The F5000 McLaren M25
#1
Posted 10 August 2000 - 15:18
of http://www.race-cars.com. Does "stillborn" mean that the
M25 never took part in a F5000 race ?
Who knows more ?
Advertisement
#2
Posted 11 August 2000 - 01:37
#3
Posted 15 August 2000 - 20:22
"who knows more" is a good question.
Dave
#4
Posted 30 September 2000 - 00:53
Fitted with a Cosworth DFV the M25 took on a new lease of life as an F1 car, and a quite successful at that. Though Villota did not win a race he finished third in the championship, with two seconds and one third.
He even attempted to qualify the car for the Spanish GP that year, but failed by a considerable margin after spinning and being hit by none other than McLaren works driver James Hunt. Apparently the car was damaged quite badly because it did not reappear until late in the season, forcing Villota to revert to his well used M23 backup.
For 1979 Emilio purchased a Lotus 78 and finished third again, finally winning the championship in an FW07 Williams in 1980.
#5
Posted 30 September 2000 - 09:12
#6
Posted 30 September 2000 - 17:51
According to Paul Sheldon it was last raced at Thruxton, Sep 10, 1978 and then used in practice for the Snetterton season's final a fortnight later. Could be that Villota crashed again and wrote the car off. I have no English magazines of that time, I believe these could be helpful. Anyone out there?
#7
Posted 30 September 2000 - 20:47
Then, according to AUTOSPORT magazine's report on the F5000 race at Brands Hatch, August 30, 1976, Bob Evans arrived with a "brand new, three year old 5.0 McLaren M25",the car now owned by David Hepworth. With an engine that was even older (5 years), Evans finished a promising second.
At the next race at Thruxton the team had problems with the car's rising-rate front suspension which,according to Evans, made it "the twitchiest car I've driven in seven years of racing". In the race he retired with a blown engine and the car was seen no more that season.
As mentioned in another post above,the car was then aquired by de Villotas team, but he used it as early as the last race of the 1977 Brithsh Gr.8 season at Brands Hatch,Oct.16.
Again according to AUTOSPORT, the team converted the car to M23 spec alongside the M23/6 the team already had. This may be the cause of the confusion over which car de Villota tried to qualify at the Spanish GP in 78, because AUTOSPORT, Doug Nye,Mike Lang and Steve Small all refer to that car as a M23. But I understand from reading other threads at this forum that Sheldon should be a more reliable source, or....
Tom
[p][Edited by tombe on 09-30-2000]
#8
Posted 30 September 2000 - 21:21
Originally posted by tombe
This may be the cause of the confusion over which car de Villota tried to qualify at the Spanish GP in 78
He tried both. The car damaged in the accident with Hunt on Friday, when Emilio spun at the exit of the corner leading to the main straight and Hunt crashed into him, was, as Michael rightfully deducted, the M25.
On Saturday Emilio reverted to M23-6 but was unable to qualify.
As for the suggestion made by Tom about the team converting the M25 to M23 spec (with an M26 air intake) the answer is yes. Only very minor decoration differences allowed at the time to differentiate the two of them, and I am sure, looking at the car, that very few M25´s parts were left visible on that M25-born M23.
Felix Muelas
#9
Posted 04 April 2001 - 20:03
#10
Posted 04 April 2001 - 22:12
Congratulations !
You have achieved a real milestone (at least for me) and now I understand why I used to wake up at nights seeing my mirrors full of "fines"
Un abrazo, and overall, a huge thanks for both questions and answers...
Felix
#11
Posted 04 April 2001 - 22:26
#12
Posted 05 April 2001 - 01:26
Now I know I have posted more than one reply by day (on average, you can see my profil !)
#13
Posted 06 April 2001 - 19:12
#14
Posted 06 April 2001 - 19:20
#15
Posted 07 April 2001 - 08:56
The full race history of the M25 is here. It had 11 starts in total, two as a F5000 and nine as a F1. It even has a DNQ at a proper GP.
The ownership history is as follows: built in 1973, the car was tested in November and then sold to Carlos Avallone in February 1974; impounded and sat out 1974 under lock and key; sold at auction early 1975 to David Hepworth only for Avallone to try to get it back; finally resolved 1976 and run in F5000 by Hepworth; sold in 1977 Guiseppe Risi’s Iberia team for Emilio de Villota and rebuilt it to M23 specification as a back-up to their ex-works M23/6; raced late 1977 and in 1978 by de Villota; then became a show car; sold by Risi via Bobby Howlings to David McLaughlin in August 1982; sold to John Foulston April 1985 and I think he ran it a few times.
I last saw it at a Brooks auction about January 1998 but it didn't sell.
Allen
#16
Posted 18 July 2004 - 12:04
I found this shot in Autosprint showing Bob Evans at Brands in a ShellSPORT Group 8 race in 1976, which I think was the car's race debut. It was turned out in McLaren orange, and somewhere I have a colour shot of it!
#17
Posted 18 July 2004 - 12:13
In fact was his second McLaren chassis (the M23/6 was the first).
#18
Posted 18 July 2004 - 12:16
#19
Posted 18 July 2004 - 12:20
I'm not sure, but i think that this chassis was finished in 1.973/74 ????
Advertisement
#20
Posted 18 July 2004 - 12:55
Pre historic racing of course..
#21
Posted 18 July 2004 - 12:57
The same thought had occured to me too!Originally posted by Vicuna
Last McLaren to race in orange?
Pre historic racing of course..
#22
Posted 18 July 2004 - 12:57
The car is McLaren orange, the cylinder heads clearly indicate a chevy.
#23
Posted 18 July 2004 - 13:03
German edition ??Originally posted by Frank de Jong
I do have a shot of the car (the same venue, I'm sure - #1, same helmet, same decals) in color; it is in Sport-Auto katalog 1/77.
#24
Posted 18 July 2004 - 13:26
(Source: Sport Auto/Renn Und Sportwagen Katalog 1977)
#25
Posted 06 October 2004 - 21:47
#26
Posted 07 October 2004 - 04:53
#27
Posted 07 October 2004 - 05:04
McCormack's basic thinking was to get a tyre advantage. And when Hasemi did so well at the '76 Japan GP on Dunlops, the whole plan germinated.
The Leyland engine was a slightly taller cylinder block variant of the Rover 3500 alloy unit, so was a lot lighter than a Chevy. With less torque than the Chev, McCormack reckoned the FG gearbox would handle it okay, and so it proved.
What was never proved was how good the car might have been with the IMC (Irving/McCormack/Comalco) heads they developed. F5000 in Australia by then permitted aftermarket heads, and these gave much better porting.
The car was brilliant in fast corners, I've never seen anything as quick in the South Curve at the end of Phillip Island's main straight...
#29
Posted 07 October 2004 - 17:37
Originally posted by Allen Brown
Sorry folks, I've been away for a couple of days and only just spotted this thread.
The full race history of the M25 is here. It had 11 starts in total, two as a F5000 and nine as a F1. It even has a DNQ at a proper GP.
The ownership history is as follows: built in 1973, the car was tested in November and then sold to Carlos Avallone in February 1974; impounded and sat out 1974 under lock and key; sold at auction early 1975 to David Hepworth only for Avallone to try to get it back; finally resolved 1976 and run in F5000 by Hepworth; sold in 1977 Guiseppe Risi’s Iberia team for Emilio de Villota and rebuilt it to M23 specification as a back-up to their ex-works M23/6; raced late 1977 and in 1978 by de Villota; then became a show car; sold by Risi via Bobby Howlings to David McLaughlin in August 1982; sold to John Foulston April 1985 and I think he ran it a few times.
I last saw it at a Brooks auction about January 1998 but it didn't sell.
Allen
...the car was tested in November and then sold to Carlos Avallone in February 1974; impounded and sat out 1974 under lock and key...
My understanding was that the car was built at Avallone's request and he subsequenly paid a deposit for it...but nothing else...
MCS
#30
Posted 18 October 2004 - 17:04
A small point but wasnt the last McLaren to race in orange one of the McLaren F1 road car racers ?
#31
Posted 18 October 2004 - 19:21
#32
Posted 15 November 2004 - 04:26
Originally posted by MCS
...the car was tested in November and then sold to Carlos Avallone in February 1974; impounded and sat out 1974 under lock and key...
My understanding was that the car was built at Avallone's request and he subsequenly paid a deposit for it...but nothing else...
MCS
This appeared in Autosport April 3, 1975
McLaren's F5000 for sale
Possibly still the most competitive F5000 car never to race was the McLaren M25, the F5000 version of Gordon Coppuck's highly successful M23 Grand Prix design.
Only one chassis was ever built and that was tested back in 1973 by John Nicholson and Denny Hulme. It proved highly competitive in testing and, for a curious reason, was bought by Brazilian Carlos Avallone.
However, the car was immediately impounded following legal action undertaken by Yorkshire hillclimb driver David Hepworth who had lost a lot of money, along with several other people, when the proposed Brazilian sports car series, organised by Avallone, fell foul at the beginning of 1973.
Hepworth telephoned us last week to say that although this was only just the beginning, the M25 was now free of the law and, as it has now passed into his hands legally, it's his to sell.
Hepworth has decided to stay away from racing for a year but would dearly love to sell the car to "an ace" as he so rightly believes it would still be a winner. "It would mop up on both sides of the Atlantic" he said.
McLaren Cars have constantly received inquiries about the M25 but it's only now that genuine terms can be agreed upon. However, Hepworth has stipulated to McLaren Cars that they will be consulted as to whom the car shall be sold to. Mike Hailwood perhaps?
#33
Posted 01 August 2005 - 16:29
Seen on Sunday at Silverstone.
Paul M
#34
Posted 01 August 2005 - 16:41
#35
Posted 01 August 2005 - 17:05
This is what I once read too. Antonio Carlos Avallone wanted to come to europe and try the F5000 as a first step towards F1. However, the project never materialized and the car was sold out. It was not seen again until 1976, when it was driven a couple of races by Bob Evans.Originally posted by MCS
[I][B]My understanding was that the car was built at Avallone's request
As far as I know, the M25 was designed by John Barnard.
#36
Posted 01 August 2005 - 18:23
Originally posted by WHITE
As far as I know, the M25 was designed by John Barnard.
Gordon Coppuck surely
#37
Posted 01 August 2005 - 19:59
Well, I can't see a difference with the cockpit or the nose (bar the absense of a couple of NACA ducts) - but the rear wing support pillar is definitely a different (perhaps later?) spec.Originally posted by Frank de Jong
...it looks quite different from the M25 (cockpit, nose)...
White; take a read of the whole thread, as there's a fair bit on the chassis within.
And it must have been a Coppuck design, as Vic says...
#38
Posted 01 August 2005 - 20:17
Originally posted by Twin Window
Well, I can't see a difference with the ...........the nose (bar the absense of a couple of NACA ducts)
I've been puzzling over this as my initial impression was, like Frank, that this was the later version of the M23 nose but then went back and tried to say why I thought this. Obviously it is not the first generation, but it does look later than, say the later 1974 version of the M23, wider, blunter and larger front wings perhaps. How about that for unclear analysis?
And I'm assuming that the M25 had a nose similar to the M23 at the time it was built????
Try this
Early 1974 M23 - winkle picker
perso.wanadoo.fr/.../ 74Fittipaldiv.jpg
Late 1974 M23
http://b.f1-facts.com/ul/a/817
www.f1datenbank.at/ images/wmcar74.JPG
1977 version
http://www.atspeedim...mclaren_m23.jpg
Anyone out there able to be more precise about what the M25 nose looked like?
#39
Posted 01 August 2005 - 22:07
Originally posted by Twin Window
And it must have been a Coppuck design, as Vic says... [/B]
As usual, you must be right. However, I remember that, in 1984 the magazine Grand Prrix International, published an interesting article about McLaren and its revival. According to the article, McLaren's revival should be attributed to Ron Dennis and John Barnard.
At the article there was a detailed recap of Barnard's career in which, among ather things, it was said that the M23 had mostly been designed by Barnard since, in 1973 Coppuck was too busy in the States to look after the formula 1 car. As Coppuck was the chief engineer, all projects used to bear his name.
The M23, was basically a M16 fitted with the suspensions of the M19 and adapted to the F1 specs. Barnard, also had assisted Coppuck in the project of the M16 so he was already familiar with it.
More or less the same can be can be said about the M24 which was the last McLaren model used at the USAC. This car derived from the M23 and it was mostly designed by John Baldwin, but also bearing Coppuck's name.
Finally, the M25 was another car based on the M23 and once again came out from Barnard's pen before he left the team. It is curious that, with Barnard no longer at McLaren, none of later Coppuck's models ( M26, M27-unconcluded-, M28 and M29 ) performed better than the M23 had done. In fact, it was not until Barnard's return than the team got back to the top. A coincidence ?
Advertisement
#40
Posted 01 August 2005 - 22:22
#41
Posted 01 August 2005 - 22:44
First of all, my friend, there is nothing whatsover to suggest that "as usual, I must be right"! Far from it, as I know only too well...Originally posted by WHITE
As usual, you must be right. However, I remember that, in 1984 the magazine Grand Prrix International, published an interesting article about McLaren and its revival. According to the article, McLaren's revival should be attributed to Ron Dennis and John Barnard.
At the article there was a detailed recap of Barnard's career in which, among ather things, it was said that the M23 had mostly been designed by Barnard since, in 1973 Coppuck was too busy in the States to look after the formula 1 car. As Coppuck was the chief engineer, all projects used to bear his name.
Your comments are interesting, not least because - when the article you mention was published in Grand Prix International - I was a full-time employee working on the magazine! How embarrassing is that...?!
#42
Posted 01 August 2005 - 23:46
At that stage, wasn't Barnard pushing a pencil across a board at Lola?
#43
Posted 02 August 2005 - 00:03
Originally posted by Mac Lark
The M25 would date to 1973 or 74 I would say.
At that stage, wasn't Barnard pushing a pencil across a board at Lola?
I think Barnard moved across to McLaren in 1972, and knew he played a role in the design of the M23 and M25 but cannot recall before our new friend White pegged him as the true father of the M23 ever having seen that car attributed to anyone but Coppuck......
I have seen the M25 being attributed to Barnard but thought that was more because he was the inky fingered engineer/draughtsman for the alterations necessary to make a F5000 out of the F1 M23 not that he was responsible for the M23 concept
And as for Dennis and Barnard being lauded for the revival of McLaren in 1984, well I'd have assumed that referred to the MP4 series of cars.
#44
Posted 02 August 2005 - 08:41
Originally posted by Twin Window
Well, I can't see a difference with the cockpit or the nose (bar the absense of a couple of NACA ducts) - but the rear wing support pillar is definitely a different (perhaps later?) spec.
And it must have been a Coppuck design, as Vic says...
On the M25 pic, the front wings seem angled backwards - that's what I meant.
#45
Posted 03 August 2005 - 07:28
#46
Posted 03 August 2005 - 08:36
- Front roll-hoop: Didn't become mandatory in F1 until April 1, 1976. Other formulae followed later. However, the front roll-hoop may well be a later addition to an earlier tub, as retrofit installation of front roll hoops to pre-1976 chassis is not uncommon. The tub could still be original and all newer aerodynamic appendages added later. The aft bulkhead/behind-the-seat tank portion of the tub at the engine certainly differs from M23-Cosworth practise - so if it isn't the original M25 tub it is certainly a much-modified M23 tub in this area.
- 'Conventional' upper front rocker arm suspension didn't become standard fit on the M23 until late season 1975, IIRC. I would suspect the Evans M25 has the original tubular rocker-with-inboard bell crank progressive rate arrangement if the tub was built late 74, early 75 (re. DCN). Again, the front suspension could have been updated during the active life of the M25.
- Rear wing pylon appears to be the post-April 1 1976 configuration, where rear wing cantilevering was reduced. On the Evans M25 picture, the wing pylon appears to be the original M23 1973 angled 'far-aft' configuration.
- The rear wing in the restored car appears to be the slightly delta-shaped, deeply cambered "banana" section, deep chord typical of 1976 M23 and later - not the constant chord, relatively thin wing shown in the shot of Evans.
- The nose cone appears shorter and blunter - aka 1976 and beyond - than on the Evans 1973 M23 configuration [the shorter, broader nose IMHO ruined the original slim lines of the M23, which IMHO never looked better than with the rarely-used "winkle-picker" nose.]
- The front wings on the restored car are much deeper in chord, which is constant, and section than the tapered, narrow chord wings on the Evans car, again reflecting late-style M23 practise.
- The perspex portion of the cockpit surround is much deeper on the restored car, which also reflects late-style M23, but I can't really tell whether this portion is taller or whether the glass fibre portion is lower. Windscreens were (and are) often made to suit individual driver requirements.
I don't know if the restored car has an airbox - the one on the Evans car certainly wasn't pretty, though. Then again, few in-period F5000 airboxes were pretty - most of them were pretty monsterous to accommodate all those carbs and long stacks. Yet in spite of the odd aesthetics of most F5000 cars they were (and are!) to me perversely attractive in their clumsy but muscular ungainlyness - ooomph!
#47
Posted 03 August 2005 - 13:32
Allen
#48
Posted 03 August 2005 - 14:05
#49
Posted 14 November 2008 - 19:46
#50
Posted 14 November 2008 - 20:00
Do not you think you are still too young and youthful to be on this old man forum?
Rodders