What is happening to the GP Masters ?
#1
Posted 14 August 2007 - 17:13
just 'hibernating' (?). any better info ?
Thanks
Advertisement
#2
Posted 14 August 2007 - 17:30
#4
Posted 14 August 2007 - 20:38
#5
Posted 14 August 2007 - 20:42
#6
Posted 14 August 2007 - 21:57
As long as Prost isnt going in...Originally posted by Bloggsworth
The other drivers won't play unless Mansell promises to stop winning all the races..............
I would love to see Prost getting in or Alesi when he is old enough.
#7
Posted 14 August 2007 - 22:04
Originally posted by Bloggsworth
The other drivers won't play unless Mansell promises to stop winning all the races..............
Funny.. I could have sworn that said "..promises to stop whingeing at all the races" .
#8
Posted 15 August 2007 - 20:53
Originally posted by carbonfibre
As long as Prost isnt going in...
I would love to see Prost getting in or Alesi when he is old enough.
Jean would definitely move the level of competition up a notch....
#9
Posted 15 August 2007 - 21:58
#10
Posted 16 August 2007 - 05:59
Originally posted by santori
Hasn't the entry age limit has been reduced to forty? Which would mean Alesi could race. So could Frentzen and Panis and Irvine and Salo. And Hakkinen from next year. Not that any of them have been linked to it, which probably isn't a good sign for the series, but just one of them would make a big difference.
In that case 'Schumi' senior would qualify in 2009! Has the possibility of becoming a great series 'IF' all comes together ?
#11
Posted 16 August 2007 - 10:29
Originally posted by Abe
In that case 'Schumi' senior would qualify in 2009! Has the possibility of becoming a great series 'IF' all comes together ?
I'd love to see Mike in DTM!!
#12
Posted 16 August 2007 - 11:59
Originally posted by vivian
I'd love to see Mike in DTM!!
Yeah, in alfa romeo!
#13
Posted 16 August 2007 - 12:40
http://www.speedcars...s.com/index.php
Then it was mentioned (forgot where) a few months ago that Johnny Herbert was also signing on, then his name also appeared on the Speedcar Racing list of drivers...
The GP Masters - single seaters - would be by far more appropriate for these top drivers than tin tops.
Did anyone see the last race under the rain at Silverstone last year ?
One can see these races live on the net.
In the last edition of MOTORSPORT there is an interesting article by Derek Warwick on his participation in the Porsche race during the last F1 Silverstone British Grand Prix.
#14
Posted 16 August 2007 - 13:16
#15
Posted 16 August 2007 - 17:19
Originally posted by Gendebien7
Did anyone see the last race under the rain at Silverstone last year ?
One can see these races live on the net.
Yeah I was marshaling on Copse exit
#16
Posted 16 August 2007 - 17:24
Originally posted by F1Fanatic.co.uk
Weren't they changing engine suppliers after the Silverstone debacle?
There is a whole battle going on over that, one of the reasons that there will be only a couple of races this year, Nicholson Mclaren tried to sue the organizers of GPM for mistreatment of the engines. The fact that the manufacturers changed something to do with engine/transmission on the cars even though the cars up until then had been 100% reliable.
I was so looking forward to seeing Mansell come from the back in the rain.
#17
Posted 16 August 2007 - 19:09
I remember when the first race was on BBC. A lot of people were excited and I think a lot of average sports fans watched the race. Sky turned a lot of people off, especially considering a lot of people just don't have the channel.
#18
Posted 16 August 2007 - 19:45
Originally posted by Ali_G
Worst mistake this series ever made was when they changed the coverage from BBC to Sky.
I remember when the first race was on BBC. A lot of people were excited and I think a lot of average sports fans watched the race. Sky turned a lot of people off, especially considering a lot of people just don't have the channel.
Yes, at the outset there was a presumption that there would be lots of coverage on terrestrial TV. The fact that this has not materialised has doubtless contributed to the lack of awareness of the series.
#19
Posted 17 August 2007 - 08:32
Autosport carried the news in January that "Jean Alesi has admitted that he has little interest in competing in GP Masters".Originally posted by Gendebien7
Jean Alesi was waiting to sign up with Alain Prost but, Jean seems to have now committed to Speedcar Racing...Then it was mentioned (forgot where) a few months ago that Johnny Herbert was also signing on, then his name also appeared on the Speedcar Racing list of drivers...
The day before Autosport had news of new drivers, as well as tyre & engine supplier for GPM:
Johnny Herbert and Alessandro Nannini are two of four new drivers that will compete in Grand Prix Masters, this week's Autosport reports.
The pair of Grand Prix winners will be joined by Roberto Moreno and Raul Boesel in a revised series, with four races likely to take place this year.
The cars will be powered by 4-litre Mecachrome engines, replacing the decade-old and revised IRL Cosworth units that were supplied to the series by Nicholson McLaren. The series will also switch from Avon to Michelin tyres.
Since then things have been rather quiet. A proposed race in Budapest was cancelled when the race organisers sought to renegotiate their contract.
When I spoke to Riccardo Patrese in May he said:
"GP Masters is being reorganised and the programme is still going ahead. The idea is to race in winter in warm places like Qatar & South Africa this year and in the future. GP Masters feel it is better to race when there are no F1 races happening so that there can be better publicity for the series."
Races are scheduled to take place in South Africa (September) and Qatar (November) this year, although there has been little news about either.
GPM has great potential, but unfortunately seems to be fighting for survival at the moment :
Advertisement
#20
Posted 17 August 2007 - 08:36
Originally posted by Ali_G
Worst mistake this series ever made was when they changed the coverage from BBC to Sky.
I remember when the first race was on BBC. A lot of people were excited and I think a lot of average sports fans watched the race. Sky turned a lot of people off, especially considering a lot of people just don't have the channel.
This.
#21
Posted 17 August 2007 - 09:15
Well I hope they go ahead but it's not an inspiring pair of tracks. The Losail race last year was pretty poor - and seriously hot!Originally posted by Maldwyn
Races are scheduled to take place in South Africa (September) and Qatar (November) this year, although there has been little news about either.
#22
Posted 17 August 2007 - 09:35
Much of that was due to it being designed as a circuit for bikes, not cars. Salazar's car was towed around for ages, causing a long safety car period, simply because gaps in the armco were not big enough for the car to be pushed through!! If GPM return this year, or in the future, I'd hope that issue will have been addressed.Originally posted by F1Fanatic.co.uk
...The Losail race last year was pretty poor...
#23
Posted 26 December 2007 - 11:42
#24
Posted 26 December 2007 - 12:46
at least they could wait for portimao´s new algarve circuit: they have wet races at low budget. and the degree of water flowing can be controlled.
#25
Posted 27 December 2007 - 00:52
Masters series officially wound upOriginally posted by anbeck
Sorry to bring this thread up again.... but I guess GPM can be officially declared dead, or has there been any news?
#26
Posted 29 December 2007 - 23:23
The problem with Mansell was that he was too good, he knew he was by far the fastest driver and started pacing himself which made the South African race look stale. It was probably just to save energy by still doesn't look good.Originally posted by lukywill
andretti missed it. mansell was too boring to watch. they canceled the series.
at least they could wait for portimao´s new algarve circuit: they have wet races at low budget. and the degree of water flowing can be controlled.
The races were too short for proper entertainment but the drivers would've been knackered anyway with anything longer. It all turned out to be a rubbish idea but it took some experience of it to realise.
Nevermind, move on.
#27
Posted 30 December 2007 - 10:39
Originally posted by Ali_G
Worst mistake this series ever made was when they changed the coverage from BBC to Sky.
I remember when the first race was on BBC. A lot of people were excited and I think a lot of average sports fans watched the race. Sky turned a lot of people off, especially considering a lot of people just don't have the channel.
I think the same can be said of A1GP.
#28
Posted 30 December 2007 - 11:04
Originally posted by Clatter
I think the same can be said of A1GP.
Indeed. And if F1 ever went to Sky the viewing figures would absolutely plummet.
#29
Posted 31 December 2007 - 18:35
Originally posted by Ali_G
Worst mistake this series ever made was when they changed the coverage from BBC to Sky.
I remember when the first race was on BBC. A lot of people were excited and I think a lot of average sports fans watched the race. Sky turned a lot of people off, especially considering a lot of people just don't have the channel.
Problem is, as with A1GP, that the terrestrial channels aren't interested in showing it. Can't blame Sky or the organisers for that.
As for the original question, suppliers have petitioned to have the company wound up over unpaid bills. This seems likely to happen unless a new investor comes in because from a business point of view the whole thing was a basket case.
#30
Posted 02 January 2008 - 23:30
GP Masters have been blighted with bad luck after bad luck. The 2006 race at Monza Italy was the first race to be effected when local court action meant that some races had to be cancelled due to noise pollution. Furthermore, the race at Silverstone later that year was hit by engine problems that could have put the whole race weekend in doubt but the engine supplier at the time Nicholson Mclaren worked hard to fix the design fault and rectified the problem. Unfortunately the lest race of the season in South Africa was scuppered by issues that arose from the race promoter who wanted to switch the even from Kyalami to Durban. 2007 seemed to get off to a good start with the announcement of a new race on the streets of Bucharest the track was designed by F1 track designer Herman Tilke. Unfortunetly, again due to issues with the Bucharest race promoter GP masters involvement in the race had to be pulled.
http://www.grandprix...rs_To_Close.php
#31
Posted 03 January 2008 - 00:55
Originally posted by HP
Masters series officially wound up
What a shame.
As others have already said, it's too bad that they didn't keep the BBC coverage and set the entry age at 40 years of age.
Hopefully it will make a comeback sometime in the future.
#32
Posted 03 January 2008 - 17:18
Originally posted by rhm
Problem is, as with A1GP, that the terrestrial channels aren't interested in showing it. Can't blame Sky or the organisers for that.
Are not interested, or simply can't compete with the over-inflated bids that Sky can make?
The first GPM was on terrestial, Sky only became interested after they saw the public interest in it.
#33
Posted 03 January 2008 - 21:54
Originally posted by fastlegs
What a shame.
As others have already said, it's too bad that they didn't keep the BBC coverage and set the entry age at 40 years of age.
Hopefully it will make a comeback sometime in the future.
I was mystified why the BBC's initial interest seemed to wane. Alright, they weren't about to show every race live, but I would have thought that the series could have complemented their other sports coverage very well.
#34
Posted 03 January 2008 - 23:44
Originally posted by Clatter
Are not interested, or simply can't compete with the over-inflated bids that Sky can make?
The first GPM was on terrestial, Sky only became interested after they saw the public interest in it.
Total myth I'm affraid - typical jealousy of pay-tv. The organisers said themselves that they tried to do a deal with the BBC, but they weren't interested unless there was a full, fixed schedule for the season submitted months in advance - something the GPM organisers couldn't manage.
The problem with terrestrial channels is that none of them are dedicated to sport - they fit it in where they can unless it's very high profile. Whereas Sky has not just 4 dedicated channels, but also the facilities to broadcast just about anything from recorded programmes featuring obscure motorsport events (World Motorsport), to stuff that wouldn't get a look-in from anyone else - Netball, Speedway, Triathlon, Hockey, and far greater coverage of more mainstream sports than the terrestrial channels ever manage - Premiership Rugby, US Open tennis, wall to wall golf, cricket and NFL coverage. Anyone that's used to watching sport on Sky gets really frustrated whenever they have to watch an event on terrestrial. British Open golf on the BBC is terrible compared to Sky's uninterrupted coverage. When the last-but-one Ashes were on Channel 4 they were cutting away from it every so often for horse racing(!). Sky's 9-ball pool coverage is more comprehensive than the BBC's coverage of the Snooker World Championship - the top event in the sport.
It's typical that people who are jealous that Sky can afford to pay big bucks for headline sport like Premiership football and PDC Darts, and jealous that people can afford to pay the subscriptions, automatically think that everything that's on Sky Sports is there for that reason - it's not. The vast majority of people that subscribe to Sky Sports do so for Premiership football and that is why they will pay almost anything to secure the rights whenever they come up for auction each time, without football there is no Sky Sports. And yet they spend a phenomenal amount of money covering stuff that wouldn't find a home at all on terrestrial TV. In that sense they are a greater public service broadcaster of Sport than the BBC are.
#35
Posted 24 April 2008 - 14:49
There's news in this week's Autosport that the series is being relaunched. Delta Motorsports head the group working on "the Masters Concept" and they are in final negotiations with investors. The original chassis will be used with a new engine, perhaps a 600bhp turbo.Originally posted by Gendebien7
It was dying a few months ago due to lack of sponsorship, but i read somewhere it was not 'dead'
just 'hibernating' (?). any better info ?
A quick trip to the old GPM website shows the new series could well be called 'F1 Masters', which suggests it may have the approval of Bernie.
Autosport's news item highlights the fact that Jacques Villeneuve has "put himself forward to race" in the revived series, which will be dropping the minimum age limit of 45.
#36
Posted 24 April 2008 - 16:20
Thanks for that Maldwyn, will watch developments closely.
#38
Posted 24 April 2008 - 16:56
Originally posted by rhm
Total myth I'm affraid - typical jealousy of pay-tv. The organisers said themselves that they tried to do a deal with the BBC, but they weren't interested unless there was a full, fixed schedule for the season submitted months in advance - something the GPM organisers couldn't manage.
The problem with terrestrial channels is that none of them are dedicated to sport - they fit it in where they can unless it's very high profile. Whereas Sky has not just 4 dedicated channels, but also the facilities to broadcast just about anything from recorded programmes featuring obscure motorsport events (World Motorsport), to stuff that wouldn't get a look-in from anyone else - Netball, Speedway, Triathlon, Hockey, and far greater coverage of more mainstream sports than the terrestrial channels ever manage - Premiership Rugby, US Open tennis, wall to wall golf, cricket and NFL coverage. Anyone that's used to watching sport on Sky gets really frustrated whenever they have to watch an event on terrestrial. British Open golf on the BBC is terrible compared to Sky's uninterrupted coverage. When the last-but-one Ashes were on Channel 4 they were cutting away from it every so often for horse racing(!). Sky's 9-ball pool coverage is more comprehensive than the BBC's coverage of the Snooker World Championship - the top event in the sport.
It's typical that people who are jealous that Sky can afford to pay big bucks for headline sport like Premiership football and PDC Darts, and jealous that people can afford to pay the subscriptions, automatically think that everything that's on Sky Sports is there for that reason - it's not. The vast majority of people that subscribe to Sky Sports do so for Premiership football and that is why they will pay almost anything to secure the rights whenever they come up for auction each time, without football there is no Sky Sports. And yet they spend a phenomenal amount of money covering stuff that wouldn't find a home at all on terrestrial TV. In that sense they are a greater public service broadcaster of Sport than the BBC are.
Nothing to do with jealousy, its simply the power of economics.
Many of the obscure sports that Sky show is not done for some noble reason, its because they are cheap, and Sky have a lot of channel time that they need to fill.
#39
Posted 24 April 2008 - 18:11
Turbo too... Awesome!!!
#41
Posted 24 April 2008 - 19:04
The series is being promoted by Delta, who already have their own chassis.Originally posted by Jhope
Why not use the current breed of Champ Car chassis?
#42
Posted 24 April 2008 - 19:31
I thought there was a 45 year minimum age?
#43
Posted 25 April 2008 - 00:49
Originally posted by fer312t
Having JV in the series doens't seem to be in the spirit of the original concept...
I thought there was a 45 year minimum age?
the minimum age limit does not need to be there, if a former World Champion such as Villeneuve wants to be part of it, then he should be. Added to that can be other more recently retired former F1 stars plus the former stars that took part in the first series of it (Mansell, Fitipaldi etc.....)
If its done properly, it can be a great success. The idea of JV's in terms of ballast is a good one also.
#44
Posted 25 April 2008 - 06:45
I agree. Perhaps dropping age limit will mean it becomes a series for all ex-GP drivers (hence being re-branded as F1 Masters) which may open up the opportunity of it becoming a part of F1 in some shape or form. If that happens then F1M will have the backing and promotion that GPM lacked.Originally posted by former champ
If its done properly, it can be a great success.
#45
Posted 25 April 2008 - 08:35
Originally posted by former champ
If its done properly, it can be a great success. The idea of JV's in terms of ballast is a good one also.
Yes. Otherwise it would be very unfair that recently retired F1 stars like JV would be racing agains 60-65 year-olds, like Fittipaldi, for example...
#46
Posted 08 May 2008 - 14:22
I guess because they already have an existing chassis just waiting for an engine to be fitted. Why go to the expense of scrapping that and starting again with the Panoz?Originally posted by Jhope
Why not use the current breed of Champ Car chassis?
More news on the revived series today - Riccardo Patrese has confirmed to Autosport that he has been in contact with the organisers and is "very happy to race again"
#47
Posted 08 May 2008 - 21:33
Originally posted by former champ
the minimum age limit does not need to be there, if a former World Champion such as Villeneuve wants to be part of it, then he should be. Added to that can be other more recently retired former F1 stars plus the former stars that took part in the first series of it (Mansell, Fitipaldi etc.....)
If its done properly, it can be a great success. The idea of JV's in terms of ballast is a good one also.
Totally agree.
I hope the organizers apply common sense and get rid of the age limit.
Like you, I think JV's idea of adding ballast based on age is a great way to go.
#48
Posted 08 May 2008 - 23:15
#49
Posted 09 May 2008 - 07:03
The Autosport report seems to suggest they are doing just thatOriginally posted by fastlegs
I hope the organizers apply common sense and get rid of the age limit.
From the same report:Originally posted by tahadar
what sort of specs will the cars be running?
The original Grand Prix Masters chassis will be retained, but will be restyled and fitted with a new engine, possibly a small capacity turbo with around 600bhp.