The Sprint; after the 3rd… yes or no? (And ideas for tweaks)
#1
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:14
Does make an irritating argument from Brawn etc to campaign for reverse grids (there’s a conspiracy theory in there somewhere)
As it’s a ‘sprint’, I’m not sure why the still hold off the DRS for the first 2 laps. I also think a good idea would be to extend the DRA activation window to 3 seconds instead of the 1 second. Make a real differential between it and the main event on Sunday.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:16
#3
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:18
#4
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:18
#5
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:20
Hamilton would of given us the same show tomorrow, and they are giving them a free tyre choice for the grand prix next year... All the sprint does is blue ball us by having to wait for the grand prix tomorrow, and thats just to see what Hamilton does, the rest of the grid was static after the start again!
I hate how late the sprint races are compared to the grand prix, and I hate qualy on a friday even more..
Edited by SilverArrow31, 13 November 2021 - 20:22.
#6
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:21
No. It makes a mockery of the most exciting session of the weekend and the races are too short to provide any kind of strategy battle. The only saving grace today was Lewis starting last and cutting through the field in a much faster car than anything bar the top two.
Back to normal in 2022 please.
#7
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:21
There's no point to it. And never will.
#8
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:22
#9
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:22
No!
(Do we need another thread for this?)
#10
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:22
#11
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:24
If F1 want to change things up, it has to be something entirely different.
#12
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:24
No for me, I don't see a way to make it work either.
#13
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:24
#14
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:25
I believe a reverse grid for sprint with partial impact on points could be an option. Keep the "qualifying" as deciding event for start grid of race and the sprint.
Give points for sprint but only best three sprint results count for point consideration maybe?
#15
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:26
Yes. Good racing. Adds a lot imo.
#16
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:28
Yes. Good racing. Adds a lot imo.
Take away Hamilton though and what would we have been watching?
#17
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:30
#18
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:30
#19
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:30
Bottas’s startTake away Hamilton though and what would we have been watching?
Sainz’s start.
Sainz vs Max.
Kimi and Gio
Lando vs LeClerc
Max vs Sainz again
Perez vs Sainz
From memory. May be some battles I’ve missed or that the director didn’t show because there was also the Lewis action going on, that took up lots of camera time.
Advertisement
#20
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:31
Take away Hamilton though and what would we have been watching?
Verstappen chase Bottas, Sainz fend off Perez, Norris take Leclerc and Gasly, probably more than all of Monaco this year to be honest.
#21
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:31
I don't understand why many Drivers give it a thumbs up (PR?).
Max said it was all about the start (proven today) and the Format needs some tweaks.. Parc Fermé among one of the issues.
But, yes.. it's 'fun' wetting one pants seeing Lewis gong from P144 to P5..
#22
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:31
#23
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:32
Reverse grid sounds fun, but also like potential carnage, with little time to repair the cars for the main race. Unless that comes first, which feels like blasphemy.I believe a reverse grid for sprint with partial impact on points could be an option. Keep the "qualifying" as deciding event for start grid of race and the sprint.
Give points for sprint but only best three sprint results count for point consideration maybe?
#24
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:32
#25
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:32
Yes.
But.
Friday Q: Top 10 get reserved grid spots for Sunday race
Sprint start with top 10 Q in reverse order, rest in Q order
Points 9, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1
Grid positions >10 for Sunday according to the finishing order of those who did not have a reserved grid spot.
Edited by Singularity, 13 November 2021 - 20:34.
#26
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:32
I hate it but it is staying so need improve it, its too short IMO needs to be 40% of a GP distance at least so tyre wear is a factor
Edited by Brawn BGP 001, 13 November 2021 - 20:33.
#27
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:34
Idea for tweak:
#28
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:35
Make the sprint a proper race and give proper points. Don't call it a bloody pole.
Might want to do reverse grid if next year's cars are easy to overtake.
#29
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:36
Doesn’t offer anything additional.
Get used to it though, it’s happening.
Edited by ConsiderAndGo, 13 November 2021 - 20:36.
#30
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:39
Completely unnecessary. Still a big no.
#31
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:42
No.
#32
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:44
No, unless we start seeing sprint tyres that are deliberately outside the spec window of the race tyres for some spicy racing.
But at that point it's Mariokart.
Frankly I'd rather see the Sprint Races in identical GP2 cars painted in F1 team colours (to appease sponsors) and see them save the Grand Prix cars for the main event on Sunday.
#33
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:44
#34
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:44
A definite no. But it's useless to resist, because Crypto.com is paying 100 million dollars for it. I just wish F1 was led by people who don't care about the money but about the sport.
#35
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:48
It might work, if it was a proper race with proper points.
Certainly more fun than watching FP3....
#36
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:50
It's useless trash. Feels like we now have a 24 hour red flag and the race continues tomorrow.
#37
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:50
#38
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:55
No.
Alternative? Given that it's here to stay and is going to be the first of many new gimmicks being introduced, think of an alternative name to 'Formula One'. For me it meant exclusivity, prestige, uniqueness. Having so many races, many at cookie cutter racing circuits with the same sponsors and run off areas, removes the exclusivity. Implementing a mini Grand Prix on Saturday removes the prestige. Following NASCAR down the over saturated, gimmicky road to nothingness removes the uniqueness. It's still cars going around the track, but it stopped being Formula One to me a while back.
Just my two cents, don't mean to put words into the mouths of others.
#39
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:56
NO!!
Advertisement
#40
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:59
I still think this is a bad idea but have to admit:
1. for the people at the track, it is waaay better (from my experience of Silverstone) - your 3 day ticket actually gets you 3 days of action
2. all 3 weekends so far have been super
I still think that point 2 is down to luck, and small sample size. But I'm not going to say they were crap, when to me they obviously weren't, just to try and justify my view that this is very likely a bad idea/format.
#41
Posted 13 November 2021 - 20:59
I could see some fun in that.Make the sprint a proper race and give proper points. Don't call it a bloody pole.
Might want to do reverse grid if next year's cars are easy to overtake.
FP1 and qualification on Fridays.
FP2 and sprint on Saturdays.
Start in sprint is reverse grid based on Friday qualification, proper points are given, perhaps a bit longer race.
Race on Sunday.
Start in qualification order, normal points.
I'll watch that. In particular if they reduced the number of raceweekends....
Edited by cbo, 13 November 2021 - 21:00.
#42
Posted 13 November 2021 - 21:01
Hard pass. It adds nothing to the show.
#43
Posted 13 November 2021 - 21:01
Still no for me.
Today was better than the last one but it still feels artificial.
#44
Posted 13 November 2021 - 21:01
I still think this is a bad idea but have to admit:
1. for the people at the track, it is waaay better (from my experience of Silverstone) - your 3 day ticket actually gets you 3 days of action
My issue with at Silverstone is that is was far too late and having F1 as the last track action of the day and Friday and Saturday meant leaving the tack was a nightmare, I normally stay and watch all the action.
#45
Posted 13 November 2021 - 21:05
Which of the big teams want this? I was half listening to radio 5 and I *think * they said Red Bull and Merc don't like it but Ferrari do. Anyone got better/more exact info on that?
#46
Posted 13 November 2021 - 21:07
I say no. I liked the one in Silverstone best, and then when the shine went off with the next ones I feel it really doesnt add much.
Next year they'll be able to pick tyres every race, so even that advantage is gone.
#47
Posted 13 November 2021 - 21:08
I prefer the more traditional set up tbh.
#48
Posted 13 November 2021 - 21:08
#49
Posted 13 November 2021 - 21:14
not saying this happened here but what I hadnt noticed till now is that this format certainly encourages to go into grey areas legally. You get an extra 30 % to make up if you get caught.
Yes, you can run an illegal car and be disqualified from qualifying, and still start the Grand Prix from pole position.
#50
Posted 13 November 2021 - 21:27
Edited by John B, 13 November 2021 - 21:30.