Hottest GPs/races?
#1
Posted 04 April 2005 - 20:27
Advertisement
#2
Posted 04 April 2005 - 20:45
The 1953 Indianapolis race was very bad.
The 1955 Argentine GP race has been mentioned.
Several of the Darlington events were run in utterly miserable conditions -- something which can be said for most of the Grand National/Cup events in NASCAR, one of the reasons running events under the lights is not just something driven by television. Again, I speak from personal experience.
#3
Posted 04 April 2005 - 20:59
The grass surrounding the track, through the areas where spectators were allowed to stand, had all been burned off to avoid fires, so it was uncomfortable from that point of view too.
The effect of the temperature was such that some of the Ford V8 Specials were sidelined early enough that they borrowed cylinder heads from spectator cars to continue in the race. Even some of the MG TC-based Specials were wilting, while one with a thoughtfully located overflow tank in the (high) headrest had no problems.
Lobethal in 1940 saw the heads on Doug Whiteford's Ford V8 literally melted, by the way, but January 1-3 (the Lobethal dates) just has to be hot in the Adelaide Hills.
At Caversham in 1957 the temperatures were alarming as well. Stan Jones drove right through the Grand Prix there, stepped out of his car and was told that Lex Davison had beat him even though the Ferrari had been driven for a number of laps by Bill Patterson. I think this was the only time an Australian Grand Prix featured relief drivers coming into play, and it was because of the extreme heat.
#4
Posted 04 April 2005 - 21:00
#5
Posted 04 April 2005 - 21:33
Originally posted by crozier74
Just been listening to the ITV crew droning on about how this weekend's Bahrain GP was "the hottest race in history". As always, I was somewhat suspicious of their full grasp of the facts.
I think we had a thread about this last year.
Ah, here it is...
http://forums.atlasf...&threadid=66487
It's fair to say sometimes that it seems James Allen's sense of "in history" goes back to.... ooh 2002. It's a shame he comes up with these silly things as he has got a sense of history considering his dad raced in the 1950's and his two sons are called Enzo & Emerson.
Murray used to do the same. When he retired after 52 years of motorsport, anything pre-Mansell seemed oft-forgot.
#6
Posted 04 April 2005 - 21:38
#7
Posted 04 April 2005 - 22:16
I assume there's some sort of sensor buried in the track to measure this, but I very much doubt that there is any uniformity about how and where they measure it, since no two tracks are the same, light and shade would be variable from track to track and even different tarmac mixes would probably absorb and retain different amounts of heat: a concrete track surface would reflect more heat and thus return a lower figure.
Put a thermometer in direct sunlight and you can get it to read whatever you want - as demonstrated last year by some prat of a journalist on the Daily Express who put one in his garden and got it up to 135 Fahrenheit. Made a good picture for the silly season though ....
#8
Posted 04 April 2005 - 22:26
#9
Posted 04 April 2005 - 23:39
Originally posted by scheivlak
The 1967 and 1968 SA Grand Prix at Kyalami come to mind; DSJ wrote that in 1967 the temperatures during practice rose to 90F with a track temperature of 140F - for what it's worth.
I don't think they're worth mentioning until it's over 100F...
Warwick Farm in 1961 saw the fuel boil in the tanks of the BRMs.
#10
Posted 05 April 2005 - 00:14
#11
Posted 05 April 2005 - 00:25
#12
Posted 05 April 2005 - 01:12
Originally posted by 911
Wasn't Dallas, 1984, a hot one? Didn't the tarmac break up due to the heat, or was it because of the cars?
A relatively poor paving job which might have gotten by had the temperatures not gotten so high, not making it as difficult as it might have been otherwise for the track surface to break up. And it was HOT and temps were about 100F actual and worse with the humidity factored in, 100F+....
#13
Posted 05 April 2005 - 01:12
That's because the surface is often just laid a few days before the event... it doesn't have time to cure. So if it's inordinately hot, the breakdown takes place and schrapnel begins to fly.
I still think they shouldn't be counted unless they are over 100F!
#14
Posted 05 April 2005 - 12:09
The contemporary Autocar report says that at the start of the race, the temperature was 96 deg F, (that equals 35.56 deg C) the track temperature going up to around 140. What time the race did start? Is it possible that the temperature had gone up during the race? (To convert Fahrenheit to Celsius and vice versa, click here.)Originally posted by Vanwall
From memory (I'm not a home right now) Mike Lang reported that the temperature (Whatever that might be! See Mr. Armstrong's earlier post.) was approaching 100° Fahrenheit prior to the start of the '55 Argentina race.
IIRC at the start of this year's Bahrain Grand Prix, the air temperature was around 38 deg C, which makes 100.4 deg F. The 1993 Hungarian Grand Prix - which I attended - was similarly hot. BTW that race marked Damon Hill's first Grand Prix victory.
#15
Posted 05 April 2005 - 12:28
#16
Posted 05 April 2005 - 12:37
Are we talking about a shade temperature in the press box, someone's pit, or at the back of the stands? Not in a Stevenson screen, I'm sure! We don't know how and where it was measured, therefore the figure is meaningless - reflected heat from walls, air movements and many other factors can be involved.
Similarly meaningless is a track temperature, especially if taken on the surface and (as would seem likely in this case) in direct sunlight.
#17
Posted 05 April 2005 - 12:47
Thank You for correcting me Tim, I think 38 deg C was the temperature during final qualifying which of course took place a couple of hours before the race. Can you imagine how hot 42 deg C is? I can, since in 2003 I went to Jordan for holiday. It's amazing: wherever you go, it is strongly recommended to take a bottle of cold mineral water with you even for a ten-minute walk back to the (needless to say air-conditioned) hotel. Hats off to the drivers who finished the Bahrain Grand Prix, it must have been an extremely hard jobOriginally posted by Tim Murray
I thought that the temperature at the start of the Bahrain race was 42°C (107.6°F). This figure was mentioned several times by the commentators, and was also shown on a screen race facts display just before the start.
#18
Posted 05 April 2005 - 13:25
Double it (76)
Subtract 10% (76-7.6 = 68.4)
Add 32 (68.4 + 32 = 100.4 F)
This is exact and a lot easier than messing around with multiplying by 9 and dividing by 5, multiplying by 1.8 etc
Sadly it doesn't work the other way
#19
Posted 05 April 2005 - 14:02
So bad, of course, that one of the drivers (Carl Scarborough) died - allegedly of heat exhaustion, although I heard somewhere recently that he was possibly poisoned by engine fumes which contributed to things.Originally posted by billthekat
The 1953 Indianapolis race was very bad.
How about some of the Carreteras in Argentina? Were they run in the summer there?
Advertisement
#20
Posted 05 April 2005 - 22:40
#21
Posted 06 April 2005 - 05:52
Howard Wilcox II was a diabetic, but he was years earlier.Originally posted by D-Type
Wasn't Scarborough a diabetic as well? Or am I getting him mixed up with someone else?
#22
Posted 06 April 2005 - 06:59
Originally posted by crozier74
.... "the hottest race in history". ...... their non-existent references to pre-1950 racing.....
... what are the hottest (or coldest for that matter) conditions ...
Indeed, a little knowledge of racing should bring up Tripolis! Written accounts by Karatsch and others are priceless. Wonder what Michelins and Bridgestones would do there...
BTW is it possible to visit the Tripolis track (or Libya itself) again after all these (turbulent) years? Just wondering.
#23
Posted 06 April 2005 - 16:40
Originally posted by Arjan de Roos
BTW is it possible to visit the Tripolis track (or Libya itself) again after all these (turbulent) years? Just wondering.
The circuit is long gone, first being bulldozed for expansion of Wheelus AFB and then later on as the area was either developed or incorporated into the exapnded airport facilities. I am unaware of any remnants of the circuit being left today. You can work out its location, but nothing apparent as being left over from when it was used as racing track.
#24
Posted 06 April 2005 - 19:43
Originally posted by billthekat
A relatively poor paving job which might have gotten by had the temperatures not gotten so high, not making it as difficult as it might have been otherwise for the track surface to break up. And it was HOT and temps were about 100F actual and worse with the humidity factored in, 100F+....
On top of this there was a Can-Am race late Saturday IIRC, which was the final straw in the track coming apart! Mansell's exhaustion was one of the lasting images from that season.....
#25
Posted 06 April 2005 - 20:05
#26
Posted 06 April 2005 - 20:23
#27
Posted 31 May 2013 - 01:50