arrows going to the top of the grid.
#1
Posted 06 March 2000 - 21:33
with all there new money from orange do you think they will do better than ever.
Advertisement
#2
Posted 06 March 2000 - 23:42
But still... A bit of money left is better than none, they didn't have a closed budget about a month back.
#3
Posted 06 March 2000 - 23:51
So if the SuperTech gives some decent power without the Nitros Injection they used in preseason testing };-> maybe things will look up for the long suffering Tom Walkinshaw and his team-mates.
#4
Posted 07 March 2000 - 00:56
However, I believe that this year could be Arrows finest. Pedro is a very good driver and Jos is a very experienced driver/tester. The amount of money brought in by Orange is miniscule compared to Ferrari and MacLaren but it should still help.
[This message has been edited by Jecko (edited 03-06-2000).]
#5
Posted 07 March 2000 - 04:34
#6
Posted 07 March 2000 - 04:40
#7
Posted 07 March 2000 - 04:58
Anybody know where there are pics of this car? It looked pretty radical. This may be what made them quick in tests.
#8
Posted 07 March 2000 - 10:33
Give Hill some credit, he drove like a true champion that day. How do you 'only' set the 5th fastest lap but still disappear from the rest of the field? by running that lap again and again - driving the car on it's absolute limits. Don't forget soon after that race Hill was fighting for pole again - Hungary was no fluke, the circuit that nullified Arrows huge power disadvantage and Hill did the rest.
To the point in hand, Arrows should be very competitive this season, I wouldn't be surprised if they beat Williams and end up 5th in the WCC - the much maligned Supertec is going to be fitted to the good but originally over ambitious Arrows Chassis which should be sorted due to the lack of rule changes.
#9
Posted 07 March 2000 - 11:06
back to the subject, if their cars were of the legal weight, then they should do good. (any new info about the "legality" of the cars during the tests?)
#10
Posted 07 March 2000 - 16:41
But still... lets assume that at least McLaren, Ferrari, Jordan and Steward are reliable... That's 8 cars, which would meant that at least 3 of those will need to drop out for Arrows to even have a chance to score a point. Last year there were less reliable cars, 2 ferrari's, 1 McLaren (Coulthard either dropped or had a mech/elec problem, 1 Jordan (Hill wasn't up there) and sometiems a Steward. Ralf picked up the scraps. So you need to assume that BAR and Williams will be slower and less reliable than the Arrows if you want to put an Arrows in the points. It's gonna be hard. And without some chaotic rain races I'll settle for a maximum of 5 points! (3 by de la Rosa, 2 by Verstappen)
We'll see ;)
#11
Posted 07 March 2000 - 08:22
#12
Posted 07 March 2000 - 08:55
#13
Posted 07 March 2000 - 08:59
I seem to have some recollection of pictures of a Schumacher lackey desperately carving groove-like formations into the tyres with a knife after the race
#14
Posted 07 March 2000 - 22:24
Johan V.
#15
Posted 07 March 2000 - 22:31
#16
Posted 07 March 2000 - 23:20
They acctually MADE tires like that during winter tests the first season, but FIA found out and had a 'discussion' with the tire manufacturers not to do that ;)
(As for tires, get rid of those intermediates! they are too allround, drizzle should seperate the man from the less-manly, like Prost sliding off or going for wets while Senna was still happily driving around on slicks! Non of that 'all weather' either... only slicks + wets!)
#17
Posted 08 March 2000 - 03:17
Your standard road tyres when bald give less grip in the dry for the same reasons the only bald tyre with slick like grip is - a slick.
The reason a slick grips more is not just because of the larger contact surface area, it's because the lack or tread means no tyre squirm, which means the tyre can run incredibly soft (hence sticky) rubber without overheating.
#18
Posted 08 March 2000 - 03:38
#19
Posted 08 March 2000 - 03:59
One thing that is always true of Tom - give him a pile of cash and he'll give you a pile of results, it's Minardi and Sauber you should be calling to sell up, they cannot perform regardless of budget.
Yes he fooled Hill into driving for them (expecting loads of sponsors to follow which didn't materialise on the scale he envisaged) And even worse he fooled Brian Hart into merging his company into TWR thus getting engines for peanuts (much less than even customer Hart users would normally pay) the second the deal was done nearly all the money was sucked out of the project and Brian wasn't given any development budget, at one stage Hart refused to give TWR any engines before a race until he paid up what was already owed just in wages!
Tom Walknshaw has single handedly dismantled one of the last independent British F1 Engine manufacturers by devious means just to meet his own ends.
TW is a B*****d but he gets results - just watch and expect to be amazed.
Ken Tyrrell must be seething to see the way Tom does business and survives.
[This message has been edited by DangerMouse (edited 03-07-2000).]