part as to how to go about it but I found this thread a huge help.

Lin


#190 Michael Ferner

Michael Ferner
  • Member

  • 2,074 posts
  • Joined: November 09

Posted 23 April 2010 - 16:55

I really think you hit the ball home here, Lin: why do people complain and complain instead of just reading this thread, and take the excellent advice and the instructions provided by Ray Bell? We all KNOW it could be a lot easier with a different software, but hey, it's obviously not going to happen, and Ray has it explained down to a pat. Just try it, do it and be happy! :)

#191 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 53,396 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 23 April 2010 - 21:41

Let's have a look at FerrariChat then...

I've been on a lot of those fora where they will allow uploads within their own software, there are different ways of doing it and each have some merit. Here's the total of two posts from a random page (only one I opened...) of FerrariChat that had photos. Not one photo displayed on the page of twenty posts, by the way, all as links:

Posted Image

The first one is a typical type of usage. It requires that you click on the image filename and it opens the image on a separate tab. Or maybe a fresh window if you're using IE.

The second could probably have been just as we have it here. But note that the poster didn't use the inbuilt uploading system, choosing instead to host the pics elsewhere just as we do here.

Perhaps he has run out of his picture allowance with the forum? That has to happen, as the forum cannot sustain the level of picture hosting that would be required to put all the pics we use on TNF (and other fora within this BB) without great cost. Then again, there is an advertisement interspersed within the twenty posts on that page.

Oh... yeah... and you can't access that pic that's posted via the forum software unless you have logged in to the BB.

Edited by Ray Bell, 23 April 2010 - 21:44.


#192 Hawkeye

Hawkeye
  • New Member

  • 19 posts
  • Joined: May 10

Posted 16 May 2010 - 15:28

Gosh - as a newcomer to this forum, I thought it polite to read the official intro pages regarding foto posting but - having seen the several years worth of compexities involved - I think I will just stick to using the typed word!

The complexity is not at all user-friendly, I'm afraid but RESPECT to all those who have mastered the dark arts involved!!

#193 Marc Sproule

Marc Sproule
  • Member

  • 538 posts
  • Joined: April 10

Posted 16 May 2010 - 16:03

Here's the way I do it, and believe me it's easy.

Earlier this year I signed up for flickr. Had been thinking about it for some time but thought it was gonna be too complicated. I was wrong.

I resize my images in Photoshop. Color about 250-300kb, black and white about 100kb. I use a 5.5" in maximum dimension. Big enough to see decently and not so big that the sticky fingered types are tempted to steal it. I use flickr uploadr. It's very easy and quick..about 5 secs to upload an image once you've "added" it.

Writing descriptions and assigning tags takes longer depending on wordy you wanna be.

When I want to post images to the forum I just copy the link to the image and put it in my post. I don't upload the image here. It saves space on the forum and takes only a few seconds for the viewer to click on the link and then see the image.

I have a pro account on flickr...$25/yr US...so I can upload as many images as I want.

If you decide to go this route and have any questions feel free to pm or email and I'll help in any way I can.

http://www.flickr.co...s/46681980@N03/

Edited by Marc Sproule, 17 May 2010 - 00:19.


#194 chdphd

chdphd
  • Member

  • 1,382 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 16 May 2010 - 16:24

Aye, flickr is well made and easy to use. But I do have one wee issue with flickr. On the "all sizes" page, it offers you this code:

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chdphd/4411575930/" title="On top of the pit building by chdphd, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2691/4411575930_002cac8645_b.jpg" width="1024" height="768" alt="On top of the pit building" /></a>
This is HTML for a web site and looks like this here:

<a href="http://www.flickr.co...hd/4411575930/" title="On top of the pit building by chdphd, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm3.static....2cac8645_b.jpg" width="1024" height="768" alt="On top of the pit building" /></a>

It would be good if they offered bulletin board code as well, Which would be this:

[url="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chdphd/4411575930/"][img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2691/4411575930_002cac8645_b.jpg[/img][/url]
Which show up as this. A clickable image which takes you to the flickr page.

Posted Image

#195 David McKinney

David McKinney
  • Member

  • 14,156 posts
  • Joined: November 00

Posted 16 May 2010 - 17:33

Fine. but better still if you bring the width down to 800 so more people can see the whole thing

#196 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 53,396 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 17 May 2010 - 12:14

Marc, I frankly don't understand why anyone would use Photoshop to cut picture sizes down...

I could crop or resize maybe ten pictures while Photoshop is opening. I use Irfanview and it's tremendous for most image tasks. Sure, Photoshop gives more options when you get to the really fine points, but for speed and convenience you would be hard pressed to beat Irfanview.

As for your links, I find them atrocious!

I would much rather the picture appear on the page, or at least a thumbnail. I operate with a relatively slow satellite link here and to be forced to open another page, particularly one that has extraneous matter other than the picture itself on it, is a tiresome prospect.

Imageshack costs nothing. I have just a few pics shy of 2000 currently uploaded to Imageshack. Photobucket also costs nothing. They are quick and easy to use, and for the benefit of Hawkeye I will have to say that it's a shame he read all the negative comments and didn't simply concentrate on the simple examples I posted.

I'm no computer expert, I'm often told I shouldn't have anything to do with computers, but I don't have any problems at all posting pics on any forum. You can too, but you just have to grasp the picture of what's happening when your post is opened with the link to the picture included in it.

Edited by Ray Bell, 17 May 2010 - 12:17.


#197 vashlin

vashlin
  • Member

  • 321 posts
  • Joined: December 06

Posted 17 May 2010 - 14:01

Guys, it really isn't that difficult to post photos on TNF. Honest! If I can figure it out, anyone can.

I've been posting photos on here for over three years now and rarely have a problem. Like Ray, I use Imageshack. It's free and simple to use once you do it a time or two. Imageshack was the first one I tried and it worked so well I have stayed with it. I resize any photo first using my HP el cheapo version of Adobe Photoshop as it has a simple resize button for forum use and is much faster than Adobe (which I also have). Making sure to save the original size, of course, I grab the resized photo for download on Imageshack then copy and paste to my post here.

I admit I was very hesitant at first. It did seem complicated but I followed the advice on this thread figuring, what did I have to lose by trying and was surprised by how quickly I had it sorted out. Before doing this I knew NOTHING about posting photos.

I do admit I agree with Ray about clicking on links. Much prefer to see the photo on the page. Just lazy, I guess.

Lin

#198 chdphd

chdphd
  • Member

  • 1,382 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 17 May 2010 - 21:32

Fine. but better still if you bring the width down to 800 so more people can see the whole thing

76% of web users can see that OK in a maximized window.

http://www.w3schools...ers_display.asp

#199 Ray Bell

Ray Bell
  • Member

  • 53,396 posts
  • Joined: December 99

Posted 18 May 2010 - 14:16

Originally posted by chdphd
76% of web users can see that OK in a maximized window.

http://www.w3schools...ers_display.asp


So why not be more considerate if you know that about a quarter of the people looking in will be inconvenienced?

Advertisement

#200 chdphd

chdphd
  • Member

  • 1,382 posts
  • Joined: October 03

Posted 18 May 2010 - 16:54

So why not be more considerate if you know that about a quarter of the people looking in will be inconvenienced?

I feel the other option flickr offers is too small for three quarters of users to get a good view. So I choose good for 76% bad for 24% over bad for 76% good for 24%.