Devil is not so terrible as he is painted..
Lest there be any lack of clarity...
"Perpetual motion similar to that of the amplifier but without supplying energy from the outside to the amplifier.
A typical example would be a Ventouri nozzle, acoustic sound amplifiers, Coanda effect, amplifiers and the like . .
Of course, the system must be designed very carefully the picture below is just to understand how it works.
Of course it will not be motor and alternator . .”
unless you are joking, this kind of “perpetual motion amplifiers” exists only in your imagination.
Take the easiest case, say “an acoustic sound amplifier” (like your acoustic guitar, regularly mentioned in the previous posts) and follow the energy.
The energy, just like the mass, cannot be created, nor be can destroyed; it just passes from body to body, from atom to atom. At the end, it is an interaction between atoms and nothing more (Boltzmann).
The total energy of the sound emitted by the acoustic guitar is ALWAYS less than the mechanical energy provided to the guitar strings.
Can you focus on the above simple sentence and explain what makes you think that the energy of the emitted sound is more than the energy given to the guitar strings?
Have you made any experiments / measurements that prove the opposite?
Or it is just your “feeling”?
The acoustic guitar is a good start.
Then you can “evaluate” properly your rest “perpetual motion amplifiers”.
On the other hand, I still think you are joking.
By the way, at your post 1181 it is mentioned the dual module OPOC engine of EcoMotors / Bill Gates.
Imagine having in your car a two module OPOC. When the load is light, you operate only the module near the gearbox. From time to time (when the load is heavy) the second module gets into play.
Did you think what is the reliability of this arrangement?
If not, take a look at http://www.pattakon....ariableCapacity