
Former FIA President - Jean-Marie Balestre Dies
#1
Posted 28 March 2008 - 16:58
Advertisement
#2
Posted 28 March 2008 - 17:02
#3
Posted 28 March 2008 - 17:18
#4
Posted 28 March 2008 - 17:23
#5
Posted 28 March 2008 - 17:25
Jp
#6
Posted 28 March 2008 - 18:01
I have mixed emotions about him.
#7
Posted 28 March 2008 - 18:27
Originally posted by Welsh
hmmmm
I have mixed emotions about him.
We are acting all very careful don't we?
Well, it's sad he died for his family. But if you think Max Mosley made a mess of F1 (as some of you think), you just have to watch Balestre's reign to nuance that idea.
My idea is he made a total mess of F1, the FIA, and the relationship with FOCA, and he redeemed himself only with banning the venturi cars.
Perhaps posting such a comment seems illfitting to you, but....
#8
Posted 28 March 2008 - 18:38
Yes it does, but hey to each his own.Originally posted by Jerome.Inen
Perhaps posting such a comment seems illfitting to you, but....
RIP Jean-Marie and thanks for the many good things you've done for our sport.
#9
Posted 28 March 2008 - 18:56
Originally posted by Jerome.Inen
Perhaps posting such a comment seems illfitting to you, but....
umm.... I think it's ok
after R.I.P message, it's inevitable we'll start discussing his legacy anyway.
#10
Posted 28 March 2008 - 19:24
Me too. Sad loss for his family and friends, and a good opportunity to discuss what happened, so RIP to the old fellow. But otherwise I'm not sure he was ever really a force for good in F1.Originally posted by Welsh
hmmmm
I have mixed emotions about him.
#11
Posted 28 March 2008 - 19:36
#12
Posted 28 March 2008 - 21:17
Originally posted by britishtrident
The guy really was a genuine "hero of the resistance" --- apparently he took big risks acting as a double agent during WW2, perhaps he should be remembered for that.
His role as a "double" agent is highly contested - indeed there's no evidence to suggest he was, other than his word and his claim that all those who knew had long since died. There is a lot of evidence to suggest he was part of the French SS, however. His friendships and later business dealings with known "single" agent French SS lends further credence to him being a straightforward Nazi collaborator, rather than double agent, too.
#13
Posted 28 March 2008 - 21:17
sadly enough Jean-Marie has passed away.
R.I.P.
#14
Posted 28 March 2008 - 21:38
F1 rules that were good came to an end
Great drivers that were great are gone or retired
Colorful characters like the forumer FIA president can't come back
The world's climate is dooming us all, with it f1 tracks will be eaten up eventually with no one alive to keep f1 alive.
RIP Former President rest in peace, this life has pretty much had it's dose of f1, until the next life, and Senna, Clark, Gillles, Fangio and Schumacher's return.
#15
Posted 28 March 2008 - 21:42
#16
Posted 28 March 2008 - 21:54
Originally posted by TennisUK
His role as a "double" agent is highly contested - indeed there's no evidence to suggest he was, other than his word and his claim that all those who knew had long since died. There is a lot of evidence to suggest he was part of the French SS, however. His friendships and later business dealings with known "single" agent French SS lends further credence to him being a straightforward Nazi collaborator, rather than double agent, too.
Wow. It seems that one of the requirements to become FIA president is to be related with fascism

#17
Posted 28 March 2008 - 22:34

Originally posted by SeanValen
All good things come to an end.
F1 rules that were good came to an end
Great drivers that were great are gone or retired
Colorful characters like the forumer FIA president can't come back
The world's climate is dooming us all, with it f1 tracks will be eaten up eventually with no one alive to keep f1 alive.
RIP Former President rest in peace, this life has pretty much had it's dose of f1, until the next life, and Senna, Clark, Gillles, Fangio and Schumacher's return.
Just when I was like this "








#18
Posted 28 March 2008 - 23:48

#19
Posted 29 March 2008 - 01:21
Quite sad, ain't it? To make matters worse, motorsports is in no way unique. I respect the dead and say rest in peace, Balestre, but to say that he did any good for F1 is to show deep disrespect for Formula One.Originally posted by Ferrim
Wow. It seems that one of the requirements to become FIA president is to be related with fascism![]()
Advertisement
#20
Posted 29 March 2008 - 02:03
Originally posted by Ferrim
Wow. It seems that one of the requirements to become FIA president is to be related with fascism![]()
The Nazi's were big into Motorsport even back in the 30's Hitler and his cronies poured funds into Auto Union and Mercedes, built the Nurburgring and the Autobahns, so its been linked for a long time.
I was no fan of Balestre just as I'm no fan of Mosley but of course I wish he rests in peace.
#21
Posted 29 March 2008 - 08:21
Originally posted by TennisUK
His role as a "double" agent is highly contested - indeed there's no evidence to suggest he was, other than his word and his claim that all those who knew had long since died. There is a lot of evidence to suggest he was part of the French SS, however. His friendships and later business dealings with known "single" agent French SS lends further credence to him being a straightforward Nazi collaborator, rather than double agent, too.
At one stage I held that view but a few years ago I did some ferreting around on the web and changed my mind.
#22
Posted 29 March 2008 - 08:21
Autobahns, yes. NĂźrburgring - definitely not. It opened in 1927, built as an unemployment relief project to attract tourism. One of the moving forces behind it was Konrad Adenauer, mayor of KĂśln and later first Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany. In 1927 the Nazis were still a small regional political party in Bavaria.Originally posted by LB
The Nazi's were big into Motorsport even back in the 30's Hitler and his cronies poured funds into Auto Union and Mercedes, built the Nurburgring and the Autobahns, so its been linked for a long time.
#23
Posted 29 March 2008 - 09:29
You should bear in mind that Balestre fought (and won) several libel cases against people who made allegations about his war record. His defence was always that all those who knew the truth were dead. In his lifetime, therefore, no-one would be likely to publish anything contradicting that. But even in French law, you can't libel the dead.Originally posted by britishtrident
At one stage I held that view but a few years ago I did some ferreting around on the web and changed my mind.
And even Jeffrey Archer won a libel case once ....
#24
Posted 29 March 2008 - 12:28
I'm not sure Balestre did much harm to F1. With him, there was no question that business and sport were separate, at least until 1988 when Bernie became an FIA VP.Originally posted by StefanV
Quite sad, ain't it? To make matters worse, motorsports is in no way unique. I respect the dead and say rest in peace, Balestre, but to say that he did any good for F1 is to show deep disrespect for Formula One.
Politics are another matter. One could definitely argue that he did not take well to difference of opinion and took every opportunity to punish those who dared question his authority (Ayrton Senna, Michel Boeri for stopping the 1984 Monaco Grand Prix, his obsession with CART, etc.).
#25
Posted 29 March 2008 - 13:52
Not a fan at all, but I'm very glad he fought his battle against the constructors over safety issues, e.g. leading to the ban of skirts/ground effect cars.Originally posted by StefanV
Quite sad, ain't it? To make matters worse, motorsports is in no way unique. I respect the dead and say rest in peace, Balestre, but to say that he did any good for F1 is to show deep disrespect for Formula One.
Just compare the death and injury rates in Formula 1 before and after 1982.....
FYI, an excellent overview of the FISA-FOCA war and Balestre's role in it:
http://8w.forix.com/...n-timeline.html
#26
Posted 29 March 2008 - 14:05
That is exactly what people say about Max when they want to describe some good that he has done.Originally posted by scheivlak
Not a fan at all, but I'm very glad he fought his battle against the constructors over safety issues, e.g. leading to the ban of skirts/ground effect cars.
Just compare the death and injury rates in Formula 1 before and after 1982.....
FYI, an excellent overview of the FISA-FOCA war and Balestre's role in it:
http://8w.forix.com/...n-timeline.html
#27
Posted 29 March 2008 - 14:22
Originally posted by StefanV
That is exactly what people say about Max when they want to describe some good that he has done.
I give most credit to Jackie Stewart, Sid Watkins, Louis Stanley, Nicky Lauda and a handful of others
#28
Posted 29 March 2008 - 14:34
Yes, and those within FIA who are simply doing their job instead of being occupied with politics. Now, in reality it must also be acknowledged that a position like Balestre had automatically means politic. Balestre, and later Max, was a politician representing FIA. I guess another problem is a general assumption that FIA is representing us, the race fans. They do not. Maybe Balestre and Max did/does a tremendous job.Originally posted by britishtrident
I give most credit to Jackie Stewart, Sid Watkins, Louis Stanley, Nicky Lauda and a handful of others
#29
Posted 29 March 2008 - 14:48
Originally posted by LB
The Nazi's were big into Motorsport even back in the 30's Hitler and his cronies poured funds into Auto Union and Mercedes...
Yes, but not for "sporting" reasons...
#30
Posted 29 March 2008 - 16:02
Is that the sister of the famous three-time F1 world champion Niki Lauda?Originally posted by britishtrident
I give most credit to Jackie Stewart, Sid Watkins, Louis Stanley, Nicky Lauda and a handful of others

#31
Posted 29 March 2008 - 16:26
For all what they did, drivers kept dying and getting seriously injured in the seventies and early eighties at an alarming rate. Only after 1982 things changed.Originally posted by britishtrident
I give most credit to Jackie Stewart, Sid Watkins, Louis Stanley, Nicky Lauda and a handful of others
Of course there are other factors in this (like the introduction of carbon structures!) but IMHO -for whatever reason- the FI(S)A played a crucial role in making the sport safer than it was before.
#32
Posted 29 March 2008 - 16:37
It was a global awareness that did most of it. FI(S)A was maybe a part of it, but companies like Volvo, Mercedes and many others had long before that started to focus on safety and it was inevitable that it would also reach auto racing. And again - Balestre was hardly the man that put together the suggestions. They come from the auto industry and employees deeper in the organization and the direction was given by the board.Originally posted by scheivlak
For all what they did, drivers kept dying and getting seriously injured in the seventies and early eighties at an alarming rate. Only after 1982 things changed.
Of course there are other factors in this (like the introduction of carbon structures!) but IMHO -for whatever reason- the FI(S)A played a crucial role in making the sport safer than it was before.
#33
Posted 29 March 2008 - 18:02
Somehow it seems you really don't have a clue what was happening in Formula 1 between 1978 and 1982 ;)Originally posted by StefanV
It was a global awareness that did most of it. FI(S)A was maybe a part of it, but companies like Volvo, Mercedes and many others had long before that started to focus on safety and it was inevitable that it would also reach auto racing. And again - Balestre was hardly the man that put together the suggestions. They come from the auto industry and employees deeper in the organization and the direction was given by the board.
#34
Posted 29 March 2008 - 19:22
I do. The safety in F1 was quite frankly horrible. It did not take much effort to make it safer and there was a massive public opinion that forced a change to come through. Balestre was there at that time, but he can not seriously be credited as the person that made F1 safer. It was a process, involving many people. Some of them, like Ronnie Peterson, was already dead.Originally posted by scheivlak
Somehow it seems you really don't have a clue what was happening in Formula 1 between 1978 and 1982 ;)
#35
Posted 29 March 2008 - 19:49
Originally posted by StefanV
I do. The safety in F1 was quite frankly horrible. It did not take much effort to make it safer and there was a massive public opinion that forced a change to come through. Balestre was there at that time, but he can not seriously be credited as the person that made F1 safer. It was a process, involving many people. Some of them, like Ronnie Peterson, was already dead.
Not much effort?
But there were other times when Balestre fought for the good of the sport. He believed that the turbocharged engines in F1 and the ground-effect aerodynamics were both dangerous and a waste of money. He pushed through the new normally-aspirated engine regulations in 1989, overcoming all opposition . When he changed the rules in the World Rally Championship, following the death of Henri Toivonen, he was challenged in court by the giant Peugeot company , the motorsport division being led at the time by Jean Todt. If the FIA had lost the case, the federation would likely have been bankrupted, but he stuck to his guns and won an important ruling which established considerable powers for the federation , which had not been defined up to that point.
http://www.grandprix...ns/ns20183.html
Give credit where credit is due.
#36
Posted 29 March 2008 - 20:12
Seriously...Originally posted by Gilles4Ever
Not much effort?
http://www.grandprix...ns/ns20183.html
Give credit where credit is due.
#37
Posted 29 March 2008 - 20:15
Originally posted by StefanV
Seriously...
Errr, yes that is true....
#38
Posted 29 March 2008 - 20:21
As I was saying - he did not have any choice but to make sport safer. Especially the WRC since it was not only Toivonen that died, it was also spectators. The media at that time demanded a change.Originally posted by Mika Mika
Errr, yes that is true....
#39
Posted 29 March 2008 - 20:39
Originally posted by StefanV
As I was saying - he did not have any choice but to make sport safer. Especially the WRC since it was not only Toivonen that died, it was also spectators. The media at that time demanded a change.
Group B not sure that the FIA needed the media to convince them to ban it.
In some ways a real shame I used to LOVE watching the "Killer B's"