For my wide-ranging tastes and interests, Wikipedia is very much improved these days compared to the early garbage it presented on almost every subject imaginable.
Just be thankful for small mercies and - where it matters - double-check what it tells you.
There's little profit surely in fulminating here about its manifest shortcomings, its policies seem unlikely to be changed by a handful of critics here - however expert or vocal they may be.
Above all, whatever BS Wikipedia perpetuates it's not as if its inaccuracies will delay a cure for cancer...and I'd be pretty confident that the sun will still rise regardless tomorrow morning...
One moment here Doug, aren't you the fellow who recently wrote: "Does historical accuracy matter if it makes a good story? Of course it does."