Paul ‘Macca’. When I wrote:
Originally posted by P4Replica
Got some BAD news for you .... I've got details of 80 cars listed, worldwide, on my P4 Replica Register. By the way - Lee Noble made a 'few' Lotus 23 replicas too !
it was intended as a facetious reply to Philippe’s (T54) post – a point obviously lost on you. IMHO, Jim Glickenhaus’ P4, is obviously in a different league to even the best P4 replicas, such as the Norwood P4’s and the (
Shapecraft ally-bodied) P4 Spyder currently being built by Richard Wilson. As I said in my earlier post #49: “Probably (in fact, almost certainly) - The BEST P4 replica in the World !” Why you continue to delude yourself that this car is anything other than a very good reproduction though, amazes me.
Originally posted by Macca
Noble/Carpenter/Butler/Foreman/Sbarro P4 replicas are just lookalike kitcars with GRP bodies not even moulded from an original, on a different design of chassis, with different engine & gearbox (usually, but not always, not even Ferrari) - so they can't even be talked about in the same breath as a car which, at worst, was built to original factory plans around an original engine and gearbox.
Well – excuse me for breathing ! We are of course NOT talking about an original P4 engine, but a late 1966 3-litre 36-valve F1 engine that has been ‘cosmetically enhanced’ to look like a P4 engine, and a ‘prototype’ Ferrari gearbox of ‘unknown parentage (– possibly a 'prototype' P3 or F1), which is certainly not the correct P4 Type 603R gearbox.
Originally posted by Macca
…. and it's precisely forums (or rather fora ) like these which are vital in bringing together the sources of evidence and information to ensure that the question is fairly considered and that Van Gogh gets a fair trial. As has been said elsewhere, the car in question has been the subject of the most public rebuilding on record ….
A fair trial ? Come off it Macca ! The owner of this car was making specific claims that “this car is #0846” on FerrariChat as far back as October, 2002 – long before any of the so-called ‘evidence’ was ever produced on that forum. And have you ever stopped to think and ask yourself why this so-called ‘restoration’ was made so public ? It certainly helped to build up a big fan base amongst the readership, didn’t it ? So when sceptics like myself came along later, and started asking pertinent questions (which seldom, if ever were replied to), we were immediately shouted down by the ‘#0846 Tifosi’, who by that time were mesmerised by the P4’s beauty and totally brainwashed !
Originally posted by Macca
It's another well-known fact that there were a total of eight P3s and P4s, that one disappeared, and one bitsa (so far), 0900, exists. That's all we've got to think about; replicas with no original parts whatever are irrelevant. ….
And the ‘one that disappeared’ (#0846) is still missing - Paul. This ain’t it ! No matter how much you want it to be. What we are now discussing is another very good ‘Bitsa’ – albeit with far less (if any) original or correct P4 content than #0900 !
Originally posted by Macca
I would love to know what light Forghieri and Borsari would be able to throw on all this!
What would be far more interesting is what light David Piper could shed on this car. He did build it, after all. It’s a shame that he is reluctant to go public. Why don’t you give him a the courtesy of a phone call, Paul, and ask him to tell you about this car, as has been suggested on previous occasions ? I understand that it’s nearly 10 years since you last spoke to him. It’s about time that you updated yourself on the facts of the situation. Or could it be that you’re scared to know
the real truth ?;)